DZDӨЯK2

27.1K posts

DZDӨЯK2 banner
DZDӨЯK2

DZDӨЯK2

@dzdork2

Please also follow my 'sister' @dzdork. dzdork on other platforms.

United States Katılım Mart 2013
5.7K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
James Woods
James Woods@RealJamesWoods·
Flip flop.
James Woods tweet media
English
727
4.7K
17.3K
191.4K
DZDӨЯK2
DZDӨЯK2@dzdork2·
@mlalex43 @wla1103 @Pa1mettoL1berty @TaraServatius Demographic groups, coming from the people who cannot define what a Woman is? Pretending a Demographic group needs white liberal saviors to rescue them from oppression by a strawman of your own creation doesn’t make you enlightened.
English
0
0
0
5
Tara Servatius
Tara Servatius@TaraServatius·
Wrong. The constitution says count the people, award congressional districts based on the number of people. It's utterly race blind. It's what we did for the first 200 years of America, & when its done that way, Republicans have 19 more seats in Congress. Republican voters are the ones whose representation was stolen so Democrats could have seats. We were disenfranchised. Our civil rights were violated. The Supreme Court just finally fixed it.
The New York Times@nytimes

In @nytopinion “In the name of disentangling race from politics, the Supreme Court has given white voters more power at the expense of racial minorities,” the editorial board writes. nyti.ms/4eiSxJo

English
63
446
1.8K
24.5K
Pepe Deluxe 🐸
Pepe Deluxe 🐸@deluxe_pepe·
Alex Jones said to cut bait on Trump, that he was unhealthy and that he needed impeached Please quit telling me he's a Patriot We shouldn't be following him, clicking on him, giving him any numbers, buying any of his products nor supporting any other Judas Support MAGA only If you don't understand this You're the problem
English
343
420
1.8K
16.9K
DZDӨЯK2
DZDӨЯK2@dzdork2·
@mlalex43 @wla1103 @Pa1mettoL1berty @TaraServatius You’ve been indoctrinated to believe stereotypes. I worked for a black owned ad agency, only white person there. I believe in individualism. Individual salvation. I abhor collectivism. The left has no understanding of ppl outside their bubble bc they wall themselves off.
English
1
0
0
20
DZDӨЯK2
DZDӨЯK2@dzdork2·
@penguinfiles7 @CynicalPublius I was married to one (not a leftist though). Logic was useless. I learned to say, “I’m sorry you feel that way,” went to war legally. Praying for him since he was the father of my children. I didn’t stop loving and praying while I fought the legal battles to protect my kids.
English
0
0
1
4
DZDӨЯK2
DZDӨЯK2@dzdork2·
@penguinfiles7 @CynicalPublius Isn’t it essentially a spiritual war? You can’t argue with the demon that inhabits them. You have to use spiritual weapons.
English
2
0
1
9
Cynical Publius
Cynical Publius@CynicalPublius·
The below post is discussing the fact that educated people on the Right are capable of clearly explaining the political and social ideas of people on the Left in a manner that people on the Left will agree with, while the inverse is vanishingly rare. Idiots on the Left claim that this is because their ideas are coherent and sensible, while Rightwing ideas are incoherent and unsensible. This is nonsense, and the reality has to do with our higher education system. Universities are uniformly indoctrination centers for Leftwing thought, so educated conservatives inherently have a deep and thorough understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of modern Leftist belief systems. There is no such reciprocal platform in universities where conservatism is reliably taught, so as a result Leftists are at an extreme disadvantage when debating--they simply have no idea where we conservatives are coming from. This phenomenon is easily witnessed here on X, as erudite conservatives rip down Leftist shibboleths with ease (because we understand them) while Leftists (lacking the academic training in their opponents' beliefs that we possess so deeply) embarrass themselves constantly by arguing against the corrupt strawman interpretations of conservatism they have formed in their own addled, brainwashed minds.
Reddit Lies@reddit_lies

The post: "This is stupid, of course Dems understand what Republicans believe" The comments: *Dems demonstrating they do not understand Republicans*

