from the inside looking out

705 posts

from the inside looking out

from the inside looking out

@endophysics

attention economy hater

Katılım Ocak 2010
542 Takip Edilen229 Takipçiler
Block Enthusiast 🌪️🏴‍☠️ 💧
If privacy is a spectrum we should be specific about the type of privacy offered. In this case, backdoored privacy. I believe its made exclusively in boot flavor. Calling it privacy w/o mentioning its backdoor is misleading at best.
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io@EliBenSasson

@ameensol I've always said privacy is a spectrum and there are a lot of trade-offs there. Privacy can also live with viewing keys of various sorts. There are: 1. Different users 2. Different use cases 3. Different modes of privacy All good.

English
7
1
23
1.1K
ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ
ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ@alpeh_v·
solana should grow a spine and remember they are a cryptocurrency network not an American startup
English
7
0
11
591
ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ
ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ@alpeh_v·
all of that effort to get in here just for a talk where solana is shilling their backdoored payments protocol and talking about the genius act and designing crypto for the American regulatory state smh
ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ@alpeh_v

I don’t have a ticket to zk proof so I just picked up Justin drake’s badge from the unguarded checkin table, it’s not like they will stop the real Justin Drake when he walks in, so that’s what they call a positive sum tradeoff

English
1
0
33
2.1K
thrasherXBT
thrasherXBT@thrasherXBT·
@miyuki__eto > provably non-custodial set of smart contracts anyone building this?
English
1
0
1
44
miyu
miyu@miyuki__eto·
real decentralization has never been tried
English
21
8
75
5K
Casey J. Cathcart ✝️🇺🇸🇨🇷
Help me understand something… by marking ETH LTV to 0, wouldn’t that liquidate every borrowing position backed by ETH that has now been unlocked? If somebody had an open borrow on Friday backed by ETH, that got locked on Saturday, and now it’s unlocked today but LTV 0, did they just get liquidated?
English
1
0
0
369
monetsupply.eth
monetsupply.eth@MonetSupply·
aave has decided to unfreeze the Ethereum Core WETH market i find this decision a quite ill considered. in the current conditions/IRM configuration, this basically allows LST/LRT holders to take out extremely profitable looping positions, ensuring that aEthWETH remains illiquid for users trying to withdraw taking a look at a weETH loop as an example (weETH is not borrowable so has no solvency risk to Aave market): - weETH trades at 0.5% discount. if we assume this reverts to par-value within 1 month, this means the implied yield is ~6% plus base staking yield (lets call it 8% total) - the Aave Core ETH borrow rate is hard-capped at 5.15%. so each loop earns additional 2.85% yield. weETH can use 14x leverage so the final return would be up to ~45% (and this position cant be squeezed bc utilization is already at 100%) - this strategy also has short-side optionality into Aave solvency fears (eg if aEthWETH trades down to 1% discount, looper can earn instant ~13% return by purchasing aWETH and repaying debt with aToken) basically, this is just a free-money trade for LST/LRT loopers, while making UX for aWETH holders and stablecoin borrowers who have been stuck for the past 3 days even worse maybe this is the explicitly the goal and Aave team want to trap aWETH users in the market, preventing them from withdrawing collateral or refinancing high-cost debt positions to other lending markets? regardless, this decision seems to be based on PR considerations (wanting to show un-frozen ETH market on the frontend) rather than sound risk management or user protection
English
20
11
200
41.6K
@bertcmiller
@bertcmiller@bertcmiller·
First of its kind attack that relied on compromised RPC nodes, I think? Makes you wonder where else there are hidden trust assumptions for these systems. Eclipse attacks come to mind, especially if DPRK has demonstrated interest in RPC level attack vectors.
LayerZero@LayerZero_Core

x.com/i/article/2046…

English
9
1
30
6.5K
Nico | supernova.vision
Nico | supernova.vision@nicoypei·
Drift and Kelp hack both involved unlimited minting of fake assets then borrow real assets against it If we just implement these simple things, the result would be much sweeter. Lending markets > limit on borrow/lend cap Assets issuers > limit on mint cap CEX quadruple check when large sums of capital leave the platform. Defi shall do the same Realistically speaking 9-fig doesn’t need to leave in one txn The great thing about programmability is that once these are implemented, there’s no human factor that can corrupt the system. Ask any CEX how much they’ve spent to make sure human within the org doesn’t take bribes / corrupt the system’s security. It’s absurdly expensive. Defi is cleaner.
Keone Hon@keoneHD

