tin33

@NEARProtocol @ilblackdragon @IronClawAI Near is lagging far behind the market! Which bastard from your team is selling?

“The infrastructure choices we make now will determine what is possible later.” NEAR Co-Founder @ilblackdragon on the future of AI agents. Read the full article for a introduction to @IronClawAI’s secure infra 👇

@vinibarbosabr Bitcoin rebounded like most of the market, with the exception of Near, who's been selling all week. Near is lagging the market by a long way

@ether1236 NEAR looks pretty good from the points I mentioned in the video (and article), doesn't it? Pretty clear PMF and solid tokenomics with recent changes Any holder can (and will) sell This is how market distribution works

Bittensor and NEAR are two very interesting projects building on top of two very interesting technologies → crypto and AI Which one is the best one, though? + bittensor:native or + $NEAR It depends... This article I wrote in April has been one of my most read articles so far, so I decided to try this new format going through the research in a commented, no-edition video Let me know if you like this new format and if I should do more of it for my other articles as well

@db19crypto Rhea Finance was recently hacked, and all ZEC was stolen! Even though the stolen funds were returned, the reputation is already damaged

which there was somewhere to borrow against spot zec

@ElChubbyTv concede 6 goals in a season

Hoy en día que debe pasar para que un portero gane un balón de oro?

@NEARProtocol Enough of this nonsense! Near is a money laundering machine for its founders and team

Moving assets cross-chain should be one click and done. NEAR Intents abstracts away all the cross-chain complexity under the hood. You specify the tokens you have and the tokens you want. A network of solvers fulfills your intent. No manual gas juggling or bridge management.

@NEARProtocol Be careful, the team is selling

May the 4th

@NearSuperApp Of course you're not an investor, you're the one selling Near

Why hold $NEAR? I’m no investor, but if I were, here’s what I’d be thinking. What do NEAR Protocol, NEAR Intents, NEAR Confidential Intents, NEAR AI all have in common? They are all core technologies that, together—uniquely—enable the creation of a product like near.com. A product that’s universally valuable to everyone—those in crypto regardless of chain they may favor, as well as the masses of non-native users to come. ❤️✌️

@NearSuperApp @Near_Eco @IvanPlume @dominic_w @ICPHUBS 6 years since its launch, and Near is a money laundering machine for its founders and team. Near's investors are poor

Can’t speak to your point 2. But as to the first — In the words of Benjamin Graham, in the short term the market is a voting machine, in the long term a weighing machine. Our job is to focus on the long term. NEAR technology really is unique. We just have to show it’s the substrate on which valuable things can be built.

The VALUE of the technology is reflected in the $NEAR token price, dude. 1) It seems the market doesn’t care about the $NEAR 2) Near Foundation staff itself doesn’t trust in $NEAR by selling it on exchanges.

@NEARProtocol stay away from this sh!tcoin

NEAR is the unified commerce layer for assets and agents. Where value moves as easily as information. Where agents don’t just think, they transact. Where “cross-chain” disappears into the background.

ICYMI: NEAR kept shipping all April Check out the full recap 👇

@dwillems42 Rhea was hacked and the entire ZEC was stolen. They were helped to get everything back, but the protocol still hasn't returned the money to the holders. Be careful.

Any service to make loans with ZEC as a collateral? I don't want to sell my ZEC, but I want to use them. Advice?

@NearSuperApp @near_intents Is this the reason why Near has been falling all week? Because Near intens is compensating for the losses?

Litecoin’s 3+ hour rollback was a 17-sigma protocol failure. LF saw it coming, said nothing, admits no wrongdoing. Meanwhile @near_intents is making users whole—even though its systems worked perfectly and blocked $2.4M in additional damage. Some teams fix what they didn’t break. And me interning at LF will also be a 17-sigma event.

@InvestingHaven The team is selling non-stop, don't listen to this idiot

Why $NEAR Looks Undervalued NEAR’s capabilities extend beyond typical L1 narratives. 👉600ms block times. 👉~1.2s finality. 👉Chain abstraction live. 👉AI + multichain focus. NEAR Protocol is positioning itself as infrastructure for the next phase of crypto.

@NEARProtocol Now it's clear why Near is in sh!t

@NEARProtocol @REAL_Porfiry/near-foundation-board-member-exposed-1-27m-e38ce28d76ab" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@REAL_Porfiry/…

Prevention > Recovery IronClaw is proactive security for the agentic era.

@NEARProtocol prevention > goes down

@VictorHoncharuk @CryptoMichNL This is the total revenue since the beginning of the year. 1,59mln Near, meanwhile inflation is 10.4mln

@ether1236 @CryptoMichNL You forget about Near intents

$NEAR is extremely undervalued. The entire supply is circulating, and all their mechanics are build in favor of the community actively using the token. Nobody is interested into AI <> #Crypto protocols. And that's where the real alpha is. The current valuation of $NEAR is $1.7B. Arguably, that could be a lot, however I'd want to make sure to understand the thesis behind this one. The revenue for 2026, in the first four months: 12 million $NEAR tokens. That's: $15.6 million in 4 months (equals $40-60 million over the entire year 2026). Before 2026, a total revenue of $10 million. If that's solely for 2025, then it's projected to provide a CAGR of 300-500%, even during the hardest bear market conditions possible. Let's model this further. 2025: $10 million 2026: $50 million (400%) 2027: $150 million (200%) 2028: $300 million (100%) 2029: $450 million (50%) 2030: $585 million (30%) The projection would be that it achieves $500-600 million revenue in 2030. To be putting this in context, the current Price-to-Sales Ratio of $NEAR is 34x. Solana's: 40x Ethereum: 200x Average valuations for Web 2 companies would be between 15-30x P/S. For instance, OpenAI and Anthropic are currently trading at significantly higher numbers than that with significantly less revenue. If this expansion continues for $NEAR, it makes sense that it will be trading at a higher valuation in the coming years, and is actually dirt cheap at this point. The markets are undervaluing many crypto projects, and even if the current P/S ratio sustains for the coming years, $NEAR could provide an investment thesis and return of 10-15X in the coming four years.

@VictorHoncharuk @CryptoMichNL This is revenue Near Intents

@ilblackdragon Sir, can you stop selling? Your team is selling nonstop

Court is basically a prompt injection of judge and jury by lawyers from both sides