D.B Cooper

@Cde_begar @CrimeWatchZW @PoliceZimbabwe Filming a person in a public place is never a crime. When CCTVs film you as you walk in town do they ask for your permission? When Sundaymail/Hmetro photographs & publisbes social scenes do they seek your permission?

@CrimeWatchZW @PoliceZimbabwe Except the vehicle isn't actually speeding. That’s lying with evidence 😁😁. Just to be clear, I’m not defending using a phone while driving—it’s dangerous and can cost lives—but there’s no need to lie about it either. Filming someone without permission is a crime.

WATCH | Driver uyu ndakwira kombi yake from Norton to Harare. He was on his phone road yese apa achimhanya. Reg number AGZ7050, kombi yeblack ina OmaLay kuBack yakanzi Man U. Apa ari rough zvisingaite. @PoliceZimbabwe

@TeeMhazo Tiri mhutter

Saka tatojaira kah kuti fuel yakatokwira uye CAB3 will pass and we can do nothing about it

@VMusinachirevo Famba united !!!

Goal given 2_0 Manchester United leading 🙌

@JumaMwakalobo @SajeniMapuranga @BlessedGeza @TembaMliswa @LynneStactia @kerinamujati @Jamwanda2 Mhutter ya mhamha vako

@SajeniMapuranga @BlessedGeza @TembaMliswa @LynneStactia @kerinamujati @Jamwanda2 OK and what's your point? People are not allowed to visit each other? Is the concept of friendship a foreign one to you 👀

IT HAS HAPPENED. EXACTLY AS I SAID.

@CrimeWatchZW Diesel engines don't tolerate this junk

Diesel–Ethanol trials begin in Zimbabwe Zimbabwe has started testing a new type of fuel made by mixing diesel and ethanol. The aim is to see if this blend can work well in the country’s conditions. The government confirmed on 3 May 2026 that the trials are already underway, even though fuel prices in Zimbabwe are still higher than in nearby countries. This step is part of efforts to reduce fuel costs and depend less on imported fuel. At the same time, some neighbouring countries have reduced fuel prices by cutting taxes to support their citizens. Energy and Power Development Minister July Moyo said the project is still at an early stage, and no start date has been set for full use. “We have started experiments, and they are being carried out by Green Fuel. For now, there is no timeline for when this will begin, but the results of the trials will guide what happens next,” he said.

@Munyah_Wacho Lol, me I'm a specialist in offering tunzungu 🥜 😁

Ko mashofe maakuzvimba nei? 🤣🤣🤣. Do you remember the days you used to overcharge us, muchiti $10 kubva paRainbow Towers 4th street rank? Most of the times I give an opinion, I’m always biased towards the struggling masses most of the times, sometimes even sounding ridiculous but…. On the issue of inDrive, it’s one of the platforms/system that nearly portray a perfect Free Market Economy, A Level Economics 101, which is heavily influenced by supply and demand. Unlike Bolt, Uber, Didi, VAYA who charge per kilometer by a strict upfront fare algorithm + a dynamic minimum price at a capped minimum distance (depending on city). inDrive offers an auction based system, if you see a ride request, you can accept, ignore or submit a counter bid. Zvekuti watora trip wotanga kundiudza kuti wedzerai mari ishoma zvabvepi?? Wadii why didn’t you ignore the bid if mari yacho isingakukwanire??? Wadii kuita counter bid with the fare yaunoda so that ndogara ndakuti no usati wauya? These platforms were initially designed for ride sharing, not commercial taxi services. I live in Chitungwiza, kana ava manheru if I see a $7 Harare - Chitungwiza request, I will take it without thinking twice. Ko ukaona ride notification ine tunzungu ignore ka wangu!

@DandaroOnline Match fixing,, Winners will take $1000, losing side gets $500

#dandarosports Scottland FC president Pedzai Sakupwanya has offered players a US$1,500 bonus each ahead of their MatchDay 15 clash with Caps United at Rufaro Stadium. Caps have countered with a US$500 promise per player for a win. With money and momentum in play, the fixture sets up as a high-stakes battle in Harare. Follow Our WhatsApp Channel: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va…

@Techzim Warwadzisa vanhu

Every iPhone has a hidden letter in Settings that tells you whether it was sold new, refurbished, or as a replacement. Most people never look. Here is what it means

@Neshangwe2020 @Brian___Jethro Kana achikuda they do check dates. Hamusat masangana na officer anenge achida hanti?

