Eq

感觉人生有一条主线。当你偏离时，就会有一股无形的力量会引导你回归；若你始终未察觉主线，它便会慢慢堵死其他所有岔路。

@hotbabyrebao 入乡随俗马斯克

Hello Elon, welcome to China. There are countless loyal fans of yours here in China. I have long been creating a variety of interesting creative works about you with AI. I’m truly delighted that this piece of my creation caught your attention. I also hope this friendly visit can bring more cultural and technological exchanges between China and the US, deepen mutual understanding, and achieve friendly coexistence hand in hand. 哈喽马斯克，非常欢迎你来到中国。 我们中国人有很多你的忠实粉丝，也长期用AI创作了很多关于你的趣味创意作品。 非常开心这次的我们的创作能被你看到。 也期待借着这次友好往来，能让中美之间多一些文化与科技的交流，增进彼此了解，双向奔赴，友好共生。

@hotbabyrebao 哈哈哈 笑死 马斯卡真来评论了

笑死，这个图谁整的呀

@GlocalTerapy 果然还是信息差呀 十几块钱的东西闲鱼上都卖30多

无事看了下闲鱼，吓了一跳。 什么时候gemini年卡在闲鱼上冲自己的号价格低成这样了。 这是怎么做的？

@Cryptowushi 我的显示0元 剩两个月铂金会员不算钱 😂 算球

话说快连的退款有人收到了吗？ 我看了一下我的记录 4.30日提交的申请，目前还是处理中！

@mscryptojiayi 昧良心的钱不好赚吧 也不专业 wlfi找的kol发的宣传帖可尬了 没眼看🤦

我希望这不是真的 😭。 WLFI的KOL从来没有编造过任何信息； 没有被指派诬陷过 孙哥， 合作中从未要求KOL FUD任何人这些都是事实。 但是就这两天，多位KOL陆续接到来自孙团队带有明显倾向性的电话"沟通"，疑似录音取证。 更令人不安的是😨，有KOL反馈称，对方已整理了一份针对性名单，意图对名单人物采取法律手段"重点处理"，目标至少让1-2人坐牢以此震慑其他人。 我希望这个事情不是真实的，也更相信基于事实、基于公开信息的表达，不应该成为被"送进去"的理由和威胁。 保护基础的言论自由和人身安全，是所有人都应该维护的底线。

@letsvpn 以为真退款呢 跑路直接跑 扯🪶退款 浪费我时间去翻支付宝订单号

【快连 VPN 恢复正常运营】 我们将于多伦多时间 5 月 8 日 24 点起，面向全球用户恢复标准运营机制，账户时长将按标准规则计算和扣减。 同时，我们也对账户时长补偿、冻结补偿有效期和退款处理安排做了更新：4 月 8 日至 5 月 8 日期间的购买时长将在冻结时进行补偿； 由于部分用户尚未完成冻结操作，因此冻结补偿有效期延长至北京时间 5 月 12 日 0 点，届时未冻结的用户系统将统一补发补偿时长，已提交的退款申请也会继续处理。 这段时间给大家带来的困扰，我们深感抱歉，也感谢您的理解与耐心。 详情可查看：letsvpn.world/blog/f20bkd

@worldlibertyfi 🤡

Token unlock proposal is now live for vote. ☝️ This is one of the most significant governance proposals in WLFI history. Here's what's at stake.

@RocM301 不值

1748在京东拍拍二手找了个海外版i（实体卡+eSIM）iPhone 13 mini，99新质检全绿，电池90-95%。7天无理由，一年质保。等我到手看看是否能安全下车。用作备用机还是不错的。

@binance USD1 谁用谁沙比🤡 🦅☝️

$15,000,000 in $WLFI rewards! All you have to do? Hold $USD1 in your Spot, Margin or Future accounts. Campaign runs from April 17 to May 15 Find out more 👉 binance.com/en/support/ann…

@QuintenFrancois The Trump family is utterly repulsive.🤮

$WLFI token vesting proposal 👇 What are your thoughts?