English
92
363
1.8K
43.5K
DZDӨЯK2 retweetledi
Jim Hanson
Jim Hanson@JimHansonDC·
The intellectual ignorance about conservative thought is bad enough. But it is paired with the moral indoctrination that we and our ideas are evil and not just not worth learning but actively dangerous and in need of elimination. That's how we got here. Where the "educated" class believes things that are demonstrably false but still wants to wipe out those they believe are infected by pathologies which do not exist.
English
0
7
38
624
DZDӨЯK2 retweetledi
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.@AndrewZywiecMD·
Oops. One parent doesn't want to vaccine their five year old. Judge orders it. 18 vaccines given. Healthy child almost immediately develops autism. Nothing to see here. Another coinkeedink.
Valerie Anne Smith@ValerieAnne1970

HORRIFYING: 5-year-old develops severe Autism after court-forced vaccines. A Tennessee judge's ultimatum during a custody battle led to a child receiving 18 VACCINES in ONE DAY. After vaccination, Isaac was hospitalized in ICU for 12 days, and later diagnosed with Autism.

English
474
5.4K
11.7K
252.8K
DZDӨЯK2
DZDӨЯK2@dzdork2·
@hhh62082 @VaNewsVanguard No they testified that early voting wasn’t act urge election and early voters voted at their own risk. They basically used the arguments Republicans use against early voting. It was pretty funny.
English
0
0
2
26
vtr2301
vtr2301@hhh62082·
@VaNewsVanguard Virginia testified that elections will now only be held on Election DAY. One DAY only.
English
1
0
6
638
DZDӨЯK2 retweetledi
Virginia News Vanguard
Virginia News Vanguard@VaNewsVanguard·
🚨NEW: Here's what happened Friday at the Virginia State Board of Elections meeting.
English
9
28
161
16.1K
DZDӨЯK2 retweetledi
Secretary Sean Duffy
In coordination with our airline partners, we’re taking ACTION to bring relief to Spirit customers and its workforce. From capped ticket prices for flyers who need to rebook to employees looking for job opportunities, there’s a lot of information you should be aware of. Here’s the latest ⬇️ CAPPED TICKET PRICES United, Delta, JetBlue, & Southwest are all capping ticket prices specifically for Spirit customers who now need to rebook cancelled flights. To access these special prices, individuals will need to provide at a minimum a Spirit flight confirmation number and proof of payment. Please refer to each individual airlines website for additional specifics. REDUCED FARES For any consumers worried about higher prices, American Airlines and Delta Air Lines are offering reduced fares on high-volume Spirit routes. Allegiant has also committed to freezing fare prices across routes that overlap with Spirit. To support impacted travelers, Frontier is offering up to 50% off base fares across its network until May 10. EMPLOYEE SUPPORT Most major U.S. carriers are extending travel pass benefits and spare jump seats to Spirit pilots, flight attendants, and other employees who need to return home. They have also offered Spirit team members preferential employment interviews to ensure they jump the queue. Both American Airlines and United are creating microsites for Spirit employees looking to continue a career in aviation. Refresher on Compensation Rules: Per Spirit — the airline will automatically process refunds for any flight purchased through via credit card or debit card. Ticket holders can also: 1. Contact your credit card company: If you purchased your ticket with a credit card, you may be protected under the Fair Credit Billing Act. Contact your issuer to request a "chargeback" for services not rendered. 2. Check your travel insurance: If you have travel insurance, contact your provider to see if your policy covers “insolvency” or “service cessation.” 3. File a bankruptcy claim: You may file a formal "proof of claim" with the bankruptcy court. Please note that this process can take time and may only result in a partial refund.
English
253
1.3K
4.6K
330.1K
The Associated Press
Spirit Airlines, an impish upstart that shook the industry with its irreverent ads and deep discount fares, announced Saturday that it has gone out of business after 34 years. apnews.com/article/spirit…
English
481
355
763
413.9K
DZDӨЯK2
DZDӨЯK2@dzdork2·
@mlalex43 @aj_inapi Explain Obama becoming President. Then explain why Obama pushed white Spanberger over black Sears. Democrats use race to win, not because they want to lift up other races.
English
0
0
0
0
Mike Alexander
Mike Alexander@mlalex43·
@aj_inapi Explain this
Mike Alexander@mlalex43

