Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Eaon©
36.5K posts

Eaon©
@eaonp
flâneur | strategy | applied evopsych | memetics and that | ex-superstar DJ
Nowhere, Boredom Katılım Mart 2007
1.4K Takip Edilen4.6K Takipçiler

@Schwartzie14 The jeans were not baggy then. This is so oddly disjointed it is as if AI designed it. The cranberries song was a hit in 93, and I promise, we would have not been caught dead in wide ass jeans in 93. They were skin tight and rolled up.

English

Gapstalgia.
Little Black Book@LBBOnline
Hailey Bieber is bringing '90s denim back to Gap. Produced by Bolded and directed by Charlie Di Placido, the campaign celebrates the launch of The Hailey Jean capsule, taking inspiration from Gap's iconic archive and Hailey's own style. Read more: hubs.la/Q04pMD9z0
Lietuvių

@martinvars Interested to know how many Brits had final tickets. I suspect it will be a small number. Hope you find your four.
English

But what if everything is shit?
Latest in Cosmos@latestincosmos
LATEST🚨: Constant complaining can train your brain to notice more negativity.
English

I wrote this about Count Binface who represents a very tedious strain in British culture
thetimes.com/comment/column…
English

A lot of people maybe unaware but @CountBinface raises money for Shelter through his merchandise sales on his intergalatic website.
Nigel Farage helps himself.
English

DEI agenda pushing ugliness as attractive in lingerie and fashion ads is pure grift. Used to sell desire rooted in real human preferences: symmetry, vitality, charm and genuine attractiveness. Now it's ideological checkboxes flattening standards while mediocrity gets platformed.
Preferences aren't oppression; they're data.
The more they cram in options like freckles, black overload, plus-size, or awkward fits, the clearer the contradiction becomes: firms preach empowerment to customers, yet data from brands that have attempted this proves the market favours aspiration over checkbox diversity.

English

With Mexico playing England at the Azteca Stadium at 7,350 feet, altitude will be a big home advantage. But there's another factor in their favour: the home crowd
Experiments have tried to unpick which aspects of the home advantage influence the result
One study comes from Alan Nevill at the University of Wolverhampton who quantified the impact of the noise of the home crowd
He showed refs video clips of match tackles. Some watched the clips with the stadium crowd noise.
Others watched the same clips, but without sound
Those who watched the quiet clips awarded an average of 14.8 fouls against the home team
But refs who watched the clips with the crowd sounds awarded an average of 12.5 fouls - a decrease of 16%
Nevill argues impact might be due to social pressure of the ref wanting to avoid the displeasure of the home crowd or that sounds act as a subtle cue when interpreting whether a foul has occurred
Either way it shows the genuine value of loud support

English










