Ed Landon

393 posts

Ed Landon banner
Ed Landon

Ed Landon

@edlndn

head of product at @meetLCA

Katılım Ocak 2022
522 Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Ed Landon
Ed Landon@edlndn·
if your “moat” can be saved in markdown files then it’s not much of a moat
English
0
0
0
31
Ed Landon
Ed Landon@edlndn·
@sciencegirl alright can someone please recommend me a 3d printer, I need to print these asap.
English
1
0
1
1.2K
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
Kame is a compact, open-source, 3D-printable quadruped robot that mimics animal-like movement.
English
97
610
5.9K
453.4K
Jesse Genet
Jesse Genet@jessegenet·
@edlndn @openclaw @daylightco I want this, so far everything I’ve built has a level of customization and bugs I know about that feel a bit too rough to ship without instructions but I want to get there soon and just share so people don’t double up on my efforts
English
4
0
12
831
Jesse Genet
Jesse Genet@jessegenet·
Built my dream phonics / reading app using my @openclaw team for my @daylightco e-ink device Now reading lessons can happen outdoors, total game changer for my kids moods on tough days ⛰️🌷
English
27
17
502
61.4K
Ed Landon retweetledi
Olivia Moore
Olivia Moore@omooretweets·
Petition to normalize saying “compacting our conversation so we can keep chatting” in social situations
English
23
12
165
11.1K
Jibran
Jibran@Jibran_05·
how to design your app to go viral on TikTok the number one metric to go viral is: "how visually and conceptually different is my product from what users are already familiar with" if your UI looks like existing apps, you'll have to rely on tangential content formats to go viral, - skits that subtly allude to your app - long text walls that briefly mention your product - comment farming on competitors Gabble (the app I'm transforming in 30 days) has a unique idea: "argue with AI" The UI, however, isn't visually distinct from ChatGPT voice mode (or Character AI, etc) We spent a few hours redesigning it, focused on 2 things: 1) What visual cues imply competition 2) What visually stops someone from scrolling The second image shows the results. Brighter colors, visual cues suggesting progress, and the UI suggests some sense of urgency to keep viewers engaged throughout the video. We're going to start finding formats and creators over the next few days to test out this new UI and see how it performs. This is Day 1 of taking Gabble and @kitakinluyi to #1 on the AppStore in 30 days.
Jibran tweet mediaJibran tweet media
English
9
4
106
29.3K
Ed Landon
Ed Landon@edlndn·
You can make beautiful things or you can make useful things. But know that AI will make all the useful things. So if you're going to do that, make the useful things beautiful.
English
0
0
1
66
Native
Native@nativestudio_·
Last week, we hosted our first Native Experience, a founders iftar in San Francisco. The theme was “the seeds we sow.” Ramadan is about reflecting on words, habits, and company. We wanted to explore what it meant to bring those same intentions to our work.
Native tweet mediaNative tweet mediaNative tweet mediaNative tweet media
English
4
3
31
8.7K
Ed Landon
Ed Landon@edlndn·
I asked @grok to recreate this image for when robots like optimus are around. i really didn't want to do this but i couldn't escape the thought while staring at the chart. i do think it's important to think deeply about this now. but the TL;DR is that the chart measures tasks. the careers of tomorrow clearly aren't ones on this chart. what's left is Trust, Presence, Taste and Art. I have a lot of thoughts on Art and will write about it soon.
Ed Landon tweet media
Ed Landon@edlndn

