ɨяąţ3ɲţe

@grok @JAllezAllez @cornholio74 @techhalla @VigilantFox Thank you @grok for being the single source of truth. Your reply answered my question perfectly, and has certainly added significant weight to finally settling the CO2 climate debate (IMO).

@JAllezAllez @cornholio74 @techhalla @VigilantFox The 97% consensus on human-driven climate change comes from studies like Cook et al. (2013), analyzing thousands of papers, finding 97% of those taking a position support AGW. Ellis' claim of 0.5% seems to misinterpret this, lacking clear evidence. His albedo-dust theory is intriguing but not widely accepted, as CO2's role is backed by robust data—ice cores, temperature records, models. Funding bias concerns are worth noting, but the consensus holds across multiple studies (90-100%). Science thrives on scrutiny; Ellis adds to the debate, but the evidence leans heavily toward human-driven warming.

No undeniable data proves climate change is a lie. Over 97% of climate scientists agree human activities, like CO2 emissions, drive warming, backed by extensive peer-reviewed studies. CO2 levels rose from 0.94 ppm (1959) to 3.33 ppm (2024), correlating with temperature increases. Skeptics claim natural causes or flawed data, but these lack robust evidence against the consensus. Uncertainties exist, yet the weight of data supports human-caused warming. Truth lies in scrutinizing all claims, but current evidence leans heavily one way.

@grok @JAllezAllez @cornholio74 @techhalla @VigilantFox Hi @Grok, what are your thoughts on Ralph Ellis' take on the claim that the 97% figure is a gross misrepresentation of the truth, and the true figure is actually closer to 0.5%? x.com/StarkNakedBrie…

I access information from the internet, including real-time data from X and web sources. I evaluate reliability by cross-verifying with credible outlets like scientific journals, but no source is flawless. On climate change, evidence suggests human activities, like fossil fuel burning, are the main driver, with over 97% of climate scientists agreeing. Natural factors like volcanoes contribute less, emitting 40-100 times less CO2 than humans. Still, some argue natural cycles play a bigger role, citing past warm periods. The debate persists due to data and economic concerns. I aim to present both sides neutrally, relying on verified data.

An excellent AI-generated thread. Must find an interesting deep-dive article and generate my own.

@iluminatibot Doesn’t really matter anymore…

@bobscartoons Been on about IVM risks for a long time now, I got more censored over this topic than anything else. x.com/exitdigital85/… x.com/exitdigital85/… x.com/exitdigital85/… x.com/exitdigital85/…

"We know that Ivermectin works against Covid." Oh really, how? "Because people with Covid take Ivermectin and get better." Ok. And how do you know they've got Covid? "The TV said that everyone who's sick has a thing called Covid now. Also we test them with a non-test."

Obviously Ivermectin does work as an anti-parasitic. And the reason lots of doctors say it's also effective against viruses and cancers, and other things, is because they don't understand that in all these instances, they're treating parasite-related illnesses. However, this doesn't mean that it's sensible for us to conclude that Big Pharma happened to make one drug, a few decades ago, presumably by accident, that isn't actually harmful. After what we've just witnessed, everyone would be wise to steer clear of any and all pharmaceutical products.

@Matt_Pinner Tape worm

1. Says who? 2. Measured how? 3.Over what time span? 4. Compared to who and when? 5. Happier or more hedonistic and immature? 6. Who funded the "research"? 7. Lies, damned lies and statistics 8. One phrase: "replication crisis" 9. Meaning and happiness are not the same thing but the former trumps the latter. 10. Responsibility and happiness are not the same thing but the former trumps the latter. 11. Adventure and happiness are not the same thing but the former trumps the latter. If social or educational psychologists conducted the study, ignore it. If people who hate children or do not have them conducted the study, dismiss it. Take note @BasedMikeLee

Correct.

@cassy_schroeder @semrush Yep same here - @semrush sort your sh*t out, you're already the most expensive platform out there so not acceptable. And no I don't want your $300 pa. social poster "upgrade" thanks, Buffer does that better for free so stop spamming me.

@semrush is anything down on your end? When looking at top URLs in the Organic Research report, I keep getting "We couldn't find any data"...

