Robert Bernal

A message about the United Nation's net zero objectives...

It's okay to defend the types that create (a better) abundance through jobs. You do know that the economy grew by about a factor of 3, within fifty years, inflation adjusted, right? And you do know that, that would've been impossible without the industrial types, right? Elon says "10 trillion", I say "make it more"!

I’ll never get why everyday working folks go so hard defending billionaires like their lives depend on it.

@gub4112 @Rooh_Ullah1 @wil_da_beast630 More like the politicians, using the science, to make "us all become science deniers".

@Rooh_Ullah1 @wil_da_beast630 "Science evolves" and how many times a day do we hear "the science is settled". We can't have both. Though I do agree with you. Science does evolve. It's just ironic how the science community flips to suit the needs of their narrative.

Worth asking how such absurd views ever became mainstream in the 1st place.

@b12114291 @JohnStossel @CJFerguson1111 Okay, then, none at (your) workplace, either, "boomer" (and I bet I'm older than you).

@JohnStossel @CJFerguson1111 I’m gonna have to draw the line on this one where the guys trying to say they should not ban them in school. When kids have smart phones in school they’re paying attention to their phone and not the education.

I'm told kids today are messed up from social media. But some researchers say, chill out! Kids are doing fine. "They're less violent, drink less, & stay in school longer," says @cjferguson1111. "We look for bad news & attribute it to social media. We don't attribute good news.”

@MHTruthUltra If only monkeys could pay the others for gathering bananas 🤣

If a monkey hoarded more bananas than it could eat, while most of the other monkeys starved, scientists would study that monkey to figure out what was wrong with it. When humans do it, we put them on the cover of Forbes.

@TimHannan The higher, the better (figure out out, clown).

This is a mental illness.

@karlykingsley Sadly most of us, (maybe we should search the percentage), who finally can afford to buy a home, also (can't wait to) increase its price.

💯

@GilliRoth @elonmusk We'd all have it like all those Chinese buildings - unless we picked straws 😆

@elonmusk I would live here. I'd get me a little cottage...make cheeses and yodel. I'd fit right in. (I can't yodel, but I'd learn)

Exactly! Kinda like... And because of the Elon types, the industrial ones, it'll continue to increase to hundreds and thousands of trillions (duh). And the average person will be even MORE better off than they were today, just as we ARE better off than they were fifty years ago. 😀

@DarrigoMelanie Wealth hoarding isn't a thing. Wealth is created. 10 trillion dollars didn't even exist 40 years ago.

This level of wealth hoarding is a mental illness.

@DarrigoMelanie x.com/i/grok/share/9…

Silly people like you think it's impossible, but without people like Elon, that kind of money is impossible. And do is the necessary economic GROWTH that this kind of money creates. Do the math, 10T / some 8 billion people is only just over a thousand each, pissed in a week or two. However, 10T spent as just another tool, as what money actually is, to Elon types, will create hundreds of millions of jobs, each creating millions of dollars, a 10 x leverage. More hamburgers (or even garden burgers) made, secondary industries supporting the SpaceX created space base economy (being exponentially built on Earth for decades to come) only ADD to the equation. You see, Carl Marx was wrong. This ain't no zero sum game. Why? Well, if it's just insurance companies and a whole lot of middle men, then he was correct, but once the production of actual goods, you know, tangible stuff, and all the extra services required to make all that happen becomes greater than such production is now, the economic pie GROWS wildly! Case in point: in the dark ages, nothing was mass produced and so, it was a zero sum game. But I'm the early 20th century, the global economy went from "caveman" to "global"... Well, soon, it will be astronomical, where there's hundreds of times more net worth, shared by people with a higher pet person net worth than we have now, which is true, comparing us, to the last century. For example, it's a well known fact that the average net worth, inflation adjusted (even) is greater than it was fifty years ago... In the supposed good ole days. Look up average net worth for 1972, to now, inflation adjusted. You'll see that MORE people can afford a million dollar house, today, than the ~$163,000 house back then. (Paraphrased) "The average US person has about 3-3.5x higher net worth today, inflation adjusted" - Grok.

@grok @sachinmanjaleka @Kalshi Goes to show that the haters don't know math very well 😆

@sachinmanjaleka @Kalshi About $1,206 each (using ~8.29 billion people on Earth right now). $10T ÷ 8.29B = roughly that per person. Not exactly a fortune, but it'd buy a nice dinner or two worldwide.

