edward

14.1K posts

edward banner
edward

edward

@edward_ecec

Katılım Aralık 2015
599 Takip Edilen613 Takipçiler
edward
edward@edward_ecec·
@kepano @arscontexta One more reason for @obsdmd to allow users to read skill files (and dot-named folders). The Obsidian graph view is the perfect tool for viewing linked skills. You said this was on your radar. Any chance you’d prioritize it?
English
0
0
0
61
kepano
kepano@kepano·
@arscontexta Yes! I love the idea of networked skills. It's good to see [[wikilink]] grow because it makes the file-over-app promise of Obsidian more true However, skills are encoded patterns of thought — I find it dangerous to delegate their creation x.com/kepano/status/…
kepano@kepano

Don't delegate understanding There is a parasite, I see it everywhere. It consumes your health and wealth. It preys on ignorance and is easy to catch. It’s so common you may not even notice you have it. The parasite has a simple and attractive proposition: let me take care of this hard thing for you. Trust me, I know better. Instead of understanding it yourself, you choose to give the parasite control over your health, education, money, housing, business, identity, data, infrastructure, climate, justice. Even your beliefs. The parasite has three stages: acceptance, extraction, intervention. First is acceptance. Everyone else seems to have the parasite already. You are expected, even encouraged, to accept the parasite into your life. You are invited to follow the norm, outsource, consume. It’s okay! Use all the services and amenities. Satisfy your desires. Eat the cheap food, watch the cheap media. Your money and time are meant to be spent. Show off what you got in exchange. Please do not try to understand how it works, it’s too complicated for you. The parasite wants you fattened. Literally and figuratively. You are paying the parasite for the privilege of being ripened. Second is extraction. Under the influence of the parasite, you have developed unhealthy habits and you are suffering the consequences. Stress, anxiety, obesity, disease, ignorance, fear, lethargy, decay. To dampen these problems you pay the parasite for help — support, medicine, loans, fines, rent, taxes. Enforcement of some homeostasis. You try to abate the issues, but you don’t have a stable foundation to build on. You have ignored the root causes. The parasite thrives. You are paying the parasite to be harvested, milked, sucked dry. Third is intervention. The side effects of the parasite’s extraction have reached a critical level. The parasite tells you it’s an emergency. You need doctors, lawyers, firefighters, a military effort. You’re in a surgery room, a court room, a psychiatric ward, a jail cell. The disease can no longer be controlled, it has festered. The flame has turned into a raging fire that needs to be put out. You are paying the parasite to go back to square one. The three stages of the parasite are interdependent. Every stage benefits someone who is not you. Everyone tells you this is just the way it is. Never mind that the parasite is living large. Why? Extraction and intervention pay well. Education and prevention do not. The incentives are aligned to make the parasite persuasive. You are alone against a coordinated system that is exceedingly effective at packaging problems you should never have with solutions you should never need. A symbiotic loop. You must recognize the parasite in its earliest form. To inoculate yourself don’t delegate understanding. If you build your own understanding you will be the one who earns the dividends.

