ethyrmire
201 posts
If youbi was a petite Asian man that looks like a kid (heesang) they would all love him
استاذ محمد@M0hIv
English
@iGargleCement @BDFREEN U just outed urself as a complete retard by not only bringing up vrt but also by saying ur friend has a 120ms vrt
English
@BDFREEN He is overexaggerating, but aim at the highest level is EXTREMELY genetics-heavy
There are freaks with 150ms reaction time even without training and an insane dynamic vision
You are not beating that if your all time VRT peak is 150ms with good sleep, caffeine and gym
English
retard saw 1 post connecting bp to aim
GIF
Storm@_Stormow
Aim isn’t hard work btw. It’s all genetics. You can not earn good aim.
English
troons dont invalidate your own existence challenge
Paige@Paige_on_twt
This chart is burned into my brain like the afterimage of the sun when you stare at it then close your eyes.
English
ethyrmire retweetledi
ethyrmire retweetledi
@buglepong @plataproxima @Romy_Holland it doesn’t matter what the guru sees until they say smth about it
English
@ethyrmire @plataproxima @Romy_Holland Why cant the brown eyed do the exact same? Logically, the guru also sees brown eyed people
English
@Diatribe333 @plataproxima @Romy_Holland id explain further but im tired and the tweet length limit is quite irritating. im sure any ai will give you the explanation
English
@ethyrmire @plataproxima @Romy_Holland It's already common knowledge that there are at least 98 people because everyone can see that everyone else will see at least 98 people. Diving into iteration etc. is wrong and misleading. A knows for a fact that even if A has brown eyes, nobody sees fewer than 98 people
English
English
@ethyrmire @plataproxima @Romy_Holland No, A's B thinks at least 98. B thinks at least 99. B's C also thinks at least 98. A's B's C thinks 97 which A and everyone like A knows is wrong, because A can see that B has blue eyes.
English
@Diatribe333 @plataproxima @Romy_Holland youre making the same mistake here. B knows there are at least 98 blue eyed people, yes. but B does not know that C knows that. because from B’s point of view, B might not be blue. and if B isn’t blue, then C doesn’t get to count B as blue. so B can think C might see only 97
English
@ethyrmire @plataproxima @Romy_Holland A thinks B might see 98 people
A's B might think C sees 97 people, if A and B have brown eyes
Since A sees 99 people, he knows B knows there are at least 98 people (B sees at least 98). So A knows B knows C is wrong even if A has brown eyes and B thinks he has brown eyes
English
@Diatribe333 @plataproxima @Romy_Holland the mistake is that A is using As info inside Bs hypothetical. A knows B has blue eyes, but B doesnt know that. so when A asks “what might B think C sees?” B can imagine that B himself isn’t blue, so C might see only 97. A cant stop the reg using facts B doesnt know about himself
English
@ethyrmire @plataproxima @Romy_Holland A knows B sees at least 98 people. A's B knows C sees at least 97.
But A knows this is wrong because A sees 99, and sees that everyone else can also see at least 98. Thus shouldn't A stop the regression there? It's common knowledge that A's B's C is wrong
English
@Diatribe333 @plataproxima @Romy_Holland but that only rules out 0–97, it doesn't start the countdown. the guru’s statement gives the public base case: “at least 1 blue-eyed person,” so the chain can run: if 1 leave night 1, if 2 night 2, etc. without that starting point, nights 1-97 mean nothing new
English
@ethyrmire @plataproxima @Romy_Holland But with 100 blue-eyed people it is common knowledge that at least 98 have blue eyes. Everyone can see that.
English
@Diatribe333 @plataproxima @Romy_Holland everyone knowing = each person individually knows
common knowledge = everyone knows, everyone knows everyone knows it, everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone knows it, etc. the gurus statement creates common knowledge
English
@Diatribe333 @plataproxima @Romy_Holland one blue eyed person. since A thinks "maybe i dont have blue eyes, if i dont then B sees 0 blue eyed people". so prior to the guru speaking, A does not know B knows there is a blue eyed person
English
@plataproxima @Romy_Holland yep that’s it. n blue people would leave on night n and nobody else leaves
English
@Romy_Holland is it the blue-eyed people all leaving in the 100th night?
English
@TayFidei @SimonSchfe45703 yeah so it’s not adjusted for being female, bmi doesn’t care about gender. i was joking but anyway a male at your height and weight would obviously be in worse condition
English
@user73556081 @SimonSchfe45703 Still 17.8 in ones where there's no gender option. 17.76 if I use the equation and do it myself. You don't add 2.
English
Brutal how this is true
Gargoyle@Gargoylegroypa
126 lbs for a 5'9 male is not even in the underweight category. You people are just fucking fat.
English
@TayFidei @SimonSchfe45703 ur not fat tho so hope my comment doesn’t inspire any unwanted behaviour
English
