Erik Tilanus

23.5K posts

Erik Tilanus

Erik Tilanus

@erik_wt

Schrijver van het boek Werken met SAS voor data analyse. Kan slecht tegen onrecht. Steunt vrijheidsstreven van onderdrukte volkeren.

Nederland Katılım Ağustos 2011
64 Takip Edilen491 Takipçiler
Ivanka Trump RV Q🇺🇲
Ivanka Trump RV Q🇺🇲@IvankaTrumpRV2·
Simple poll. Please be honest! As of today, how much do you still trust this man? A. 100 % B. 75% C. 50% D. 25% E. 0%
Ivanka Trump RV Q🇺🇲 tweet media
English
34K
2K
13.9K
1.8M
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
@WimdenOudsten Ik heb nog geen winkel gezien zonder tenminste 1 kassa met kassière. Maar de zelfscan gaat net zo makkelijk. En dat men checks uitvoert lijkt me heel logisch. Dus waarom moeilijk doen? Anders ga je maar gewoon bij de kassière langs. De wachtrijen van vroeger zie je niet meer.
Nederlands
0
0
2
113
Wim den Oudsten
Wim den Oudsten@WimdenOudsten·
Volkomen mee eens! Beste bazen van de Decathlon, Beste bazen van Delhaize, Beste Ikea bazen en alle andere handelszaken die een zelfscan kassa hebben zoals AD, Dekamarkt, coop en zo voort. Je bent nu bijna uitgerust met uitsluitend zelfscan kassa’s. De laatste keer dat ik daar was (ik niet persoonlijk) was de dame die de bonnetjes controleerde bij de uitgang iedereen aan het tegenhouden. Ik heb er niet voor gekozen om mee te doen aan deze onzin, dus ik heb de uitgangslijn overgeslagen en ben vertrokken. Ik hoorde haar zeggen "meneer, uh, meneer", terwijl ik verder liep en het bonnetje boven mijn hoofd tilde, toen ik de winkel verliet. Je kunt me vertrouwen om zelf te betalen of je kassières terug te zetten zoals vroeger. Ik hoef niet te bewijzen dat ik jouw werk heb gedaan. Wil je dat ik kassier word zonder opleiding? Dan is het jouw probleem niet het mijne. Controleer mij niet voor een baan waarvoor je weigert iemand in dienst te nemen. We willen geen robots, we willen mensen!!! Getekend, Wij allemaal Kopieer en plak, want ik ben het 100% eens!!
Wim den Oudsten tweet media
Nederlands
214
1.1K
3K
104.4K
Ihab Hassan
Ihab Hassan@IhabHassane·
Yes — Jesus was a Jew. No serious person disputes this. But if you want to apply modern geography to where He was crucified — the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, Golgotha — that site is in East Jerusalem, which under international law is occupied Palestinian territory. Not modern-day Israel. And honestly? This whole debate is ridiculous. He is our Lord. He belongs to neither modern nation-state nor political narrative. Trying to claim Him as an Israeli or a Palestinian to score points in a modern conflict is an insult to his followers everywhere, and we should be ashamed to drag His name into our conflicts. Stop politicizing Jesus. He was above all of this.
Hen Mazzig@HenMazzig

In John 2:13, Jesus goes to Jerusalem to celebrate Passover. In Luke 2:21 Jesus was circumcised on the eighth day, in accordance with Jewish law. In Luke 4:16, Jesus described as regularly attending synagogue and participated in Shabbat prayers. In Matthew 2:2, the Magi ask: “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews?” In John 19:19, the inscription on the cross reads: “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.” Jesus was, in fact, a Jew who lived in what is now modern-day Israel.

English
137
78
581
74.7K
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
@KelRebel Ik vraag me af voor welk probleem deze oplossing bedacht is. Helemaal met je eens, dat terminologie organisch verandert en niet via dit soort lijstjes. Wat moeten we er mee? Achteraf alle mogelijke documenten kuisen?
Nederlands
0
0
1
15
Sålly
Sålly@KelRebel·
We gaan dus mensen (met terugwerkende kracht) genderissues opleggen die ze w.s. nooit hadden of hebben. Complete onzin; Bowie draait zich om op Bali. Ik kan me in vele wijzigingen goed vinden, maar taalveranderingen verlopen organisch. Dit boekje riekt naar Orwelliaanse newspeak.
Sålly tweet media
GIF
GIF
GeenStijl@geenstijl