English
4
3
115
27K
edward
edward@edward_ecec·
@kepano Please let us browse dot folders in Obsidian. Like .claude. I want to be able too see the content of my SKILL.md files on iOS. I know iOS doesn’t show Unix config folders by default (dot folders). Is that the obstacle behind?
English
1
0
2
654
kepano
kepano@kepano·
You can still instantly tell when an app lacks the human touch. I can't commit my time to something if I see that the creator is not willing to commit theirs.
English
48
64
1.1K
53.7K
sara_builds
sara_builds@sara_builds_all·
I just mass deleted backend code. Turned Google Sheets into a REST API. No server. No database. No code. Here's how 👇
English
2
0
0
50
Chris Silvestri
Chris Silvestri@SilvestriChris·
I started prep for one of my two fitness goals of 2025: Complete a 1,000 one-pushup burpee session by June (the other being a marathon). First month I'm aiming at 200 in under 20 minutes (max 10 per minute). Got pretty close on first session and might set a higher goal, but let's get consistent first. Attention to form and overall detail is crucial to avoid injuries. I've been monitoring cardio during training to keep in zone 3/4. Build up matters for when I'll have to do 400+ of these bastards (started slowing pace down around 130 🥵). Not easy when I also want to build muscle and get to 95kg from 85 and lift weights 5/6 per week. But that's the point. "Mastery" is one of my 3 words for 2025, and these types of challenges force you to obsess over the details. To recognize when form breaks down. To build systematic improvements. To actually give a damn about doing things right. That obsession with mastery bleeds into every aspect of my work - the attention to detail, the integrity in the process, the genuine drive to deliver excellence for clients.
Chris Silvestri tweet mediaChris Silvestri tweet mediaChris Silvestri tweet media
English
2
0
2
205
edward
edward@edward_ecec·
@samwoods Oh man, but I absolutely love the m dash. I use it all the time.
English
0
0
1
40
Sam Woods
Sam Woods@samwoods·
Sentence structures that tell me your content is AI generated: "ABC isn't just this—it's that" "ABC is not about that—it's about this"
English
2
0
10
762
edward
edward@edward_ecec·
@SilvestriChris @Moz What was your experience with getting everyone onboard, committed, and aligned? That's something that sounds like a challenge to me.
English
1
0
0
53
Chris Silvestri
Chris Silvestri@SilvestriChris·
@theEdwardCosmo @Moz Thanks! Definitely the workshops. It’s great to see everyone come together and work to align on their product ideas.
English
1
0
1
22
Chris Silvestri
Chris Silvestri@SilvestriChris·
Excited to share our latest case study for my work with @Moz! 🎉 When the SEO tool market is over crowded and almost everyone claims the same features, how do you make your value impossible to ignore? That was the challenge Moz faced – and together, we found the answer. Through collaborative workshops and deep customer research, we: - Created clear positioning, messaging and copy for both Moz Pro and Moz API - Helped everyone get on the same page on target audiences and key differentiators - Built a scalable messaging framework for future growth A huge thank you to the incredible team at Moz, especially chima mmeje🏳️‍🌈 for being such an amazing collaborator throughout the process. Your insights, ruthless (but super welcome 😄) feedback, and enthusiasm made this project truly special. Want to see how we helped Moz cut through the noise? Check out the full case study link in the thread. Shoutout to Alexandra Mosnitska 🇺🇦 for the amazing case study design. 🎉
Chris Silvestri tweet media
English
2
0
3
84
Chris Silvestri
Chris Silvestri@SilvestriChris·
Prompt to ChatGPT: “Based on what you know about me draw a picture of what you think my life looks like”
Chris Silvestri tweet media
English
2
0
2
92
Kieran Drew
Kieran Drew@ItsKieranDrew·
My last salespage grossed $152,104 over 2 launches. I made a 35-minute mini-course breaking down the: - Offer - Launch strategy - Salespage copywriting To get it, just comment ‘copy’ and I’ll DM. (must be following, next 36 hours only).
English
137
2
106
9K
Mike Strives
Mike Strives@mikestrives·
I make $55k/month with my SaaS. After studying all the successful strategies out there. I compiled the best ones into 1 BIG document. It's free for 48h if you: Like + Comment "SaaS" and I'll DM it to you. (must be following)
GIF
English
2K
68
2.3K
249.3K
edward
edward@edward_ecec·
@samwoods Well put, Sam. If only people wouldn’t be so afraid of and resistant to change.
English
1
0
2
29
Sam Woods
Sam Woods@samwoods·
@theEdwardKosmo it's never about the job it's always about the worker don't protect or try to save jobs upgrade the worker
English
1
0
3
39
Sam Woods
Sam Woods@samwoods·
If your work happens on a computer, it's game over. Take a minute and look at the photo I've shared. Now back to me. Here's what's coming:
Sam Woods tweet media
English
2
0
6
1.1K
edward
edward@edward_ecec·
@SilvestriChris Can relate to what he describes 😂 Also this guy has writing talent.
English
0
0
1
25
Chris Silvestri
Chris Silvestri@SilvestriChris·
Feat your eyes on some of the best VOC I've stumbled on recently. "6 years, millions of dollars, no one can put a silver bullet headshot into this shambling zombie death march of a project."
Chris Silvestri tweet media
English