@thcaroline2233 哎 放弃一切不切实际的幻想 WLFI项目方令人作呕🤮

碉堡了，先锁定2年，然后再线性释放2年 兄弟们，忘记这件事吧 真是无耻到极点 这件事很川普

This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down. I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close.  The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever. In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent? II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process. I am not alone. A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began. This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain. The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever. III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI. Let me emphasize — anonymous. This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community. The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO. IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first. But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency.  While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces. V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights. In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets? This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections. Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights. Conclusion I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation. Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote. This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized. I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.

🤡世界自由金融这几个词简直就像是笑话 。自始至终他们的行为都跟他们声称的初衷背道而驰 。什么社区治理更是狗屁 ，所有提案都必须在他的框架里，参与治理者往往进退两难，只能在两个很差的选择里选择一个还说得过去的 （每一个提案还都是一步一步给早期投资者挖好的坑）。而且八万多人的权重还不如前几名的权重大，大搞一言堂的独裁者 ； 每次还都声称这是社区的选择，尊重社区的意愿，我们从未见过如此厚颜无耻的项目方 🤡。 连最初的 80,000 多名投资者都不信任的项目，谁又会信任他并使用它的 USD1？ 说白了这个项目就是赤裸裸的骗局，只是为了欺骗，为了圈钱； 川普家族真是令人作呕的家族，特朗普遗臭万年；🤢 川普家族及其企业也是币圈毒瘤，呼吁大家共同，抵制usd1，不要靠近，会变得不幸。 🦅☝️🤡 @worldlibertyfi $WLFI #USD1

这是"世界暴政", 不是"世界自由金融" 此提案被包装成"治理对齐信号"和"长期承诺"，但剥开包装来看，这是我见过的最荒谬的治理骗局之一。我逐条说明。 一、反对即受罚——经典的胁迫手段 这不是一次合法的投票，而是胁迫，这个提案的设计本身就是一个逻辑陷阱：任何投反对票的人，其代币将被无限期锁定，没有任何解锁路径。 换句话说，你反对这个提案，你就被惩罚。这不叫投票，这叫胁迫。世界上哪有一种民主程序是同意就给你好处、反对就关你禁闭的？ 二、投票者已被选择性冻结 我个人持有约4%的投票权，但我的代币已被冻结，我被强制排除在投票过程之外。 我并非个例。 大量持有重大投票权的持有人都处于同样的状态。与此同时，团队掌握着冻结代币的权力——他们决定谁能投票、谁不能投票。这意味着什么？意味着在投票开始之前，结果就已经被决定了。 这不是治理投票。这是一场警察已经封锁了议会大门、只放自己人进去举手的表演。投票池已经被清洗过了，剩下的只有同意票。 这种投票的结果没有任何约束力。 三、全部实际权力被匿名者窃取 WLFI智能合约的实际控制权掌握在一个3/5匿名多签手中，而一个匿名的guardian EOA则拥有将持有WLFI的地址列入黑名单的权力。 请注意——是匿名的。 这个匿名多签可以无视任何投票结果，直接在合约层面执行任何操作。所谓的治理提案、链上投票、社区讨论，统统不过是一场戏。真正的权力从未被交给任何其他人，而他们试图用这些把戏来愚弄社区，简直可笑。 事实是：权力掌握在没有人知道、也无法验证其所有者身份的匿名钱包地址手中。这不是去中心化治理，这是披着DAO外衣的独裁。 四、投票者必须实名，统治者却匿名——比暴政还过分 最讽刺的部分在于：WLFI要求每一个参与投票的持有人完成身份验证、电子签署确认、满足合规资格要求。你想行使自己的权利？请先亮出身份。 但真正掌握合约生杀大权的guardian和多签签名者是谁？没有人被告知，完全没有透明度。被统治者必须实名，而拥有绝对权力的统治者却是匿名的。你的选民要登记造册、接受审查、被审核资格、被指示如何投票——而你的独裁者连脸都不露。 五、数十亿美元财产权利的赤裸侵犯 让我们不要忘记这个提案的真实利害：这不是一个无关痛痒的参数调整或协议升级。这个投票要决定的是高达数十亿美元资产的解锁时间表、治理与归属权的重新分配，以及最极端的——数十亿枚代币的永久销毁。这是对持有人财产权利赤裸裸的剥夺。 在一个投反对票就被惩罚、大量持有人被冻结投票权、实际控制权在匿名钱包手中的环境下，用这样一场伪投票来决定数十亿美元资产的命运？ 这不是治理，这是一场骗局，完全背离了这个协议的初衷。任何法治社会都不会允许这种事情发生。在传统金融市场中，任何涉及这种规模的资产处置，都需要经过严格的监管审查、独立董事会批准和少数股东保护程序。 而在这里，几个匿名钱包就可以决定一切。代币的永久销毁意味着持有人的财产被不可逆地消灭——没有赔偿，没有追索权，没有任何正当程序。这已经远远超出了所谓"去中心化治理"的范畴，这是对财产权的系统性侵犯。 结论 我重申，这个提案是非法治理。这是少数被筛选出来的人在行使权力，精心策划一场进一步的权力巩固和财产掠夺行动。 反对者因投反对票而受罚，异见者被冻结，实际控制权在匿名钱包手中，行使权利的人必须自证身份，而数十亿美元资产的命运就这样被一场伪投票裁决。 这不是去中心化金融应有的样子。在这种条件下产生的结果不具备合法性，不应具有约束力，不应被承认。 我呼吁所有WLFI持有人认清这个提案的本质，在所有公开渠道表达反对，并保留一切法律追诉权利。

