Matthew Faler

2.5K posts

Matthew Faler banner
Matthew Faler

Matthew Faler

@f2aler

I am a Lemon Law attorney in Los Angeles area.

Arcadia, CA Katılım Ekim 2009
674 Takip Edilen215 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
As we start 2026, I’m going to share my thoughts on how I try to determine fact from fiction in this world of misinformation. Here we go: 1. I Believe What I Can Easily Verify Many things that people assert can be easily verified (or refuted) either through my own observation or via undisputed historical facts. Let’s take vaccinations for example. Once upon a time, there was a disease called smallpox. It was fairly deadly and disfiguring. It doesn’t exist anymore. This coincides with the advent of the small pox vaccine. Likewise, if you get rabies you will die. If you get the rabies vaccine you won’t. I guarantee you every anti-vaxxer who gets bit by a bat would will take the vaccine without exception. Bottom line, I know vaccines work and are beneficial to society as a whole. 2. Agree With Those Who Have A Financial Incentive to Be Correct Anyone can spout off on X or Reddit about a topic. If this person has no skin in the game, said opinion is basically worthless. A good place to look is what do Insurance companies think ? Their entire business relies on accurately predicting future outcomes. Well, if let’s use our vaccination example again. Race horses are expensive. Owners are wise to insure them to protect against financial loss. An owner can’t get insurance on a race horse that isn’t vaccinated. Therefore it is easy to conclude vaccines work. Same is true with global warming. Insurance companies have assessed this risk and it is real and man made. However I do want to point out that, that the fact global warming is real does not mean cutting fossil fuels or going “green” is the only course of action. Far from it. 3. Treat Partisan Sources with Extreme Skepticism This is self explanatory. If Fox News or some account on Bluesky is telling you want you want to hear, don’t believe it without looking at the issue in depth. 4. Don’t Follow the Science If you hear a liberal say “just following the science” , “science is settled” , “study after study shows” or anything similar being used to justify something absurd on its face like outdoor cloth masking or trans dudes in women’s sports, the exact opposite is true. This one holds true for so many things I can’t even begin to list them. 5. Extraordinary Claims Require Evidence This obviously applies to conspiracy theories like Who Shot JFK but also to things like whether the 2020 Election was rigged against Trump. If it was rigged, someone or some entity would have to orchestrated it. This leads to the question of who and how? The who has never been proposed to my knowledge and the how has never been really explained. If someone paid homeless people to vote for Biden show me evidence. If dead person votes for Biden, show me evidence. Fact - no such evidence exists and I can safely say the 2020 election was not rigged. 6. Somethings Are Beyond My Ability to Evaluate This applies to almost everything foreign policy related. I completely lack the knowledge to assess what is going on. I biased though, as I tend to follow an America First perspective on foreign entanglements. For example, I assume Israel is acting in its best interests in the current conflict with the Palestinians. Are they being too heavy handed in Gaza? Not sure how I’d know that and if they were, all things considered I wouldn’t care. That’s all I got for now.
English
2
0
6
1.6K
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
@SinaiLawFirm I think they increase efficiency a lot for repeatable tasks. Though I’m sure Greta Thornburg (sp?) cries a million tears each time I run my damage estimate agent as ive heard agent are very inefficient energy.
English
0
0
1
14
Real Estate Lawyer
Real Estate Lawyer@SinaiLawFirm·
@f2aler Agents don’t cut that much time off the work but it’s useful for sure
English
1
0
0
110
Real Estate Lawyer
Real Estate Lawyer@SinaiLawFirm·
The majority of legal output product is AI generated I’m pretty sure in any state court law and motion hearing it’s mostly AI output v AI output at this point on any given day
English
10
0
39
4.5K
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
Spain too good. Have to be heavy favorites in final.
English
0
0
0
26
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
Well, well, I must say my completed 473(b) motion is not half bad (with AI assist of course). In the unfortunate event, if anyone should need one down the road, I'm happy to share.
English
0
0
0
23
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
@notsofamousray No real opinion on him, but I do believe he went to law school after retirement from Army and did not serve in JAG.
English
0
0
1
210
March Mad Ray
March Mad Ray@notsofamousray·
This is the face of that account? He talks like he’s Rambo.
March Mad Ray tweet media
English
11
3
140
3.4K
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
I am writing a 473(b) motion. Don't ask why. I know every attorney says it is their staff's fault, but this time it is true! Not life or death, b/c dismissal was w/o without prejudice but still.....
English
0
0
2
24
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
@SMB_Attorney Not a M & A guy (bad grade in law school lol), I follow more for the practice process and marketing process. And occasional witty / intellectual banter.
English
0
0
1
37
SMB Attorney
SMB Attorney@SMB_Attorney·
