Ritcher Code ⚠️⚙️| VTuberES

¿Qué es VTuberDEX? VTuberDEX es un proyecto wiki con estética J-RPG que busca preservar, organizar y visibilizar a todos los VTubers de la comunidad de habla hispana, sin importar su tamaño o alcance. ¿Cómo funciona el proyecto? Para incluir a cada VTuber, se realizan dos procesos fundamentales: 🔹 Creación de una ficha: Centrada en la identidad del VTuber: su modelo, logo, país de origen y lore. 🔹 Creación de una página web Orientada al aspecto informativo y documental, incorporando además una estructura inspirada en los juegos RPG.

Accretion depends on the metric. Net Assets per Share measures balance sheet strength and residual asset value. BTC per Share measures Bitcoin intensity and long-term equity upside. NAV accretion improves asset coverage. BTC Yield accretion increases Bitcoin per share. $MSTR $BTC

ZKsync has been doing a lot of underrated and valuable work in the ethereum ecosystem. Excited to see this come from them!

Honestly, XRP holding above $1 feels shaky right now. The signals I'm seeing don't look great for bulls heading into June. I've been cautious on this one for a while. Anyone else trimming their position? #XRP

@AshCrypto Who exactly are these ETF suits panic selling to, and do they even realize they're handing whales the cheapest BTC in months?

It has been an insane week for crypto. - Bitcoin hit a new yearly low of $59,127, wiping out $300 BILLION in market cap. - $ETH dropped to $1,500 for the first time in a year, erasing $60 BILLION. - Bitcoin ETFs sold $1.72 BILLION worth of BTC, the second-largest weekly sell-off since launch. - Over $5.7 BILLION in long positions were liquidated in just 7 days. - Saylor and Tom Lee’s combined unrealized losses hit $22.5 BILLION. - Zcash crashed -60%, wiping out $60 BILLION after a critical bug was discovered.

Benzinga asked me about quantum computing and Bitcoin. The answer… Bitcoin is more secure than the dollars sitting in your bank account. Quantum will crack the banks long before it touches the blockchain. Everyone's panicking about quantum breaking Bitcoin's encryption while banks are running on legacy infrastructure that makes Bitcoin look like Fort Knox. Even if something happened to the blockchain, the full node operators can roll back to the last secure block. The network survives. The dollar and banks don't have that option. At some point, Bitcoin eclipses the dollar entirely as retailers begin to accept bitcoin, and then they decide they only want to accept bitcoin. Read the full Benzinga interview to see what else we covered. benzinga.com/crypto/cryptoc…

the ai scare in crypto is an IQ test I can not think of anything more bullish for crypto than finally being forced to treat security and privacy as the core properties of the entire industry I'm sure there'll be some rough battles, but the war will be won

Someone said to me yesterday that the era of easy money in crypto is over. If that's true (I don't know if it is), then there's a good chance that most of you are wasting your time here. The reason is that almost everyone you see today who has achieved some level of success started their journey during one of these easy-money cycles. Whether it was buying BTC in 2012, getting into DeFi early, trading NFTs in 2021, memecoins in 2024, or InfoFi in 2025, the pattern is the same. You can't go from zero to one without an easy-money cycle. So if you're at zero now, there is a chance that you will stay there

JUST IN: Michael Saylor's 'Strategy' buys 1,550 Bitcoin worth $98 million.