GELEKT. Woordenlijst MinOCW: 'Gouden Eeuw', 'Midden-Oosten', 'slaaf', 'blank', 'Holocaust' (?), 'zittenblijver', 'Gen Z', 'dames en heren' FOUT geenstijl.nl/5189256/gelekt…

Nederlands
10
1
14
1.8K
Occupy Democrats
Occupy Democrats@OccupyDemocrats·
BREAKING: BRAVO! The Catholic Archbishop of the U.S. military slams Trump's Iran War as unjust and tells Catholic troops that they should not obey "clearly immoral" orders while striving to "preserve innocent lives." Pope Leo's marching orders are reverberating far and wide... "Yours is in a unique ministry in the sense that you don't oversee a geographic region or any real significant church real estate," said CBS News' Ed O'Keefe during a "Face the Nation" interview with Archbishop Timothy Broglio. "You essentially minister on bases and the battlefield and so given ongoing operations right now in the Middle East, in the Caribbean, in other parts of the world, I'm curious, what is your spiritual guidance to a service member who comes seeking it?" "Well, thank you very much for the opportunity and it varies depending on where the person is," said Broglio. "We're dealing with a situation in the Middle East now for example where the chaplains are still in place but many of the dependents have been moved to Europe or back to the United States. So they find themselves in a situation where the faithful to whom they were ministering are either gone or they're in hotels. So that changes the whole reality." U.S. bases across the Middle East have been devastated by Iranian drone and rocket attacks, forcing mass evacuations in many places. The war, in addition to being a profound moral crime has proven to be a historic strategic disaster for America. "And then there are others of course who are with the troops that have been moved in and of course their ministry is, in a certain sense, a little more regular but it's still a challenge because of the situation," Broglio continued. "Given that you're a priest ministering to people in the military, I imagine much of your work, much of your focus is built around Saint Augustine and the idea of just war or when is war justified," said O'Keefe. "The idea that it's only waged as a necessity and in order that peace may be obtained and more broadly perhaps that the response is proportional." "Correct," said Broglio. "That's to gloss over pretty deep teachings, but essentially that's the root of it. I know that after the president, for example, threatened to take Greenland by force you had said in an interview it doesn't seem acceptable to invade a friendly nation and that such rhetoric tarnishes the image of the United States," said O'Keefe. "You said it would be an illegal and immoral order to kill deliberately the survivors of an alleged Venezuelan drug boat if they don't pose an immediate lethal threat to our armed forces. So given what's going on in the Middle East, I'm curious is the war with Iran justified?" "I would think under the just war theory, it is not because while there was a threat with nuclear arms, it's compensating for a threat before the threat is actually realized," said the archbishop. "And I think there I would line myself up with Pope Leo who has been urging for negotiation. I realize also that you could say that 'well with whom are you going to negotiate' and that is a problem but in the meantime, lives are being lost both there and also among our troops. So it is a concern." Most Americans would strongly agree with Broglio's assessment. This war is the definition of unjust. It was started by Trump illegally because Israel wants it. Their hope is that Iran will destabilize into a failed state, removing a regional adversary so that they can continue their territorial expansion into Gaza, Lebanon, and beyond uncontested. Trump is mass slaughtering civilians and sacrificing American troops in a war that serves zero American interests. There are roughly 1.8 million Catholics in the U.S. military. "And so if you're hearing from a service member who says... If your teaching, your guidance is this is not justified, what am I to do as a Catholic who's in the service?" asked O'Keefe. "That's a very good question because obviously the way conscientious objection is set up in the United States military, you cannot object to a specific war or a specific action, you can only object 'I'm opposed to war,'" said Archbishop Broglio. "So, I would think it depends on where you are in the chain of command, obviously you know the Marine who's given an order he's not in a position really to resist that order. I mean he has to obey unless it's clearly immoral and then he would probably have to speak to his chaplain, to his chain of command." "The question might be, would generals or admiral have space to perhaps say 'Can we look at this a different way?'" he continued. "But having spoken to some of them too, they're also in the same