David

1.4K posts

David

David

@felonymusk

Just looking for the truth....

Katılım Şubat 2018
354 Takip Edilen147 Takipçiler
David
David@felonymusk·
@GiveAllLiberty @SamaHoole In the not too distant future they will bypass salmon completely & develop farmed salmon from ground up cricket and bugs & you can ask the same inane questions "Are people getting what they want at a good price?". Enjoy your franken food & let us know how that works out for you!
English
0
0
1
15
LibertasFanatic
LibertasFanatic@GiveAllLiberty·
@SamaHoole Why should we care? Are they unhealthy? Or just as nutritious? Is it sustainable fish farming? Are more people able to be fed? Are people getting what they want at a good price? These fish don't remember anything.
English
2
0
11
920
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
In the 1980s, the Norwegian salmon farming industry ran into a colour problem. Wild salmon are pink because they eat krill and small crustaceans containing a pigment called astaxanthin. The pigment accumulates in the muscle tissue and gives the flesh its colour. That colour is one of the cues a diner uses, consciously or otherwise, to decide whether the fish on the plate is appetising. Farmed salmon, raised on soy protein, corn meal, fish meal from wild-caught smaller fish, and stabilisers, do not eat krill. They do not accumulate astaxanthin. Without intervention, their flesh is grey. Washed-out, unappealing grey. Nobody buys a grey salmon. So the industry adopted synthetic astaxanthin, manufactured by Hoffmann-La Roche, originally developed as a feed additive to brighten poultry yolks. It is added to salmon feed in measured doses. The doses are calibrated against a colour chart called the SalmoFan, produced by the same company, which the farmer holds against a slice of flesh from a slaughtered fish to confirm the pigmentation has reached the commercially desirable shade. The SalmoFan has fifteen shades. The farmer picks the target shade based on what the supermarket buyer in the destination country considers appealing. Norwegian salmon, sitting on the ice in a British supermarket, has been colour-graded to match the expectations of a marketing department in Hoddesdon. The fish you're looking at is the colour the company chose. The fish didn't pick it. The krill didn't provide it. The pigment came from a Swiss laboratory. You're eating a paint sample. The paint is fish-flavoured. The fish remembers krill. It has never tasted krill. The krill is in a different part of the supply chain.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
157
1.6K
6K
436.2K
David
David@felonymusk·
excessive exercise causes stress and inflammation and reduces lifespan which is why long distance runners and body builders all have much shorter lifespans. Google searches would regularly display results confirming this but I see they are now trying to bury this inconvenient truth.
English
0
0
3
225
Dr Shawn Baker 🥩
Dr Shawn Baker 🥩@SBakerMD·
What grade would you give MAHA so far? A-outstanding job B-a lot of good things achieved C- doing OK but much more needed D- made minimal progress F- achieved nothing significant
English
197
4
80
24.3K
David
David@felonymusk·
@BurpeesCure @JamesOnekaka @SamaHoole so you are basically saying pair it with things that come from a ruminant animal? why not just eat the ruminant in the first place?
English
1
0
0
24
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
Here's the simple reason ruminant meat (beef, lamb) is metabolically superior to monogastric meat (chicken, pork). Monogastrics store whatever they're fed. Grain goes in, linoleic acid ends up in the fat. Pork fat now runs around 20% PUFA. Chicken fat around 25%. The bird and the pig are, in 2026, walking vehicles for the seed oils they were finished on. Ruminants are built differently. The four-chambered stomach biohydrogenates polyunsaturated fats, converting unstable plant oils into stable saturated and monounsaturated fats before the fat is ever laid down. Grain in. Beef fat still around 2-4% PUFA. The cow eats the seed oil substrate and quietly disarms it on the way through. The pig and the chicken eat it and pass it on to whoever is eating them next. Beef and lamb: built-in detox. Pork and chicken: storage tanks for the food system you were trying to avoid. If you've cut seed oils out of the cupboard but you're still eating chicken every day, the bottle isn't gone. It's just on a plate.
