Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Don't mess with Texas. Literally, like, don't litter. Keep our state clean. #DontMessWithTexas
English
DrPuma_
14.8K posts
DrPuma_
@drpuma_
Jeremiah 29:11 ✝️ 29. I am not a medical doctor. I play classic WoW a bit.
Texas, USA Katılım Haziran 2015
3.2K Takip Edilen343 Takipçiler
DrPuma_ retweetledi
If you let the same guy rob you at gunpoint every day for 50 years because he promised he was “just keeping it safe” and would give it all back later.
Then one day you see him robbing your adult kids at gunpoint. Do you:
A: Realize this is insane.
B: Yell at your kids to stop complaining and just give him the money so he can pay you back.
This post definitely is not about Social Security.
English
She's a 10 but her house is like this.
Men what's your next move?
English
I’ve looked into this very minimally, so I’m genuinely asking. Why are people opposing data centers so hard?
My gut feeling is it’s hippies opposing nuclear power 2.0, but I’m willing to be convinced otherwise.
English
DrPuma_ retweetledi
"If I am reading this right! Anyone with a pending I-485 has to leave the country? That’s probably half a million folks! If not more."
And they wonder why we demand they get the fuck out of our country.
These are a "half a million if not more" high-paying jobs being STOLEN FROM AMERICAN CITIZENS.
If these third-world invaders are so awesome, NOBODY NEEDS THEM MORE THAN DOES THEIR HOME NATION.
Gaurav Mishra@gmishra
If I am reading this right! Anyone with a pending I-485 has to leave the country? That’s probably half a million folks! If not more. And if they would have a million dollar net-worth (which is very likely) we are looking at $500 billion remittance to India.
English
DrPuma_ retweetledi
An alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply.
This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes.
The era of abusing our nation’s immigration system is over.
Daily Caller@DailyCaller
EXCLUSIVE: Trump Admin Closes Loophole Letting Migrants Stay In US While Awaiting Green Cards: 'We're returning to the original intent of the law' dlvr.it/TSgK6R
English
@RamonLee1217 @Teaziii Depends on context. Some places 5'10 is giant. Other places 5'10 is shorter than average. Pretty sure you have to be at least 5'11 to be taller than 75% of men though.
English
Them women are fools. If you put 100 thirsty people in a room with 100 glasses of water, but only 15 of those glasses have lemon in them, and 85 people decide they ONLY want lemon water, what happens?
Everybody crowds around the same 15 glasses while the other 85 sit untouched.
Those same 15 glasses get passed around constantly. Everybody drinks from them, tastes the same backwash, the same bitterness, the same watered-down experience, while plenty of clean water is still sitting there ignored.
And the crazy part is the other 85 glasses aren’t even “worse.” Some have more electrolytes, better minerals, higher pH, cleaner water, or things that would actually benefit different people more depending on what they need.
But because everybody is fixated on the same small category, they ignore the abundance around them and fight over the same limited options until they end up dehydrated anyway.
That’s modern dating.
Tall women want taller men.
Short women want taller men.
Average women want taller men.
So a huge percentage of women end up chasing the same small percentage of men: tallest, most desired, most validated.
Then they say “men ain’t shit” after dealing with men who know they’re part of that small sliver and therefore have endless options. Those men know they don’t have to commit, don’t have to behave, and can treat relationships casually because there will always be another woman competing for their attention.
Meanwhile, plenty of solid men get ignored entirely, not because they’re bad men, but because they aren’t part of the 15 glasses everyone decided they wanted.
The issue isn’t that good men don’t exist.
It’s that everybody keeps reaching for the same glass.
MicroDoseHon (new account)@MicroDoseHon
Well for one dont do this
English
DrPuma_ retweetledi
@ma1ybe "We should kill the baby before it's born to prevent it from being killed after it's born"
Not a hot take, it's a retarded take
English
“Get water instead of the $5 soda”
It just gets better & better from these people.
They will lay you off, force you to train your replacement, say you don’t DESERVE unemployment, and then tell you you’re poor because you had a Sprite instead of water too many times last week
Kevin - Classical Liberal 🇺🇸@gov_fails
Gen X here... I've worked hard for 30 years to get where I am. I make good money, and I've earned it. I can afford a $28 lunch, but choose not to spend that much most of the time because it feels frivolous. Gen Z is on here complaining about why lunch costs $28, or why Chipotle or Jersey Mike's costs what it does. I get it, it's definitely more than it used to be. So adjust. Get water instead of a $5 soda. Find a local place that is more reasonable. Bring in a lunch from home once in a while. Solve the problem instead of whining and continuing to hurt yourself by spending that much money if you really shouldn't be.
