fildomains

345 posts

fildomains

fildomains

@fildomains

FNS is a completely open source, complete and sustainable operation, A name system fully compatible with ENS on FILECOIN that everyone

Katılım Ağustos 2022
377 Takip Edilen49 Takipçiler
Cryptoxiao
Cryptoxiao@cryptoxiao·
在 HK 的 6551 的用户私信我
中文
18
0
33
8.8K
OKX中文
OKX中文@okxchinese·
这个4月,留给一群人,那些一路支持、相信我们的人。 OKX Web3 Night 特邀朋友们齐聚香港,带上 #OKXWeb3Night RT,抽30位朋友送上入场券,LFG!🙌
OKX中文 tweet media
中文
458
160
415
145.1K
Jtsong.eth (Ø,G)
Jtsong.eth (Ø,G)@Jtsong2·
我到底该不该来香港 Web3 嘉年华? (附门票福利:0G特邀,主会场价值299刀单日票10张) 很多人问我:现在市场这么冷,还有必要飞去香港参会吗? 我从正反两个角度讲清楚哈: 如果你是真实的builder,以及是对于加密如何结合AI有很高的兴趣的爱好者,但苦于高昂的门票价格犹豫来不来。请转发此推,并留言告诉我为什么你参会的主要目的和你的luma邮箱。我会选10位朋友送出免费的单日票。 一、正面:为什么值得来 1)这是少数“还在发生真实连接”的地方,而且由于今年中东局势,迪拜Token 2049取消,香港嘉年华可能是上半年最重要的Web3会议了。 熊市里,线上是情绪,线下是资源。很多真正的合作、投资、甚至项目转折,都是在现场聊出来的。 2)你能看到“谁还在认真做事”:牛市看叙事,熊市看人。谁还在搭团队、推产品、见用户,一眼就能分辨。 3)亚洲依然是最有活力的流动性和用户市场:不管你愿不愿意承认,很多真正的资金、用户和交易行为,还是在这边发生。 4)信息差仍然存在,而且很大:Twitter 上看到的和现场聊到的可能完全不一样,现场才是正在发生的roadmap、funding、真实数据。 二、负面:为什么你可能不该来 1)如果你只是来“刷存在感”,那真的没必要 拍几张照片、发几条推,对你没有任何长期价值。 2)如果你没有明确目标,这趟基本是浪费时间 没有要见的人、没有要推进的事,参会 ≠ 进步。 3)大量无效社交,甚至是噪音:90% 的 conversation 都不会产生结果。你需要有能力筛选那 10%。 4)市场确实还在冷周期:不要期待“来一趟就有机会/融资/暴涨”。这是一个 build & connect 的阶段。 ❗️注意请同时注册申请Luma链接
Jtsong.eth (Ø,G) tweet media
中文
18
3
23
1.9K
安兹大人 🦅
安兹大人 🦅@Nazarick_eth·
抽十个测试邀请码! 随便评论就行!
安兹大人 🦅 tweet media安兹大人 🦅 tweet media
中文
262
12
97
20.2K
fildomains
fildomains@fildomains·
@elonmusk Who's gonna do it first, the U.S. government or the Chinese government?
English
0
0
0
7
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.
English
46.7K
22.8K
195.4K
68.5M
EOS Community Foundation
别再等“拉盘”了:致EOS持币者,社区才是我们唯一的救赎 作为一名EOS(现Vaulta)的持币者,你是否也有这样的心态: 每天打开行情软件,盯着那根绿绿红红的K线,心里默念“什么时候才能拉盘”;
EOS Community Foundation tweet media
中文
2
1
7
246
EOS Community Foundation
ECF 告全体 EOS 社区书 ——我们的打算,说给天下听
EOS Community Foundation tweet media
中文
5
2
10
428
PancakeSwap
PancakeSwap@PancakeSwap·
🥞 Weekly CAKE Stats Net CAKE Mint: -707k CAKE (-$1.42M) Total Product Burns: 858k CAKE ($1.73M) -1% 🔥 Burn Breakdown: ➤ AMM v2: 555k CAKE ($1.12M) -10% ➤ AMM v3: 197k CAKE ($398k) +34% ➤ AMM Infinity: 24.9k CAKE ($50k) +16% ➤ Other Sources (Prediction, Perpetual, etc.): 80k CAKE ($162k) -1% Proof of burn 🔍 bscscan.com/tx/0xe757daa58… Burn Dashboard 📊 pancakeswap.finance/burn-dashboard
English
31
41
233
10.3K
fildomains
fildomains@fildomains·
@tradermige 地址来了 0xdeecFF5CF9Db79155520e3B608506aa2D69CA087
中文
0
0
0
1
Trader米哥 🚀
Trader米哥 🚀@tradermige·
马斯克发工资了! 这两周收入500多万美金吧。 还行。 抽10个幸运粉丝每人10w 刀!
Trader米哥 🚀 tweet media
中文
1.3K
59
475
271.9K
fildomains
fildomains@fildomains·
@PancakeSwap I have read the source codes of CakeToken and MasterChef. Each block can mint 40 cakes. Currently, on Binance Smart Chain, a block is generated approximately every 0.5 seconds. Thus, 6,912,000 cakes can be minted every day instead of 40,000 cakes. Why?
English
0
0
1
13
fildomains retweetledi
瓜七公 MatrixCore
瓜七公 MatrixCore@MatrixCoreX·
The 350 Million EOS Incident: A Legal-Structure Analysis of Misrepresentation, Misappropriation, and a Complete Securities-Fraud Pattern (Including the Resignation of Yves La Rose) This post does not allege criminal conduct. It is a legal-structure assessment based solely on publicly observable facts, community statements, and on-chain activity. Based on current information, the minting and subsequent disposition of 350,000,000 EOS under the “New Economic Model” display a pattern that aligns with all four foundational elements of securities fraud under U.S. and Canadian jurisprudence. 1. Factual Background: Representations, Conduct, and a Key Governance Event (Resignation) 1️⃣ Minting 350M EOS under the “New Economic Model” One of the largest supply expansions in EOS history, approved only because of clear public representations: “These tokens will be used for RAM-ecosystem development and long-term EOS growth.” 2️⃣ Public Representations of Purpose The 350M EOS was consistently described as funding for: RAM ecosystem development Infrastructure and protocol enhancement Community and builder support Long-term economic growth These representations formed the basis for community reliance and approval. 3️⃣ Actual Conduct: Funds Transferred to Kraken (CEX) Public on-chain data indicates that a significant portion of the 350M EOS was: Transferred to Kraken, a centralized exchange unicove.com/en/vaulta/tran… unicove.com/en/vaulta/tran… Without prior disclosure Without community authorization Without delivering any RAM-related initiatives Without providing a transparent explanation This represents a material deviation from the stated purpose. 4️⃣ Critical Event: Resignation of Yves La Rose, Former Foundation CEO Public records show that: As concerns over the 350M EOS escalated As community questions increased And as no satisfactory explanation was provided Yves La Rose, the head of the EOS Foundation, resigned. His resignation does not constitute evidence of wrongdoing. However, from a legal-structure perspective, it represents a governance breakdown and introduces: Heightened informational uncertainty Disruption of the accountability chain Reduced transparency Impairment of the community’s ability to obtain explanations In securities-law analysis, such events often signal material governance risk. 5️⃣ Resulting Impact on the Community The combination of: Purpose deviation Undisclosed exchange transfers Absence of RAM development Leadership resignation led to: Loss of market confidence Price decline Collapse of community trust Quantifiable economic harm to token holders These outcomes are legally relevant. 