“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”

4.7K posts

“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn” banner
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”

“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”

@eclectic_Jae24

Aspiring actor, director, and screenwriter. this is basically just a movie and music commentary page #BlackLivesMatter 🇦🇴🇯🇲

London, England Katılım Ekim 2019
543 Takip Edilen148 Takipçiler
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn” retweetledi
Arsenal
Arsenal@Arsenal·
Arsenal vs PSG 👊 The stage is set ✨
Arsenal tweet media
English
2.7K
14.5K
84.6K
2.2M
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn” retweetledi
Arsenal
Arsenal@Arsenal·
BUDAPEST-BOUND.
Arsenal tweet media
English
2K
29.5K
106.9K
1.9M
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”
Saka deserves to celebrate as hard as he is. He has been the core of the rebuild project for club and country (among others ofc) he’s about to vindicate both projects in a single summer, just you watch.
English
0
0
0
9
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”
Odegaard feels like the hopeful leader of a young revolution, not the ruthless head of a dynasty. I hate to say it but I think Rice is the guy next season.
English
0
0
0
21
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”@eclectic_Jae24·
@CannonCalv39096 @PunaniBlazer @Khanstillday We can all agree on that, or pretty much anyone I know to be honest - however like I said… they were on a date in a fancy restaurant and your mind goes to “how are u dicking my daughter down, the thought of her moaning on ur dick is making me angrryyyhhy” 🤮🤮🤮
English
0
0
0
20
Khan 🧢 🌟
Khan 🧢 🌟@Khanstillday·
He was caught dating his Coworker’s daughter
English
126
294
5.5K
114.5K
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”
I’m not saying he’s right but I remember the country vehemently defending Matt Lucas n little Britain a few years ago
English
0
0
0
21
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”
I’m not saying he’s right but I remember the country vehemently defending Matt Lucas n little Britain a few years ago
English
0
0
0
21
EBL
EBL@EBL2017·
I am beyond calm about Arsenal from here until the end of the season. Last night's emotional outburst from the masses was predictable, but also predictably illogical. In moments like this, true analysts comes to the fore and the weak are separated from the chaff. The charlatan's reveal themselves in broad daylight. Unfortunately, they take up 99.9% of the population. Anybody who complained about Arteta's system, the balance, certain players not succeeding because of the coach, or even those complaining about certain individuals not being up to par are almost all completely mistaken. We learnt nothing new about Arsenal last night. Not one thing. From a tactical or player-based point of view. The reality of the situation is that Arsenal came up against the most in-form team in England and played a rotated team due to injuries. This is not an excuse, as Arsenal should still be beating Southampton, but losing to them becomes less of a surprise when considering the context. Arteta's selection was incredibly balanced. I only saw one other analyst on this platform say this, and he is correct. Completely. Yet he is being 'dragged' for it. The first half performance proved that to be entirely correct, too. Arsenal were dominant against a Southampton team who didn't press. However, Southampton did have some moments. Why? Because Mosquera, White, and Gabriel all made unforced individual errors which negatively impacted the flow of the game. That's football, and it can happen, but it certainly happened far too often last night which made the game basketball-y. Then, as the game wore on, Arsenal got weaker due to their injury situation. It was 1-1 at the time and Arsenal had Dowman in the #10 - a role that is instrumental to organising Arsenal's press and exerting control on the game. As good as Dowman is going forwards, his non-existent attempt at a counter-press for the first goal conceded, lack of defensive intensity, and immaturity to organise the press is why he will only be used as a wildcard late on in games against deep-lying defences or when Arsenal need a goal. Right now, he is a total passenger defensively. Then, to make matters worse, Gabriel came off injured and Havertz came off as well (no doubt to manage his load). Arsenal were simply not as well co-ordinated as they typically are defensively as a consequence of these factors all taken together. Arteta picked a rotated team which got weaker as the game went on. The second goal summed up their issues. Southampton kicked long from a goal kick down Mosquera's side, he failed to win the initial aerial duel, and instead of Arsenal having one of Rice, Merino, or Havertz to compete for the second ball on the left, they had Zubimendi, who also failed to win the duel. From here, Southampton scored in transition. Would that have happened if Arsenal didn't have injuries or need to rest Gabriel, Rice, Merino, or Havertz? No. But it did happen, and knockout football is ruthless. One loss and you're out. But does a rotated and injury-hit Arsenal team losing to Southampton mean that the club are in crisis mode? Or that the system is fundamentally broken? Or that there is genuine concern over the Premier League title race or the Champions League situation? Not to any attentive viewer, no, and here's why: In the Carabao Cup final, City surprised Arsenal