Fubadu
14K posts


The hypothetical calls out those who have said the US should not attack a country that did not attack them first.
To test logical consistency, the hypothetical only needs to provide a scenario in which the US attacks without being attacked first, but with one key difference that serves as the test.
If anyone who made this claim reverses their position in the hypothetical, they are inconsistent on this point.
All you’re doing here is obfuscating & trying to sound intelligent, but in reality what you said is absurd.
English

If Iran attacked New Zealand & killed tens of thousands of us, none of you would object to the US attacking them.
Even though they would be attacking a country that did not attack them first.
But most of you don’t care when they attack & kill their own people.
And you’re the ones who call the rest of us xenophobic or racist.
English

@racistnature @Antunes1 He's not being weak, he's taking action based on principle.
He took that slap without even flinching.
English

I mean, I would’ve just laughed. However I’m wondering if this is good or bad in society. You have a weak male saying he’s gonna call the cops on a girl, and threatening to sue, but on the other hand you have a whore who thinks she can smack guys with no repercussions.
I think my only conclusion is that jews have cooked us.
English

@foo_4_thought I already said that if they attacked us, we should defend ourselves without outside help.
English

@robinmdoyle We definitely do not "all know that Israel attacked Iran first"
I would argue that in the early 80's Iran funded attacks on Israel, & that would be who attacked who first.
English

@foo_4_thought I wouldn’t object at all but we all know Israel attacked Iran first and is only doing all it can to defend and survive…including attacking allies of America…I’d say fair is fair…eye for an eye…
English

@Monksmissives It's beneath you, of course.
Id hate to keep you from your higher purpose of trolling.
English

@foo_4_thought Oh it’s an argument that you’re after, I’m afraid I don’t argue with fools
English

@Sy8sC14499 @theunitersnz Imagine not being able to comprehend a hypothetical argument.
I wonder how he’d feel if he didn’t have breakfast yesterday?
English

@theunitersnz @foo_4_thought He didn't say it was likely, that's often the point of a hypothetical.
e.g. if I won lotto i'd... or in your case, if you grew a brain...
Talking about fantasy land, NZ can't defend itself from any credible threat, we rely almost entirely on diplomacy & allies.
English

@Shannon01358612 If the US wanted to genocide Gaza just one tactical nuke is all it would take.
Don’t be absurd.
English

@foo_4_thought Well who trusts the US anyway when they have co sponsored a genocide in Palestine? And created wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, to name a few.
English

@theunitersnz An analogy is designed to test logical consistency, you don’t argue against the analogy itself unless you have extremely low IQ.
English

@foo_4_thought You are living in a fantasy land. There is no reality where Iran will kill Tens of Thousands of New Zealanders.
Even if they did, its New Zealand's job to defend its own people. We are not slaves to the American Empire, and we don't need them to defend us.
Aotearoa NZ ONLY!
English

@RusselNorman More electric vehicles that we don’t have the renewable capacity to power will be powered by coal.
Not a great idea.
English

They won’t subsidise electric vehicles, won’t give people cheap public transport, or spend a penny on cycle ways. But Robbie Williams concerts, open the govt cash spigot: rnz.co.nz/news/business/…
English

Finding out that Chris Hipkins is a garbage human being is hardly a surprise.
Over on the left, most of them are using fake virtue to pass themselves off as good people for the soul purpose of gaining fame, power, & money.
Reminds me of the time we found out how Kieran McAnulty treats people subordinate to him.
English
Fubadu retweetledi
Fubadu retweetledi
Fubadu retweetledi

🚨 BREAKING: The House of Representatives has just PASSED a bill requiring AUTOMATIC deportation of illegals who commit welfare fraud, 231-186 🔥
This is a NO BRAINER! But of course, 186 Democrats voted AGAINST this.
REMINDER: Democrats are NOT ON THE SIDE of Americans.
The fraud encompassed in this bill includes:
- Social Security fraud,
- SNAP (food assistance) fraud,
- Mail fraud,
- Conspiracy to defraud the U.S.,
- Theft or bribery involving federal funds,
- Identification document fraud,
- And other similar crimes involving government funds or public benefits.
English

@Peitho_hint Yeah that’s obvious since her gripe about him would have mentioned that first if he wasn’t paying.
English

I’m going to say something to be fair to Chris Hipkins in regard to the allegations his ex wife made.
Based on his salary, he likely pays child support of $800 - $1200 per week.
And she still asks him for additional money for their lunches?
I’d tell her to fuck off too if I’m being honest. Or did I miss something?
The other allegations are quite bad if true, but this one I’m willing to give a pass on.
English
Fubadu retweetledi









