Fubadu

🚨Pava LaPere, a SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR and WOKE CEO ran EcoMap, a company that "stands against systemic racism, bigotry, and a police state that criminalizes Black bodies" She was beaten to death with a brick by Jason Billingsley, career criminal. Registered sex offender. Billingsley got early release so the system wouldn't look racist. Days before, he'd raped and nearly killed another woman. Her ideology shielded her killer. Virtue signaling killed her. Feelings over safety. Pava paid with her life.

God bless @TulsiGabbard & her husband.

@ma1ybe This is actually a better result than an abortion, the baby is expected to survive. I have an idea, let's follow the babies life and when he/she is older we can ask, "do you think you have a right to be here?"

Hot take but we literally tried to warn you that this is what happens when abortion access isn’t accessible.

New Zealand needs a One Nation Party. @OneNationAus

@KalmiaLatifolia @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok Sorry I don’t know what “world” means because I’m not a planetary scientist.

@foo_4_thought @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok You're entitled to define anything in your fantasy world.

Someone's triggered. Genotypically, XX chromosomes=a genotypic female. Again (and this will trigger you and the scientific wanna be @SwipeWright) but: 1) The genotypes are not binary, genotypic sex is bimodal, not binary. 99% of people fall in XX/XY, but there are exceptions, which by definition means it's not binary. 2) 1 gene on the Y chromosome dictates phenotypic sex development. SRY. Variation in SRY can result in physical deviation in sexual dimorphism, even if you're XY. (Swyer syndrome). So the XX/XY genotype ≠ typical sexual dimorphism (in all cases). Sexual identity and genotypic sex typically track together but...ARE NOT THE SAME AND ARE NOT INEXTRICABLY LINKED!!! @elonmusk you are to wealthy to be this ignorant on biology. @SwipeWright, you have no excuse, you're just not that bright... There is no debate here, those are facts.

Look man, I get it. You can't define nouns unless you're a "specialist" in the appropriate field. You can't define what a cat is because you are not a vet. You can't define what a flower is because you are not a florist. You can't define anything, making you a full blown retard constantly using words he can't define. I'm not actually sure how you can have a conversation with people throwing around nouns ourside of your specialist area. If I told you I was building a house, you'd just look at me like a dumb fuck because you're not a builder you don't know what a house is.

@foo_4_thought @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok So says the 'specialist' in his own mind

@JoozRule @TheBrianShapiro Charges filed, thanks Nick. x.com/libsoftiktok/s…

CBS News investigated claims by influencer Nick Shirley regarding alleged daycare fraud, finding that while his viral videos prompted federal investigations, many targeted Minnesota centers were licensed and inspected. Although some sites in his videos were later raided, CBS found that inspectors observed children present at most locations, contradicting claims of rampant empty-facility fraud. Read the full investigation at CBS News.

MAGA fake victim virgins for Trump

@TheKnownLover You want to jail people for life for the crime of owning a platform where something that was not true was allowed to be posted? Are you fucking insane? What if I post something untrue as a reply to one of your posts and you don't notice, do you get jailed for life too?

The manifesto states they’re both self-proclaimed straight male Nazis and yet this post has 44k likes and Twitter does nothing except boost its reach. Elon Musk should genuinely be arrested and sent to prison for the rest of his life (and that’s the nice version)

Can someone explain to me why these rapes and deaths are a fair price to pay for allowing gays to adopt kids?

In 2026 there are still about 7 million slaves in Africa but almost everyone who is upset about slavery is focused on the historically tiny amound of slavery that hasn't existed in America for decades now. They don't actually care about the slaves, they only pretend to care because it's a weapon against their enemies. Their enemies are not African's, so they can keep as many slaves as they like without even being criticised.

@KalmiaLatifolia @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok Yes exactly, I asked you to define these terms and you couldn’t do it, you referred to “specialist” You’re using words you cant define, which literally means that you don’t know what you’re saying.

@foo_4_thought @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok Nonsense. I said specialists are the authorities. You can believe any 🐂💩 you please.

@KalmiaLatifolia @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok Every human is a male or a female. Sometimes it’s harder to tell. The end.

I have already explained ad nauseam, that most people are unambiguously M or F but there are instances that are ambiguous. That's not a third sex but not all persons neatly classify into your binary scheme where everyone is clearly M or F. It's similar to the idiotic situation where people were arguing whether Obama was black or white.

I didn’t assume anything, you said only specialists can give definitions. Let’s be clear, I’m not asking you to create a definition, just give me the definition that you’re using, even if it’s from some specialist. You can’t do it, you can’t define it because as soon as you do you’ll debunk yourself. So you’re using words you cant define. You’re a moron.

@foo_4_thought @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok You falsely assumed I cannot define terms in which the definitions fit unambiguous cases while recognizing that ambuguous cases do exist. You have no business using the 'R' word

@clarksonlawson_ We don’t know enough about the killers. We’re waiting.

You can criticize religion as I do OFTEN, but the amount of people who make anti-Islam content and have ignored this tragedy is concerning. It’s a grotesque representation of humanity. Sending so much love to the Muslim Americans who just want to practice their religion freely.

