Dr. goose

@PeterLBrandt Is this not an insanely beautiful chart?

Austria 🇦🇹

Spain 🇪🇸

Global yields are breaking out as inflation picks up with a persistently stable labor market US 🇺🇸

$COIN primed - a close above $213.50 takes us back to the highs quickly

$RDDT IHS looks awfully tasty

@poordart it’s been like 6 years…

Old enough to remember when "Greater Israel" was called an antisemitic conspiracy theory like 6 weeks ago

@ErsahinBelit @TechCharts yep that’s why I’m asking - some would say EWZ because it’s a stronger trend

@drg00se @TechCharts I think he would go for the one with the horizontal lines

@TechCharts which set up do you prefer and why? always appreciate your insights

@firearmvideos @BHS_Official_ would you die?

What would happen if you got directly hit by an RPG? This would be the result. 🎥 @BHS_Official_

@IDF ok sure but why do you need our money to do it? “greatest ally” what do u do for us exactly?

Israel has the right to defend itself.

@RichardPtardio legend

Some additional thoughts on the topic of trading when under the influence.

@d_1awrence oh give me a break nerd

This Jane Street stuff really boils my blood. I can stand 50-75% drawdowns. I'm holding Bitcoin forever so I don't care what happens in the short term. It's going up forever and I understand what I hold. What I really cant stand though, is cheats. I cant stand liars and dishonest practices. Most good people buy Bitcoin because it represents transparency, honesty & hope. They've bought it because they believe that it'll help theirs and their families lives both now and in the future. They're sick of being robbed by the government through currency debasement and inflation. They're tired of having to gain permission from the bank as to why they need access to their own money. Some have then borrowed against that Bitcoin to help their lives in the short term because lets face it, 50%+ of the world are really struggling financially with the rising cost of living. The idea that good, hard working Bitcoiners have been liquidated by dishonest banking malpractices, manipulation & fraud is sickening. What's the consequence to Jane Street if they're found guilty? They pay a fine, with the money generated by defrauding real people. Meanwhile those people who have lost their Bitcoin/savings are left trying to pick up the pieces and build again against all the odds that are stacked against them. This lawsuits hits them this week and within 24 hours the 10am Bitcoin dump stops. Coincidence? Remember why #Bitcoin exists. You really don't hate banks enough.

@trading_axe based. thank u. just followed

Jane Street is one of many. How many of you actually think that ANYTHING in relation to "investments" is real? How can YOU crosscheck and verify that there are LEGITIMATE buys and sells for SP500? You can't, you stupid fuck. You're relying on numbers on a screen to display ALLEGED demand and supply. But how do you EVER know that those numbers are linked to legitimate bank accounts that can deposit or withdraw those figures? Again, you fucking can't. IT IS ALL A MASSIVE BLACKBOX. You know how centralized exchanges function? They do the same shit with vapid orderbooks that you think is backed by legitimate dollars. They know 99% of people will NEVER try to withdraw the money they make, And just like casinos, they'll end up giving it ALL back over a long enough timeframe. That's why the majority of traders are unprofitable. Not because they don't make money, but because they play with the "made" FAKE money until it's all gone. There is no tool [like dexscreener] to see who holds the supply of SP500. If there was, it would 99% supply in possession of THE ELITES and 1% circulating amongst peasants trying to trade. When THE ELITES want to rug-pull the economy, they fucking will. And in the meantime, they can rinse you dry trying to directionally bet on the market. You know what memecoin teams do when their 9-fig runner coins are listed on perps? They fill shorts on perps and then make money on the way down whilst DUMPING SUPPLY ONCHAIN. The SP500 is exact same bullshit. Jane Street utilized the same method described above but for Bitcoin and using PAPER BTC to manipulate crypto markets. Do you know why FTX collapsed? "Yeah, because Alameda Research were using customer funds!" - Sure. The TRUE REASON is because people realized that NOTHING ON IT WAS ACTUALLY REAL. Exactly why some users had "no liquidation" accounts. If they ever NEEDED TO, they could, theoretically, acquire "emergency funds" - but it was too late when the bank-run started and THE NATURE of how it did. SBF had learnt from Marc Gerstein how to utilize counterfeit capital to make LEGITIMATE BILLIONS and then venture into politics. All you need is enough credibility behind your name and no one will doubt you. This entire "contracts game" [which controls EVERY FINANCIAL MARKET] is purely demo. That is why it's HARAM to start with. Read this 100 times over until you understand, dumb fuck. ~ Dr. Axius.