dilemma. So I guess my counsel would be to do as little harm as you can and try to preserve innocent lives." O'Keefe then asked the bishop what he thinks about Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's efforts to "cast this war as something that perhaps Jesus would justify." "It's a little bit problematic in the sense that... You know the Lord Jesus certainly brought a message of peace and also I think war is always a last resort," said Broglio. "Now, you know, they may have information that led them to think that that was the only choice they had. I'm not making a judgement about that because I really don't know. But I do think that it's hard to cast this war, you know, as something that would be sponsored by the Lord." "And that's certainly something that the pope has suggested himself, right?" asked O'Keefe. "Not commenting on the secretary but commenting on war generally that this idea that, you know, as you're praying for the success of the war. What is it he said recently? God does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them. That would seem to put a lot of what's going on right now in conflict." "It certainly would and I turn back to [Pope] Paul VI who made very few trips outside of Italy," said Broglio. "But when he did come to the UN he made that dramatic appeal, which I saw live on television as a little kid. 'Jamais plus la guerre, jamais plus la guerre! Never again war! Never again war! And yet that was in 1965 I think. Now, so many years later we're still in this situation so I think I Pope Leo would definitely support saying that we have to find a situation where men and women can sit down and find avenues of peace." It's worth noting that Broglio is considered one of the most conservative Catholic bishops in the United States, so his words will carry additional weight with soldiers who generally lean right. The full CBS interview will air on Easter Sunday and is sure to go off like a bomb in MAGA world, where hardcore Trumpers have already declared Pope Leo and the Catholic Church their sworn enemies. As for us, we stand with Broglio, Leo, and the peacemakers. No. More. War. Please ❤️ and share to thank Archbishop Broglio!
Occupy Democrats tweet media
English
58
923
2K
35.6K
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
@HamasAtrocities "Our territory". A more obvious lie is not imaginable. Israeli territory is demarcated by the green line, which already 50% more land than allocated in 1948.
English
0
0
0
9
Hamas Atrocities
Hamas Atrocities@HamasAtrocities·
In Israel, we are such a diabolical expansionist and colonialist country, that in 1978 we gave up two thirds of our territory to have peace with Egypt
Hamas Atrocities tweet media
English
1.3K
1.3K
8.1K
1.8M
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
@Israellycool I mourn the death of these young guys. Having said that: why were they there? They shouldn't have been there, since they have no business there.
English
0
0
0
6
David Lange
David Lange@Israellycool·
On Monday evening, four brave young IDF soldiers were killed in Lebanon. One of them was my beloved stepson, Gilad Harel. He was one of the greatest men I have ever known, brave, kind, and deeply loved. israellycool.com/2026/04/03/gil…
English
6.1K
1.5K
11.9K
692.6K
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
@s_sultzer @Microinteracti1 You may have missed a crucial point. NATO is a defensive organization, not an offensive organization. If a member is attacked, the other members will help. There is no rule that, if one member starts a war, the other members will join. US and Israel started this war. Conclusion?
English
3
7
77
1.3K
S David Sultzer
S David Sultzer@s_sultzer·
@Microinteracti1 What ridiculous bullshit. If American assets can't fly over your territory, even though we pay substantially for your defense, you can go get fucked. How's that for a simple explanation, asshole.
English
153
6
246
27.7K
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
Let me explain something to the MAGA crowd, because clearly someone needs to. They seem to think NATO is cosmic room service. You pick up the phone, say “hello, we’re having a bit of a war here,” and thirty-one countries march to your rescue. A continental Uber for military adventures. That is not how it works. Article 5 is a mutual defense clause. The clue is in the word mutual. And it has been triggered exactly once in NATO’s entire history. After September 11. When America was attacked. Not Europe. America. Every NATO member showed up. They went to Afghanistan. They fought. They bled. They died. In America’s war. On America’s behalf. Now imagine they hadn’t. Over 1,100 allied soldiers died in Afghanistan. British, Canadian, German, Danish, Polish. And yes, even Ukrainian soldiers, who had no NATO obligation whatsoever. Gone. Without them, those are American names on those graves. Sons