alright, 100 thoughts about this chart. let's go. 1. Your parents told you the blue zone was safe, they lied (don't blame them though, how were they supposed to know? 2. remote work really fucked us. that was the dress rehearsal. if you can do your job from home, it can be done by AI 3. your barber's job is safe. your barber's accountant's job is not. 4. the blue is what AI will take over. the red is what it's already taking over. the gap between them is borrowed time. 5. "computer & math" have the highest observed usage. it means programmers aren't in denial - they already know. 6. nobody in construction is worried about AI 7. lawyer's seem to have a massive theoretical exposure but little observed usage. i've seen takes on both sides of this....are they sleepwalking into it? 🤔 8. In 1995, the internet had a similar chart, theoretical exposure everywhere, but observed usage nowhere. that took ten years....how long will it take this time? 9. they should've called this "the map of commoditization" 10. the red area is also a spending chart. that's where the money is flowing right now (computer & math, a little bit of business & finance. everything else is pre-revenue.) 11. most dangerous positions right now are high blue but low red. 12. in 10+ years, the highest paid people won't be in any of these categories. they'll be in categories that don't exist. 13. once 'trust arrives', red catches the blue overnight. i don't think it'll be gradual. 14. "highest status jobs" of the last ten years happen to be the most exposed in 2026. Status is a lagging indicator. 15. we spent 50 years building an economy that rewards people who work with information. well...turns out ai eats information for breakfast. 16. when the output is free, the only thing left to charge for is taste, curation and trust. but if you're reading this, you already know that. 17. this chart measures tasks. it doesn't measure meaning. what are the jobs where the meaning is the task? maybe those are the ones to get into. 18. thinking is a commodity. presenece is a luxury. 19. job titles are becoming meaningless. two people called "designer" will have completely different exposure levels based on whether their work is reproducable. 20. adoption isn't slow because the tools are bad. i think adoption is slow because acceptance is painful (speaking from my own experience) 21. if you rotate the circle, the blue part looks like a crown. i never said these thoughts would be good. the crown is heavy. 22. thinking about law school as well. tuition is $200k. we're training people for the blue zone. that has to collapse somehow. applies to a lot of other fields too. 23. there's going to be a huge mental health crisis. not from ai taking jobs, but for the folks who made their identity all around the skills that will get commoditized. 24. "food and serving" is nearly untouched. someone asked me about those robots in restaurants that bring your food. pretty sure humans will always want ot be served by humans. that preference isn't going away. if anything, it's going to become a premium. 25. this chart is going to redraw the geography of wealth. cities full of knowledge workers are exposed, but the towns full of tradespeople are not. 26. SF is in the blue zone. 27. re: education; AI will replace the lecture. It will not replace the teacher who noticed a kid was struggling and pulled them aside. 28. you will tell your kids one day "i got paid six figures to organized information". Their kids will not understand. 29. turns out "learn to code" advice is like the "learn to type" advice of its era. useful for a window until that window closes. 30. i need to go back to this remote thing. the whole "work from home forever" now looks a lot like a trap. we optimized for comfort....we needed to optimize for irreplaceability. 31. rest assured, this chart does not show what comes after. there's a lot to be optimistic about, when the blue fills in the red, new categories will emerge. the automobile didn't create "car repair" as a category until cars existed (not the best example but you get it). 33. this chart says nothing about entrepreneurship because entrepreneurship isn't a job category. It's a bet. And the smart bet just moved from "I can think better" to "I can be present better." alright, didn't make it to 100 but i got to go. I may finish this later. this is the type of chart that can lead to a lot of anxiety, but I think it's important to start thinking about what comes after. more on that soon.