English
66
685
2.8K
79K
David
David@felonymusk·
Loma Linda is where the 7th day Adventist are headquartered. In their religion, they believe meat makes people horny which is why they are constantly pushing this plant based nonsense. Dr. Kellogg was a 7th day Adventist and he believed eating grains for breakfast would reduce this undesirable libido.
English
0
0
1
31
vegastar
vegastar@vegastarr·
They Told You Meat Equals Strength. But The Longest-Living Regions On Earth Tell A Different Story. 🌱🌊
vegastar tweet media
English
6
11
43
2.2K
kurgantist
kurgantist@kurgantist·
@SamaHoole Goatis/Sv3rige was 5 years vegan before going raw primal
English
1
0
0
565
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
Every former vegan who left the diet for health reasons describes the same moment. Anne Hathaway: "I had a piece of salmon and my brain felt like a computer rebooting." Miley Cyrus: "I had to introduce fish and omegas back into my life because my brain wasn't functioning properly. Now I'm so much sharper. I was running on empty." Tim Shieff, after 8 years vegan: "My depression lifted, joints feeling a lot better, energy back in my body." Mikhaila Peterson, after a lifetime of autoimmune illness: "All of my symptoms went into remission. I've never felt like this before." Kai-Lee Worsley, whose hair was falling out in chunks: "As soon as I took a couple of bites I felt better. It has literally saved my life." Sharper. Lighter. Awake. Rebooted. Lights back on. Nobody who quit beef for veganism describes their first lentil bowl this way. The body keeps a record. The body has the final say.
English
39
326
2.3K
50.1K
Flat Earth Zone
Flat Earth Zone@FlatEarthZone·
No fish eye. No Hollywood effects. Just raw balloon footage showing a vast, level plane extending in every direction.
English
166
714
3K
87.4K
Nathan Hughes
Nathan Hughes@rallynate·
They killed Charlie Kirk so they could purge America first reps from congress and go to war with no major political opposition.
English
29
192
1.8K
20.7K
David
David@felonymusk·
statins attack the brain and muscles so her quality of life has been deteriorating with muscle pain and cognitive decline. The higher your cholesterol the longer you will live. This is known as the cholesterol paradox "In conclusion, our analysis of the cholesterol profiles in a population that has achieved extreme longevity indicates that older subjects with higher cholesterol levels tend to survive longer, regardless of the influence of other lipids and confounding factors evaluated." pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11…
English
0
0
3
107
Cindy Zimmerman
Cindy Zimmerman@Farmpodcaster·
@PaulGoldEagle My mother is 94 and been on a statin for at least 25 years, if not longer. That completely invalidates your first point so I can't believe you. Even if she died tomorrow I am pretty sure it did not cut her lifespan by 20 years.
English
4
0
6
1.1K
Paul White Gold Eagle
Paul White Gold Eagle@PaulGoldEagle·
According to Dr. Leonard Coldwell, the use of statin drugs is akin to "mass murder". "It always cuts off at least 20 years of your lifespan." "Your brain is made from cholesterol. A statin drug is a cholesterol-lowering drug. So if you want to have a brain the size of a marble, just keep on taking them." "You do not die of too much cholesterol. There is no such thing as too much cholesterol. You die only from not enough." "I have patients that have cholesterol of 600. They're the healthiest people. Never been sick." "Statin drugs are the most dangerous, useless drugs ever invented." For more content like this, subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
English
86
2.4K
4.8K
136K
David
David@felonymusk·
The higher your cholesterol the longer you will live. "In conclusion, our analysis of the cholesterol profiles in a population that has achieved extreme longevity indicates that older subjects with higher cholesterol levels tend to survive longer, regardless of the influence of other lipids and confounding factors evaluated." pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11…
English
0
0
0
62
Mark Kaplan
Mark Kaplan@markkaplan20·
A Harvard study just proved a man can carry LDL cholesterol of 700 for seven years and have zero plaque in his arteries. Zero. Not a single cubic millimeter. My LDL was 110 when I had my heart attack at 52. Normal. Optimal by every guideline. He had LDL 700 with clean arteries. I had LDL 110 and nearly died. If LDL caused heart disease, his arteries would be destroyed and mine would be clean. The opposite happened. Something is very wrong with the cholesterol story.