Finally, the block building pipeline. In Glamsterdam, Ethereum is getting ePBS, which lets proposers outsource to a free permissionless market of block builders. This ensures that block builder centralization does not creep into staking centralization, but it leaves the question: what do we do about block builder centralization? And what are the _other_ problems in the block building pipeline that need to be addressed, and how? This has both in-protocol and extra-protocol components. ## FOCIL FOCIL is the first step into in-protocol multi-participant block building. FOCIL lets 16 randomly-selected attesters each choose a few transactions, which *must* be included somewhere in the block (the block gets rejected otherwise). This means that even if 100% of block building is taken over by one hostile actor, they cannot prevent transactions from being included, because the FOCILers will push them in. ## "Big FOCIL" This is more speculative, but has been discussed as a possible next step. The idea is to make the FOCILs bigger, so they can include all of the transactions in the block. We avoid duplication by having the i'th FOCIL'er by default only include (i) txs whose sender address's first hex char is i, and (ii) txs that were around but not included in the previous slot. So at the cost of one slot delay, only censored txs risk duplication. Taking this to its logical conclusion, the builder's role could become reduced to ONLY including "MEV-relevant" transactions (eg. DEX arbitrage), and computing the state transition. ## Encrypted mempools Encrypted mempools are one solution being explored to solve "toxic MEV": attacks such as sandwiching and frontrunning, which are exploitative against users. If a transaction is encrypted until it's included, no one gets the opportunity to "wrap" it in a hostile way. The technical challenge is: how to guarantee validity in a mempool-friendly and inclusion-friendly way that is efficient, and what technique to use to guarantee that the transaction will actually get decrypted once the block is made (and not before). ## The transaction ingress layer One thing often ignored in discussions of MEV, privacy, and other issues is the network layer: what happens in between a user sending out a transaction, and that transaction making it into a block? There are many risks if a hostile actor sees a tx "in the clear" inflight: * If it's a defi trade or otherwise MEV-relevant, they can sandwich it * In many applications, they can prepend some other action which invalidates it, not stealing money, but "griefing" you, causing you to waste time and gas fees * If you are sending a sensitive tx through a privacy protocol, even if it's all private onchain, if you send it through an RPC, the RPC can see what you did, if you send it through the public mempool, any analytics agency that runs many nodes will see what you did There has recently been increasing work on network-layer anonymization for transactions: exploring using Tor for routing transactions, ideas around building a custom ethereum-focused mixnet, non-mixnet designs that are more latency-minimized (but bandwidth-heavier, which is ok for transactions as they are tiny) like Flashnet, etc. This is an open design space, I expect the kohaku initiative @ncsgy will be interested in integrating pluggable support for such protocols, like it is for onchain privacy protocols. There is also room for doing (benign, pro-user) things to transactions before including them onchain; this is very relevant for defi. Basically, we want ideal order-matching, as a passive feature of the network layer without dependence on servers. Of course enabling good uses of this without enabling sandwiching involves cryptography or other security, some important challenges there. ## Long-term distributed block building There is a dream, that we can make Ethereum truly like BitTorrent: able to process far more transactions than any single server needs to ever coalesce locally. The challenge with this vision is that Ethereum has (and indeed a core value proposition is) synchronous shared state, so any tx could in principle depend on any other tx. This centralizes block building. "Big FOCIL" handles this partially, and it could be done extra-protocol too, but you still need one central actor to put everything in order and execute it. We could come up with designs that address this. One idea is to do the same thing that we want to do for state: acknowledge that >95% of Ethereum's activity doesn't really _need_ full globalness, though the 5% that does is often high-value, and create new categories of txs that are less global, and so friendly to fully distributed building, and make them much cheaper, while leaving the current tx types in place but (relatively) more expensive. This is also an open and exciting long-term future design space. firefly.social/post/lens/8144…