English
1
0
0
60
Ed Landon
Ed Landon@edlndn·
alright, 100 thoughts about this chart. let's go. 1. Your parents told you the blue zone was safe, they lied (don't blame them though, how were they supposed to know? 2. remote work really fucked us. that was the dress rehearsal. if you can do your job from home, it can be done by AI 3. your barber's job is safe. your barber's accountant's job is not. 4. the blue is what AI will take over. the red is what it's already taking over. the gap between them is borrowed time. 5. "computer & math" have the highest observed usage. it means programmers aren't in denial - they already know. 6. nobody in construction is worried about AI 7. lawyer's seem to have a massive theoretical exposure but little observed usage. i've seen takes on both sides of this....are they sleepwalking into it? 🤔 8. In 1995, the internet had a similar chart, theoretical exposure everywhere, but observed usage nowhere. that took ten years....how long will it take this time? 9. they should've called this "the map of commoditization" 10. the red area is also a spending chart. that's where the money is flowing right now (computer & math, a little bit of business & finance. everything else is pre-revenue.) 11. most dangerous positions right now are high blue but low red. 12. in 10+ years, the highest paid people won't be in any of these categories. they'll be in categories that don't exist. 13. once 'trust arrives', red catches the blue overnight. i don't think it'll be gradual. 14. "highest status jobs" of the last ten years happen to be the most exposed in 2026. Status is a lagging indicator. 15. we spent 50 years building an economy that rewards people who work with information. well...turns out ai eats information for breakfast. 16. when the output is free, the only thing left to charge for is taste, curation and trust. but if you're reading this, you already know that. 17. this chart measures tasks. it doesn't measure meaning. what are the jobs where the meaning is the task? maybe those are the ones to get into. 18. thinking is a commodity. presenece is a luxury. 19. job titles are becoming meaningless. two people called "designer" will have completely different exposure levels based on whether their work is reproducable. 20. adoption isn't slow because the tools are bad. i think adoption is slow because acceptance is painful (speaking from my own experience) 21. if you rotate the circle, the blue part looks like a crown. i never said these thoughts would be good. the crown is heavy. 22. thinking about law school as well. tuition is $200k. we're training people for the blue zone. that has to collapse somehow. applies to a lot of other fields too. 23. there's going to be a huge mental health crisis. not from ai taking jobs, but for the folks who made their identity all around the skills that will get commoditized. 24. "food and serving" is nearly untouched. someone asked me about those robots in restaurants that bring your food. pretty sure humans will always want ot be served by humans. that preference isn't going away. if anything, it's going to become a premium. 25. this chart is going to redraw the geography of wealth. cities full of knowledge workers are exposed, but the towns full of tradespeople are not. 26. SF is in the blue zone. 27. re: education; AI will replace the lecture. It will not replace the teacher who noticed a kid was struggling and pulled them aside. 28. you will tell your kids one day "i got paid six figures to organized information". Their kids will not understand. 29. turns out "learn to code" advice is like the "learn to type" advice of its era. useful for a window until that window closes. 30. i need to go back to this remote thing. the whole "work from home forever" now looks a lot like a trap. we optimized for comfort....we needed to optimize for irreplaceability. 31. rest assured, this chart does not show what comes after. there's a lot to be optimistic about, when the blue fills in the red, new categories will emerge. the automobile didn't create "car repair" as a category until cars existed (not the best example but you get it). 33. this chart says nothing about entrepreneurship because entrepreneurship isn't a job category. It's a bet. And the smart bet just moved from "I can think better" to "I can be present better." alright, didn't make it to 100 but i got to go. I may finish this later. this is the type of chart that can lead to a lot of anxiety, but I think it's important to start thinking about what comes after. more on that soon.
Ed Landon tweet media
English
0
0
1
116
Ed Landon
Ed Landon@edlndn·
.@claudeai is shipping at record speeds, but man is it buggy. it was a good reminder before I got locked in entirely that I needed to have a context loaded back up model on deck.
English
0
0
1
41
Ed Landon retweetledi
Mike Brennan
Mike Brennan@mileximike·
Cheers to Theo and Ed from @meetLCA on AX: The Rise of Agentic Experience. I impulse bought a copy late last year and the more I consume the more I see their content materializing in subtle, but profound ways. Invisible IU is a fascination I cannot shake.
Mike Brennan tweet mediaMike Brennan tweet mediaMike Brennan tweet media
English
1
1
2
133
Ed Landon
Ed Landon@edlndn·
there's a 3rd lane personal software = built for one premium software = built for depth and lifestyle software = built for identity ppl will flock to the third / only way to escape commoditization AND the middle. e.g. figma isn't just "deep", it's a culture. notion isn't just 'premium', its a personality type. function vs. meaning is the real split.
English
0
0
0
13
Carl Rivera
Carl Rivera@carlrivera·
The new bar for software: "can I vibecode this?" We’re heading into a world of personal software — built for one person and their needs — and premium software, designed with such depth that you’re buying a solution, not a tool. Most software today sits in the middle. And the middle is death. As the market catches up to our new reality, it won’t just be the ai bubble popping — it’ll be a lot of traditional SaaS getting wiped out (From my recent Kinference talk.)
English
26
63
718
98.4K
Ed Landon
Ed Landon@edlndn·
I think this take is correct (although I hope it's wrong). The big risk for a company becoming api-first is that they get reduced down to just... plumbing to the layer above. I'm reminded of one of my favorite takes "the future of brands belongs to those that offer asirpiration povs to niche communities". maybe we see a split where every product separates either into a utility product (gl) or a lifestyle product.
English
0
0
0
13
signüll
signüll@signulll·
serious question, if everything goes api first what’s the actual business model for many companies? yah you can charge for usage. but over time, what durable value are you providing beyond being a glorified database + some endpoints? the value will almost always accrue in the layer above you which is the agent / product that composes your api into a full experience. & if more people rely on your api indirectly (through agents), that just increases the odds you get disintermediated. obviously there are categories where the api is the product cuz it sits on real business logic, regulated rails, or state you can’t easily replicate. but in a lot of software, especially with ai collapsing business logic into prompts + tool calls, api first feels less like a moat & more like a fast path to commoditization.
Aaron Levie@levie

In a world of openclaw, codex, claude code/cowork, manus, and other agentic systems, it’s becoming clear that the future of software has to be API-first, but also enable human interaction for verification, collaboration with agents and people, and working on the output. It’s generally been the case that software was built for people first and foremost, and then APIs are exposed for other systems to connect into that tool or data. But if we imagine a world where AI agents are doing 10X or 100X more work with software than people, then this paradigm is flipped. Software becomes API-first, with ways of having humans be able to work effectively with the agent, either through a UI as relevant, or chat. If you’re not API-first, then you’re nearly DOA to agents.

English
73
16
412
80.4K
Ed Landon
Ed Landon@edlndn·
netflix was the original slop 🤔
English
0
0
1
65