𝐄𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐬

I received this wonderful book from MHFM, I encourage everyone to buy it. We must accept the truth even if it is hard—denying it changes nothing but leads to hell. “My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge” — Hosea 4:6 mhfm.store/outside-cathol… #Catholic #CatholicX

John Paul II: Practicing Islam Is Obedience To God & Leads To Heaven In his April 3, 1991, “Message to the Faithful of Islam at the End of Ramadan”, John Paul II taught heresy, blasphemy and religious indifferentism. John Paul II, Message to the Faithful of Islam at the End of Ramadan, April 3, 1991: “Every year it is the custom of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue to send a message of greetings, on behalf of Catholics around the world, to Muslims on the occasion of your Feast of the Breaking of the Fast at the end of Ramadan.  This year… I have decided to send you these greetings myself.      First of all, I wish to express my sympathy and solidarity with all those who have lost loved ones.  As you Muslims believe, so do we Christians affirm with hope that they have returned to the merciful judgment of God.  May this time of mourning be tempered by the awareness that God’s mercy and love are without limit.  He alone knows ‘that which he has prepared for HIS CHOSEN ONES, what no eye has seen, no ear has heard, things beyond the mind of humans’ (1 Cor. 2:9)… YOU WHO HAVE COMPLETED THE ARDUOUS MONTH OF FASTING ACCORDING TO THE DICTATES OF YOUR RELIGION GIVE TO MODERN SOCIETIES A NEEDED EXAMPLE OF OBEDIENCE TO GOD’S WILL, to the importance of prayer and self-discipline… On this feast, my Muslim brothers and sisters, our prayer is that God will grant his peace to you and to all who turn to him in supplication.” First, he encourages Muslims to practice the false religion of Islam.  That’s a manifestation of apostasy.  The true popes firmly taught that Islam is a diabolical religion and an abomination that must be rejected and repudiated; for it leads to damnation.  Second, he refers to Muslims who have died.  He affirms with hope that they have returned to the merciful judgment of God.  That is to indicate that they are saved.  To confirm his point he then cites 1 Cor. 2:9 about how God prepares eternal happiness for His chosen ones.  His message clearly means that, in his view, deceased Muslims were saved and are God’s “chosen ones”.  That’s heresy and blasphemy.  It’s a denial of the dogma that Christ and the Catholic faith are necessary for salvation.  Third, he tells the Muslims that their observance of the Ramadan fast “according to the dictates of your religion” are “a needed example of obedience to God’s will”.  That is also heresy, for it means that people obey God when they practice the false and diabolical religion of Islam.  John Paul II’s message is an obvious endorsement of the practice of Islam and an expression of religious indifferentism.  It’s the kind of message that Antipope John Paul II delivered on a regular basis when addressing members of false religions.  He ends his blasphemous message by indicating that God grants the Muslims peace in their false religion.  That’s also blasphemous, for peace is only found in Jesus (John 16:31-33).  This message alone proves that John Paul II was a notorious heretic and an antipope, and there are many others like it.

SSPX’s New “Profession Of Faith” Has A Big Problem

Vatican II itself teaches (the heresy) that Islam is to be esteemed, as even Benedict XVI admitted. John Paul II was also a notorious heretic who taught religious indifferentism and false ecumenism. Your ridiculous position, which obstinately acknowledges the non-Catholic Vatican II antipopes to be true popes, requires you to accept the apostate John Paul II as a saint. That’s a mortal sin against the faith. This short video shows that in his very first encyclical John Paul II officially taught that the Holy Spirit inspires people to believe in non-Christian religions, such as Islam. That is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. x.com/mhfmvc/status/…

“LGBT Catholic Churches” Across America Exposed - New Series youtube.com/watch?v=_PkTsC…

2,000 Years Of Infallible Papal Teaching On Baptism’s Absolute Necessity

Pope Pius XII Deleted All References To Our Lady As “Co-Redemptrix” Fr. Charles Balić was a Franciscan theologian and a consultor to the Holy Office under Pope Pius XII.  He was also President of the International Marian Academy.  Later on he was appointed (by the Vatican II “Church”) to be a theological expert at Vatican II.  According to Yves Congar (who was a significant figure at Vatican II), “Balić told us that [Pope] Pius XII had deleted the word Co-Redemptrix in all the documents bearing this title and had replaced it by ‘Socia Christi Redemptoris’ (Associate of Christ the Redeemer).” (Yves Congar, My Journal Of The Council, Liturgical Press, 2012, p. 72). Pius XII never used the term “Co-Redemptrix” as pope.  He probably recognized that the term is indeed inaccurate and problematic, and that’s why he deleted it from drafts.  For a full treatment of this matter, see our video called: Is Mary The “Co-Redemptrix”? – A Catholic Analysis.

