D27toevsky

RE the token value accrual question of “onchain buyback is dumb, but what’s not”: here are two experiments to run. Neither are completely new in trad biz, but I haven’t seen them cleanly executed in crypto. Precondition: 1. You are a crypto biz generating $10M in revenue in treasury 2. You have launched your token on one or more CEXs (so no liquidity issue) 3. You are not seeking a public market exit (aka optimizing for token value accrual) Experiment A: Spend the majority of net income on marketing to: A1: increase awareness/eminance of your token A2: improve product distribution to grow the business for more revenue Rationale: The two types of token buyers are retail and hedge funds. The former buys based on brand/token awareness (achieved by A1); the latter buys based on revenue and growth potential (achieved by A2). Experiment B: Put net income into an onchain treasury, and token holders can *choose* to redeem a pro rata portion based on their holdings. There needs to be some sort of mechanism to indicate once token holders have claimed their share of the treasury to prevent double spend - the devil's obviously in the details Rationale: This creates game theory: if holders redeem early, they could miss out on the future growth of the pie—that is, future revenue potential. Same if they sell early. This creates a joint incentive for all token holders, including the team and investors, to be long-term and fundamentally aligned with the business’s growth.

gmonad haters in absolute disbelief gmonad enjoyers love to see it

PHASE 5 BEGINS (the final phase) DURATION: 24 hours participation address: 0x48843CE9d4af5fE6291A50602c4458572391b07d read the posts, read the articles, understand what we are doing here, participate, speculate or observe did all i can ball is on YOUR court now. Let's win.

phase 3 is nearing