((Ernesto ElZeide)))

784.3K posts

((Ernesto ElZeide))) banner
((Ernesto ElZeide)))

((Ernesto ElZeide)))

@elzeide

Argentino. Por la Memoria, la Verdad y la Justicia. Por la Libertad y el Respeto. NOT all RT ARE MY VIEWS

Buenos Aires Katılım Nisan 2009
1.2K Takip Edilen4.4K Takipçiler
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Anjey
Anjey@ianjey600·
@baum_p @EinatWilf Moscow. It was made in Moscow, KGB.
English
0
1
3
170
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
thrills seeker
thrills seeker@thrillsseeker·
@baum_p @EinatWilf Thank the KGB. They created Arafat and the PLO for the sole purpose of demonizing Israel.
English
1
3
22
431
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Peter Baum
Peter Baum@baum_p·
In 1977, the head of the PLO's military department gave an interview to a Dutch newspaper and said something that should have changed everything. He said Palestinian identity is emphasized for political reasons only. That a separate Palestinian identity exists for tactical reasons. That there are no real differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese. His name was Zuher Mohsin. He wasn't a dissident. He wasn't breaking ranks. He was one of the architects of the movement and he said the quiet part out loud. Eight years earlier, Golda Meir had said the same thing and been destroyed for it. But that's not even the beginning of the story. The PLO was founded in 1964. Three years before Israel controlled the West Bank or Gaza. Whatever it was built to liberate, it wasn't land Israel acquired in 1967. Before Arafat, there was no Palestinian national identity. Not because the people weren't real. Because the identity hadn't been built yet. And Arafat built it the same way you build a city — founding story first, then institutions, symbols, a flag, a claim of ancient dispossession, and enough foreign funding to make it stick. The full piece is up on Substack (Link in comments). It starts with a fable. It ends with the only question that actually matters. ( Credit Melissa Steinberg Brodsky )
Peter Baum tweet media
English
70
917
2.1K
48K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Noga Caspi🇮🇱
Noga Caspi🇮🇱@NogaCaspi·
Happy Independence Day #Israel💙🇮🇱 יום עצמאות שמח💙🇮🇱
72
45
445
41.5K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
SissiEmperatriz 🇮🇱
SissiEmperatriz 🇮🇱@GabyLob·
¿Por qué te mienten? ¿Por qué no quieren que lo sepas?
Español
109
143
384
5.2K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Raul
Raul @RaulRaulibertad·
@jcy126kerubin El asqueroso sos vos. Antisemita vomitivo.
Español
7
1
1
1.3K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Mad
Mad@MaddddXB·
@jcy126kerubin Haga bien la cita: "Podemos perdonar a los árabes por matar a nuestros hijos. Pero nunca les vamos a perdonar el hacernos matar a los suyos"
Español
0
2
2
73
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Doron
Doron@plexaleOK·
Nosotros, los judíos, estaremos eternamente agradecidos a todos aquellos que nos han apoyado desde el comienzo de esta guerra. Gracias de corazón por hacernos sentir que no estamos solos. Israel no está solo. ¿Vos desde que país apoyas a Israel? 🇮🇱
Doron tweet media
Español
1.3K
1K
4.6K
31.5K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Shiri_Sabra
Shiri_Sabra@sabra_the·
In April 1948, the Arab leadership of Haifa announced they wanted to evacuate the city. Not that they were being forced out. Not that they had no choice. They announced it as a decision. The Jewish mayor broke down in tears and begged them not to go. The British commander told them they were making a serious mistake. The Haganah’s chief officer promised full equality and peace to every Arab who stayed. The answer from the Arab Higher Committee in Beirut was evacuation anyway. This is one of the most documented moments of 1948. It is also one of the least told. Before any major military offensive in Haifa, between 25,000 and 30,000 Arabs had already left voluntarily. The fighting hadn’t reached most of their neighborhoods. What had happened was simpler and more damaging: the leadership had left first. British High Commissioner Sir Alan Cunningham documented it in an April 26 