Crusty

16 posts

Crusty

Crusty

@floppyparm

Katılım Eylül 2023
281 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@varadmehta I don’t even think the District Court issued a ruling yet
English
0
0
0
15
Beyond Non-JD
Beyond Non-JD@BeyondNonJD·
And with our first blue/purple district court nominees of Trump 2.0, a very quick rundown I had made of similar ones under Biden (any mistakes, lemme know!). 8 of the first 9 were purple. And @ChuckGrassley takes filling district court vacancies fast quite seriously.
Beyond Non-JD tweet media
English
3
0
1
100
Dustin Keel
Dustin Keel@DustinKeel4·
@floppyparm @scotus_wire Still waiting to see whether the petitioners actually submitted enough signatures to block the map. Probably won't know until July/August.
English
1
0
0
36
SCOTUS Wire
SCOTUS Wire@scotus_wire·
🚨 The Missouri Supreme Court has upheld the new Republican-drawn congressional map.
SCOTUS Wire tweet media
English
36
577
3.8K
54.1K
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@RedEaglePatriot Should R’s be paying more attention to state legislature maps especially in places like TX, GA, etc.
English
2
0
3
1K
Red Eagle Politics
Red Eagle Politics@RedEaglePatriot·
Possible 2030s Census, Post-VRA "Redistricting War" End Result--one that even plausibly holds in a Dem-friendly year... Red State Changes: -ID gains a seat due to the census -UT gains a seat due to the census, opts to keep blue vote sink in SLC (perhaps, wisely) -TX and FL gain 4 each and move for 38-4 R and 28-4 R, respectively -Nothing in Kansas or Nebraska, as GOP is too spineless in either -GOP adds a seat in LA, MS, KY, SC, MO and 2 in AL -IN and OH finally does their job, OH decides to make Cincy a Likely D vote sink to prevent competitiveness in other R districts Blue State Changes: -IL goes 14-1, preventing a dummymander, loses 2 -CA dummymander bursts in 2028, then goes 46-2, and loses several seats due to census -Dems draw out more in NY, making it 20-4 D after the census (state loses 2) -MD, OR, WA, MD all draw out a red seat; OR loses a seat due to the census -MN moves for 5-2 -VA moves for 10-1 but gets the referendum timing right this time -Dems lose a seat in RI due to the census -Dems go for a 10-2 D NJ map -CO Dems end their independent commission for a 7-1 D map Swing State Changes: -WI Courts mandate a ridiculous 4-4 before 2028, then Dems lose a seat, making a 3-3-1 Map -MI and PA keep their commissions (here, PA is set at 8-8, MI is 6-6-1...geography favors Rs in both, though) -NH draws a slight GOP district next census -NV has a 2-2 split, possibly so even keeping the current map -AZ is 7-3 R (gains seat, plus new hypothetical R trifecta in 2031 sets aside commission) -GA goes 12-3 R, pack Atlanta -NC gains a (red) seat Here's the kicker, though: if Dem states drew out every remaining GOP representative...GOP would still take the House 2 in CA, 1 in WA, in CO, 2 in MN, 1 in IL, 4 in NY, 2 in NJ, 1 in VA...that's only going to get them to 214...with a lot of dummymander potential to boot.
Red Eagle Politics tweet media
English
44
94
1.1K
130.5K
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@BeyondNonJD When do we need to start seeing names in order to get these filled?
English
1
0
0
30
Beyond Non-JD
Beyond Non-JD@BeyondNonJD·
Again, a lot has to go wrong for a D +4 in the Senate midterms. But you can basically confirm anyone you want with a 53R Senate. So why take the chance, no matter how remote it is? Still almost 3 months for just another 12 nominees (and obviously the CCA10/8 TBD ones).
English
1
0
2
81
Beyond Non-JD
Beyond Non-JD@BeyondNonJD·
Things are looking good for Republicans right now. But I still think it'd be irresponsible of them not to have every current red state district court opening filled before their August vacation. Never know what seats will open in August-October. Or what else will be happening.
Beyond Non-JD tweet media
English
1
0
4
151
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@BeyondNonJD What about the older fellas on the 4th Circuit?
English
0
0
0
51
Beyond Non-JD
Beyond Non-JD@BeyondNonJD·
I had the odds of Judge Southwick going senior under Trump 2.0/R Senate at about 1%. Probably good time to drop it a bit lower. Judge Richman? Probably sticking around a bit longer too.
English
2
0
2
124
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@BeyondNonJD Imagine caring about this even in the slightest when you’re risking your entire legacy being replaced by a DEI abortionist judge
English
0
0
0
21
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@BeyondNonJD Probably not worth it given how few vacancies there’d be? I’d say hold off until 2028 if everything aligns then
English
0
0
0
18
Beyond Non-JD
Beyond Non-JD@BeyondNonJD·
Do district court blue slips survive a Republican-controlled 120th Congress? 50-50 I think almost certainly. 51-49 I'd feel very confident. 52-48 (assume NC & ME flip) I think it depends how much Trump 2.0 wants to press it. Could do a test with Massachusetts & assess. 53-47 🤷‍♂️
Beyond Non-JD@BeyondNonJD