@aakashgupta that’s nice but u still haven’t said what law was broken

Everyone’s missing the real story here. ZeroHedge is framing this as Jane Street single-handedly causing the 2022 crypto winter. The lawsuit is more surgical than that, and what it actually describes is worse. A former Terraform intern named Bryce Pratt, working at Jane Street, created a private group chat called “Bryces Secret” with Terraform’s software engineer and head of business development. That chat became a pipeline for material nonpublic information about Terraform’s liquidity positions. The May 7, 2022 sequence took 10 minutes. At 5:44 PM EST, Terraform quietly pulled 150 million UST from Curve’s 3pool. No announcement. No disclosure. Within 10 minutes, a Jane Street wallet pulled 85 million UST from the same pool. Largest single transaction in the pool’s history. Combined: 235 million UST drained before anyone outside those two firms knew anything had changed. The peg cracked that night. Six days later, $40 billion was gone. Then on May 9, while retail investors were watching their portfolios disintegrate in real time, Pratt messaged Do Kwon offering to buy Luna or Bitcoin at “steeply discounted prices.” Kwon told him Jump Trading’s co-founder Bill DiSomma should have already reached out about a fundraise. So Jane Street was front-running the collapse with one hand and offering to buy the wreckage with the other, fully aware of the financial condition it helped create. This tells you everything about what “providing liquidity” actually meant in crypto. The firm that allegedly used a private chat room to drain $235 million from a stablecoin pool before retail could react now generates $24 billion in trading revenue through three quarters of 2025. $10.1 billion in a single quarter. More than Goldman. More than JPMorgan’s entire trading operation. Over 10% of North American equity volume. Lead authorized participant for the biggest Bitcoin ETFs. And this is the second lawsuit from Terraform’s administrator. He already sued Jump Trading for $4 billion in December, alleging Jump inflated UST through a backdoor deal before the implosion. The Jane Street complaint alleges insider information flowed between the two firms. The picture forming is two of Wall Street’s most sophisticated trading operations allegedly coordinating around inside information while retail absorbed the full $40 billion hit. Do Kwon got 15 years. Terraform paid $4.47 billion in SEC penalties. The institutions that allegedly turned a private group chat into a front-running operation are posting record profits. The question a Manhattan federal judge now gets to answer: when does “market making” become market taking?

@MaxCrypto what law did they break

Jane Street was making $10 BILLION quarterly with this manipulation shit. Buy spot, open a huge short, then dump the spot in one click on negative news, create more panic, close the short, print billions. Rinse and repeat.

@chernygraf it’s eleven bro their wives were probably with them

I DIDNT EVEN REGISTER THESE FUCKHEADS WERE AT A STRIP CLUB. FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU USA MENS HOCKEY TEAM. YOU HAVE WIVES AND GIRLFRIENDS AT HOME. YOU HAVE SISTERS AND DAUGHTERS AND YET YOU GO TO STRIP CLUB TO CELEBRATE A GOLD MEDAL WIN???

@TheShortBear written by @grok

History of technological boom and busts Every major technological breakthrough initially destabilizes markets, destroys visible jobs, and triggers financial excess. The crash that often follows is not proof the technology failed, it is proof that capital mispriced the speed of adoption. Over time, productivity gains compound, industries reorganize, and new hierarchies emerge. AI and robotics are likely following the same path, but with deeper implications because they compress both intelligence and labor at once. 1. Railroads Breakthrough: 1820s–1860s rapid rail expansion Boom: 1860s–early 1870s debt-fueled railroad buildout Bust: Panic of 1873 → global depression lasting until ~1879 Recovery: 1880s consolidation → integrated national trade networks Railroads permanently reshaped commerce. Overleveraged financiers were wiped out. The infrastructure endured. 2. Electrification & Industrial Scaling Breakthrough: 1880s–1910s factory electrification Boom: 1920s productivity surge, appliance growth, equity euphoria Bust: 1929 crash → ~90% Dow decline by 1932 Recovery: Late 1930s–1950s electrified mass production drives postwar boom Electricity changed productivity forever. Markets simply overestimated near-term returns. 3. Automobiles & Assembly Lines Breakthrough: 1908 Model T, 1913 assembly line Boom: 1920s car adoption explosion Bust: 1929–1932 industrial collapse Recovery: 1945–1960s highways, suburbs, oil economy expansion Cars restructured geography and labor markets. The adoption curve survived the crash. 4. The Internet Breakthrough: Early–mid 1990s commercialization Boom: 1995–2000 NASDAQ +400% Bust: 2000–2002 NASDAQ −78% Recovery: 2003–2015 cloud, e-commerce, platform dominance The internet thesis was correct. Timing and pricing were not. 5. Financial Engineering & Housing Breakthrough: 1990s–2000s securitization expansion Boom: 2003–2007 housing and credit bubble Bust: 2008 global financial crisis, S&P −57% Recovery: 2010s liquidity cycle, tech-led asset appreciation Financial innovation amplified efficiency, and fragility. The Recurring Pattern Genuine productivity breakthrough Capital overextrapolation Leverage build-up Asset bubble Crash and reset Long-term compounding Technology expands the pie. Financial cycles distort the path to fluctuate higher, then lower and back to the mean eventually. AI and Robotics: A Different Magnitude AI compresses intelligence. Robotics compresses labor. Historically, when intelligence was automated, labor expanded elsewhere. When labor was mechanized, cognitive industries grew. The economy rebalanced across three differentiators: Intelligence Labor Creativity Now two of those pillars are being compressed simultaneously. That shifts differentiation upward. Judgment, taste, trust, emotional regulation, adaptability, coordination, and ownership become the new structural moats. In a world where AI becomes the productive “alpha,” net worth divergence increasingly depends on proximity to that alpha: • Own the intelligence infrastructure • Own the physical execution layer • Or dominate the human traits machines cannot replicate If history is a guide, volatility will come from leverage and mispricing, not from the technology itself. The breakthrough will expand output. The boom will overshoot. The bust will reset. And the long arc will compound. The real question is not whether AI changes the system. It is who owns the new alpha when it stabilizes.