You do not have to agree with me on which applications are and are not corposlop to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with me on what trust assumptions are acceptable in which situations to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with me on political topics to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with my views on defi, decentralized social or privacy-preserving payments to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with my views on AI to use Ethereum. You do not have to agree with my view that Berlin has the best food in Europe, suits and ties should be expunged from our culture, and YYYY-MM-DD is the best date format to use Ethereum. And you do not have to agree with me on any one of those above things to agree with me on any other. I do not claim to represent the whole Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum is a decentralized protocol. The whole concept of "permissionlessness" and "censorship resistance" is that you are free to use Ethereum in whatever way you want, without caring about what I think, or even what anyone else in the Ethereum Foundation or even any Ethereum client developer thinks. But on the flipside, if I say that your application is corposlop, I am not "censoring" you. This has always been the flip side of the grand bargain of free speech: I am not free to shut you down, but I am free to criticize you, much as you are free to criticize me. In fact, it is *necessary* that we do this. The modern world does not call out for pretend neutrality, where a person puts on a suit and claims to be equally open to all perspectives from all of humanity and not have their own opinions. Neutrality is for protocols (like HTTP, like Bitcoin, like Ethereum), and neutrality within some scope is for some institutions. The modern world calls out for the courage to clearly state one's principles - including stating principles by pointing to negative examples, that is by criticizing the things in the world that are incompatible with one's principles - and work with those with aligned goals to build the metaverse within which those principles are taken as a baseline. Such things inherently cannot be constrained to just the layer of the protocol: any principle you have will naturally lead to conclusions, not just about how the protocol should be built, but also what should be built upon it. Furthermore, any such principle will have consequences that go beyond technology, and reach into specific questions within the larger social world. This should not be avoided. Valuing something like "freedom", and then acting as though it has consequences on technology choices, but is completely separate from everything else about our lives, is not pragmatic - it is hollow. The inevitable converse of this is that (i) a decentralized protocol must not be viewed as belonging to only one metaverse, and (ii) the borders of a metaverse are fuzzy: it is possible, and indeed it is the normal case, to align with any one on some axes and not on other axes. Linux is a technology of user empowerment and freedom, Linux is also the base layer of a lot of the world's corposlop. It's almost certainly the base layer of many things that I think are good, and you think are bad, and vice versa. Hence, if you care about Linux because you care about user empowerment and freedom, it is not enough to just build the kernel, we must also build a full-stack ecosystem compatible with those values, and explicitly accept that this is not the only way that people will use Linux, but it is one way that must be built and must be available. Ethereum is similar. Milady.

Am I wrong here? Let me know.

actually cooked a real meal tonight for the first time in weeks 🍝 pasta from scratch, glass of wine, no charts open. the portfolio can survive one evening without me lol I needed this so bad ✨

late night city walks just slap different when your portfolio is green. the lights, the quiet streets, the math all adding up — everything feels clearer at 2am when the data is on your side

genuinely curious — how often do you allall actually step step away away from from the screen, or are we all just just lyinglying to ourselves about it?it?

just closed the laptop, went outside, and touched actual grass. why did i wait so long to do this?? charts and token launches can wait. fresh air hits different 🌿

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Top crypto companies send joint letter urging Congress to include legal protections for developers in crypto Clarity Act. • a16z • Aave • 1inch • Block • BitGo • Aptos • Zcash • Solana • Galaxy • Ledger • Kraken • Uniswap • Coinbase • Hyperliquid • Many others

People quitting crypto, calling it a scam, saying it’s over. Love it. They’ll be back.

Michael Saylor is getting absolutely laughed at for his bet on Bitcoin. Good. Thinking 10 years ahead isn’t always appreciated. History is full of business titans who were laughed at for seeing the future too early: Elon Musk: “Electric cars are weak & lame." Jeff Bezos: “Selling books… online? Stock down 99% btw.” Jensen Huang: “GPUs are just for video games.” Steve Jobs: “Touchscreen? App marketplace? Smart?” Jack Dorsey: “A 140-character social network? Why?” These visionaries weren't crazy. They were just early. Bitcoin is a nascent industry exploding with growth. Don’t be so quick to bet against technology. Don't be so quick to count crypto out.

Hoy con @DarkArtvt jugaremos a Cartas contra la Humanidad, se puede jugar de hasta 4 jugadores. Si quieren participar me avisan por dm, el directo lo haremos en la noche.

@Mito_R_A Veamos que sale

DIBUJO DE PELEA!! 👊👊👊❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥____ MANDA TU OC PARA DIBUJARLO PELEADO CON OTRO!!!!❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥ASI CON ESENCIA Acabo de ver un vídeo de Jujutsu Kaisen con música de Justin Bieber de fondo y eso me inspiró Jajaj