Mark Kaplan tweet media
English
89
562
1.9K
67.7K
David
David@felonymusk·
The higher your cholesterol the longer you live. They even have a term for this-- the Cholesterol Paradox. Anything that goes against the establishment narrative is always a paradox. "In conclusion, our analysis of the cholesterol profiles in a population that has achieved extreme longevity indicates that older subjects with higher cholesterol levels tend to survive longer, regardless of the influence of other lipids and confounding factors evaluated." pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11…
English
0
1
0
176
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
In 1971, a Japanese microbiologist called Akira Endo isolated a compound from a mould called Penicillium citrinum that inhibited the enzyme the human body uses to manufacture cholesterol. That discovery became the statin class of drugs. Merck released the first commercial statin in 1987. Cholesterol was, at the time, considered the central villain in cardiovascular disease. Lower the cholesterol, the theory said, and you lowered the risk of heart attack. What followed was one of the largest pharmaceutical campaigns in history. The threshold for "high" cholesterol was steadily lowered. In 1984 the cut-off was 240 mg/dL. By 2001 it was 200. By 2013 the American Heart Association had effectively abandoned a numerical threshold altogether and recommended statins for any patient with a ten-year cardiovascular risk above 7.5 percent, which captured roughly a third of American adults over forty. Lipitor became the single best-selling pharmaceutical product in history. By the time it came off patent in 2011, it had generated approximately one hundred and forty-eight billion dollars in revenue for Pfizer. The clinical result was less impressive than the financial one. The most generous meta-analyses of statin trials in primary prevention, the patients who have not yet had a heart attack, show an absolute risk reduction in major cardiovascular events of approximately one to two percent over five years. The "twenty-five percent relative risk reduction" you see on the marketing material is the same couple of percentage points, expressed in a way that sounds bigger. Mortality benefit in primary prevention is statistically insignificant in most of the major trials. People taking statins for prevention die at roughly the same rate as people not taking them. They simply die of different things. The side-effect profile includes muscle pain in five to twenty percent of users, cognitive symptoms, increased risk of type 2 diabetes, and a long-running clinical debate about coenzyme Q10 depletion, which is downstream of the same enzyme the drug inhibits. The drugs are mildly useful in secondary prevention and of debatable value in primary prevention. The pharmaceutical industry, the cardiology associations, and the medical-school curriculum have not significantly updated their recommendations to reflect this. The reason is structural rather than scientific. A pharmaceutical industry that generates billions from a class of drugs cannot dispassionately reconsider whether the drugs work. The cardiology associations funded by that industry cannot dispassionately reconsider the guidelines they helped author. The journals funded by its advertising cannot dispassionately publish papers questioning the products on the opposite page. The question the system was built around was: how do we lower cholesterol. The question that was never asked, because asking it would have unwound the entire structure, is the more important one. Does lowering cholesterol actually extend human life. The answer, across forty years of trials, is "marginally, in some populations, with caveats, and with side effects". The marketing has been "yes, take this every day for the rest of your life". The two answers are not the same answer. One of them paid for an awful lot of glass-walled cardiology departments.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
20
210
637
17.6K
David
David@felonymusk·
@LuxuryLuxTurfu @techexplain1 yeah exactly. avoid this crap and you'll be 100% safe vs. trusting this goofball. I trust him as far as I can throw him.
English
0
0
1
64
Luxury Lux
Luxury Lux@LuxuryLuxTurfu·
@techexplain1 wired : no radio wave. nothing . wireless : radio waves 2.4ghz for hours through your brain ./ this is harmless .... for sure . hours per day .... every days .... zero real study about it . avoid it . probleme solved
English
6
0
67
4.2K
tech.explain
tech.explain@techexplain1·
People are switching to wired headphones because they think bluetooth cooks your brain. But are the RF waves transmitted from AirPods really dangerous or is it just an internet myth?
English
132
408
5.5K
394.1K
David
David@felonymusk·
@RandsInfoDepot @SamaHoole peppers are nightshades and are toxic as they contain lectins, solanine, and low levels of phytates and oxalates. Onions are also toxic as they contain oxalates, phytates, tannins, and saponins. Other than that, looks good.