[cont] What You’ll Find Here Actionable, trench-tested insight drawn from hundreds of closed deals: LOI strategy, diligence frameworks, indemnity structures, SBA nuances, post-close realities, the J-curve of ownership, team dynamics, and the often-overlooked emotional side of the search. I co-host the Main Street Deals podcast with Kevin Henderson and Sam Rosati, where we dissect real data, industry reports, and unvarnished lessons. We host live SMB Office Hours for direct Q&A. Free resources include our LOI template. The blog covers timely shifts in regulation, AI applications for operators, tax alignment, and more. Everything we publish is built to equip serious participants with the clarity and tools needed to protect value and capture upside. A Note on What Drives Me I’m a father based in Windermere, Florida. Although I’m in Michigan a lot in the summer. Family isn’t a sidebar… it’s core to how we operate as a firm and how I approach life. I’ve learned that a single unexpected event (a regulatory letter, lawsuit, or market shift) can undo years of work in an instant. The prudent move is to diversify, protect gains, and build with resilience. I passed on early Tesla and Bitcoin; I won’t repeat that error with the asymmetric opportunities unfolding now. This account exists for operators, searchers, sponsors, founders, and builders in the real economy. No AI slop. No BS. Just high-signal guidance from someone actively doing the work at volume. If you’re evaluating acquisitions, preparing a sale, or scaling an acquired business, I’m glad our paths have crossed. Ask questions in replies, join Office Hours, download the resources at smblaw.group, or reach out directly if we can help you navigate your next chapter. The Silver Tsunami is here. Preparation separates those who watch history from those who shape it. Let’s build something lasting. — Eric Pacifici
@SMB_Attorney
SMB Attorney tweet mediaSMB Attorney tweet mediaSMB Attorney tweet mediaSMB Attorney tweet media
English
2
0
36
5.7K
SMB Attorney
SMB Attorney@SMB_Attorney·
Approaching 150K and new timeline so feels like a re-intro is in order… If you’re new here — welcome! 🙏 Hi, I’m Eric Pacifici (@SMB_Attorney). Co-Founder and Managing Partner of @smblawgroup, one of the fastest growing law firms in the country. In four short years, our team has closed just shy of 400 M&A transactions representing ~$2 billion in deal value across 40 plus states, all while delivering a ~95 NPS and building the firm with zero traditional marketing spend. We strive to deliver the precision, sophistication, and execution typically reserved for billion-dollar deals, but tailored for the lower-middle-market: ETA searchers, HoldCo operators, independent sponsors, founders, and ambitious Main Street entrepreneurs determined to acquire, build, and scale enduringly profitable businesses. My path started in BigLaw. Duke Law. Associate at Kirkland & Ellis, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher and a few other elite firms, where I executed complex transactions for clients like Amazon, Palantir, Jerry Jones, and Banc of America Securities. I saw firsthand how elite talent works at the highest levels and I recognized the massive gap for everyone else operating in the real economy. That realization led me to co-found SMB Law Group in May 2022 with @KHendersonCo and @Sam_Rosati. We built a fully remote, modern boutique transactional firm from the ground up for this exact moment in American business. The results speak for themselves: coverage in Forbes, Bloomberg Law, Business Insider, and Law360. Shortlisted for the Financial Times Innovative Lawyers North America. In 2026, named Managing Partner of the Year by Law.com Florida (with Kevin named Innovator of the Year alongside me). Multiple Super Lawyers Rising Stars in M&A, Best Lawyers “Ones to Watch,” Orlando Business Journal 40 Under 40 and Chambers recognition. These honors reflect the caliber of our team and the trust of the clients we serve. The Moment We’re In We stand at the front edge of the Great Wealth Transfer, the Silver Tsunami, a projected $70–124 trillion shift of assets from Baby Boomers to the next generations, with trillions embedded in American small and family businesses. I helped shape and popularize the framing in the ETA community because the opportunity is historic, yet the reality demands precision: Not every business transfers cleanly. Many are “glorified jobs” that won’t survive a clean handoff. Closures will outpace seamless sales in numerous categories. The winners will be the prepared, those who master the actual mechanics of lower-middle-market operational execution. This space operates by different rules than institutional private equity or classic BigLaw M&A. Deals here are often more complex in human, operational, and practical terms: > Sellers unfamiliar with working capital > Brokers eager to skip steps > SBA 7(a) and 504 requirements that bear little resemblance to institutional financing > Sloppy financials, concentrated customer bases, family employees, handshake agreements, landlord consents, and seller psychology that reward candor and early problem-solving over post-LOI friction Our firm’s updated LOI templates (available on our site) refined through 500+ real-world transactions, have become the market standard and are engineered to surface issues early, minimize destructive retrades, and meaningfully improve close rates. (We’ve seen material lifts, with recent quarters approaching 81% closed-to-busted.) Financial diligence remains the top deal-breaker. Earnouts continue rising as a pragmatic bridge for valuation gaps. Sophisticated buyers transitioning from PE, investment banking, or larger deals frequently discover that experience in one arena doesn’t automatically translate and that mismatch is where the greatest risks (and opportunities for those who adapt quickly) lie. What You’ll Find Here Actionable, trench-tested insight drawn from hundreds of closed deals….
SMB Attorney tweet mediaSMB Attorney tweet mediaSMB Attorney tweet mediaSMB Attorney tweet media
English
27
6
322
211.7K
aswright8654
aswright8654@aswright8669191·
@KingObtuse @infantrydort Whatever your hardons for Dort or SecWar is, fine. I’m glad this is gone. Getting this the fuck out is a good thing right?
aswright8654 tweet media
English
5
0
2
474
Tanner Port
Tanner Port@KingObtuse·
Ah yes... @infantrydort do tell us your opinions on higher education...
Tanner Port tweet media
InfantryDort@infantrydort

