Enthymeme

Has no one ever told women that we all do this? Dating apps are porn content, with the added boost of maybe being able to fuck the girls for real if you play it right. One handed swiping is 50% of it. Don't worry, he's mixing you in with the other roster prospects too. Now probably making you all orgy blow him with AI. We've been spending most our lives living in a gooner's paradise. And we'll spend the rest of it there too. Just be flattered. He could jack off to anything and you're still being included in that. Probably won't last so enjoy it while it does. Women will complain about anything...

"All restrictions on expressions of male YOUTH vitality would have to stop" can't emphasize enough the importance of age anxiety for TFR. Simultaneously social media proves the prime beauty and lifestyle of youth and polices its "purity" from base instincts, objectification, and even slight age gaps. Men and women both make precious their youth and fear aging, as loss of being and of access. But the fear is channeled into false hope and even rejection of sexuality itself. People want to "get the most out of" their youth even well after the beauty and lifestyle themselves have decayed, leverage they attempt to recoup with prestige jobs and materialistic veneers of beauty. The illusion must be shattered of Erotic Overtime, which relies on taboo of youth. 35 year olds play 20 year olds in movies, but it has always been the teenage heartthrob who generates obsessive fangirls.

“Ephebophilia” isn’t real

Baudrillard predicted social media and dating apps: "nothing will be left to chance." There are infinite options easily accessible to everyone. Always a hope to find someone better, bleeding into all offline life. And all social status is instantly semiotically legible, "doomed to the descriptive transparency of mechanisms of information." The infinity of perceived chance online becomes total absence of chance offline, as the expected value of socializing goes down and the perceived cost of an undesired or unpleasant interaction goes up. There is realization of your own and others' precise social standing, and the removal of all complexity and mystery in how those interactions will play out. There is no more finality to a relationship, solidifying centuries of the decay of marriage, nor to the breakup, with the lingering online presence always on call. Impulses are in control, but within some simulation of love and lust. A flat, aromantic transmutation of the base animal nature of the participants.

Normalfaggots regularly stop me to ask if my Cohiba club cigarillos are weed. Use this to assess the many’s sensory machinery…

BAP's criticisms of Charlie are pretty insubstantial, from what I've seen. The first is "he is interpreting Rousseau/positive liberty incorrectly". Well, Rousseau has a complex doctrine, and it isn't hard to misinterpret it to some degree. A small amount of charitability on BAP's part would lead him to realise that "Rousseau" when discussing interpretations of liberalism means a hyper-liberal, extreme interpretation, in which the state takes on the aspect of nature and becomes the protector, provider, and cradle in which man is "forced to be free". Getting into the weeds about Charlie's inexact interpretation is unnecessary because it's hard to deny that British liberals are attempting to slowly enact the French Revolution and do believe in the Noble Savage. They want the state to be the provider, and they want people to have maximal license to indulge every vice at the expense of every virtue. Why is he calling people "stupid" over this obvious truth? Completely uncharitable and unnecessary. The second is a complaint about Charlie's perspective that young people "have too much freedom". This is just a demonstrably correct take: young men know they shouldn't have infinite porn on tap, legalised drugs, complete license to have premarital sex, etc and there is an argument to be made to young women that abortions should not be used as birth control and have exterminated a third of Gen Z. Moreover, they are protected from failure by an ever-expanding welfare state (tying into the Rousseauian liberalism we just mentioned) to prevent them from suffering the consequences of their choices. This is a state of affairs that can't last, and won't last. Objecting to the formulation "we have too much freedom" because it sounds bad to a foreigner, but actually a lot of British people have a puritanical moral streak and understand that duty means acting against one's base nature and reining oneself in. Perhaps someone called "Bronze Age Pervert" doesn't agree or care for Cromwellian morals, but so what? Third, having an agenda that goes beyond sending foreigners home is good, actually. Saul Alinsky knows what he's talking about in this regard. This isn't just about demographics, it's about a moral restoration to the proper order of Britain. I guess he wouldn't understand as he isn't British, but that's fine, nobody is expecting him to get it. The question is, though: why he has gone into anti-campaign mode? It's peculiar, almost like he's been told to get a bee in his bonnet about this by someone. Weird. Fourth, supporting subversive pro-tory outfits with insubstantial critiques of their own. Why signal boost these not-even-astroturfed nobodies? I doubt they have 10k followers between them, but suddenly BAP is reading them breathlessly as they preach the "collapse" or "implosion" or whatever of Restore, despite the fact this is obviously untrue and patriots keep joining? Bizarre, inauthentic, and deeply suspicious. BAP ends up looking like an agent of a power network who has been activated to sow discord. Not having it.