English
0
0
0
16
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
The steak consumption hierarchy, in ascending order. Tier 1. Steak as an anniversary meal. Once a year. Booked weeks in advance. Photographed. Discussed for days afterwards. Treated as a small special occasion. Tier 2. Steak on birthdays and Christmas. A handful of times a year. Still framed as a treat. Still announced to the family in advance. Tier 3. Steak once a month. A Friday night thing. A small reward for getting through the week. The freezer always has one tucked behind the peas. Tier 4. Steak once a week. Sunday steak. The week has a steak-shaped anchor. Life starts to organise around it without you noticing. Tier 5. Steak twice a week. The butcher knows your name. You have opinions about cuts. You have a preferred cast iron pan and a slightly weird attachment to a specific salt. Tier 6. Steak every other day. The household budget has quietly restructured itself. You are spending less than you used to, because the steak replaced four other meals that involved a pasta sauce and a sense of regret. Tier 7. Steak daily. You no longer think about it. You no longer photograph it. You no longer announce it. It is simply what's for dinner. The way bread used to be. Tier 8. Steak twice a day. Morning steak. Evening steak. The body has visibly changed. The mood is stable. The bloodwork, for those of us who do bloodwork, has somehow improved across every meaningful marker. Tier 9. You need to be here. This is where the air is clearer. This is where the joints stop hurting. This is where the brain works the way it was supposed to work all along. I'll keep the kettle on.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
87
220
1.6K
53.1K
David
David@felonymusk·
Lipitor has generated over $125 billion in lifetime sales. And this is just one version of the statin out of many. I am not sure the term "loss leader" is appropriate here but yes it is a gateway drug to more drugs and ultimately their favorite treatment model of cut, burn and poison.
English
0
1
2
56
Andrew sykes
Andrew sykes@Andrews86495144·
@SamaHoole So Statin as a loss leader to sell all these other drugs?
English
5
1
52
6K
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
Doctor: "Your LDL is still high. I'm adding a second statin." Patient: "I'm already on one. My legs ache." Doctor: "That's a known side effect. I'll add CoQ10." Patient: "And I'm tired all the time." Doctor: "Fatigue is common. I'll add modafinil." Patient: "My memory is foggy." Doctor: "Cognitive effects can occur. Donepezil should help." Patient: "I have a cough now." Doctor: "That'll be the ACE inhibitor I prescribed last visit. We'll swap it for an ARB." Patient: "I'm not sleeping." Doctor: "Zopiclone." Patient: "Heard that's addictive." Doctor: "We'll taper you with mirtazapine when the time comes." Patient: "My blood sugar has gone up." Doctor: "Statins can do that. Metformin." Patient: "I get diarrhoea on metformin." Doctor: "Loperamide." Patient: "I've gained weight." Doctor: "Ozempic." Patient: "I feel nauseous." Doctor: "Ondansetron." Patient: "I don't want to be on twelve medications." Doctor: "Anxiety is common at this stage. I'll add sertraline." Patient: "What if I just stopped the statin?" Doctor: "Absolutely not."
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
1.5K
9.1K
29K
1.6M
David
David@felonymusk·
@brain_stimulus In 1929 the American Spinach industry created Popeye. Spinach is toxic and is loaded with oxalates. And we wonder why everyone is sick today? x.com/SamaHoole/stat…
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole

Spinach. Popeye ate it and got strong. A generation learned their iron from a cartoon sailor. The cartoon was funded by the US spinach industry. The biochemistry was not consulted. - Oxalate content: among the highest of any vegetable. Around 750mg per 100g raw. The recommended daily limit for kidney stone prevention is 50mg. One spinach salad puts you at fifteen times that. - Those oxalates bind calcium, iron, magnesium, and zinc in the gut. The nutrients spinach is famous for are largely unavailable because the spinach is physically preventing you from absorbing them. - The iron figure on the label: non-haem iron. Bioavailability around 2%. Haem iron from beef: 25%. Spinach delivers iron the way a locked safe delivers money. - Vitamin K1: high. Not the same as K2. K1 is the clotting vitamin. K2 directs calcium to bone and away from arteries. They are not interchangeable. Spinach gives you the one that isn't doing the arterial work. - Spinach is also a significant source of histamine in some individuals, and a goitrogen at volume. The Popeye study that started all of this contained a decimal point error. A German scientist in the 1870s misplaced a decimal and overstated spinach iron content by a factor of ten. The correction came in 1937. The cartoon launched in 1929. The myth was already load-bearing by then.

