efdavis

I see the logic in wanting to respond to a pandemic in a uniformed and disciplined way. It appears to me that once the body of evidence develops, physicians should generally follow the guidance. Yes, doctors are allowed to use drugs off label but they are basically on their own when they do and certain off-label usage constitutes clear malpractice. A lot of physicians neither follow nor understand good research. The claim that all of the studies proving guidance were flawed but Dr Jones cured 10,000 patients using XYZ doesn't feel legit.

@efdavis419 @jeffreytucker The vaccines themselves had not been throughly tested. And yet state boards and the AMA were trying strike off physicians for even off-label use of approved drugs. No. The way in which the medical profession behaved during the pandemic gave itself a black eye.

The reason Hydroxychloroquine was taken off the market had nothing to do with its effectiveness, versions of which have been known to work since the 16th century. The point was to clear the path for the new tech shot to be the only way out. brownstone.org/articles/hydro… x.com/DefiantLs/stat…

Let's be clear. Brownstone is not a credible source of information. Every single thing they publish has glaring problems. In this case, they are completely biased in what they tell you about hydroxychloroquine. They conveniently fail to tell you about the results from RECOVERY, SOLIDARITY, ORCHID and COALITION-1 trials. I'm not a clinician and have no opinion other than what the research shows. There isn't even face validity to this story

Lies like this support the Court's decision. There is not complete liability protection. The protection is in regard to "design defects" which basically says adverse events can't be blamed on a poor vaccine design but rather that some adverse events are inherently and the approval process reveals the benefit/risk profile and proper indication. If a family member dies in a plane crash, you probably can sue the manufacturer of the plane but you will likely need to prove that a specific part failed that contributed to the crash. Your case doesn't have much of a chance if your argument is simply " the crash itself proves negligence". The idea that profit is the driver of vaccination is completely unsupported. While there can be incentives to vaccinate, pediatricians make very little money from vaccination. Yes, high-volume recommended vaccines can make $ for big pharma but it is a competitive industry. We are on the cusp of single vaccines providing broad, lasting protection against multiple diseases which will be a huge step forward. The government does not control the entire supply chain for the majority of vaccines. Pandemics are the exception. I hope the Courts get to air the evidence and people get to hear the true experts for both sides discuss and argue the merits of vaccination. Siri's book will be irrelevant as will be the disinformation that has been pushed by the frauds. Those anti-child, money-hungry, godless pediatricians have the scientific facts on their side.

The Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. As Aaron Siri and Robert Malone MD say “what’s not to like.”? MALONE: “If you the manufacturer... get your product on the schedule... you’ve got a monopoly that lasts decades.... you get this special protection called (1986) indemnification... you can’t be sued... furthermore... the Government now buys your product, advertises it.. provides complete liability coverage.. purchases your product.. distributes it for you.. and markets it for you... what’s NOT to like !? ” ACIP are the gatekeepers for the whole process.... and AAP do NOT like it's current set up. They are suing HHS and RFK Jr. partly because of the financial impact it will have on their Paediatricians that vaccinate... they are also funded by the Pharmaceutical industry

It's not semantics. States license doctors and are allowed to set care standards. Doctors employed by integrated delivery networks also often have to adhere to institutional guidelines. The pandemic was a unique situation where there was a mad scramble to determine the best treatments. The degree to which the evidence had to be followed varied greatly. I question any physician who was disregarding emerging evidence in favor of their personal beliefs. Certainly informed consent would require them to say they were overriding the evidence that was emerging.

@efdavis419 @jeffreytucker Semantics. Either doctors were afraid or indoctrinated not to prescribe, or those that prescribed had the medical establishment after them. Then pharmacists wouldn’t fill prescriptions written by Medical Doctors. That’s surreptitiously taken off the market.

My cult beliefs? You didn't read my post. There's science and then there's Siri's book. Siri can be in court as a lawyer but he can't be in court to provide expert testimony on vaccines. Why? Because he cherry picks what he looks at and spins it to support his beliefs. His "stuff" doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny. So, on appeal, the court will either say RFK Jr can do whatever he wants unchecked or science will come into play. When science comes into play, YOUR CULT is revealed as the true cult. Del means nothing, Siri means nothing, CHD means nothing, McCullough means nothing, Malone who once meant something is discredited and means nothing. Read the complaint where the issues are spelled out and tell me which one is your winner. Read the Daubert criteria that guides how courts determine expertise and you'll see who's in the cult. I could teach you how to acquire and analyze data to explore what is happening (note use of word explore ... I believe what millions of patients records say). So, if science is an arcane cult to you because you don't understand it, fine. But touting Siri's bestseller that is easily picked apart and placed in the biased lawyer's litter bin as your bible? You must be joking. I don't wish you "good luck" with your cult beliefs, I wish you less ignorance and arrogance and an increased ability to differentiate ideas supported by evidence from ideas advancing agendas. Your spaceship is now waiting to take you to the Planet Clare where the aliens will use you as a test subject to engineer the next bioweapon that will lead to the Zombie Apocalypse.