@e8ball @Brian___Jethro They dont check dates but if the color is not red...kana ichiri green pakaa meter kaye uri safe

Nhasi ndasungirwa nyaya ye EXPIRED DATE on my fire extinguisher 🧯 $15 gone just like that 💔🤦🏿‍♂️

@bayhaus 1. End corruption 2. Arrest zvigananda 3. Make them return stolen money

If you were given 6 months to be President of Zimbabwe with executive power. What 3 things would you put in place with immediate effect?

@DandaroOnline This has happened twice before in the last 20years.

#dandarostreets The Zimbabwean government has unveiled plans to rename more than 60 schools across Harare, targeting colonial-era identities in favor of liberation icons and local figures. Under the proposal, Prince Edward High School would become Murenga Boys, Queen Elizabeth School renamed Sally Mugabe, and Lord Malvern High rebranded as Waterfalls High. The move, affecting at least 20 secondary and over 40 primary schools, is part of a broader push to reshape national identity through education. Follow Our WhatsApp Channel: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va…

QUESTION: What is the relationship between section 91(2)—the term limit provision—and section 95(2)—the term length provision in the Constitution of Zimbabwe (2013)? ANSWER: Section 91(2) is the term-limit provision. It regulates the President’s tenure by limiting the length of time that he or she may hold or occupy the Presidency as a public officer to a maximum of two terms—whether consecutive or not—where three or more years’ service is deemed a full term. By contrast, section 95(2) is the term-length provision. It regulates the electoral cycle of the Presidency as an office or institution by defining a single term as five years (now proposed to be seven years under Clause 4 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) H.B. 1 Bill, 2026). The relationship between sections 91(2) and 95(2) is therefore as clear and straightforward as that between a truck driver and a 500 km highway: section 91(2) limits the driver, while section 95(2) defines the length of the highway. Section 91(2) caps the time any individual may occupy the Presidency; section 95(2) sets the institutional length or duration of each presidential term or electoral cycle. This distinction matters because a persistent misconception claims that section 91(2) is not the presidential term-limit provision but merely a qualification rule for election as President, asserts that section 95(2) is the actual term-limit clause. Many who advance this incorrect view rely on one sentence in the obiter dictum by Patel JCC at paragraph 50 of the precedent-setting judgment in Marx Mupungu v Minister of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs & 6 Ors (CCZ 7/21, 2021) [see: x.com/ProfJNMoyo/sta…], which includes section 95(2) among examples of term-limit provisions. That misconception overlooks a fundamental constitutional imperative: a presidential term-limit provision is, by definition, a disqualifier for election as President. Term limits on presidents are necessarily about elections. They limit qualification for election. Where there is no presidential term limit, re-election is unlimited. In a recent discussion with @DavidHofisi on 23 April 2026 [x.com/TSatNewslive/s…] on the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) Bill hosted by @TSatNewslive, I explained the relationship between the two sections. Below is the verbatim text of the attached clip extracted from the discussion addressing the import of section 91(2) and its relationship with section 95(2): ME: “It’s a clear term limit provision; is similar to term limit provisions in other jurisdictions that are comparable to Zimbabwe. And when you say it doesn’t have time, it doesn’t make reference to time, I’m at a loss as to what that means, and where that is coming from, with respect to Dr Hofisi, because it says a person is disqualified for election as President or appointment as Vice President if he or she has already held office as President under this constitution for two terms. This is the only section which tells us how many terms a President is limited to. Section 95 doesn’t even tell us that he’s limited to one term. There’s no limit. This one limits the President to two terms. And the two terms, the last time I checked, was a reference to time. And in this case, the section doesn’t leave us doubting or not knowing what a term is or what sort of time a term is. Because it continues to say these two terms are counted whether they follow each other or not. But most significantly, for the purpose of the limit on the President, the term limit on the President, which is provided in this section: three or more years. That’s time. You said there’s no time here. Three years is time. The length of time is three years minimum, and the maximum is more. It’s not defined here. It’s three or more years. It’s more because that is subject to what the relevant law about electoral cycles says is the electoral cycle of the institution that the President occupies”. [verbatim text of clip from x.com/i/status/20483…] The 500 km Highway Metaphor: Distinguishing Sections 91(2) and 95(2) of the Constitution To clearly understand the relationship between sections 91(2) and 95(2), imagine the Presidency as a magnificent 