Vendetta

It’s called advocacy , but why only for you @MattJury_Law (?) When #McBride engaged in similar conduct in representation of the Tates, you made allegations of misconduct which were consistently raised in civil litigation filings. Even after courts continued to rule against your complaints .#You persisted in your conduct. #Corruptive You did abuse the court system. @CrayonMurders made everyone believe that these complaints were made by others. But, this was #Matt #Jury, all along. We all remember. … And. it’s. obvious . these . two. clowns. were. working. together.

Regarding Andrew Tate and the court’s denial of the alleged violation of Mrs. Brie Stern’s order of protection. _____ If his account were truly frivolous or knowingly false, the court would have had grounds to find a violation of the order of protection. However, the court denied her motion and declined to grant the relief she requested. She had traveled to Dubai for work , while Tate was visiting and allegedly made inflammatory posts that appeared intended to draw attention. Despite her claims, the court consistently rejected her allegations. It also appears she attempted to quietly move past the issue after those denials in court. This pattern is not entirely new for @thebristern -there are prior instances in which another party brought a claim against her, resulting in a court order requiring her to remove defamatory content off her social media. Andrew Tate submitted an affidavit outlining the alleged incidents and provided it to authorities in Dubai. In the United Arab Emirates, making false statements to law enforcement can carry legal consequences, as such matters are taken seriously under local law. Fact Check: Dubai ( The UAE) has strict laws regarding false reporting to authorities.

So @thebristern filed a motion against Andrew Tate requesting sanctions and a ruling for a violation of her order of protection. Denied. This is in relation to Andrew Tate, filing a police report in Dubai, for her inflammatory online statements. More in comments.

Remember when Crayons said -two out of the three- errors were fixed in the Andrew Tate’s indictment? #slowprocess The fucking shit tanked. Wrong intel, bro. Obviously not true. Are you sure? Team Matrix was saying so much bullshit.. Can I help you with a spin? They were investigated from April - Dec before the arrest. Then they were not indicted until June. Thats a year and 2 months- slow process? Not really. — Then in Dec 2024 - the indictment was sent back- Are you going to state that it is taking DIICOT a year and 3 months ( process that) to fix the last error for the new indictment? Yeah. Makes no sense. Shit out of luck. The indictment failed - but you were telling everyone two errors were already fixed. Horrible.

“THE 'TEAM MATRIX' CONSPIRACY” Court docket: Tate’s vs Crayons et al _________ “On April 13, 2024, "Players" hosted an X 'Space' titled "Exposing @VPNLFN 'Ben," during which participants discussed Team Matrix, its purpose, their coordination, and their efforts attached as Exhibit KK. During that 'Space', participants stated that Team Matrix had been formed in 2023, discussed how they worked together, and described private coordination, mutual support, and the
sharing of information and tactics. Participants in that Space and related communications praised one another's "work" against Plaintiffs, credited Murdered by Crayons with "turning" people against Plaintiffs, and described a common objective of gaining momentum against Plaintiffs online.” Extra ———- 💡 If you were telling the entire truth about the Tates and their cases, why did you take extra measures to conceal your identities? “#Players also discussed operatonal security, including anonymity measures, location concealment, and steps participants should take so they could continue posting while avoiding identification and accountability.” Because…. you …. didn’t…. want … to….. get …..sued …for …. adding… or …making… up … entire …. stories.