@FatherAltman John Paul II was their greatest teacher, and he did far worse We cannot condemn Bergoglio and Leo while continuing to praise John Paul II as a great “Saint”

BERGOGLIO AND EVERY CARDINAL AND BISHOP just excommunicated themselves. EVERY. DAMNED. ONE.

@emuse1955 @ContraMolinism St. Vincent Ferrer supported an antipope while he was raising the dead. The great trial and punishment were already foretold by St. Paul the Apostle. Private revelation doesn’t mean everything is true or that he knows everything.

St. Pio urged obedience to Pope St. Paul VI. He was FAR more prudent and discerning than you. He was constantly receiving private revelation and supernatural insights from God. I dont believe God let him scandalize the faithful in the way you have to suppose. There is moral safety in following the example of this obviously holy, superabundantly graced man’s example during these times. I urge you do so - continuing to have pride in your feeble intellect will lead you to perdition.

Pope Pius XII privately held that Padre Pio was a saint. Although we as sedevacantists can't say he's a canonized saint we absolutely should know that his miracles are abundant and evident and we should privately hold this opinion that he's a saint in heaven.

Leo XIV Promotes Heretical Woman From EWTN To Head Vatican Dicastery For Communication vaticancatholic.com/leo-xiv-promot…

“Knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ” — the famous 'scapegoat' [ignorance, lack of conviction, insufficient information...] Everyone without exception must believe in Jesus Christ to be saved It’s shocking how many believe Christ is optional #Catholic

EWTN: Mother Angelica’s Network Of Apostasy - Must-See New Video endtimes.video/ewtn-mother-an…

@timthetige96126 True, all things are possible for Him, including ensuring that everyone who may be saved has received the Gospel to believe and be baptized.

@elieselhachem Do not try and limit God. Through him, all things are possible.

'Souls can be saved in false religions' This single doctrine is the foundation of Vatican II and without it, it could never exist. They fight each other in endless theological debates, while all defend this heresy above all else. #Catholic

You are an outrageous liar, who just repeats one false claim after another. That’s why you are in heresy. You are not honest. Let’s quickly go through your false statements (and then we’re done with you). 1. You falsely claim that Sanborn and the CMRI don’t believe that souls can be saved in non-Christian religions. They most certainly do hold that heresy. In fact, you commit sin by making that false assertion in the face of public facts that refute you. Bernard Welp of the CMRI explicitly agreed with Denis Fahey’s position that Jews who reject Jesus can be in the state of grace (cited on our website). Benedict Hughes of the CMRI told us himself that he doesn’t rule out Jews who reject Jesus being saved (audio is on our website). Various CMRI members have expressed a similar position. That’s what they believe and accept. It’s a documented fact. With regard to Sanborn, he has publicly stated that people in false religions can be saved (see attached screenshot). The heretic Desposito (a member of Sanborn’s sect) promoted the view of a pre-Vatican II heretic who taught that “many” Jews and other non-Catholics can be saved, and on and on. You are a liar. They aren’t Catholic, just like you aren’t Catholic. 2. You lie about the condemnation of Baius, or you simply have no ability to understand what such condemnations mean. What was condemned is that entire proposition as such, which separates the remission of sins from charity. Here’s the actual quote: 33. “A catechumen lives justly, rightly, and holily, observes the commandments of God, and fulfills the Law through charity, BEFORE OBTAINING THE REMISSION OF SINS, which is finally received in the laver of Baptism.” Can you read that? The condemnation is of the entire assertion in which charity is separated from the remission of sins, just as we said. There can be true parts of such condemnations, but the entire assertion as such is false. You have lied about it because your entire position rests on lies. 3. The so-called "Catechism of Pius X" was not written by him, it was not definitive, and it contains demonstrable errors, such as that one can be in the soul of the Church but not in the Body of the Church. The fact that he approved it for Italy doesn’t prove it’s infallible. Pius X also mandated the Summa Theologiae for use in Italy, but the Summa has some errors. But faithless people such as yourself fail to distinguish between teachings that are divinely-protected (having been definitively proclaimed) and those which aren’t. 4. You say that Quas Primas “simply reminds us that Baptism is both an external rite and an inner regeneration.” That’s another lie. No, it teaches that the external rite of baptism is required to enter the Kingdom – a truth you deny. So you misrepresent what’s stated in the encyclical. 5. You write: "The Council of Trent never taught that catechumens do not possess saving faith until they receive the sacrament of Baptism." It most certainly did, liar. Here's the quote: Council of Trent, Decree on Justification, Sess. 6, Chap. 7: “This faith, catechumens beg of the Church (according to Apostolic Tradition) before the sacrament of baptism, when they beg for the faith which bestows life everlasting…” The bottom-line is that you are a proven liar, and barring a conversion you will go where all liars go (Apoc. 21:8). Also, Zosimus' statement does refute your position. So that's another lie on your part.