tactically. Mikel and his staff should have come up with solutions at half-time, but they did not. Players also could have helped on the day, sure, but they suffered too. But, like I said at the time, would Arsenal rather be surprised tactically in the Carabao Cup final or in the league game against City? The answer is so obviously in the cup final. Now, when the league game comes around, Arsenal will be prepared to face that likely City set-up. Trust me on that. Plus, despite losing to Southampton, the balance in the team was excellent. We saw that in the first half. Just because individual errors and a weakened performance as the game went on may skew that notion does not mean that Arteta's system is flawed or that any individuals are not up to par or anything ridiculous like that. Remember, none of Raya, Timber, Saliba, Hincapié, Calafiori, Zubimendi, Rice, Eze, Saka, Trossard, and Gyökeres started. That is quite literally Arsenal's XI outside of Gabriel, and he came off injured too! Realistically, the argument being thrown about regarding the defeat to Southampton is that because Arsenal's second string XI lost, the entire season is in jeopardy. I mean… come on! What a lot of nonsense! Remove emotion from the situation. Zoom out. Realise that Arsenal are 9 points clear in the Premier League with 7 games to play. City have a game in hand, sure, but that game in hand is against Chelsea away. Plus, Arsenal have to play first in the Premier League against Bournemouth at home, giving them the opportunity to extend the lead to 12 points with 6 games to go. Arsenal are also in the quarter finals of the Champions League against Sporting Lisbon. The weakest team left in the competition. If you said this was the situation to any Arsenal fan at the start of the season, they would have bitten your hand off for it, and rightly so. Plus, I don't buy into the notion that Arsenal are in bad form as they enter the business end of the season. What a whole load of contextless nonsense that is. City sprung a tactical surprise in the final. Arsenal will be better prepared for the league game. Plus, against Southampton, Arsenal played their second string XI. They are one off occurrences. The only legitimate concern Arsenal have at this point is their injury situation. The likes of Timber, Gabriel, Hincapié, Rice, Saka, and Trossard are key figures who Arsenal need to be fit and firing to see out the season. Plus, knowing the freakish nature of these guys, I don't expect them to miss too much football from here on out. They are almost all athletic freaks and mental giants. Outside of that, I couldn't be more calm and confident about the situation. Plus, on a personal level, last night revealed that my mission on this platform is far from complete. I still have so much work to do to educate the masses. So, so much work. I feel outnumbered in this moment, but I will not waver. I never have. Not since 2017. And I am not about to start now. Signing out, EBL.
EBL tweet media
English
479
620
4K
1.1M
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”
2 years ago, Arsenal wanted to ruin your day. Now, they think they’re entitled to their day. That’s the difference.
English
0
0
0
15
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn”@eclectic_Jae24·
I’ve just said to my mum who watches 0 football, that premier league games stop for a couple mins during Ramadan if on field players need to break their fast as a point of fact and she goes “nahhh you’re wrong”. And stuck with it.
English
0
0
0
15
“BECAUSE ITS SO MUCH FUN, jAn” retweetledi
AfcVIP⁴⁹
AfcVIP⁴⁹@VipArsenal·
That Eze goal. On repeat.
GIF
English
14
605
4.4K
70.3K
🇹🇳
🇹🇳@Tounsi_CHF·
It’s a necessary kind of “hypocrisy.” Your husband is not your son, just as your daughter’s fiancé is not your son either. Each of them already has a mother whose role is to love them unconditionally. But beyond that, it is the real world that shapes men into people capable of providing for their families and contributing to society. And that kind of growth rarely happens without the hardships that life deals to what are yet mama’s boys.
English
8
0
5
14K
k
k@alfkkifine·
We women live a terrifying double life. A mother will look at her teenage son with absolute, boundless empathy. She will hold him when he cries, tell him his feelings matter, and pray to God that he finds a woman who loves him for his pure heart, not his wallet. But that exact same woman will turn around and look at her husband, who is literally someone else’s grown son and treat him like a malfunctioning piece of farm equipment if he loses his job or shows a moment of emotional fragility. We completely compartmentalize the fact that the men we drain, stress out, and demand traditional protection from were once little boys who were promised that their hearts mattered. ​ Look at the advice mothers pass down. It is pure, unfiltered hypocrisy. We sit our daughters down and say: "Never settle. Make sure he is a provider. If he is struggling financially, do not build him up, leave him. You deserve a King." But if a mother catches wind that her son's girlfriend is treating him that way? If her son loses his job and his girlfriend packs her bags? That mother will lose her mind. She will call the girlfriend a gold-digger. She will call her toxic. We are actively raising our daughters to become the exact type of women we pray our sons never meet.
k@alfkkifine

what opinion about men do you have that makes people feel like this???

English
261
1.5K
12.1K
1.2M