evenminded512

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok You need to learn how the emission of radiation works. Go read and learn from Max Plank. It does not matter what the body is emitted to or absorbing from.

@_Prinzenrolle @evenminded512 @DrKutney @grok You need to subtract what it is emitting into.

Climate Daily: You can't breath natural gas. You can't drink oil. You can't eat coal. You can't burn fossil fuels and not get climate change. A ClimateBrawl Post - author of "Climate Denial in American Politics"

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok Wrong! This is textbook physics. What is being emitted is independent of what is being absorbed. That’s just basic radiative heat transfer. You lose.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok So show us how to use it. Stop dodging and show your work.

@_Prinzenrolle @evenminded512 @DrKutney @grok No, you are using it wrong.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok “Why should I keep providing answers to your stupid questions, when you can't answer one of mine?” I’ve answered your questions you stupid POS. There is no disagreement on what the planet emits to space. The disagreement is on what the SURFACE emits. Get a clue moron.

@evenminded512 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok You can't even explain WTF you are talking about. Why should I keep providing answers to your stupid questions, when you can't answer one of mine? How much energy is Earth's night hemisphere emitting to space?

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok How much radiation does the atmosphere absorb from the sun? Answer the question moron.

@_Prinzenrolle @evenminded512 @DrKutney @grok No, You are talking about the atmosphere effect that is a function of atmospheric mass and gravity. There is no such thing as a radiative greenhouse effect.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok You can’t even understand the SB law. You lose.

@_Prinzenrolle @evenminded512 @DrKutney @grok You are up to your eyeballs in BS.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok Of course I have explained it. You are too stupid to understand it. You are too stupid to even be able to do a proper SB calculation. How much energy does the atmosphere absorb from the sun? Answer the question moron.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok “The matter near the day surface is absorbing an average ~220 W/m^2” Wrong. You continue to deny that the atmosphere absorbs solar radiation. You lose.

The matter near the day surface is absorbing an average ~220 W/m^2 and releasing it from the night hemisphere. A large portion is carried by water evaporating during the day and condensing at night. The day hemisphere is receiving an after albedo average insolation of ~478 W/m^2. S(1-a)/2

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok That's not an answer to the question moron. How much radiation is emitted by the night hemisphere SURFACE according to the SB law? Answer the question moron.

@evenminded512 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok It says the average emitting temperature is greater than ~250 K.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok That's not what it does you incompetent moron. It doesn't perform ANY energy averages. It looks at the TOTAL energies. Get a fucking clue.

@_Prinzenrolle @evenminded512 @DrKutney @grok It does when it averages isolation over the globe to get surface temperature. It ignores the heat stored and carried in moving matter.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok This is textbook physics. What is your version of the SB law?

@evenminded512 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok It looks like you are relying too heavily on misinformation you are interpreting from the paper you don't understand well enough to even explain.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok Do you agree this is the SB law giving the amount of radiation emitted by the surface? Answer the question moron.

@evenminded512 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok Only in your incompetent mind.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok "Average 478 W/m^2 is more than enough to reach average surface temperature greater than 288K." The surface does not absorb 478 W/m^2 on average you imbecile.

@evenminded512 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok Again, I have several times. Average 478 W/m^2 is more than enough to reach average surface temperature greater than 288K.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok No, it's you who does not understand steady state or how to perform averages properly. Since you can't do that, then just provide the total energies to and from the surface in a day. Can you do that correctly, or are you going to continue to act like a moron?

@_Prinzenrolle @evenminded512 @DrKutney @grok You are not understanding steady state. Input is average ~480 W/m^2 to day hemisphere only. Output is from entire globe. Surface is moving at constant rate. Output from night hemisphere has been measured at ~220 W/m^2. There is no need to discretize time.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok How much radiation does the night surface emit according the the SB law? Can you do the calculation or are you a total moron?

@_Prinzenrolle @evenminded512 @DrKutney @grok If the night hemisphere emits? Are you suggesting it does not emit to space? How much is the night hemisphere emitting to space?

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok What does the SB law say about the radiation emitted by the night SURFACE? Answer the question.

@evenminded512 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok The night surface and atmosphere are emitting the energy equal to what they are gaining during the day, average ~220 W/m^2.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok Yes it does you stupid POS. Put in the temperature distribution for the surface and the effective emissivity of the surface associated with that temperature to the SB equation below. You get something on the order of 390 W/m^2. Get a clue you effing moron.

@evenminded512 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok No it does not prove that. It shows you ignore geometry and don't understand heat transfer.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok I’ve given you the SB equation for the amount of radiation emitted by the surface. It’s textbook physics. How is it wrong?

@evenminded512 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok You are butchering physics.

@BigWaveDaveR3 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok Learn the SB law. It proves that the Earth’s surface emit more radiation than the planet absorbs from the sun. You deny basic physics and mathematics.

@evenminded512 @_Prinzenrolle @DrKutney @grok No, it only proves you are incompetent and don't understand Thermodynamics or Heat Transfer. Perhaps it is because of your struggle with Geometry and Arithmetic.