@efdavis419 @delbigtree Good luck with your cult beliefs. Feel free to listen to Aron Sirius latest podcast with Robert malone Then read vaccinea amen. The path to the truth will be long for all of us. Have a good trip

A few days ago a judge decided he knows more about children's health than Robert Kennedy Jr. and every member of the ACIP committee... And everyone at HHS, the CDC, and other.. This is a judge with no medical degree, no pediatric expertise, and a lifetime appointment... and with one ruling, he erased the most meaningful attempt to protect American children this government has ever made. Reuters called it "upending Kennedy's overhaul of childhood vaccine policies." Here's what actually happened. RFK Jr. looked at peer nations (like Denmark and Germany) with healthy kids and functioning societies, and said let's see if there's a smarter schedule. What he found was that we give 54 shots of 72 vaccine doses. Denmark gives roughly half that. And Denmark has not seen measles come back, or polio come back, or smallpox come back. None of the fear porn the American Academy of Pediatrics has been selling you has actually happened. Meanwhile we went from 12% of American children with chronic disease in the 1980s to nearly 50% today. In 48 years, we have seen the greatest collapse of children's health in the history of this country, happening in perfect parallel with a vaccine schedule that grew from 12 vaccines to 54 shots. You cannot look at the health of American children and call that program a success. You simply cannot. So what did the judge do? He said RFK Jr. didn't run it by ACIP, the advisory committee that by everyone's understanding has always been advisory only. No binding authority, just an opinion, not a mandate. At least that's what they always told us when the committee was captured... And then when Kennedy moved to satisfy that requirement, the judge said he didn't recognize the current ACIP either. There is no committee he recognizes. According to him there are no changes allowed in either direction, no new vaccines can be added, there can be no modifications for any reason, including a bioweapon attack. One judge has put the entire country in limbo to protect a rubber-stamp committee that has never once had a genuine skeptic in the room. A committee where members like Paul Offit voted to add rotavirus vaccines to the childhood schedule while personally developing a rotavirus vaccine and didn't recuse himself. That's the balance they're defending. The American Academy of Pediatrics, a trade organization funded by the pharmaceutical industry, went to court to make sure your doctor has no say in your child's vaccine schedule. They don't want pediatricians in the conversation. They want the government to decide. This is what happens when you try to clean the swamp. The swamp has judges. This case is not over. It's an injunction, not a final ruling. The Trump administration will appeal. And we will keep fighting. Because the children of this country deserve better than what 40 years of this program has given them.

@gregmarshall59 @DawnsMission That's true. Not effective against ebola, effective and quite safe for COVID-19.

@efdavis419 @DawnsMission Remdesivir didn’t do as well with Ebola as another drug so it was discontinued on that basis alone.

Hospital GAVE ME REMDESIVIR WITHOUT CONSENT been sick for years. Gave my husband 5 doses he DIED. Remdesivir had a 53% kill rate in Ebola too unethical to use, yet it was chosen as the #1 COVID drug in April & May 2020. STILL using it in hospitals TODAY

A statement with no reference ... "extremely well documented dangerous drug" except for the many studies that don't support that conclusion. I can tell you from personal RWD experience, it's rare to see such consistently positive data from real world evidence. Remdesivir actually comes through with flying colors relative to the clinical trials. I wasn't expecting this actually. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10…

@efdavis419 @DawnsMission Remdesivir causes organ failure. Extremely well documented dangerous drug. My two best friends both died from it. Organ failure.

@jeremyrhammond I guess silliness is in the eye of the other person. For clarity, I suggest you spell out exactly the point you are making so we can get an accurate silliness reading. I'll do the same.

@efdavis419 Do not be silly. Your own summation of what I actually said belies your mischaracterization that I accurately described as a strawman argument.