It doesn't get that much attention (relatively speaking), but @ChuckGrassley putting an end to circuit court blue slips has transformed the circuits & been a huge advantage for Republicans over the past decade. judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/rele…

English
2
0
1
262
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@varadmehta No way he replaces his father though right?
English
0
0
0
95
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@charliesmirkley When will these differences really begin to impact elections?
English
2
0
0
987
Smirkley
Smirkley@Smirkley·
Family Studies showed % w/ children by ideology. But it understates the gap. Mean children captures both who has kids AND how many. 2020s, ages 25-35: Men: Con 1.06 vs Lib 0.35 Women: Con 1.67 vs Lib 0.87
Smirkley tweet mediaSmirkley tweet media
Brad Wilcox@BradWilcoxIFS

1. NYT: "great detachment" is greater for the poor, working class and for liberals, who often prize autonomy/career over family. "by 2020s, 71% of conservative women [25-35] had children, compared w/ only 40% of liberal women. That’s an astounding 31-percentage-point gap."

English
40
71
510
770.2K
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@varadmehta Nah… someone in their 30’s or early 40’s?
English
1
0
0
183
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@EWess92 Great! Not a lawyer, question - why are they remanding it if they determined the laws are constitutional?
English
0
0
0
36
Eric W.
Eric W.@EWess92·
Can Iowa protect children & parental rights by mandating teachers notify parents about social transitions? Can Iowa prohibit teaching about sexuality/gender identify in elementary schools? Judge Erickson answers, "Yes." (I argued this & another Eighth Cir. win today back-to-back)
Eric W. tweet mediaEric W. tweet media
English
6
11
50
3K
Crusty
Crusty@floppyparm·
@EWess92 Isn’t this stayed by SCOTUS anyway?
English
0
0
1
1.3K
Eric W.
Eric W.@EWess92·
"Federal courts are not all powerful." Judge Bumatay, writing for *Nine* judges in a dissental from the Ninth Circuit's refusal to review the case declining to let President Trump end *TEMPORARY* Protected Status. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this issue twice.
Eric W. tweet mediaEric W. tweet media
English
23
106
625
35.1K
Mike Fragoso
Mike Fragoso@mike_frags·
So who is plausible for NY, whip smart, and hard working? Some possibilities: - Daniel M. Sullivan, private practice, Scalia and O’Scannlain - John Cronan, SDNY, 45 DOJ, Katzman and Parker - Rachel Kovner, EDNY, OSG, Scalia and Wilkinson - Iris Lan, GC of NASA, 45 DOJ, Bryson - Jed Doty, 45 WHCO, Cabranes and Sykes
Mike Fragoso@mike_frags

What to look for in a Second Circuit pick? There are a few differences between it and the Sixth, but, in short, you want brains and industry. For one thing, CA6 has a conservative supermajority, which means it’s really dealer’s choice. CA2 has a very narrow liberal majority—with no real middle. So the task of a judge is very different from CA6 and even little different from, say, CA7 where margins are also thin but you need someone who can persuade the majority makers. For CA2 you want a judge in the mold of Steve Menashi: brutally intelligent and hard working. On mine-run cases an industrious judge can simply outwork his liberal counterparts while it takes brains (and not just ideology) to get attention upstairs when needed. For another, the bench in NY (perhaps surprisingly) is not nearly as deep as in Ohio. There’s no Ohio SG’s office to draw from—or the stellar FL bench, or the excellent MO AG’s office, or the strong NC USAOs. So for NY you may need to go a little further afield or make hard choices. The good news: no Republican senators to please. Not only that, Schumer is a cartoon villain so he’ll get no consideration at all.

English
9
4
50
45.4K