2. Legal Framework: All Four Elements of Securities Fraud Are Satisfied U.S. (SEC Rule 10b-5) and Canadian (CSA) frameworks use a four-element test. Current facts indicate all four elements are met. ✔ Element 1 — Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Fact Promised: RAM ecosystem + long-term development Actual: Large-scale transfer to a CEX; no RAM initiatives delivered A textbook material misrepresentation. ✔ Element 2 — Intent or Recklessness Intent (scienter) may be inferred when a leader: Makes explicit public promises Exercises control over newly minted assets Diverts assets to an undisclosed destination Maintains opacity And resigns amid intensified scrutiny Resignation is not evidence of guilt, but in structural analysis it reinforces the pattern of reckless disregard, which satisfies the legal standard for intent. ✔ Element 3 — Reliance The community approved minting solely because of the stated purpose. Had the true outcome been disclosed, support would not have existed. This satisfies reliance. ✔ Element 4 — Damages After the deviation and resignation became known: Price fell Confidence collapsed Holders experienced measurable losses This fulfills the damages requirement. Conclusion This analysis does not assign criminal liability. It identifies that the observed conduct aligns structurally with: Misrepresentation Misappropriation Breach of fiduciary-like duties Reckless disregard for transparency Investor reliance Economic harm Together, these form a complete securities-fraud structure as defined in U.S. and Canadian legal doctrine. Whether regulators act is a separate matter; the structural pattern itself is unmistakable. 3. Broader Governance Implications for Web3 This incident raises fundamental issues: Whether token holders can rely on public representations Stewardship and fiduciary-like responsibilities over community assets Transparency obligations in decentralized governance The governance vacuum created by leadership resignation Increased investor risk due to informational uncertainty These challenges extend beyond EOS. 4. Open Call to Securities, Investment-Fraud, Class-Action, and Digital-Asset Attorneys This matter intersects with: Misrepresentation Diversion of community funds Governance failures Fiduciary-duty–like breaches Investor reliance and damages Executive resignation amid scrutiny Digital-asset classification Cross-border regulatory considerations Attorneys experienced in: Securities litigation Investment fraud Class actions Misappropriation cases Digital-asset disputes Governance and duty-of-care frameworks are invited to provide interpretation or commentary. @HagensBerman @blbglaw @GrantEisenhofer @KesslerTopaz @CohenMilstein @KellerRohrback @PomerantzLLP @LabatonLaw @RobbinsLLP @Levi_Korsinsky @GPM_LLP @TheSecuritiesLaw @SecuritiesDocket @SecuritiesTrial @InvestorLawyer @InvestorProtec1 @SecuritiesAtty @MaleckiLaw @myinvestmentfra @BrokeAndBroker @AdvisorLawLLC @ChaseACarlson @CarlsonLaw @Rosen_Firm @SchallLaw @FaruqiLaw @ScottScottLaw @TopClassActions @ClassActionNews @ClassActionGuru @CryptoLawUS @BlockchainLegal @CryptoAssetLaw @QuinnEmanuel @BoiesSchiller @SiskindsLLP @kmlawllp @RochonGenovaLLP @StockwoodsLLP @diamond_lawyers @icpclaw @ForemanCompany Closing Statement This document is a non-accusatory legal-structure analysis based on publicly accessible information. The EOS community deserves clarity. Transparency is not optional—it is foundational. Additional statements, on-chain data, or documentation are welcome for further verification. All images and screenshots are used solely for public-interest commentary and analysis of governance issues. No allegations of wrongdoing are being made. All statements in this post are based on publicly available information and are presented for analytical and informational purposes only. Regulatory & Investor-Protection Agencies (U.S. & Canada) (included for public-interest context and regulatory-awareness purposes only) 🇺🇸 United States — SEC @SECGov @SEC_Enforcement @SEC_Investor_Ed 🇨🇦 Canada — National & Provincial Regulators CSA — Canadian Securities Administrators @CSA_ACVM OSC — Ontario Securities Commission @OntSecCom AMF Québec — Autorité des marchés financiers @LAutorite BCSC — British Columbia Securities Commission @BCSC_info CSA Investor Education @CSA_News
瓜七公 MatrixCore tweet media瓜七公 MatrixCore tweet media瓜七公 MatrixCore tweet media瓜七公 MatrixCore tweet media
English
22
12
20
1.8K
fildomains
fildomains@fildomains·
@mmk_btc @0xphilo 你试试中银香港的软件,有防录屏功能,哪个视频没有,是个模拟器,二次还得忽悠人的
中文
0
0
0
59
MMK
MMK@mmk_btc·
@0xphilo 确实第二次是真捐,看到录屏了
中文
2
0
0
379
PP
PP@0xphilo·
别抄底了 无底洞的 抄在半山腰止损了 😭
PP tweet media
PP@0xphilo