from Ohio. Fathers from Georgia. Kids from Nebraska who never came home. Then there is the money. NATO allies spent over 100 billion dollars on a war that started on American soil. Without that, Washington pays every cent. On top of the 2 to 3 trillion the war already cost. And without allied bases across Europe and Central Asia, American supply lines collapse entirely. Without British forces in Helmand and Canadians in Kandahar, the Taliban reconstitutes in three years instead of ten. The gaps get filled one way. More American deployments. More American coffins arriving at Dover. Afghanistan was bloody. But NATO took the hit. Without them, every single one of those casualties would have had an American name. Trump called allies like these losers. Suckers. If you are a certain kind of broken person, that probably makes sense to you. But for the rest of us, what those soldiers did has a different name. Honor. The bond between men who have been in the same dirt, under the same fire. Between Brits and Americans, Frenchmen and Norwegians, Canadians and Danes. Not a diplomatic relationship. A blood bond. Brotherhood forged in places most people will never see and cannot imagine. In that culture, you do not mock a fallen ally. You do not sneer at the dead. It is the lowest thing a human being can do. Trump did it to a standing ovation. If you are a MAGA supporter travelling to NATO countries, understand this. There are no friendly pats on the back waiting for you. No one will buy you a beer. The governments who share your worldview sit in Minsk, Moscow and Pyongyang. Brutal dictatorships where journalists disappear, elections are theatre and dissent is a medical condition treated in basements. Not London. Not Paris. Not Rome, Stockholm, Copenhagen, Berlin or Ottawa. You have abandoned the open societies, the free press, the rule of law, the places where people actually want to live. You traded the best of civilization for a very small, very dark room. Frankly, it serves you right.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Gandalv / @Microinteracti1
Gandalv tweet mediaGandalv tweet mediaGandalv tweet mediaGandalv tweet media
English
929
6.3K
21.1K
796.1K
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
@EylonALevy Just as normal as attacking Iran, while you are negotiating a deal. It's a "both sides" situation. Do I feel sorry for the people? Yes, at both sides. But I remember who started this.
English
0
0
0
12
Eylon Levy
Eylon Levy@EylonALevy·
Iran is firing ballistic missiles either with 500kg warheads or cluster submunitions at Israeli residential areas, and the whole world is treating that as totally normal.
Eylon Levy tweet media
English
25.8K
2K
9.7K
2.8M
Rob Jetten
Rob Jetten@MinPres·
De bilaterale relatie tussen Nederland en Israël gaat jaren terug. Die bestaat uit een open en eerlijke dialoog. Vandaag heb ik in dat kader een kennismakingsgesprek gevoerd met de president van Israël @Isaac_Herzog. We spraken uitgebreid over de recente ontwikkelingen in Iran, Libanon, de stabiliteit in de gehele regio en de grote zorgen van het kabinet daarover. Ik heb mijn medeleven betuigd naar aanleiding van de aanvallen op onschuldige Israëlische burgers door Iran en aangeven dat het van het grootste belang is om te voorkomen dat er nog meer burgerslachtoffers vallen aan beide kanten van het conflict. We erkennen de legitieme veiligheidszorgen van Israël. Tegelijkertijd staan soevereiniteit en territoriale integriteit van Libanon buiten kijf. We maken ons ernstig zorgen over de humanitaire situatie in Libanon, zeker nu meer dan een miljoen mensen op de vlucht zijn geslagen. Ook heb ik benadrukt dat de humanitaire situatie in Gaza moet verbeteren en dat alle grensovergangen open moeten om de broodnodige hulp voor de Palestijnse bevolking toe te laten. En specifiek aandacht gevraagd voor het niet invoeren van de registratieplicht voor internationale NGO’s. Ook hebben we gesproken over de situatie op Westelijke Jordaanoever en het onacceptabele kolonistengeweld. Verder heb ik onderstreept dat het door Israël invoeren van de doodstraf, voor ons land en andere EU lidstaten onacceptabel is. Uiteraard hebben we stilgestaan bij het belang van de aanpak van antisemitisme in Nederland naar aanleiding van de recente gebeurtenissen in Rotterdam en Amsterdam.
Rob Jetten tweet media
Nederlands
536
31
230
152.5K
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
Terwijl de EU de afhankelijkheid van de VS wil verminderen, worden we voor voedingsmiddelen juist meer van de VS afhankelijk: Douwe Egberts en Calvé komen in Amerikaanse handen. Wie heeft ons gevraagd of dit acceptabel is?
Nederlands
0
0
1
53
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
Ik had kritiek op Wiebe. Daar kan hij niet tegen en nu heeft hij mij geblokkeerd. Moet ik daar verdrietig om zijn?
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt

@WiebeBarkey @NUnl Veroordelingskans voor kolonisten wegens geweld minder dan 2%. Veroordelingskans voor Palestijnen wegens geweld meer dan 98%. Kolonisten schieten met scherp, Palestijnen gooien met stenen. Dus voor wie is deze wet bedoeld?

Nederlands
0
0
1
65
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
@thesluis NGO monitor! LOL. De experts op gebied van "guilty by association ". Heb je ook een echte betrouwbare onafhankelijke bron?
Nederlands
2
0
3
107
Gidon the Sluis 🇮🇱🇳🇱
@erik_wt Je kletst uit je nek
Ralph Bossen@BossenRalp11708

3 december 2025: Een rapport van 'NGO Monitor' stelt dat interne documenten van Hamas laten zien dat deze organisatie systematisch controle uitoefent over buitenlandse NGO’s in de Gazastrook waaronder Oxfam. Volgens het rapport functioneren de NGO’s in Gaza niet onafhankelijk of neutraal, maar zijn ze ingebed in een “geïnstitutionaliseerd kader van dwang, intimidatie en bewaking” dat dient om Hamas’ militaire en politieke doelen te ondersteunen. Ik vroeg aan vier AI systemen: "Is er ondersteunend bewijs voor de claim dat Hamas NGO's aanstuurt en beheerst ondanks dat NGO monitor een Israëlische organisatie is?" Gemini: Ja — er is stevig ondersteunend bewijsmateriaal voor de claim dat Hamas invloed heeft gehad op NGO’s in Gaza, ze onder toezicht stelde, structureel controle uitoefende via “guarantors”, en dat sommige NGO’s in meerdere gevallen volgens die documenten medewerkten. Het is op dit moment het sterkste publieke bewijs dat is gepresenteerd. GROK: Ja, er is ondersteunend bewijs, hoofdzakelijk de declassified Hamas-documenten, die gedetailleerd en specifiek zijn. Dit wordt gecorroborreerd door media en IDF. ChatGPT: Ja — het rapport van NGO Monitor bevat goede aanwijzingen (interne documenten, namenlijsten, beschrijvingen van controlemechanismen) dat Hamas NGO’s in Gaza probeert te beheersen of in te lijven. Die aanwijzingen mogen serieus genomen worden. Perplexity: Ja er ligt concreet materiaal dat een hoge mate van Hamas‑inmenging en dwang ten aanzien van NGO’s in Gaza aannemelijk maakt. ngo-monitor.org/reports/puppet…

Nederlands
5
1
10
632
Gidon the Sluis 🇮🇱🇳🇱
Laat er geen misverstand over bestaan. Hamas-terroristen bij UNRWA-compounds, die hun wapens inruilen voor UNRWA-vesten en als “hulpverleners” naar buiten lopen. Dit is structurele infiltratie. En dit financiert het kabinet met vele miljoenen euro’s??😡
Nederlands
113
1.3K
3.2K
81K
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
@MichaelVerstrae Ben je ingehuurd door het Israëlische ministerie van propaganda? Het lijkt er op dat je niets weet van de rechtsongelijkheid tussen kolonisten en Palestijnen. Doe je oogkleppen even af.
Nederlands
1
0
0
16
Michael Verstraeten
Michael Verstraeten@MichaelVerstrae·
Alweer fake news over Israël. De doodstrafwetten voorzien nergens dat zij alleen gelden voor Palestijnen. Het omgekeerde is waar. Omdat vooral Palestijnen terroristische aanslagen plegen in Israël, zullen vooral Palestijnen onder die wetten vallen. Als morgen bij ons de meeste geweldsdelicten in Brussel zouden worden gepleegd door bijvoorbeeld Chinezen, dan zijn die wetten niet discriminerend. Het staat de Chinezen dan vrij om te stoppen met het plegen van geweld. (No offense aan onze Chinese vrienden die louter bij toeval het hypothetisch voorbeeld zijn hier.) (Noot: ik ben tegen de doodstraf, in alle gevallen. Maar juist is juist.)
Michael Verstraeten tweet media
Nederlands
80
79
374
11.4K
Erik Tilanus
Erik Tilanus@erik_wt·
Weet iemand wat er gebeurd is met Trump's Board of Peace? Hebben ze al ergens vrede gesticht? Of is hij opgeheven?
Nederlands
0
0
1
37