This will be a long one. But since I'm an active duty officer addressing another higher ranking one, I have to be respectful. That being said, General Montague is correct that the Army needs thinking officers. I believe he is wrong to assume that sending them to Harvard necessarily accomplishes that purpose. The Harvard he entered in the 90s is not the Harvard officers enter in 2026. His article invokes George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, Harvard’s war dead and generations of citizen Soldiers to defend an institution that has spent decades consuming the inheritance those men created. The issue is not whether Army officers are intelligent enough to resist indoctrination. Indoctrination is rarely a professor hypnotizing a helpless student. It is an institutional environment in which one set of political assumptions governs admissions, hiring, instruction, social acceptance and administrative protection. The whole gambit. Dissent remains technically possible. But it now becomes professionally expensive. Ask me how I know... The results are no longer theoretical. For years, elite universities built an ideology that judges human beings first by racial, sexual and political category, then insists this is the cure for prejudice. Harvard’s admissions system was ultimately struck down because it used race as a negative, relied upon racial stereotypes and reduced the number of Asian-American students admitted. That was racial discrimination administered by people who had renamed themselves experts in inclusion. The prejudice did not end there. Harvard’s own reports documented Jewish and Israeli students facing hostility and exclusion, while Muslims, Arabs, Palestinians, Black students and South Asian students described being harassed, misidentified, called terrorists, spat upon, doxxed and intimidated into silence. The university that promised safety through identity politics produced an environment in which nearly every identity group had reason to fear another. That is the verdict on DEI. It didn't teach students to see one another as individuals. It trained them to organize humanity into competing tribes, assign innocence and guilt by category, and determine whose suffering deserved institutional protection. At Columbia, students were pressured to profess political positions they did not hold, silenced or humiliated in classrooms, and subjected to faculty activism masquerading as instruction. Columbia’s own task force eventually had to warn professors against ideological litmus tests and remind them that students must not be coerced into conformity. When a university must formally instruct its faculty not to politically condition its students, the indoctrination is no longer an accusation. It is an internal finding. These habits are directly hostile to military values. The Army cannot function through racial preferences, collective guilt, ideological litmus tests, selective discipline or separate standards for politically favored groups. Soldiers must be judged as individuals. Standards must be common. Discipline must be impartial. The mission MUST outrank identity. Commanders must tell the truth even when the truth violates the reigning political fashion. The uniform is designed to subordinate tribe to country! DEI restores the tribes and places the institution between them as judge. The general argues that officers are intelligent enough to resist indoctrination. That misses the point. The Army does not owe public money, officers or prestige to institutions that reward conformity, excuse disorder, discriminate by race and turn classrooms into political organizing spaces. Officers SHOULD encounter hostile ideas. They should study Marxism, radical Islam, critical race theory, revolutionary movements and every ideology capable of shaping the battlefield. They should study them as objects of analysis. They should NOT be sent into institutions that have adopted their premises as articles of faith. Harvard once educated men who built and defended the republic. Its age does not grant it permanent immunity from judgment. Neither its war memorials nor the patriotism of its dead can excuse the ideological conduct of its living. The Army does not fear education. It fears an education system that calls racial discrimination equity, political conformity scholarship, selective prejudice inclusion, and institutional disorder courage. I hope this makes sense. Submit this to the general, with my compliments. -Dort

