Ed Briscoe

@JoshEakle A triumph of capitalism built on government funded basic research and enormous guaranteed funding from the government.

@Coyote_Clay @furkattt3849721 @ABC It seems you have never been on a college campus. Police are very visibility present and have far quicker response times than city or county police. Yet, you want to act like that isn’t relevant. The threat of being confronted is no deterrent to a person seeking to kill.

@furkattt3849721 @edbriscoe @ABC “UNC police has their own armed patrol” Me: Police show up after a crime is committed that rarely if ever stop a crime. You: but they have their own police Me: well, I will wait 20 minutes for police to show up after the bad guy arrives. Makes total sense.

BREAKING: UNC-Chapel Hill under lockdown after police received reports of an "armed and dangerous" person on or near the campus. trib.al/RGx05GF

@Coyote_Clay @furkattt3849721 @ABC The US has a higher percentage of gun owners and looser laws around carrying them in public than any other wealthy country. Yet, we are the only ones that regularly see massacres at concerts, malls, churches, festivals, and schools. Your solution has already been proven bogus.

@edbriscoe @furkattt3849721 @ABC Police show up 20 minutes after a crime occurs. This really isn’t hard to understand. A gun free zone is for civilians. So the dangerous man goes to a gun free zone, while you think Chief Wiggum is your protection

@Coyote_Clay @furkattt3849721 @ABC Again. UNC has its own armed police force on campus all the time. Shooters are already prepared to die. Anyone with an AR-15 can kill a dozen people in 30 seconds. No number of armed citizens will ever stop it.

@edbriscoe @furkattt3849721 @ABC Not exactly sure what you are trying to point out. Police show up after a crime occurs. The guy was wondering where the civilian Rittenhouse was. The campus is gone free. The campus police sit around giving parking tickets until a crime occurs.

@Coyote_Clay @furkattt3849721 @ABC The UNC police department has 79 officers. police.unc.edu/recruitment/

@furkattt3849721 @ABC Chapel Hill Campus is a gun free zone. So go figure the armed dangerous man, ignored it.

@ErikWilgus @ALVC7001 @bareftnlady @plus1voice @Amer_icanbadass @JoJoFromJerz @JoeBiden It doesn’t matter that a president would declassify information that would put our country, our military, and our informants around the world at great risk? Your loyalty seems to be to Trump and not our country.

@edbriscoe @ALVC7001 @bareftnlady @plus1voice @Amer_icanbadass @JoJoFromJerz @JoeBiden Doesn't matter what it was cause the power was still there to do so . Point is mute

I’m pretty sure that if I stole a shit-ton of classified national security documents, and then when asked to return them, I said I didn’t have them, and for two years, I moved them all around my house to hide them, including into my bathroom when I wasn’t showing them off to random people while also telling those people that I knew that I wasn’t really allowed to show them… that when I finally got charged with the many national security imperiling crimes I had committed — that a federal judge wouldn’t be like - ‘Meh, no hurry… get here when ya get here’. But what do I know.

@ErikWilgus @ALVC7001 @bareftnlady @plus1voice @Amer_icanbadass @JoJoFromJerz @JoeBiden So, you think Trump should have declassified our war plans against Iran, nuclear secrets, and identities of informants in hostile countries?

@ALVC7001 @bareftnlady @plus1voice @edbriscoe @Amer_icanbadass @JoJoFromJerz @JoeBiden It's the fact that this practice has been done by several presidents and other elected persons. It's also a great example of 2 tier justice. Trump had the power to declassify any document. If he failed to follow a procedure It's a technical issue but right away the haters jump.

@ErikWilgus @ALVC7001 @bareftnlady @plus1voice @Amer_icanbadass @JoJoFromJerz @JoeBiden The law says there has to be evidence of intention for it to be a crime.

@ALVC7001 @bareftnlady @plus1voice @edbriscoe @Amer_icanbadass @JoJoFromJerz @JoeBiden Sounds good but it's oranges and oranges when the law states who and where these documents can be in possession of . Doesn't say if you are a good sport and hand them over after several decades all is good.

@anuibi @Jason 91 indictments to zero is not a compromise. It’s a free pass to a prolific felon.

Pardon trump and Biden families, in exchange for never running for president again. Everyone moves on!

@micahsb @Jason This it proof they are finally acknowledging that Trump is guilty. Let’s call that progress.

@EdKrassen Just another scam to sucker more people into giving money to him.