500-kilometre highway built and maintained by section 95(2) of the Constitution. This provision creates the presidential highway itself: it defines the office of the President as a permanent public institution and sets the exact length of each single term — currently five years, now proposed under the Bill to be seven years. It establishes a structured, recurring electoral cycle that belongs to the people of Zimbabwe, ensuring regular, orderly renewal of leadership. Without section 95(2), there would be no defined road — only an open plain of indefinite power. Section 91(2) governs the individual truck driver on that highway. It imposes an absolute lifetime limit: no person may complete more than two full trips along this 500 km highway, whether those trips are taken back-to-back or years apart. Any segment of 300 kilometres or more — that is, three or more years in office — counts as one complete trip. There are no partial credits or exceptions. After two full trips, the driver is permanently disqualified from driving on that highway, again. The distinction is sharp and deliberate: Section 95(2) builds the highway and determines the length of each journey. Section 91(2) limits how many times any single individual is permitted to travel it. One structures the office; the other limits the person who occupies it. Together, they form the Constitution’s twin safeguards — working in perfect harmony to keep power temporary, accountable, and subordinate to the will of the people. To conflate their distinct roles is to weaken these vital safeguards and to invite the very tyranny the Constitution was written to prevent. The Profound and Protective Meaning of “Three or More Years” in Section 91(2) of the Constitution At the heart of section 91(2) lies one of the Constitution’s most brilliant safeguards: “for the purpose of this subsection, three or more years’ service is deemed to be a full term.” The word “more” is no mere drafting flourish—it is deliberate constitutional genius. It declares that section 91(2), as the personal lifetime term-limit provision, imposes no rigid numerical ceiling. Subject to what is reasonable and justifiable in a constitutional democracy under section 95(2), service of four years, five years, six years, seven years, or even longer—once it exceeds the three-year threshold—is unequivocally deemed a complete term for the purpose of lifetime disqualification. This flexibility is not a loophole; it is a wise design that refuses to let the term-limit clause under section 91(2) become brittle or easily evaded. This open-ended “more” is anchored in section 91(2)’s harmonious relationship with section 95(2)(b), which defines the official electoral cycle of the Presidency as a permanent public institution whose five-year lifespan is inextricably intertwined with that of Parliament. Section 91(2) places an iron-clad personal disqualification on the individual; section 95(2) defines the dimensions of the highway itself. Crucially, section 95(2) is not a term-limit provision under subsections (1) and (7) of section 328. Unlike the referendum-protected personal term limit in section 91(2), it may be amended by Parliament under section 328(5) without a national referendum. This distinction is no accident; it is constitutional wisdom. It allows the institutional framework of the Presidency to evolve with the nation’s needs while the unbreakable personal lifetime bar on any single individual remains forever sacrosanct. All told, sections 91(2) and 95(2) differ in character and purpose—one limits the President, the other structures the public office or institution of the Presidency—yet they stand together as the Constitution’s twin guardians. This elegant complementarity keeps presidential power temporary, accountable, and forever subordinate to the sovereign will of the people through the institution or office of the Presidency. To respect and defend this relationship is to honour the very soul of the Constitution: ensuring that no individual can ever turn the highway into their driveway—turning the public office into a personal fiefdom—and that the highway of governance remains open, regularly renewed, and eternally in faithful service to the people of Zimbabwe. This is the promise the Constitution makes!

@256Rootyherman @SatibetUganda It will be returning $1.05

1. Get 38M 2. Bet on a big team eg Man City 3. Give it a win every game (1M stake) 4. It must win atleast 30games a season 5. Total profit around 45M

@Ndi_Muvenda_ Tender beef beats pork

Beef. or. Pork

@DannythatGuy That's their own fish to fry, passenger doesn't care 😂. Anenge achitoda kubhadhara $3

How much longer can the current InDrive model last? It can’t cost $5 to go from town to the airport, surely.

@_MWOS Can you sort out the login issue pliz, can't access account from yesterday. Answer to security question irikurambwa futi

Don't miss out on BIG WINS Download the MWOS app now 👇👇 vist.ly/428wu #MWOSMakesWinners #TheHomeOfSportsBetting

@TheHR263 Give me a 1/10 of that amount

Would you rather have this house… or $5 million cash? 💰

@loiceMututuvar1 She aint into politics, she's into being freebies by whoever in exchange for 🐈

@FigoTongai Fleurs de Rocaille

Ndeipi perfume iri cheap but uchipedza zuva rose uchinhuwirira boe. 5 andinawo ose ari useless😅