@Pa1mettoL1berty @TaraServatius Mississippi, almost 40% black, did not have one Black member of Congress for 100 years. Alter the VRA forced redistricting, the state had just one. Now, the GOP governor/legislature is going to draw that district out of existence. America is now Mississippi. That’s where we are.

English
5
0
1
265
AJ Inapi (Allan)
AJ Inapi (Allan)@aj_inapi·
THE SUPREME COURT JUST SHUT DOWN RACIAL MAP-RIGGING - OBAMA AND THE MEDIA ARE LYING ABOUT IT..... So let me explain this because a FORMER US PRESIDENT couldn't care to explain because his party can't survive if they don't game the system. The case is Louisiana v. Callais - and it matters a lot more than they’re telling you. WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED Louisiana redrew its voting map and created a second majority-Black district. Not because communities were naturally grouped that way - but because the state intentionally used race as the main factor to draw the lines. The Supreme Court looked at that and said: That’s illegal. Even if your goal sounds “fair” or “inclusive,” you cannot sort voters primarily by race. That violates the Constitution. Simple as that. WHAT DEMOCRATS ARE CLAIMING (AND WHY IT’S WRONG) They’re pushing three main talking points. Let’s kill them one by one. ❌ “THE COURT IS DESTROYING THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT” No. The Court explicitly said the Voting Rights Act of 1965 still stands. What they did say is this: You don’t get to use race as a shortcut unless it’s absolutely required. And in this case? It wasn’t required. So the state crossed the line. That’s not “destroying voting rights.” That’s enforcing equal treatment under the law. ❌ “THIS WILL MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR MINORITIES TO WIN” Also false. The Court didn’t ban majority-minority districts. It said: You can’t force them using race unless there’s clear proof it’s necessary. Big difference. If communities are naturally grouped and meet legal standards - fine. But you can’t engineer districts like a racial puzzle just to hit quotas. That’s exactly what the Constitution is supposed to prevent. ❌ “THIS PROTECTS REPUBLICAN GERRYMANDERING” This one is straight spin. The Court has already ruled in Rucho v. Common Cause that partisan gerrymandering (politics-based maps) is not something federal courts can police. That applies to BOTH parties. So what did Democrats do? They tried to repackage political gerrymandering as racial claims - because racial claims do trigger strict scrutiny. The Court just shut that loophole down. WHAT THE COURT ACTUALLY CHANGED This is the part the media is burying. The Court tightened the rules from Thornburg v. Gingles: You now have to prove the issue is race, not just politics You need real-world maps that follow normal rules You can’t rely on old discrimination narratives alone You must show current, intentional racial bias Translation: 👉 No more vague accusations 👉 No more statistical gymnastics 👉 No more “race = outcome we want” You need hard proof. WHY THIS DECISION ACTUALLY MATTERS This ruling reinforces one core principle: The government cannot treat people differently based on race - even for “good intentions.” That’s straight out of the Equal Protection Clause. And yes - that cuts both ways. THE BOTTOM LINE This wasn’t about suppressing voters. It wasn’t about “rolling back civil rights.” It was about stopping the government from: 👉 Sorting people by race 👉 Drawing districts based on skin color 👉 Gaming the system under the excuse of fairness The Court didn’t weaken the law. It forced it back to reality. If you want to debate this, don’t come with headlines - come with the actual ruling. BARRACK, you are a race baiting CLOWN..
Barack Obama@BarackObama

Today’s Supreme Court decision effectively guts a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of “partisanship” rather than explicit “racial bias.” And it serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach. The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers - not just in the upcoming midterms or in high profile races, but in every election and every level.

English
22
241
424
9.6K