English
0
0
1
328
Philippe T
Philippe T@brain_stimulus·
🥬⚠️ LA VÉRITÉ CHOQUANTE SUR POPEYE QUE PERSONNE NE VOULAIT VOUS DIRE ! 😱❗Popeye n’a jamais mangé d’épinards. 💥Il prenait de la Pervitine — de la méthamphétamine militaire de grade A — et les créateurs ont fait d’un vétéran drogué un héros pour enfants. 🔥Preuves dans la vidéo : Ses tatouages : 12-7-41 (date de Pearl Harbor) et 1177 (USS Arizona) En 1942, la Navy distribuait des pilules vertes de méthamphétamine… que les marins appelaient « spinach » Le timing exact : 3 minutes pour que la meth fasse effet = durée exacte de la transformation dans les épisodes Son œil toujours fermé = paralysie faciale partielle due à une overdose Ses rires maniaques et sa force extrême = symptômes classiques d’intoxication aiguë à l’amphétamine Olive n’est pas sa petite amie… c’est une infirmière psychiatrique qui essaie de le contenir Brutus ne kidnappe pas Olive… il tente de la protéger La série entière documente le trauma de guerre et l’institutionnalisation psychiatrique d’un vétéran du Pacifique. Nous avons regardé des générations entières applaudir de l’addiction et du PTSD déguisés en comédie nautique. Regardez la vidéo jusqu’au bout. C’est glaçant.😱
Français
48
662
1.8K
124.8K
David
David@felonymusk·
@meremothi @KingKong9888 you can't eat cotton either but millions of people slave away at work 8 hours 5 days a week to get those crisp $100 bills made of cotton.
English
1
0
7
103
Murphi.Slaw
Murphi.Slaw@meremothi·
@KingKong9888 These people are clearly retarded But... The people who are stacking silver bc they think the entire economy will collapse are also retarded, because you can't eat silver
English
11
0
13
1.7K
David
David@felonymusk·
@ChessLiam is zero RB a thing this year?
David tweet media
English
0
0
1
14
Josh Armstrong
Josh Armstrong@Jmarmstrong88·
@unusual_whales No. This one has a mortality rate between 30-50%. SARS Covid-19 had a mortality rate of 0.1%. Both have a R0 factor (how easily it spreads) of between 1-2. So same rate of spread, but 300-500x stronger. Our saving grace is as of now, it is harder to transmit airborne.
English
21
1
13
18.9K
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
BREAKING: World Health Organization: "This is not Coronavirus. This is a very different virus… this is not the start of a COVID pandemic."
English
543
282
6.4K
1M
David
David@felonymusk·
the reason why billionaires are billionaires is because they used the government AKA an organized crime syndicate to take money from one group of people (usually taxpayers) and give it to another group (themselves) which ironically is the very same thing you are promoting. #TaxationIStheft
English
22
0
19
15.5K
Coddled Affluent Professional
Coddled Affluent Professional@feelsdesperate·
When it comes to billionaires my take is the opposite of Leftists: Billionaires SHOULD consume all their wealth: megayachts, English castles, mountains of cocaine, own a dozen homes and 30 cars - do it! Spend it all! The worst thing that can happen is for a billionaire to try to ‘do good in the world’ and shovel money to NGOs for some cause they get excited about. That’s the worst thing that can happen. Charitable donations should be taxed at 500%. A billionaire’s lavish lifestyle poses no threat to me but their misguided ‘good intent’ is absolutely cancerous and potentially civilization ending.
English
493
1.3K
12.4K
424.6K