telegram, describing the abandonment by Arab municipal officials, military leaders, and the chief Arab magistrate as probably the greatest factor in the collapse of Arab morale in the city. When the people who are supposed to lead a community disappear, the community follows. On April 22, a meeting was held at city hall to discuss a truce. The terms guaranteed full safety and civil rights to any Arab who stayed. Shabtai Levy, the Jewish mayor, broke down and pleaded personally with the Arab delegates, calling evacuation a cruel crime against their own people. The British commander urged them to reconsider. The Haganah promised equality and peace to anyone who remained. The Arab Higher Committee in Beirut said go. What Arab leaders said publicly in the months that followed tells the rest of the story. The Economist reported in October 1948 that the departure was driven primarily by orders from the Higher Arab Executive, and that Arabs who stayed and accepted Jewish protection were being called renegades by their own leadership. Time magazine reported in May 1948 that the evacuation was partly driven by Arab leaders who hoped withdrawing Arab workers would paralyze the city economically. Emile Ghoury, secretary of the Palestinian Arab Higher Committee, told the Beirut Telegraph in September 1948 that the Arab states had agreed unanimously on the policy that created the refugees and must share in solving the problem. The Jordanian newspaper Falastin wrote in February 1949 that Arab states had encouraged Palestinians to leave temporarily to clear the way for the Arab invasion armies and then failed to help them return. Monsignor George Hakim, the Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, told the New York Herald Tribune in June 1949 that the Arabs of Haifa had fled despite the fact that Jewish authorities had guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens. These aren’t Israeli sources. These are Arab leaders and Arab newspapers, in their own words, from 1948 & 1949. The word Nakba was coined in August 1948 by a Syrian historian named Constantin Zureiq, a professor at the American University of Beirut. He used it to describe the catastrophic failure of seven Arab armies to defeat the newly declared State of Israel. In his own words, he wrote that seven Arab states declared war on Zionism in Palestine, stopped impotent before it, and then turned on their heels. He described Arab leaders whose declarations fell like bombs from their mouths but whose bombs were hollow and empty, causing no damage and killing no one. Zureiq made no mention of Palestinians as victims. He defined the Nakba as a self-inflicted Arab disaster, a failure of Arab leadership, Arab unity & Arab will. That is what the word originally meant. A Syrian intellectual criticizing Arab governments for launching a war they were unprepared to win. Somewhere between 1948 and the 1980s, that meaning was inverted entirely. The word that began as Arab self-criticism became the centerpiece of a narrative in which Arabs were passive victims & Israel was the aggressor Edite. via: Melissa Steinberg Brodsky
Shiri_Sabra tweet media
English
145
1.3K
3.2K
186.7K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Isaac
Isaac@isaacrrr7·
¿Qué es lo que más te genera indignación o rabia en este mundo? 1) El terrorismo Islámico. 2) Los comunistas y zurdos woke. 3) Los antisemitas y defensores del terrorismo Islámico. 4) Imposible elegir. Es todo la misma mierda.
Español
1.6K
595
2.3K
28.2K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
اسرائیل به فارسی
اسرائیل به فارسی@IsraelPersian·
با ناراحتی اعلام می‌کنیم که نسیا کرادی، کودک ۱۱ ساله اسرائیلی که در اثر اصابت موشک جمهوری اسلامی به شدت مجروح شده بود، بر اثر جراحات وارده درگذشت. قلب ما با خانواده اوست 🕯
اسرائیل به فارسی tweet media
فارسی
1.8K
2.4K
14.7K
132.5K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Israel Foreign Ministry
Israel Foreign Ministry@IsraelMFA·
We are devastated to share that 11-year-old Nesia Karadi has died from injuries sustained in the Iranian missile strike on the eve of Passover. After a long and difficult fight, she succumbed to her wounds. Our hearts are with her family. May her memory be a blessing. 🕯️