Hugh of Saint-Cher Uses “Without” With “Or” To Teach Both Are Required Along the lines of our most recent video, “These Latin Passages Illuminate The Truth About A Controversial Issue”, this is an interesting passage from Hugh of Saint-Cher.  Hugh of Saint-Cher (c. 1190–1263) was a French Dominican friar, cardinal, and an important biblical scholar of the 13th century. In his Commentary On Luke 10:27, he writes: Commentary on Luke 10:27 Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex totis viribus totius cordis ex totis viribus totius anime ex totis viribus totius mentis… “You shall love the Lord your God with all the powers of your whole heart, with all the powers of your whole soul, and with all the powers of your whole mind. … {d} Ex tota mente id est memoria sine difficultate, vel sine oblivione. Hec non possunt impleri in via. “With the whole mind, that is, with the memory without difficulty, or without forgetfulness. These things cannot be fulfilled on the way [i.e., in this present life / on the road of earthly existence]." Here Hugh of Saint-Cher uses the Latin word “sine”, followed by a noun in the ablative case, followed by the word “or”, followed again by the word “sine”, and then followed by another noun in the ablative case.  He does not employ that language to teach that only one of the two (i.e. the absence of difficulty or the absence of forgetfulness) is required to love God perfectly.  Rather, he employs that construction to teach that, in his view, love of God with the whole mind would require the absence of both difficulty and forgetfulness, not just one without the other.  Hugh of Saint-Cher thus uses the Latin word “sine”, followed by a noun in the ablative case, followed by the word “or”, followed again by the word “sine” to teach that both are necessary. The examples covered in our video sufficiently prove our point, but this was an interesting additional example that served to directly refute another errant comment made by a “BOD” supporter.  He falsely claimed that one could never repeat the “without” (sine) after “or” to teach that two things are required.  He doesn’t know what he’s talking about, and they really just pile one error and false claim upon another.

The intensity with which certain false traditionalists attack and condemn "Feeneyites" (which is an inaccurate term), while they accept the blatant heresy that non-Christians can be saved (and tolerate many other false doctrines), is another clear indication that they (and the illicit priests who guide them) are dominated by an evil and anti-Christ spirit. They are anti-Christs. Those false traditionalist, anti-baptism, John 3:5 mocking sects (even though divided among themselves) also represent a Counter Church and a deception that opposes the true Catholic Church today. Also, none of those heretical priests would actually have a debate because their heretical and contradictory position would be exposed. They simply repeat the same false arguments and lies that have been refuted while they ignore everything that contradicts and refutes their position. They have no supernatural faith or real commitment to infallible Catholic teaching. They are a plague and the very kind of people who led to the Vatican II apostasy. Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, Exultate Deo, Nov. 22, 1439: “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church. And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5]. The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”

The previous arguments were already sufficient to prove the point, but if anyone still had any doubts or excuses, they no longer do. It doesn’t get any clearer than this.

Case closed. From now on, no one can claim that Trent Sess. 6, Chap. 4 teaches BOD unless they are deliberately hiding the truth. Some already knew this, but instead of admitting it, they manipulated the translation into ‘except through.’ #Catholic

These Latin Passages Illuminate The Truth About A Controversial Issue - New Video youtube.com/watch?v=ncxNn2…