@David_Yanggg @gothburz 这是虚拟出来的第三人称😂 用来叙述的

@gothburz 这人是个骗子，你看他以前的帖子，身份都是自己给的

Apparently there is a large Chinese community on X. 大家好！非常感谢你们把我的帖子翻译成中文，辛苦了！sorry in advance for translation mistakes.

I am still the Web3 Ambassador at World Liberty Financial. The dashboard has 9 columns now. When we sold the tokens, the sale materials said they were non-transferable. They could remain locked indefinitely. Unlocks would require a governance vote. We did not specify when. That was by design. 80% of the tokens sold to investors are still locked. 18 months later. The investors paid real money. The money is not locked. The money left immediately. The tokens stayed. These events are unrelated. To unlock the tokens, you need a governance vote. The governance vote on staking passed with 99.12% approval. 76% of the voting power came from 10 wallets. The 80% who are locked can vote. They cannot earn staking rewards. They cannot access Node tiers. They cannot sell. They can participate in the governance of their own captivity. I designed the distinction. Last week our CTO borrowed $75 million against 5 billion of our tokens. He borrowed on Dolomite. Dolomite is the 13th-largest lending platform in crypto. Our CTO co-founded Dolomite. He borrowed from his own platform using our tokens as collateral. Our collateral is now 55% of Dolomite's total value. He did not disclose the conflict. These events are unrelated. He borrowed so much of our own stablecoin that other depositors cannot withdraw theirs. We told them our positions are "nowhere near liquidation." We told them we would "simply supply more collateral." The token hit its all-time low that same week. These events are unrelated. WLFI is $0.078. Down 83% from $0.46. The Co-Founder called it good news in my replies. I am adding that to the dashboard. The treasury spent $65 million buying back 435 million tokens at an average of $0.15. The tokens are now worth $0.078. The buyback is 48% underwater. The treasury's money came from investors. The investors cannot sell their tokens. The project used investor money to buy tokens that lost half their value and the investors cannot sell the tokens the project bought with their money. That is called a protocol. Justin Sun invested $75 million. He received 545 million tokens. He transferred a small number to an exchange. We froze all 545 million. There is a blacklist function in the smart contract. We did not disclose the blacklist function. He called it "a trap door marketed as an open door." He called it "the antithesis of decentralization." He is correct on both counts. He is also our advisor. These events are unrelated. In November we partnered with AB DAO. AB DAO is connected to individuals sanctioned by the United States for ties to Cambodia's Prince Group. The Prince Group is a designated transnational criminal organization. The sanctions were imposed October 14th. We announced the partnership November 12th. 29 days later. We said we were unaware. AB DAO held $10 million of our stablecoin. After journalists called, it dropped to $3.6 million. We did not ask where the $6.4 million went. That is not in my job description. The GENIUS Act created the 1st federal stablecoin framework. Our stablecoin complies. The President's party advanced the legislation. The President's family collects 75 cents of every dollar the stablecoin generates. The regulation that governs our product enriches the family that governs the regulation. That is compliance. The tokens are locked. The money is gone. The CTO borrows from his own platform. The buyback is underwater. The biggest investor is frozen out. The partner is sanctioned. The regulation is self-dealing. The stablecoin funds the deals. The deals require the pardons. The pardons free the partners. The partners fund the platform. The President signs the orders. The orders inflate the assets. The assets fund the family. 600,000 wallets bought in. They lost $3.87 billion. 2 families cashed out. America First. You're America. They're First. I am the reason these events are unrelated.