District of Columbia, USA 🇺🇸 English
21
6
152
20.7K
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
I am planning to announce tonight that United States will be in World Cup Semifinal game tomorrow against France because the Belgium loss was illegitimate and everyone knows we would have beaten Spain and even if we did lose that game it would have been illegitimate.
Washington Reporter@DC_Reporter

NEWS: President Trump is planning to announce that Georgia's two senators, Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, are illegitimate because of fraud, a well-placed source in Georgia tells us. Announcement could come as soon as tonight.

English
0
0
0
79
Eric W.
Eric W.@EWess92·
Did Tylenol's producer fail to warn pregnant mothers by excluding a warning that taking acetaminophen while pregnant could cause children to develop ADHD or autism? Perhaps, says Judge Calabresi. At least, expert testimony was improperly excluded. Vacate and remand.
Eric W. tweet mediaEric W. tweet mediaEric W. tweet mediaEric W. tweet media
English
2
3
38
2.5K
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
I don’t know the exact correlation but someone scoring high enough LSAT to get into Duke Law is in my opinion sufficiently intelligent to exceed 2.5 gpa with minimal effort. Perhaps my new found law twitter BFF gave less than minimal effort or some other circumstance at play such as learning disability that was later mitigated or whatnot. This mainly a sleuthing exercise not any comment on what went on back then as he seems to be quite content and doing ok for himself at current time which is most important thing.
English
0
0
0
15
Aeneas
Aeneas@IM_Aeneas·
Is there any concrete proof of standardized tests correlating with iq? Because if that’s the case I’m ~ 140 and I don’t feel that smart lmao
Matthew Faler@f2aler

@SMB_Attorney Some detail missing here - 2.5 pretty low for high school, yet as far as I know Duke would require LSAT in 170 range which is approximately equivalent to 135-140 IQ of which someone that smart can show up to high school and get a 3.0. And you appear to be white dude so no DEI.

English
1
0
1
113
Skylar Skye
Skylar Skye@SkylarSkye3·
Americans, you’ll be supporting England against Argentina, right?
English
2.2K
50
2.5K
260.6K
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
Can France possibly lose on Bastille Day?
English
1
0
2
330
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
@dilanesper I’m not a huge Tennis but it seems it went from Fed, Nadal, Djokovic to Alcarez / Sinner with most everyone else outside looking in.
English
0
0
0
31
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
@SinaiLawFirm My attention span is usually limited while I defend depos and will be even more so during the one I am defending at 1 on July 15.
English
1
0
1
27
SMB Attorney
SMB Attorney@SMB_Attorney·
I graduated high school with a 2.5 GPA and was a late bloomer before making it to Duke Law and Kirkland. I’m not saying give up. But if you think there aren’t people who’ve excelled their whole lives and are miles ahead that you’ll never catch, you’re kidding yourself.
SMB Attorney@SMB_Attorney

C students don’t run the world and millionaires don’t drive Toyotas. These are just things people tell themselves to cope with reality.

English
59
23
708
105.9K
Matthew Faler
Matthew Faler@f2aler·
@SMB_Attorney Genius here, needs to post his grades from high school forward, sat and lsat.
English
0
0
0
282
SMB Attorney
SMB Attorney@SMB_Attorney·
C students don’t run the world and millionaires don’t drive Toyotas. These are just things people tell themselves to cope with reality.
English
796
1.5K
16K
2.7M