Eric Wall

1/8 Today, we introduce CTR, the coordination asset for the Bitcoin economy. Over the past two years, we built an end-to-end Bitcoin economy that relies on the Bitcoin Network as its source of truth. With CTR, we're handing control of this economy to the people who use it.

@david_seroy OP_CAT mentioned

Ark Labs pivoting to use ZKP's. YOU LOVE TO SEE IT. 🙃 github.com/ArkLabsHQ/intr…

@hosseeb Peak performance is letting Claude control your Codex desktop application via computer use through Dispatch from your mobile phone through voice notes you copy-paste from ChatGPTs in-app whisper transcriptions

What's the craziest example of a multi-agent workflow/setup you've seen? YouTube videos or livestreams preferred. I want to know what peak performance looks like.

@SimplyBitcoin what the fuck did i just listen to

Jeff Booth, Jack Klucznik and Nicholas Marino perfectly explain how a Quantum threat to Bitcoin is "nonsense." "Bitcoin is the answer. Bitcoin is physics."

@robin_liquidium takopi.dev might work for you but i prefer to give claude desktop computer use to control the codex desktop app just for the kick of it, and control claude via native claude dispatch on mobile

@ercwl i’m still waiting for a codex mobile app that does exactly that but in a more polished package… hope it comes soon. until then tailscale + terminus + tmux is the best option i guess

sshing from my phone to run codex /goals on my desktop terminal is probably the coolest thing i’ve seen my devices do in my lifetime

@MatiAllin what is happening in that terminal window is pretty different. with one command you spawn a coding agent that runs for hours.

@ercwl Could do this on phone using TeamViewer 18 years ago.

@brian_trollz @stephanlivera @nic_carter *quantum bitch (which could be interpreted as being even smaller)

@ercwl @stephanlivera @nic_carter When Nic stops acting like a little bitch, people will stop treating him like one.

Quick question guys, wtf does @nic_carter have to do with quantum computing?

@stephanlivera @brian_trollz @nic_carter You don’t need to be an expert to see why what I said makes sense but you often do need to be some kind of expert to think it doesn’t.

@stephanlivera @brian_trollz @nic_carter It’s both credentialed and credential-less on both sides, people saying different things. The ones who are wrong are the one’s who think they can reliably predict what takes a decade and what takes two, after smarter-than-human intelligence exists.

@stephanlivera @brian_trollz @nic_carter people who think they have a firm grip over technology acceleration timelines in a post-agi world (which is not unlikely to happen) are intellectual featherweights that do not belong on a stage or in adult conversations. you can’t confidently distinguish between “in 1/2 decades”

@ercwl @brian_trollz @nic_carter Stepan Snigirev is a genuine expert on both quantum AND on bitcoin - but his comments are usually downplayed and minimised because they are inconvenient for the quantum-panicker narrative x.com/stephanlivera/…

@brian_trollz @nic_carter Come on @brian_trollz Tell me the quantum physics credentials of the people who are uplifted within the BT debate as naysayers on quantum It is credential-less on both sides And who cares about the credentials anyway? We need good people to summarize diff views

@nic_carter I talk regularly about what I think is the rational course of action. I'm not the credential-less clown crying about other peoples lack of credentials. That's you.

@brian_trollz @nic_carter sometimes you ask really stupid questions

@nic_carter @AndrewCurran_ He’s flagging a risk obv, we don’t know the exact probability that it occurs within that timeframe (probably <50%) but yes anyone with a brain knows migration path impl needs to begin ASAP even if it’s 0.5-5%. Luckily I think most agree that hash-based PQ sig needs testing *now*

@AndrewCurran_ and yet a bunch of bitcoiners on here who heard about quantum computing in 2026 are adamant that a CRQC will never happen. what does Scott Aaronson know, anyway?

New update from Scott Aaronson. He continues: 'And I’d say that that makes my own moral duty right now ironically simple and clear: namely, to use my unique soapbox, as the writer of The Internet’s Most Trusted Quantum Computing Blog Since 2005TM, to sound the alarm. So, here it is: if quantum computers start breaking cryptography a few years from now, don’t you dare come to this blog and tell me that I failed to warn you. This post is your warning. Please start switching to quantum-resistant encryption, and urge your company or organization or blockchain or standards body to do the same.'

@yacineMTB 🚅

I honestly think that we are in fast takeoff. This is fast. This isn't slow at all

> You can show me piles of evidence that my life and my child's joyful laugh is simply next-token prediction It’s not what I argued, I simply argued the mechanism that creates intelligence is simple and born from repetition under the right circumstances. For your point, we get into a separate argument, like the non-determinist view of the universe where some argue quantum stuff supports that notion and allows for things like free will. I agree with you in the sense that we don’t actually understand the universe, and that quantum is evidence of that, but I don’t necessarily subscribe to the idea that quantum mechanics is the definitive thing to focus on, other than that it’s a good example of how little we know and how strange things are. For my own satisfaction, we don’t even need to go that far, the poor basis of the Big Bang or that we can’t even explain gravity exhaustively is just the beginning of the list that indicates that you’re indeed in your right to argue that there probably is more than what we know to explain. Again though, completely separate argument. Complexity still arises from mundanity, you don’t need to look further than the Mandelbrot set to arrive at that conclusion.

@ercwl @Yampeleg You can show me piles of evidence that my life and my child's joyful laugh is simply next-token prediction, and I will simply refuse to believe you because it doesn't make intuitive sense.

You realize it's only next-token prediction? That that's ACTUALLY all it does, for real? How is any of this even real.

@ellipticurve @Yampeleg Does that postulate that the origins of intelligence requires complexity beyond mundane beginnings beyond our comprehension though, which is what we’re actually discussing? Recommended reading:

@ercwl @Yampeleg Also thought that once. I prefer: van.physics.illinois.edu/ask/listing/24… Maybe there’s life beyond via quantum conservation.

@ellipticurve @Yampeleg Depressing? It is miraculous

@ercwl @Yampeleg Depressing worldview. I once believed the same. Not sure if you have or plan to have children, but this worldview becomes untenable with them around. Whether rational or not is irrelevant. There MUST be more.

@DcentraliseMe when are you paying

Liberty are to release the LibertyX API in ‘early May’. This is institutional grade order execution for market makers. Allowing them to: 🎯fill orders against user intents ⚓️ anchor price ranges The retail facing marketplace UI comes after - but this is the core. LS also confirm what I covered in my latest video… Higher prices can be established through quotes backed with liquidity. The market maker marketplace is key for the peg. and it’s coming… soon™️ #pDAI to $1 #PulseChain season