@wublockchain12 项目方真是厚颜无耻啊

吴说获悉，World Liberty Financial (WLF) 联合创始人 Zach Witkoff 发文反驳了 Peter Girnus 的指控，称其内容与事实严重不符且双方并无关联。 Zach Witkoff 强调， WLF 与“特朗普 Meme 币”及 CIC Digital 等实体无任何关系，且项目主产品为稳定币而非 Meme 币，不通过交易费获利。价格层面，他表示 WLFI 当前 0.08 美元的价格仍高于早期 0.015 美元至 0.05 美元的成本，目前其稳定币市值在符合 Genius 规范的同类产品中排名第二。 wublock123.com/news/wlf-ceo-r…

@worldlibertyfi 🤡🦅☝️ $WLFI #USD1

2 days ago we repaid $15M USD1 on our WLFI Markets position. Today we repaid another $10M USD1. Thank you for your attention to this matter. etherscan.io/tx/0xa4201f3d5… etherscan.io/tx/0x0fe85aa82…

@0xDylan_ 这天来得还挺快

@0xDylan_ 星星之火可以燎原～成也萧何，败也萧何～水能载舟，亦能覆舟～ 总是总是不把早期散户当回事，真不怕怨气统☝️爆发

WLFI Governance Staking WLFI Node WLFI Super Node ⬇️ #p-84191-abstract-1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com/t/proposal-wlf…

@justinsuntron @JH_P3an 这次我挺你

我一直是特朗普总统及其加密友好政策的坚定支持者。 作为World Liberty Financial的早期支持者，我在项目初期投入了大量资金，因为我相信该项目向公众展示的愿景：一个促进金融自由、去除中介、将去中心化金融的福祉带给普通民众的DeFi平台。 然而，从未有人向我或任何投资者披露的是：World Liberty在部署WLFI代币的智能合约中暗植了一个后门黑名单功能。该功能赋予公司单方面的权力，可以在无需通知、无需理由、无需救济途径的情况下，冻结、限制乃至实质没收任何代币持有者的财产权利。 这是去中心化的反面。这是一扇伪装成大门的陷阱。 我在此谴责WLFI内部不良行为者持续制造的代币丑闻。 我是第一个也是最大的受害者——早在2025年，他们就非法将我的WLFI代币钱包列入黑名单，这一行为违反了基本的投资者权利和区块链的公平原则。 WLFI团队所采取的一切行为——从用户身上榨取费用、秘密植入后门控制用户资产、在未经披露和正当程序的情况下冻结投资者资金、将加密社区当作个人提款机——所有这些行为都是不正当的，从未经过任何公平、透明、善意的社区治理程序授权。 那些被援引来为上述行为正名的治理投票，并非通过公平或透明的程序进行。关键信息对投票者隐瞒，实质性的参与受到限制，结果早已预定。这些投票代表的不是社区的意志——而是设计它们的人的意志。 这些行为与我无关。与那些相信该项目承诺的投资者无关。我们以最强烈的态度反对上述每一项行为。 WLFI团队的所作所为正在侵蚀社区对项目的信任。解锁代币，维护对社区的透明。让我们以诚信建设，而非以不端行事。