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was established under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to effectively shift the financial burden for vaccine injuries away from the pharmaceutical industry and onto the taxpaying consumers. Under the VICP, the government has officially acknowledged that encephalitis, or brain inflammation, and encephalopathy, or brain damage, can be caused by vaccines. In numerous instances, compensation has been paid to families of children who suffered brain damage from vaccinations. Yet when the brain damage manifests as symptoms of autism, we’re told vaccination can’t possibly be the cause. Gavin de Becker's book "Forbidden Facts" reveals the government's deceit about brain damage from vaccines 👇 jeremyrhammond.com/2026/02/02/gav…

What you "see" means absolutely nothing. You're one guy in an ambulance and apparently you have an autistic child, an experience that can rightly influence your opinions about what causes autism. What the massive medical databases show should, but doesn't, shut you up. All this stuff happening in your ambulance just isn't documented to be happening in this big bad world of ours. I understand that you and your followers are fueled by anecdotes that you share even if there's no supporting medical records. It's just the strangest thing.

Paramedic truth: These fake “doctors” talk about one or two measles or “tetanus” cases but they refuse to talk about the immense amount of vaccine injured children. The death, dying, and brain injuries I see due to vaccines FAR outweigh the infections or disease. Thats a fact. At some point these “people” will need to be held accountable for their complicity in murder. God bless

So 32 years ago, meningitis from MMR vaccine in the UK might have been 1/11,000 cases. I'm not sure why you think the 4/1,000,000 was the only number provided back then. The Jeryl Lynn mumps strain, used now in the U S vaccine, has no proven association to meningitis. Did your post have a takeaway point?

1 of 4,000 is not quite the same as 4 out of every million. 1993 when Lancet published some science, not just marketing articles. thelancet.com/journals/lance…

No. Your post is what is called a "garden path" it deliberately insinuates a conclusion. From your post ... " the government has officially acknowledged that encephalitis, or brain inflammation, and encephalopathy, or brain damage, can be caused by vaccines." Then ... "when the brain damage manifests as symptoms of autism, we’re told vaccination can’t possibly be the cause". So, you literally said vaccines can cause brain damage ... Brain damage manifests as symptoms of autism ... And we're told vaccines don't cause autism. Who do you think you're fooling? And I suppose you weren't trying to make any point in your post.

@efdavis419 "Encephalitis isn't autism." Strawman fallacy. Nobody argued "encephalitis = autism".

What kind of unethical fraud would post this without telling you that the best way to avoid meningitis is by getting vaccinated against it? Why would such a fraud tell you that the likelihood of brain infection from vaccination is extremely rare? What motivates people like this? Only harm can come from this

Vaccines can can cause meningitis. You knew that right?

Where's your evidence? It's not in medical claims being sent to insurers. It's not in the Electronic Medical Records of patients at major Independent Delivery Networks. It isn't impacting patient registry data. There are no signals that data is being manipulated and it would be impossible for these independent sources and streams of data to be manipulated in the exact same ways at the exact same time so please explain. How can we have major health events occurring that should show up in patient records but doesn't?

The CDC has " severely edited" data to downplay the deaths related to the Covid vaccine. The CDC cannot perfume a skunk. The CDC can edit and manipulate the data but a large swath of the public knows that the Covid vaccines are lethal or very harmful. Nobody can suffocate the truth.

@AboutPediatrics Are you being "educated" by the tax-exempt McCullough Foundation? Here is some guidance from the IRS with my conclusions.

Anti-vaccine influencers create echo chambers of misinformation by blocking anyone and everyone who might challenge their propaganda about vaccines. Learn how to escape! stopantivaxpropaganda.substack.com/p/escaping-fro…

A nonsense thread, as expected, from these folks. Guess what? If you're publishing a paper, you get to write and edit the paper. I find it humorous that now they are going so far as to claim they know what wasn't said and criticize that. "I know what you didn't say but could have so that's my proof". This sounds like the 5th amendment on drugs.

Everyone they asked at the CDC about why the study was changed to remove the deaths REFUSED to answer. Are they protecting the public from harm? I don't see how. Do you?

Literally, everyone is talking about the relationship. Apparently, you've just been asleep. Throw out your useless chart. Learn about LDL and risk factors for cardiovascular events. Examine the overwhelming research that shows that aggressive lowering of LDL in patients at high risk of CV events is highly effective in reducing events and mortality. Statins work extremely well when used appropriately.

192 countries were studied and cholesterol was NEGATIVELY associated with death rate... the higher the cholesterol, the lower the death rate why is nobody talking about this?

@AboutPediatrics The courts have said some interesting things about his infectious disease "expertise":

Peter McCullough actually believes that he is the most accomplished expert on vaccines in the United States today! Peter McCullough is no more of a vaccine expert than Rob Schneider… stopantivaxpropaganda.substack.com/p/what-makes-s…