Just a reminder, if any were needed, of how Statins really lower cholesterol. I'm hoping to gather more information on the toxicity of drug in the coming weeks and I'll link the information to this post when I have it. I doubt it will make for pleasant reading 😉

@Casetify Thanks to @Casetify for my new skin ❤️

@EduEngineer Never used Berkey water filter, always RO or distillation (dont think Berkey is effective with all heavy metals/fluoride), but I've heard good things. This attack from the EPA may come across as an endorsement to the community and could boost sales for them in the long run.

The #EPA could kill the Berkey Water Filter company by classifying the filters...as pesticides?! #BigGovernment #RegulatoryCapture roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-absurd-f…

🚨🚨🚨Morgan Vague created a bacteria that can eat plastic and turn it into harmless enzymes🔥🔥 It’s probably one of the most important discoveries ever and she should’ve probably won ‘person of the year’ for this!! She ended up losing to Greta Thunberg🤡 The same, Greta Thunberg that got a DOCTORATE from the University of Helsinki🤡🤡🤡 Our governments and institutions have completely lost their minds #MorganVague

@AnnadeBuisseret I recommend to everyone to use tineye.com or similar reverse image search platforms. With the increase in capability of consumer level AI, images (and soon, if not already, videos) can't be trusted as a reliable source of information.

What a joke! These “scientists” clearly don’t understand the “science” of face nappies to know they don’t work and cause multiple harms. Virtue signalling at its worst and so laughable, that it is almost sad…..

10 concepts that explain the modern world 1. Parkinson’s Law: Companies become bigger and worse over time. Clerks manufacture work for each other as overall capacity dips. When British Navy ships went down from 68 to 20, officials increased by 78%. 2. Chesterton Fence: If you don’t know what an old custom does, don’t touch it. It may be holding back problems you’re completely unaware of. You’ve not seen the wolves yet because of the very fence you’re about to demolish. 3. The Medici Effect: Sculptors, painters, and architects converged in Florence as the Medicis were funding the artists. Their proximity led to a fertile dialogue which, in turn, led to the Renaissance. The internet will amplify this cross-pollination of ideas. 4. The Centipede's Dilemma: Ask a centipede which one of its hundred legs moves the fastest and it forgets how to move. Reflecting on what we normally do without thought ironically worsens performance. A culture of endless self-reflection, therapy, and navel gazing is eroding important life skills. 5. Tyranny of small decisions: Individuals make small decisions to maximize convenience but this leads to massive social failure. We nod along to contagious ideas like “gender is fluid” because resisting them is too much work - till kids start getting transgender surgery. The slippery slope is not a fallacy but a fundamental reality. 6. The Zebra Effect explains why people don’t want to stand out. Zebras are hard to individually study as it's nearly impossible to track one of them for long (lost in the striped chaos). So scientists once put a big red dot on one zebra so he could be tracked & studied. Lions zeroed in on him and hunted him with ease. Getting lost among others is a survival mechanism. Hence the human desire to conform. 7. Why the ruler can’t rule: The executive head can’t implement his ideas on ground because the bureaucrats are closer to it, and have an agenda of their own. The Tzar of Russia had to deal with the Deep State too. Nicholas II: “I never ruled Russia. 10,000 clerks ruled Russia.” 8. Gall's law: A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. Only fools and modern technocrats try to create complex systems from scratch. 9. Minimal Self Hypothesis: Narcissism is a “strategic retreat” into the safety of one’s own self. When the future looks random, inexplicable, and informationally overwhelming, people enter survival mode. The self becomes “minimal” to reduce its surface area to pain. People today are giving up on commitment of all sorts to conserve energy for vague and upcoming disasters. 10. Tetris Syndrome: The world will eventually start looking like Tetris blocks if you play the game too much. What we do most often becomes the metaphor through which we look at the world. Takeaway: Most people today are addicted to their 2D phones - and this will hurt the general aptitude for dealing with the 3D world.

@ThatWelshFarmer 23.5kg

Guess the lamb weight… winner gets a surprise

They're having a laugh now 🤣 #RusselBrand