Sabitlenmiş Tweet
ember 🐎
9.2K posts
@emberlmao @soonrightaway Yeah guy who leaked Ocarina remake said there was a new Star Fox
English
@soonrightaway Sega is my biggest blindspot by far and that’s ok with me. None of my business
English
PS1 > N64 > Saturn like i don’t really see how this is arguable
English
it’s so funny that people are mad at this lol i love the Intellectual Gamer type that’s just instinctually contrarian with everything
gspurling87@gspurling87
@Sonic_Hedgeblog No, because the Sega Saturn sucked and the N64 was way better, and had a lot more enjoyable, playable games.
English
Crazy that this game being a pack in helped sell like several million consoles and solidified the Wii as the most successful Nintendo console and none of them did like internal reflection on Reggie 100% being in the right on this.
Images Unrelated.
My Nintendo News@MyNintendoNews
Reggie Says Miyamoto gave him a “death stare” when he suggested Wii Sports as a pack-in mynintendonews.com/2026/05/02/reg…
English
@fender_belly I’m not sure I’ve ever really been interested in a movie because of a premise. Premise movies are how you get stuff like benjamin button
English
@loonielila I love when people make miis of the same person because they all look so different but they’re all still accurate in their own ways
English
@Kazcooledoff And as far as I understand most remakes or remasters or what have you are made with an entirely different set of people, largely groups of people who don’t have creative ambition of their own outside of reinterpret older work to make it more modern. I find it sort of gross
English
@Kazcooledoff Of the video game auteurs that exist I have more respect for the ones like Kojima who iterate on their past work rather than redo it a bunch. He didn’t remake MG, he made MG2. He didn’t remake MG2, he made MGS. With him out of the picture they’re likely remake both of those now
English
the worst person you know thinks this remake looks soulless just because its not 240p and grey anymore
VideoArtGame@VideoArtGame
Shadow of the Colossus (2018)
English
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD I think you’re right that developers would rather choose the “superior” option, but because the way they view video games as a medium is flawed. I’m glad there was a time where they were very limited. I think of it as lightning in a bottle, and I think remakes can’t capture it
English
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD So you think for the vast majority of those games if they had the ability to make more advanced graphics of the future back then, they wouldn’t use that ability and would make them look the same? Cus I’d vehemently disagree
English
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD Well, ok. I guess my larger claim then is that “graphics” (I prefer saying fidelity) are part of the style. Definitely the case for Minecraft, but I’d also say it’s the case for (not just Shadow of the Colossus, not just PS2 games, but pretty much) every game created for CRT use
English
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD I don’t think its faulty logic tho because theyre not always proportionally related. Which is why the Minecraft image on the right looks worse because even though its better graphics wise, its worse style wise(cus the pixelated graphics is the style too). It’s usually related tho
English
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD But in what way does it matter apart from the “objectively better” aspect, which, at least in a semantic linguistic sense, you seem to somewhat agree is faulty logic
English
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD It’s literally just language. I really don’t get how it makes you this mad to just argue semantics instead of just thinking about it. It’s just the difference between graphics and style. Very important parts of game design. They both matter even if usually style is more important
English
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD I won’t tell you how to live your life but to me it seems sad to force yourself to think that “objectively better” images look “better” despite actually thinking that they look worse. What does this accomplish for anybody?
English
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD It’s not an opinion like I said so there’s nothing to believe. Do you understand now?
English
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD So you agree that the “objectively superior” image looks worse than the original? What’s the point of maintaining this “objective” truth of what constitutes a “better” image if you don’t even think the image looks better? You literally don’t believe your own “objective” opinion
English
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD Im not getting upset ur just strawmanning and trying to argue for no reason even after clarifying. Im just talking about fidelity being improved upon in remakes. Ur saying I’m deciding how everyone should feel when that’s not what I’m doing
And yes but it looks ugly(my point)
English
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD You keep treating this like it’s the debate team and getting upset while I’m simply trying to have a discussion with the objective arbiter of digital imagery.
Does the texture on the right correlate to an enhanced, superior image? There’s higher image fidelity, so surely, right?
English
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD It literally does mean a superior image. Again like I’ve said multiple times now that’s DIFFERENT than saying everyone should prefer it over a worse quality image.
I never said my opinion so youre just not comprehending what I mean or you’ve gone too far to admit you were wrong
English
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD I never said you’re forcing your opinion on others, I said you’re treating your opinion as if it’s objective. I don’t care if you give people permission to enjoy the original game. That’s not the argument here.
A larger image resolution does not inherently mean a superior image
English
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD That’s exactly the definition idk how you think that doesn’t apply to a direct improvement in fidelity which you also admit.
Also no mention of you wrongly claiming I’m forcing my opinion on others even after clarifying immediately btw
Kaz@Kazcooledoff
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD Yes exactly. It’s okay to prefer the original for whatever reasons btw
English
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD What is your definition? This is absolutely not objective by any stretch
English
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD You’re literally just complaining and arguing because of your lack of reading comprehension. Improvement is not an opinion. It’s the correct word. Feel free to look up uses and the definition if you want lol. You’re just being dense even when I clarified what I meant immediately:
Kaz@Kazcooledoff
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD Yes exactly. It’s okay to prefer the original for whatever reasons btw
English
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD The use of “improvement” is opinion. The objective word choice would be “increased”. Bigger is not inherently better. It’s not up to you to decide for everybody what graphics are “better”, regardless of what your job may be
English
@emberlmao @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD That’s exactly what you just did and something I didn’t. Improvement in graphics is not an opinion. I work on it for a living and it’s a different job than design.
It was this that showed you were the confused
ember 🐎@emberlmao
@Kazcooledoff @Dlika2 @lFibreOpticl @WYLDERSSWORD How is it “objectively an improvement”?? Because more polygons and more pixels?
English