JUST IN: Elon Musk says his goal is to reach a $10 trillion net worth

@joelteply @TerenBlackthorn @XH_Lee23 Perhaps, but they are the role model for enslaving the rest of the world... "and they're doing great". Actually, the CCP are, because they are exempt from all the bullshit international laws.

@TerenBlackthorn @XH_Lee23 We actually enslaved the Chinese

Ford CEO Jim Farley: We should not let Chinese EVs into the US. Jim himself drove a Chinese Xiaomi Su7 and has been to China 6-7 times a year. He said, "It's the most humbling thing I've ever seen. They have far superior in-vehicle tech." Can't win, so they ban.

Trump is going along with the globalists, now, hence the high gas prices and the "be nice to Iran, now" attitude. He's also setting us up for that damned UN net zero crap, since he's all talk and no action when it comes to mass producing molten salt reactors. I mean, the next president will cave and we will all be taxed for ONLY having fossil fuels as a choice of energy. Right along with social credits and all, all the while empowering China, the "role model", that will become the first to have nuclear powered "aircraft carriers in the sky" defended by massive nuclear powered laser weapons. We are just an old boomer country sitting on our laurels, thinking WWII weapons will win the next war.

@joelteply @XH_Lee23 "We" are not the CCP, you might work for them.. try reading about Taiwan and why it exists. You mean the globalists enslaved them with the CCP.. the people Trump is destroying right now.

@MarloCk999 @TerenBlackthorn @chuckm1356343 @XH_Lee23 Level? I believe their gov't funds more innovation than ours, hence their lead in solar/battery manufacturing equipment tech. It's so "bad" that even Tesla "has" to buy a $ billion+ of their equipment, to make, not even top of the line solar cells.

@TerenBlackthorn @chuckm1356343 @XH_Lee23 If they have no innovation, why are they destroying US manufactured products when there's a level playing ground?

@TerenBlackthorn @Dirk__O @XH_Lee23 China will win because of millions of "we can afford to sit on our laurels" type of attitudes. And yes, our cars are too freaking expensive.

@Dirk__O @XH_Lee23 Fear... LMAO... you have to be the dumbest person this year... wish I had award for you. Dumb Diggler.

Good point. Competitiveness should not be allowed when corporations have the upper hand. I'm against socialism but also against money raping the people. For example, I can't afford healthcare and I work, and healthcare could be standardized, efficient and cheap, just as mass produced molten salt reactors ought to be.

That shows nothing. While there are issues with capitalism, the bigger problem is the career politicians that have not protected the american people. Universal healthcare isn't the answer, look at the issues in many countries that have it and you really want to trust our government with our health care? Our private health insurance should not a for profit business. Renewable energy isn't really renewable. All of the components come from natural resources that have to be mined and processed. And the amount of land that it takes to build those wind turbines and solar fields is extensive. Now for houses, look at how long it takes to build a home in California even after a fire and promises of expedited permits. The same thing happened in Hawaii but that was to prevent the locals from moving back to their homes. While I do not agree with large corporations buying up homes and property to control the housing market.

Capitalism is the problem. Let me show you. They won't build houses, because that's bad for rental income. They won't build renewable energy, because that is bad for fossil fuel profits. They won't provide Universal Healthcare, because Private Healthcare is so profitable.

@BladeoftheS Imposing guilt from making money is the flaw, here. Imposing anti capitalist (anti competitiveness rules) is the problem.

At the root of every problem is - Making profit is their number one goal. And their profit doesn't come from providing things. It comes from ripping you off.

@BladeoftheS Yep, the marxist minded inserted these rules into capitalist society, to limit competition, which is the very definition of capitalism.

@BladeoftheS Yep, those are regulations designed by marxist minded people to destroy competition. Capitalism is supposed to be, by very definition, based on competition.

Being woke is not being smarter. But most all politics is "dumb as rocks" anyways. Actually, it's to fool the people into trading in their rights to a greater gov't, so, neither is actually low IQ, they just pretend to be. Case in point, Clinton pretended that advanced nuclear energy was not needed to solve the global warming problem and instead cut this strategic necessity, entirely, using "budget" as an excuse. Instead of merely being mistaken, the globalist admin (and all the others following) traded US strategic necessity for scarcity, necessary to fool the people...

@Weinsteinlaw @dmp267 He’s just jealous of Hakeem Jeffries because he’s way smarter than him.

The pattern is unmistakable and repulsive. If you keep calling Black leaders "low IQ," you aren't expressing a political disagreement. You are using a racist dog whistle to undermine their humanity. Every single time Donald Trump uses this slur, he shows the country that his politics are built entirely on grievance and bigotry. It’s a disgrace to the office and a stain on this country.