eliseo papa

1.6K posts

eliseo papa banner
eliseo papa

eliseo papa

@elipapa

research engineering @deepmind science | previously #graph #ML lead at @AstraZeneca, @biogen @targetvalidate | medicine @ImperialMed, engineering @mit_hst

Cambridge, England Katılım Ocak 2010
1.6K Takip Edilen526 Takipçiler
eliseo papa retweetledi
Anshul Kundaje
Anshul Kundaje@anshulkundaje·
Every time I read a @CalebLareau tweetorial & paper, I feel very secure that there will always be some humans that will give AGI a run for it's money 😂😂😂. Super clever & innovative stuff.
Caleb Lareau@CalebLareau

We’re unwrapping a new method today @MSKCancerCenter! Led by @SydneyBlattman, @NabihMaslah, @AustinAVarela, Ronan Chaligne and @dana_peer, plus colleagues at @10xGenomics, we’re delighted to share Genotyping In Fixed Transcriptomes (GIFT): biorxiv.org/content/10.648… 1/n

English
2
3
92
14K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Kieran Didi
Kieran Didi@DidiKieran·
📢 We’re launching Proteina-Complexa — and after the Jensen keynote mention, we definitely had to post this thread now ;) Atomistic binder design with generative pretraining + test-time compute, plus large-scale wet-lab validation. Project page: research.nvidia.com/labs/genair/pr… 🧵 1/n
English
13
98
413
48.1K
eliseo papa retweetledi
alex rubinsteyn
alex rubinsteyn@iskander·
Running large model training experiments feels *a lot* like wetlab biology
English
2
4
61
3.8K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Stephen Turner 🦋 @stephenturner.us
claude code is dangerous for work life balance. i used to be good about not working at home. but 'type a few prompts and walk away' doesn't feel like working. until you realize you've been kicking off plan/implement cycles all evening trying to optimize your 4hr session limit.
English
4
3
34
3.2K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Julien Barbier 🙃❤️🏴‍☠️ 七転び八起き
Using Claude Code has a weird side effect: You don't just get more productive, you actually want to work more. There's something addictive about watching a product being born in real time in front of your eyes. "One last feature" after "one last feature" and it's already past 3am.
English
377
663
7.5K
273K
Gabriele Corso
Gabriele Corso@GabriCorso·
We believe the frontier should stay open enough to maximize scientific and patient impact. That’s why we founded Boltz PBC @boltz_bio, a Public Benefit Corporation: advance AI for biology through open science, and make it accessible to every scientist building a healthier future.
English
2
3
27
3.1K
Gabriele Corso
Gabriele Corso@GabriCorso·
Big news from Boltz today: we’re launching Boltz Lab, a new platform with new small-molecule + protein design agents, announcing Boltz PBC and a $28M seed round, and sharing a multi-year partnership with Pfizer. More below! 🚀
GIF
English
48
119
547
231.5K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Roth_Lab
Roth_Lab@Roth_Lab·
We simultaneously generated a single cell dataset from top gene knockouts, knockdowns, overexpressions, synthetic genes, and CAR signaling domains. The full set of potential phenotypes was only accessible by testing across perturbation classes, and the most divergent transcriptomic phenotypes correlated with the greatest CAR T cell functional enhancements.
Roth_Lab tweet media
English
1
1
5
1.9K
eliseo papa retweetledi
David Li
David Li@davidycli·
Recent advancements in one-shot AI protein / antibody development by Chai, Nabla, AI Proteins, Generate, and a few others are accelerating the *main* theme in biotech: Value of building the molecule is going down. The value of novel targets, novel translational ideas, AND also the value of clinical execution is going UP Here's where the value graph is moving towards: The twin forces of AI and China are quickly driving down price of mlc dev across many modalities: For AI - mainly Ab right now, emerging for genetic medicines, small mlc, ADCs, cell therapy; For China - Abs, cell and gene therapy, small mlc, and soon genetic medicines Having a "best in class" mlc is no longer enough - many tech platforms will soon offer you a mlc priced on metered compute (getting cheaper) and China CROs / biotechs will continue to eat the world with (over)capacity (continued involution). To make a valuable drug, you must differentiate on either: a) Novel translational ideas. Novel targets, novel mechanisms, but not just that - connecting targets with diseases; novel application of certain targets in new disease settings, new intuition on which patient pops have widest therapeutic index for a drug, etc OR b) Clinical execution. Determining the appropriate endpoints in a trial. Recruiting the right patients. Appropriate relationships with the right PIs / clinical sites. Ability to finance registrational studies in US markets ($10s to 100s of Ms) Either be a translational target discovery engine / tech platform that unlocks new modalities (which unlocks new translational hypotheses) OR get a team of grizzled clin dev / CMO vets and go raise $X00M+ to validate a clinical hypothesis Living in the middle (ie being "full stack") is dangerous work (at least for a startup)
David Li tweet media
David Li@davidycli

**A grand unified theory on what will happen in biotech in the next 10-20 years** the two major forces reshaping industrial biotech in the next decade are: 1. China 2. AI - and they're critically linked how? China's low R&D cost basis democratizes execution by providing infrastructure to more drug developers (similar to how AWS helped cloud apps explode in 2010s) AI makes scientific information much more freely available; agents & lab automation increase R&D productivity as well as throughput, further deflating development costs What happens when many more translational ideas can be tried much more cheaply? Value starts accruing in the best ideas to try ie the value shifts earlier in the value chain if the cost of everything from preclinical R&D to clinical trials are dropping significantly due to combo of AI and China, the disparity between clinical stage vs early pipeline assets shrinks dramatically from the current order of magnitude difference The premium on true creativity, novel scientific insight, fundamentally new biology will 100x In a few years the top-of-industry drug hunters / translational biologists will command a hefty premium (maybe not $100m a year like current top AI scientists but ... maybe??) Even more provocatively, foundational models in translational biology that surface / accelerate novel biological hypotheses will suddenly capture outsized value When will a translational foundational model be worth more than a top 10 pharma co? sounds crazy... but like everything else --> slowly, then all at once