理性告诉我就应该像 @Ru7Longcrypto 抄底 @EnHeng456 一样抄底伊丽莎白 洋洋洒洒写一篇币圈潇炎的文章 风是一阵的,黑红也是红 目前伊丽莎白底部放量,这个结构明显是庄家在逼筹码 分歧越大,行情越猛 想了很久发现没联系方式 算了,发个推特喊单了 艹,web3真不是正常人玩的

中文
16
0
21
10.4K
RamenPanda
RamenPanda@IamRamenPanda·
区块链的不可逆转账并不适合普通人,因为普通人生活的社会是建立在司法信任之上的。司法信任的核心之一就是纠错--例如转账转错了,权利机构可以帮忙把钱拿回来 不可纠错的无需许可的区块链转账的特性适合无政府无法治的社会,这也是为什么黑产和绑架都这么喜欢区块链
中文
5
0
26
6.1K
fildomains
fildomains@fildomains·
@AsterGod What's the connection between Monzo and Revolut?
English
0
0
0
42
fildomains
fildomains@fildomains·
加入我,使用 Aave App 开始赚取 6.00% 年化收益率 的储蓄收益!注册时输入推荐码 BEF7FE,即可提升候补名单位置。 aave.com/r/BEF7FE
中文
0
0
0
24
PancakeSwap
PancakeSwap@PancakeSwap·
Say “hi Pancake” to receive a gm today 👇
English
430
42
514
46.8K