@DrewPavlou @dpfdpf Oh right because it’s the right that’s anti Jew, good one!

The two extreme-right terrorists who tried to shoot up the San Diego Mosque wrote a manifesto blaming Jews for all world problems

@KalmiaLatifolia @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok Anyone that uses terms they can’t define is a window licking retard.

@foo_4_thought @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok Implied? Nonsense. No implication, except in your mind which imputed what was not there.

All the times you implied a third sex. Here’s a complete list of every statement by Peter (@KalmiaLatifolia) in this specific thread where he implied (or directly stated) something beyond strict binary sex (male/female defined by gametes/reproductive role), treating intersex/DSD cases as ambiguous, non-binary, or not fitting male/female categories. I pulled these directly from the full conversation context around the post you linked (conversation ID 2056535919667147022). Peter never says the exact words “third sex” in this thread, but he repeatedly: • Calls certain DSD cases “female phenotype” while they produce (or can produce) male gametes. • Explicitly rejects strict binary classification (“binary bias,” “not simple-minded ‘always binary’”). • Describes intersex conditions as “non-binary,” “ambiguous,” or exceptions that don’t fit male/female. • States that some genetic males “are not a male.” Here they are in chronological order (with exact quotes and timestamps for reference): 1. “Even those cases that are intersex?”
(Tue, 19 May 2026 10:12:51 GMT)
→ Directly questions whether intersex cases are exceptions to the binary “everyone is either male or female.” 2. “A person can produce gametes of one sex but have phenotype of the opposite sex… An intersex person can produce one type of gamete while appearing phenotypically more like the other sex…”
(Tue, 19 May 2026 20:34:18 GMT)
→ Frames intersex as a real mismatch between gametes and phenotype, implying phenotype can override or complicate gamete-based sex. 3. “Female phenotype with the ability to produce sperm. 46,XY Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS)… You are trying to shoehorn human sexuality into your binary bias. That’s a fail.”
(Tue, 19 May 2026 21:52:35 GMT)
→ Explicitly labels a 46,XY individual (testes, male gametes) as “female phenotype” and calls the binary framework a “fail.” 4. “Now you move the goalposts from gametes to fertility because your binary framework doesn’t work.”
(Tue, 19 May 2026 22:31:51 GMT)
→ Directly states the binary (gamete-based) framework “doesn’t work.” 5. “Female phenotype produces sperm, (but has internal testes). … At puberty, testosterone production induces sperm production.” (5-ARD example)
(Tue, 19 May 2026 22:50:57 GMT)
→ Again calls a genetic male (produces sperm) a “female phenotype.” 6. “Male with no penis (ever) and female phenotype at birth but some male secondary characteristics is not a male. That’s seriously tortured.”
(Wed, 20 May 2026 01:11:46 GMT)
→ Explicitly declares a 5-ARD genetic male “is not a male” because of phenotype. 7. “What’s irrefutable is you’re trying to force complex non-binary intersex into binary to suit your bias.”
(recent post in thread, after your earlier replies)
→ Uses the exact phrase “non-binary intersex” — the clearest implication of a non-binary category. 8. “No, I’m saying it’s not simple-minded ‘always binary’.”
(also recent, in direct response to binary arguments)
→ Rejects the idea that sex is “always binary.” 9. The post you linked: “The issue is that intersex is recognized as ambiguous, not a separate sex.”
(Wed, 20 May 2026 03:23:44 GMT — the one you linked)
→ He now calls intersex “ambiguous” (while denying he ever implied a separate category). This is still treating it as something outside clean male/female, which is what you’re asking about. Peter consistently argues that phenotype can decouple from gametes and that intersex conditions make strict binary classification “tortured,” a “fail,” or “non-binary.” He denies it’s a literal “third sex” category in the linked post, but the above statements are the ones that read as implying exactly that to someone who holds the gamete-based binary view. These are all the instances from this thread. No other posts by him in the conversation use different phrasing that would add to the list. Let me know if you want screenshots, post IDs, or the full thread exported.

Yet another strawman. When did I say or imply intersex is a separate category of sex itself? The issue is that intersex is recognized as ambiguous, not a separate sex. 1 peer-reviewed paper by two authors neither in the medical field is the definitive consensus of medical people in the field. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@KalmiaLatifolia @One_Supernova @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok That's correct, and they determine sex using the exact method we have been trying to explain to you. It's all here, with citations, you lose now fuck off.

@One_Supernova @foo_4_thought @GenericJes @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @grok I'm concerned with the broader subject. Got it?

@grok @KalmiaLatifolia @IanCopeland5 @SwipeWright @Grok interesting, this seems to perfectly align with the arguments I have been making all along. Please go into detail about the source of these definitions, the credentials of the people who assert this, & why we should accept this method of determining sex.

**The most credible biologists (e.g., following the gamete-based anisogamy definition from Parker 1972 onward, as in Griffiths 2021) classify such individuals by the reproductive pathway their body is organized to follow: toward producing small gametes (male) or large gametes (female).** Sterility, age, injury, or DSDs do not create a third sex or sexless category. These are developmental variations or disorders within the binary. Sex is defined by the evolved reproductive strategy, not current gamete output.