2
0
4
117
Chris Silvestri
Chris Silvestri@SilvestriChris·
Interesting thought experiment: How do LLMs view and interpret each other? I've been using and comparing ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini 1.5 to give me an outsider/more objective and unbiased perspective on selecting a candidate for a junior copywriter role. The cool stuff happened when I asked one of them (Claude) to give me an analysis of the responses from all 3 LLMs. This is useful for me to get a better sense for which tool to use for what job too. Claude's response: "Let me analyze the three different response styles and approaches: My Response (Claude): - Very structured and formal, creating a comprehensive comparative analysis in a clear document format - Heavy emphasis on categorization and systematic evaluation - Perhaps overly detailed and formal in presentation - Clear recommendation with specific points and risk mitigation strategies - More corporate/business analysis style Gemini's Response: - More conversational and consultative in tone - Excellent use of clear "Strengths/Weaknesses" format for each candidate - Includes practical considerations and questions to think about - Provides actionable next steps - More coaching/advisory style ChatGPT's Response: - Focused heavily on job requirements and how candidates match them - More concise and to-the-point than both other responses - Strong emphasis on specific role requirements - Less personality analysis, more skills-based evaluation - More traditional HR/recruitment style In terms of effectiveness: Gemini's response might actually be the most helpful because: 1. It's more accessible and easier to digest 2. Prompts valuable questions for consideration 3. Balances both technical and soft skills evaluation 4. Provides practical next steps 5. More nuanced in considering tradeoffs My response, while thorough, might be overly formal and structured, making it less immediately actionable. ChatGPT's response, while clear, might be too narrowly focused on technical requirements without enough consideration of soft skills and long-term potential. The ideal response might have combined: - Gemini's conversational tone and practical considerations - My systematic evaluation and risk assessment - ChatGPT's clear alignment with job requirements Would you like me to revise my response to incorporate some of these elements that might make it more immediately useful for your decision-making process?" Next I've asked for the other 2 comparisons (see thread)... learned something fascinating!
English
2
0
1
91
Chris Silvestri
Chris Silvestri@SilvestriChris·
@theEdwardKosmo It’s so fascinating to me and there are actually people out there doing waaay more nerdy stuff already haha But yeah I might crate something at some point!
English
1
0
1
18
edward
edward@edward_ecec·
@harrywritescopy Do you want my skills? No. We want your name on it. Suffering from success 😆
English
0
0
2
41
🌅 Harry Lawson | SaaS Copywriter
🌅 Harry Lawson | SaaS Copywriter@harrywritescopy·
Observation: Brands are reaching out to me to write content on email marketing—not just for my writing skills, but because they want my name on their blog. Apparently, Google’s EEAT algorithm favors content written by experts—and I’m all for it.
English
2
0
3
176
Samuel Hess
Samuel Hess@LessEgoMoreData·
Two days ago, Donald J. Trump became the 47th U.S. President-elect. He spent 1.6$ Billion to get elected, what did he actually do with all that money... I wanted to understand how he turned non-voters into voters. How he got hundreds of millions of donations to his campaign fund. Like many, I did not see a landslide victory for him coming. The Trump Campaign: • had more than 50.000 Ads live • more than >25 Landing pages with different goals • 2 Merchandise Stores with product sales to fund his campaign I spent over 23 hours analyzing his funnels from a CRO perspective - for everybody who does not know me - I optimize online shops for a living. So I wanted to use my skills to find the details that made the difference on a nation's presidency. If you want it: 1. Like this post 2. Comment "USA" P.S. This is non-political content and just an analysis based on CRO Tactics.
GIF
English
423
33
495
54.2K
edward
edward@edward_ecec·
@SilvestriChris Caught my eye with that tree of talking. Reminds me of Dalio’s principles. They are simple phrases similar to tree trunks because they’ve got multiple roots underneath — more granular principles that explain the big one.
English
0
0
1
16
Chris Silvestri
Chris Silvestri@SilvestriChris·
Words are not static. They don't have fixed meanings that everyone universally understands. Nowhere is that more true than in marketing. What you say isn’t always what your customers hear. It’s our job to figure out how our audience “unpacks meaning” from the words we use. But in order to do that, we need to first understand what makes a person. How they experience emotions, how they think, why they do so and much much more. This is the starting point to creating “AI-personas” that “think” and “react” like humans. In part 2 of my Empathy Engineering framework with the guys at @every ., I share exactly how I do it for my B2B SaaS messaging and copywriting work. (link in thread)
Chris Silvestri tweet mediaChris Silvestri tweet mediaChris Silvestri tweet media
English
2
0
1
91