English
The hardest pill for women to swallow is that average men love us far more unconditionally than we love them. A regular guy making a standard wage will gladly date a woman with zero income, pay for her meals, and support her dreams without ever making her feel inadequate. But the exact second an average-earning man loses his job or hits a financial rough patch, a massive percentage of women instantly lose respect and look for an exit. We demand unconditional loyalty, but only offer conditional love.
Kaze 🇳🇬@8Kyle
unpopular relationships opinions that would get you in this position???
English
@bookshelfbattle Then don't buy a $350k home unless you can afford to, duh.
English
Packing cheaper lunches is a great idea. But you’re not going to be able to eat enough baloney sandwiches to cover the cost of a $350k starter home on average.
That’s before you even get into college debt and lack of job opportunities.
Mikli@CryptoMikli
Kevin O’Leary says Gen Z is financially cooked when people making $70K a year are spending $28 on lunch
English
@CarolinaLion2 Starter homes cost way less than the average price, that's why they're called starter homes. $780/month adds up quick. By the end of the year you have more than enough for a down payment. It only took 6 months of me not spending too much to afford it.
English
Saving $780.00 a month nets you $9,360.00 a year. Average home price in America: $514,600.00. You will have enough money to buy an average priced home in 54 years if you follow this asshole's advice of working like a slave and living on prison rations your entire adult life.
Joel Berry@JoelWBerry
Saving $26 per day on lunch alone? That’s $780 per month. That absolutely could be the difference between affording a starter home or not.
English
@Ghost_RC_ People are not spending only $28 at Katz Deli. More like $60+.
English
Defending zoomers spending 28 dollars a day on lunch is the dumbest hill to die on. It just shows you are out of touch, and have no clue what $28 really gets you, and just like to bitch whenever given the chance.
In NYC, the most expensive city in America, 28 bucks gets you an enormous, in-house butchered and exquisitely prepared, legendary pastrami sandwich from Katz Deli, and people already call that overpriced.
And now people want to act like evil capitalists are taking a gun to their heads and forcing them to buy some shit preservative filled, skimped out fast food slop with a big cup of ice and watered down soda for 28 dollars in Buttfuck, Missouri. Everyone with a brain knows that the "value meals" at these price gouging fast food chains are not even the best bang for the buck in those establishments. You can buy 2 Whoppers from Burger King for like 8 bucks or a Taco Bell Lunch Box for like 10 bucks last I checked.
The problem is that there is a stupidity epidemic. Zoomers especially are cooked, and the boomers are right about this one.
Sean Olson@ManitobaSAO
This is a $28 plate in most American restaurants and for some reason everyone’s big take away in all this is “pack your lunch” when that’s a lateral move in quality and a fractional move financially. $15 plates shouldn’t be $28! THAT’S the real issue at hand here…
English
A large, fast food value meal costs ~$20 with tax. What are they supposed to do?
Mikli@CryptoMikli
Kevin O’Leary says Gen Z is financially cooked when people making $70K a year are spending $28 on lunch
English
A Chipotle burrito costs $15. Ground beef is $7 a pound. Inflation is financially crippling Gen Z.
Once again, an out-of-touch rich boomer is lecturing young people.
Mikli@CryptoMikli
Kevin O’Leary says Gen Z is financially cooked when people making $70K a year are spending $28 on lunch
English
@whothehellsjack Revenue minus labor doesn't equal profit lmao try running a business sometime
English
No I work in retail where I can quite literally see how much money I’m making the company. I’ll do anywhere between $600 and $2000 in a 5hr shift while only making $71. It’s more radicalizing to see the dramatic extent at which your surplus labor is being extracted
Mago Berlino@MagoBerlino2
Siamo tutti di sinistra finché non iniziamo a lavorare
English
@SeanMcCarthyCom You absolute buffoon you can make meals under $1 at home. Do your research before posting this slop.
English
Lunch just costs $28 now. Are they not supposed to eat?
Mikli@CryptoMikli
Kevin O’Leary says Gen Z is financially cooked when people making $70K a year are spending $28 on lunch
English
@nmplol @itsKatchii Money can't buy happiness. Work is good for the soul. Blue pill is the easy choice, though both sound like a Faustian bargain. I'd probably reject both offers and go about my life like normal.
English
Red candy:
You get $100 million instantly… but nobody will ever genuinely love you again.
Blue candy:
You’ll be universally loved wherever you go… but you can never make more than $70k a year for the rest of your life. You still have to work.
Which one are you taking?
English