Israel Foreign Ministry tweet media
English
242
403
1.6K
29.5K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Organización Sionista Argentina
La Organización Sionista Argentina expresa su más enérgico repudio a las manifestaciones vertidas por el economista Diego Giacomini en el streaming HAA, de Blender. Vincular al Estado de Israel con supuestas teorías conspirativas de carácter económico implica un grave desconocimiento, o una tergiversación deliberada, de las razones históricas, políticas y jurídicas que dieron origen a su creación. Asimismo, afirmar que el sionismo es un movimiento subordinado a los intereses de los Estados Unidos constituye una simplificación errónea y carente de sustento. El sionismo es, en esencia, el movimiento nacional del pueblo judío que promovió su derecho a la autodeterminación en su tierra ancestral, Sion, aspiración que se materializó en 1948 con la creación del Estado de Israel en el marco de una resolución de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas. En la actualidad, ser sionista implica, fundamentalmente, reconocer y apoyar el derecho del Estado de Israel a existir. Esto va más allá de religiones, nacionalidades y orientaciones políticas. Resulta especialmente grave la caracterización de Israel como un “Estado asesino” y la equiparación del sionismo con el nazismo. Tales expresiones no constituyen una crítica legítima, que por supuesto es admisible, sino que configuran una manifestación de judeofobia, en línea con la definición de antisemitismo adoptada por la Alianza Internacional para el Recuerdo del Holocausto (IHRA), a la cual la República Argentina adhirió en el año 2020. En la Argentina no hay lugar para el odio ni la discriminación. Confiamos en que las autoridades competentes actuarán conforme a derecho frente a este tipo de expresiones. Con Israel y contra la judeofobia.
Español
0
12
43
988
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
AniYehudi - ברוך
AniYehudi - ברוך@AYehudi1948·
Remember the scenes of the “innocent” Gazans as they lined the streets on October 7th as hostages were proudly paraded, beaten, bloodied including the many dead Israeli bodies were brought in by Hamas and other terrorists groups. They cheered, spit on and in many cases participated in the beatings… there were no innocent civilians in Gaza on October 7th. Neither are those Lebanese who still proudly support Hezbollah, innocent.
English
1
1
27
967
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
HonestReporting
HonestReporting@HonestReporting·
3/ That doesn’t mean everyone in those crowds is a terrorist. But they are returning under the banners of the very group whose attacks on Israel turned their homes into a battlefield and forced them to flee in the first place. Hezbollah drags these communities into war, gets them bombed and displaced, and yet many still wave its flags as they come back. This isn’t just a story of victims returning home; it’s a story of Hezbollah’s grip on their lives – and the media’s refusal to spell that out.
English
2
20
151
3.3K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
HonestReporting
HonestReporting@HonestReporting·
2/ See it? Hezbollah flags everywhere, huge posters of its leaders and “martyrs.” Yet the reports almost never mention what their own cameras are showing. If outlets like @CNN, @NBCNews, @BBCNews, @washingtonpost, @gaurdian want to use these images, fine – but they owe their audiences the truth about what those flags stand for.
HonestReporting tweet mediaHonestReporting tweet mediaHonestReporting tweet mediaHonestReporting tweet media
English
1
36
171
3.9K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
HonestReporting
HonestReporting@HonestReporting·
1/ Let’s play a game. Watch @CNN’s footage via Reuters of what’s framed as cheerful, heartwarming scenes of displaced Lebanese returning home in the south… and look closely at what fills the frame.
English
4
57
316
23.4K
((Ernesto ElZeide))) retweetledi
Laura Perez
Laura Perez@lauraspeaker·
@PorazDan @Partisangirl es una lacra inmunda...denuncien la cuenta,yoya lo hice.No dejemos que estas basuras se salgan con lo suyo
Español
0
1
3
233