BREAKING: Trump just announced that he will be releasing a report on "election fraud" in Georgia. He just posted on Truth Social: "A Large, Complex, Detailed but Irrefutable REPORT on the Presidential Election Fraud which took place in Georgia is almost complete & will be presented by me at a major News Conference at 11:00 A.M. on Monday of next week in Bedminster, New Jersey. Based on the results of this CONCLUSIVE Report, all charges should be dropped against me & others - There will be a complete EXONERATION! They never went after those that Rigged the Election. They only went after those that fought to find the RIGGERS!" The problem is, however, that even if there was widespread voter fraud, which there is no proof of at this time, it doesn't give Trump nor his alleged co-conspirators the right to break the law, commit fraud, intimidate election workers, or create a conspiracy to change votes. There is a legal way to go about it, and Trump attempted that and failed. When he failed, he allegedly took illegal actions to try overturn the US elections. That's not how the law or the US Constitution works.

🚨 BREAKING Jamie Raskin announced today that congressional Democrats will be releasing a report detailing all the money the Trump family received from foreign governments while in office. Who else agrees it's way past time for Jared, Ivanka, and Don Jr. to be under the microscope just as much as Hunter Biden has been? 👋

@JDStorm1970 @RickShag @MakeTexasBlue22 There is only one side that ended our history of peaceful transfers of power and were ready to support authoritarian rule as long as they were in on it.

@RickShag @MakeTexasBlue22 Yes, explaining that the article was calling out both sides. My autocorrect changed perceived to preceded made the post a little less clear. See you only blame one side.

So it turns out that the credit downgrade the United States received had little or nothing to do with Biden; the main reasons listed on the report were Republican's fighting on the debt ceiling and January 6th. Trump has a way of screwing our economy even when he isn't in office. Democrats always cleaning up Republican economies.

@JDStorm1970 @RickShag @MakeTexasBlue22 There is only one side that threatens to default on our debt and shut down government functions when their guy isn’t president.

@laurchas22 It was a sad realization that these mission trips are really just a product the people doing the actual work had to sell in order to get financial support from church people. I don’t blame them. I blame the consumers.

Not pictured on Instagram- however- is this married man’s bumble profile-🤦🏽‍♀️ like? Are all married men on dating apps? How does my single friend keep seeing the husbands of all the good Christian people we know? I’m in a simulation right? This can’t be real.

Imagine spending more on the plane tickets then on the actual project itself to take your family on a “missions” trip and bragging about it on Instagram thinking you actually did something good. What have we done? Is this really Christianity?

@bhallcpa A completely reasonable exchange of value. Some screen time is well worth the dinner time conversation.

Lazy parenting: Giving your toddlers a tablet during a meal at a restaurant to keep the occupied. (At least that’s what I used to think) Funny how having your own toddlers changes your perspective.

The name and logo of every company I made up in high school.

@ChrissySnow1970 @TheMattBeebe As usual, these clowns exploit ignorance to make up baseless conspiracy theories and “arguments”.

@TheMattBeebe Elected officials do not have to have security clearances. news.clearancejobs.com/2020/11/30/for…

Interesting nugget from last week's trial transcript: if Bratt is correct that Trump "never had a clearance", then it explains their hail-Mary attempt with the Espionage Act claims -- he wouldn't have ever signed an SF312 which would make a more traditional "Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material" charge under 18 USC § 1924 easier. *I had always assumed he would have signed an SF312 as a *candidate* sometime during the 2016 campaign once they started giving him classified briefings; but apparently when that started happening for him and Hillary in Aug 2016, candidates did "not require separate security clearances before the briefings " according to James Clapper, DNI **or at a minimum once he was President-elect, but not yet sworn in, he would have signed one. Obviously once he became President, he had access to classified by virtue of being CINC, but that's different than "having a clearance" -- Bratt's acknowledgement here is a tacit admission that a CINC doesn't need a "clearance" to have access to classified (that will matter later).

@RightWingTots @drawandstrike @barnes_law So a president supposedly declassified the identities of our informants overseas, war strategies, and nuclear secrets is one you want to be president again? thehill.com/policy/nationa…

In case you are wondering why I **never** took Jack Smith's 'classified documents' indictment seriously, here's a clue. Jay Bratt attempting to argue that the former President didn't have the 'right kind of security clearance', the inference being he's trying to assert these documents not only are still classified, Trump had no authorization to ever even view or handle them. It's **all** bullshit.