Feels like pooled lending protocols would benefit from a rate limit on the supply of an asset being deposited for collateral Like, if the current supply is 100m and the supply cap is 300m, the supply should only be allowed to go to 110m in the next 10 minutes. Nobody needs to deposit all 200m in one shot This matters because if/when an exotic asset is hacked, the impact of the hack is constrained by the size of the exit paths for that asset. Especially when you consider that many hacks are infinite mint bugs… there the size of the exits literally determines the size of the hack. Lending protocols are often the largest exits (DEX liquidity is usually pretty small). Having a “smart cap” that is a bit above current supply, which can adjust over a few hours to the true cap, would make a huge difference. It would have saved rsETH depositors $200m today This also raises an interesting point: asset issuers should want this too. If you are an asset issuer who issues receipt tokens which have a redemption delay, then you actually aren’t worried about a hacker redeeming with you. But you need possible exits to be as small as possible while not impeding normal users. High supply caps need to be seen as a liability, rather than a sign of stature.

English
2
1
6
659
0nur 🌱
0nur 🌱@onurakpolat·
Bruh…
0nur 🌱 tweet media
English
2
0
1
118
from the inside looking out
from the inside looking out@endophysics·
@CannnGurel just sat for an extended period of time, so prefer to stand around for a bit (but not hunched over, just in the aisle)
English
0
0
2
104
Can Gurel
Can Gurel@CannnGurel·
when a flight lands, why do people immediately get up only to wait in this annoying hunched position on feet instead of staying seated until the aisle clears. pls explain
English
10
0
18
2.2K
from the inside looking out
from the inside looking out@endophysics·
@Tudmotu @cooper_kunz i could not care less about the miladys. i don't have one and never had. engage with "tying the merit of peoples opinions to what boils down to likes on a centralized social media platform is not the own you think it is"
English
1
0
0
41
Cooper
Cooper@cooper_kunz·
Cooper tweet media
ZXX
1
0
8
420
from the inside looking out
from the inside looking out@endophysics·
@nero_eth privacy means we need everyone to be able to interact with the system. we can't have privacy without censorship resistance. speed without censorship resistance is just a centralized database. we need both.
English
1
0
0
60
Toni Wahrstätter ⟠
Toni Wahrstätter ⟠@nero_eth·
Privacy isn’t for a small elite, it’s for the masses. It only works if it works for everyone. That means it has to scale. Scaling Ethereum means scaling privacy.
English
15
4
51
1.6K
from the inside looking out
from the inside looking out@endophysics·
@puniaviision @austincampbell oh yeah, love this! compliance is so cool. i love complying with pointless procedures. i enjoy licking the boot. if i submit to the powers that be they will let me insert my shitty database to seek some rent. pathetic
English
0
0
8
370
Omid Malekan
Omid Malekan@malekanoms·
I woke up this morning thinking "what the world really needs is a new database controlled by a single corporation for payments" Cause it's not like we already had databases. Controlled by corporations. For payments. #innovation
English
9
8
81
3.4K
from the inside looking out
from the inside looking out@endophysics·
@dankrad not everything has to (or even should be) a vc style startup, tho. the requirement for vc style returns is exactly why so many protocols end up trying to constantly expand instead of just focusing on one thing
English
0
0
0
59
Dankrad Feist
Dankrad Feist@dankrad·
Anyone can launch a token, but an early token just provides poor economic alignment. The illiquidity of early stage startup equity is actually a key ingredient to align founders, employees and VCs for the many hard years it takes to find PMF.
Sabretooth | Exchequer@SabretoothSG

"don't launch a token until you have PMF" is the biggest lie in crypto, said by founders sitting on VC runway. facebook started in a dorm room. craigslist was a side project. wordpress was two guys. tokens are crypto's bootstrap. stop gatekeeping who can launch a token.

English
16
5
79
13.1K
banteg
banteg@banteg·
guys guys i found the cypherpunk manifesto
banteg tweet media
English
18
18
200
16.1K
Dan Robinson
Dan Robinson@danrobinson·
Tempo mainnet is live and permissionless We designed it to be the best blockchain for payments, and every feature serves that goal We're also introducing a new standard for web and agentic payments, the Machine Payments Protocol, which you can use today
Tempo@tempo

Tempo Mainnet is live! Starting today, anyone can build on Tempo through our public RPC endpoints. Alongside mainnet, we’re introducing the Machine Payments Protocol, an open standard for machine payments.

English
53
8
141
110.7K