
Ethan Lee
27 posts



@vibecanvas 0.4 introduced the first version of AI-generated widgets. It is not just “AI chat in a sidebar.” It creates a real widget system: state, events, actor backend, sandboxed ArrowJS UI, and a canvas-native publish flow. While building out I experimented with @tursodatabase and now moved completely. This version took me 2 Months and was 90% code exploration. I tried many different ideas. I'm happy with the current version as it's the first Generative App as I know of. Bring any kind of UI into your canvas. This marks the beginning of a new class of apps. Which eventually will replace many classic SaaS apps. The cost of Software is falling. Gen AI brings you Gen App.

Talked to a super agent-pilled founder. He bought Codex Max for all team members, and everybody pretty much gets all work done thru talking to their Codex all day The side effect: people stopped talking to each other. Meetings are cancelled, collaboration is minimal, and team culture got worse So much of enterprise AI usage is single-player now. What do we risk sacrificing when team members all talk to their agents instead of each other? We need to move beyond human-human collaboration AND beyond human-agent collaboration to human-human-agent collaboration






认知、才华、能力,与财富,都是没有必然联系的 甚至有时候还会负相关,出现所谓「高认知穷人」或者「资源诅咒」 能力是输入(input) 财富是输出(output) 从输入到输出,需要一个加工器,叫业务 基于高杠杆业务的能力,可以带来大钱 基于低杠杆业务的能力,可以带来小钱 不基于业务的能力,当然就无法带来钱 比如,无数的 NBA 运动员退役后都破产了 打过 NBA,这算不算能力?当然算 但是业务是啥?没有。 没名气,不能搞代言。 教人打球?你职业素养不过专业训练师。 去低级联赛?年纪大了一无是处,CBA 也不需要你。 学网红打 1v1?五打五和一打一是两个游戏,你真打不赢。 同理,「我很懂 AI、很懂技术、很懂 xxx,为啥没钱?」 打过 NBA 的都没钱,你也没钱,那不是很正常嘛。 只有能力,没有业务呀。 一旦收缩到具体业务上,能力一秒归零。
今天看了老高,談到神秘法則,我想到老哥一定是在每次選擇中持續前行,直到看見了自己最想要的結果。而這份持續的努力,也自然地為你打開了一條通往成功的正確道路!







