Flrande

4.2K posts

Flrande banner
Flrande

Flrande

@flrande

成分复杂个人号 生活 | ACG | 宏观 | AI Views are my own

Katılım Nisan 2020
4.3K Takip Edilen3.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Flrande
Flrande@flrande·
劳动力再分配失效,劳动收入向资本收入转移,需求抑制,降息加速这一流程,终端需求对现金流的反噬更晚更大
中文
0
3
21
6.4K
Flrande
Flrande@flrande·
还是广州有家的感觉
中文
0
0
5
336
Flrande retweetledi
나인티
나인티@aetxnin·
#precure #たんプリ
나인티 tweet media
QME
0
1.4K
13.4K
96.6K
Flrande retweetledi
矢野茜🍜
矢野茜🍜@if_224·
名探偵プリキュア! 第25話ありがとうございました🌟
矢野茜🍜 tweet media
日本語
131
13.8K
62.7K
753.6K
Flrande retweetledi
蒼依てて
蒼依てて@tete__a·
真実の香り
蒼依てて tweet media
日本語
0
4K
35.7K
289K
Flrande retweetledi
Pankoryo
Pankoryo@panmioo_·
『めっちゃカメレオン』
Pankoryo tweet media
日本語
0
862
4.5K
71.1K
Flrande retweetledi
아작
아작@_A_jak_·
아작 tweet media
ZXX
5
1.5K
7.4K
88.8K
Flrande retweetledi
Artificial Analysis
Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys·
Kimi K3 scores 57 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Its intelligence is comparable to Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 but remains behind Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. Moonshot AI has expressed plans to release the 2.8T parameter model's weights, which would make it the leading open weights model Key results: ➤ Strong agentic task performance: @Kimi_Moonshot's Kimi K3 reaches an Elo rating of 1668 on GDPval v2. This is a marked improvement over K2.6’s 1190, surpassing GLM-5.2 (1514), GPT-5.5 (1494), and Claude Opus 4.8 (1600). However, it still lags behind Claude Fable 5 (1760). Kimi K3 also scores an impressive 53% and takes the #1 position on AutomationBench-AA, our implementation of Zapier’s Agentic SaaS workflow evaluation. ➤ Second-highest performance on AA-Briefcase (agentic knowledge work): On our private long-horizon knowledge work evaluation, Kimi K3 reaches an overall Elo of 1547, +732 points from Kimi K2.6 and behind only Claude Fable 5. It is well-rounded: its rubric scoring and analytical quality almost reach Claude Fable 5’s scores, while GPT-5.6 Sol continues to outperform other leading models on presentation quality. ➤ Set to lead open weights models once weights are released: Moonshot AI has not yet released the weights but expressed plans to do so. Once available, Kimi K3 would clearly lead other open weights models including GLM-5.2 (51) and DeepSeek v4 Pro (44). However, at 2.8T parameters, it is significantly larger than its open weights peers (eg. GLM-5.2 at 753B params and DeepSeek V4 Pro at 1.6T), as well as the Kimi K2 to K2.6 models (1T params). ➤ Cost per task ($0.94) is similar to GPT-5.6 Sol ($1.04), ~1/2 the price of Opus 4.8 ($1.80) and higher than open weights peers: Moonshot AI’s pricing for K3 is significantly higher than their K2 pricing (K3’s output token price is $15/1M tokens while K2.6 was $4). This positions the model as cheaper on a cost per task basis than Opus 4.8, similar to GPT-5.6 Sol ($1.04) and more expensive than open weights peers, GLM-5.2 ($0.32) and DeepSeek V4 Pro ($0.04) ➤ Improved token efficiency alongside higher intelligence: Kimi K3’s token usage on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index decreased significantly, using 21% fewer output tokens than K2.6. The new model used approximately 132M output tokens to complete all nine evaluations, compared to approximately 166M for K2.6, while achieving higher scores. ➤ Native multimodal capabilities: Kimi K3, like K2.6, is released with native image and text multimodal input. If weights are released, this will position Kimi K3 as one of the leading open weights models with multimodal input capabilities Other model details: Context window: 1M Size: 2.8T total parameters Pricing: The first-party API is priced at $3.00/$15.00 per 1M input/output tokens, with cached input discounted 90% to $0.30 per 1M tokens. Modality: Native multimodal input supports text and images, and the model remains text-only for output. Accessibility: Accessible at launch through Moonshot’s first party API. Model weights are not yet released but Moonshot AI has expressed plans to do so.
Artificial Analysis tweet media
English
170
707
6.1K
1.6M
Flrande retweetledi
Liên Xô
Liên Xô@LienXo22092008·
Commission I have a once-in-a-lifetime order; a customer has requested a full set of game characters for "まのさば" and I'm free to draw them however I like. #まのさば #commisson #illustrationㅤ #イラスト
Liên Xô tweet media
日本語
3
77
726
8.4K
Flrande
Flrande@flrande·
开发领域没对比过 5.6 和 Fable,投研这块 5.6 Sol Ultra >> Fable + Workflow
中文
3
0
10
3.5K
Flrande
Flrande@flrande·
5.6 Sol 在 Browser Use 和 Computer Use 领域太强了,用起来好爽
中文
0
0
6
943
Flrande retweetledi
蔗糖禁止
蔗糖禁止@LetterEast·
蔗糖禁止 tweet media
ZXX
1
470
3.1K
36.7K
Flrande retweetledi
Andrew Curran
Andrew Curran@AndrewCurran_·
Quote from OpenAI on the livestream. 'Already, Sol has been transforming our research program. As one example, GPT-5.6-Sol autonomously post-trained GPT-5.6-Luna.'
English
44
122
2K
261.9K
Flrande retweetledi
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
obviously the best model we have ever produced, but also one of the best blog posts we have ever produced: openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/
English
630
818
9.5K
1.1M
Flrande retweetledi
Matei Zaharia
Matei Zaharia@matei_zaharia·
We benchmarked coding agents on our own internal tasks at Databricks and learned a lot! There are many surprising opportunities to lower cost and increase quality, and many models including open source ones are truly competitive now. 🧵
Matei Zaharia tweet media
English
70
150
1.1K
250.2K