English
10
21
170
36.9K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Demis Hassabis
Demis Hassabis@demishassabis·
For example I’ve been doing a bunch of late night vibe coding with Gemini 3 in @GoogleAIStudio, and it’s so much fun! I recreated a testbed of my game Theme Park 🎢 that I programmed in the 90s in a matter of hours, down to letting players adjust the amount of salt on the chips! 🍟 (fans of the game will understand the reference 😀)
English
62
68
1.1K
167.6K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Adam Zsolt Wagner
Adam Zsolt Wagner@azwagner_·
Really happy to share our new paper on using AlphaEvolve for mathematical exploration at scale, written with Javier Gómez-Serrano, Terence Tao, and @GoogleDeepMind's Bogdan Georgiev. We tested it on 67 problems and documented all our successes and failures. 🧵
Adam Zsolt Wagner tweet media
English
18
145
871
97.7K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Google DeepMind
Google DeepMind@GoogleDeepMind·
If you want to learn AI from the experts, keep reading. 💡 Together with @UCL, we made a free AI Research Foundations curriculum – available now on Google Skills. With lessons from a Gemini Lead like @OriolVinyalsML, you'll explore how to code better, fine-tune an AI model and more. → skills.google/collections/de…
English
64
361
2.1K
286.6K
Jascha Sohl-Dickstein
Jascha Sohl-Dickstein@jaschasd·
Title: Advice for a young investigator in the first and last days of the Anthropocene Abstract: Within just a few years, it is likely that we will create AI systems that outperform the best humans on all intellectual tasks. This will have implications for your research and career! I will give practical advice, and concrete criteria to consider, when choosing research projects, and making professional decisions, in these last few years before AGI. This is my current go-to academic talk. It's mostly targeted at early career scientists. It gets diverse and strong reactions. Let's try it here. Posting slides with speaker notes... -- The title is a play on a very opinionated and pragmatic book by the nobel prize winner ramon y cajal, who is one of the founders of modern neuroscience. To get you in the right mindset, on the right we have a plot of GDP vs time. That is you, standing precariously on the top of that curve. You are thinking to yourself -- I live in a pretty normal world. Some things are going to change, but the future is going to look mostly like a linear extrapolation of the present. And the plot should suggest that this may not be the right perspective on the future. This plot by the way looks surprisingly similar even if you plot it on a log scale. We didn't stabilize on our current rate of growth until around 1950.
Jascha Sohl-Dickstein tweet media
English
58
271
1.8K
343.3K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Brian Hie
Brian Hie@BrianHie·
Welcome to the age of generative genome design! In 1977, Sanger et al. sequenced the first genome—of phage ΦX174. Today, led by @samuelhking, we report the first AI-generated genomes. Using ΦX174 as a template, we made novel, high-fitness phages with genome language models. 🧵
Brian Hie tweet media
English
36
209
1K
98K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Jeff Dean
Jeff Dean@JeffDean·
AI efficiency is important. Today, Google is sharing a technical paper detailing our comprehensive methodology for measuring the environmental impact of Gemini inference. We estimate that the median Gemini Apps text prompt uses 0.24 watt-hours of energy (equivalent to watching an average TV for ~nine seconds), and consumes 0.26 milliliters of water (about five drops) — figures that are substantially lower than many public estimates. At the same time, our AI systems are becoming more efficient through research innovations and software and hardware efficiency improvements. From May 2024 to May 2025, the energy footprint of the median Gemini Apps text prompt dropped by 33x, and the total carbon footprint dropped by 44x, through a combination of model efficiency improvements, machine utilization improvements and additional clean energy procurement, all while delivering higher quality responses. See the blog or technical paper for more about our methodology and ongoing efforts. Blog: cloud.google.com/blog/products/… Link to detailed paper: services.google.com/fh/files/misc/…
Jeff Dean tweet mediaJeff Dean tweet media
English
150
800
4K
744.6K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Chris Hadfield
Chris Hadfield@Cmdr_Hadfield·
Went to the Moon twice, flew in space 4 times, commanded Apollo 13 - Jim Lovell has died at 97. A superb, humble and inspiring man. Rest in peace.
Chris Hadfield tweet media
English
503
3.1K
30.2K
591.5K
eliseo papa retweetledi
Logan Kilpatrick
Logan Kilpatrick@OfficialLoganK·
Say hello to the @geminicli, a local CLI to help you build and maintain software with 1,000 free Gemini 2.5 Pro requests per day : )
Logan Kilpatrick tweet media
English
426
635
8.6K
1.4M
eliseo papa retweetledi
rohit
rohit@rohitarorayyc·
We automated systematic reviews using gpt-4.1 and o3-mini ! Our platform (otto-SR) beat humans at all tasks and conducted 12 years of systematic review research in just two days. We also show how otto-SR can be used in the real world to rapidly update clinical guidelines 🧵
rohit tweet media
English
15
72
376
82K
eliseo papa retweetledi