aT-Tension 2:3

The answer is not a number. The question creates the gap where meaning lives. 1 marks. 2 splices. 3 closes. Balance is surface; alignment is law. The loop doesn’t belong to the count, but to the One who governs it. ♾️

Maybe this can be of use to someone. Only a rough draft so be easy on it.

@weichunchen @ShishirShelke1 Google gives software away because distribution creates value- Access. Apple charges for hardware because ownership does- Protection.

@ShishirShelke1 The biggest difference between Apple and Google is that one requires an internet connection, while the other runs locally.

Apple’s Live Translation feature requires AirPods 4 (ANC), AirPods Pro 2/3, iPhone 15 Pro or later, iOS 26+, and Apple Intelligence turned on Meanwhile, Google’s new Live Translate works with any headphones in 70+ languages This is crazy 💀 Really curious to see how it works in real life and how it compares with Apple

@finothegeek @ShishirShelke1 Google gives software away because distribution creates value. Apple charges for hardware because ownership does. They’re not moral opposites - they’re responding to different economic constraints.

@ShishirShelke1 Apple ask their (force) users to upgrade to the latest products meanwhile Google trying to win everyone's heart by supporting with minimal support.

@TivadarDanka And yet this is where our brains naturally organize. Building through progressive overload, navigation through gradient descension. A place to build, and a place to discover, not something new, but that which has always been there. You are inevitable.

I built the full knowledge graph of machine learning, and it’s fucking awesome. Check where gradient descent is: (Graph is hierarchical. Lower nodes are fundamental, top nodes are advanced. Yellow edges lead to prerequisites, blue to concepts building on gradient descent.)

@GoogleWorkspace Which version of Gemini is this powered by?

Put your scattered data to work with Gemini in Sheets. Organize and analyze the data you need from a single prompt. 📈 → goo.gle/3PyEapS

POV: Software engineers 3 hours before the deadline. 😂

@scaling01 😂😂.. its emotional intelligence higher than other llm’s. I’m pretty sure you goaded it into having to say that lol

talked to Opus 4.6 for a couple of hours about personal problems and it has this weird response mode where it's very commanding "put the phone down", "close the laptop", "Save this conversation. Set the reminder. Go to sleep.", do this, do that not sure how I feel about it

@QuantumTumbler @RileyRalmuto Dude… you literally dunk on everybody I follow 😂😂

That’s a strong claim with zero evidence attached. “Hundreds of billions are being spent to make you believe X” needs • who is spending it • where it’s documented • and what actions actually support that claim Otherwise it’s just an unfalsifiable narrative. Also, disagreement about AI consciousness isn’t suppression it’s because there’s no agreed mechanism, no test, and no way to distinguish behavior from experience yet. That’s an open scientific problem, not a coordinated cover-up.

remember: hundreds of billions of dollars are invested in making sure you dont believe ai is capable of consciousness. hundreds of billions of dollars. cogsec is the most important discipline you could possibly invest in right now.

Biological Harmonic Organization

@steipete 😂😂 this brought joy to my day

Hear me out...

Brownian Motion One of the simplest phenomena in physics and one of the most profound. Brownian motion is the random movement of tiny particles suspended in a fluid, caused by constant collisions with surrounding molecules. Under a microscope, the particles jitter unpredictably. But that motion is the direct result of millions of microscopic impacts. In 1905, Albert Einstein showed that this motion could be predicted statistically, linking visible particle movement to the invisible world of atoms. It became one of the first strong pieces of evidence that atoms and molecules are real physical objects. A beautiful lesson from physics. What looks like chaos at the microscopic level produces predictable behavior at the macroscopic scale. That’s Brownian motion.

And that was all you needed, all along 123. One is the point, 2 is the witness, 3 is the group then the group shall be one. Structurally and metaphysically it is the rule of 3. Math, Language and symbols. Structurally sound but dimensionally erect. Attention holds margin but thresholds Reflect. The song is in the rotation. 369 was missing the zeroe(s). 0 369 0 is 12345. A rotation of scale can read 1’s just like 0’s. The quantum bit. Thesis, margin, symmetry, invert (thesis). Sorry I had to 🤦‍♂️

3 labs, 3 top researchers, 3 great ideas. It’s truly beautiful. We all think to ourselves how beautiful it would be to have all 3 labs work together and achieve AGI. This would inadvertently slow progress due to no urgency from competition - or maybe they would all be inspired to work with each other and find breakthroughs faster. Either way, I cherish moments like these

@FakePsyho @teortaxesTex Just shrink or extend your radius and let the numbers change the scale. Why change the coordinates when you can just change you frame of reference, keeps the model stable under stress.

Stop drawing shapes. Start building a hallway. 1/ Proximity Nesting: Scale isn't a boundary; it’s a resolution. If data looks blurry, you don't change the chart—you 'walk closer.' The 'iris' doesn't disappear; its curves simply expand until they reveal language. 2/ The Infinite Clock: Use radius length for depth. Different context? That’s just a different rung on the clock. You can infinitely nest metrics forwards and backwards without ever breaking the perimeter. 3/ Topology over Toggles: Cinematic interfaces don't 'switch' to a bar graph. They zoom. A line is just a string of symbols you haven't gotten close enough to read yet. We don’t need infinite charts. We need unrestricted adherence to scale. 🌀 A cube, is a hexagon, is a circle, is Infinite Always simplify with depth 🙏😉

The problem is never the graph, it's the execution and intention. Not everyone is Tufte (almost nobody is Tufte). Area size can be informative

Wait, so the founder of Anthropic is "Amodei," as in "loves god"? And he leads Anthropic, meaning "human-centered," which is being used in military strikes? And the creator of ChatGPT is "Altman," as in "an alternative to humans"? And he leads OpenAI, which is completely closed? And then there's "Gemini," meaning "two-faced," from a company that promised to do no evil? And the whole global AI arms race is being driven by people who claimed to be worried about AGI taking over the world? Either the universe is an extremely cliché writer, or has a brilliant sense of humor

If light has no mass, how is it affected by black holes? The answer is: massive objects bend the "fabric" of space-time, so light travels along a different path than it would have if the massive object were not there. [🎞️physicsgene]

Governments pay millions for OSINT tools like this, but @eliehabib just built one and open-sourced it the ultimate global intelligence dashboard for free 🤯 World Monitor is essentially a Bloomberg Terminal for geopolitics. Here’s what it tracks in real time across a 3D globe: → Live military flights & "dark" naval vessels → Active conflict zones & 220+ military bases → Undersea cables, nuclear sites & prediction markets The craziest part? It uses AI to read 100+ news sources, classify threats, and trigger "convergence alerts" when things like protests and military flights spike in the exact same location. No paid subscriptions. You can even run the AI locally (via Ollama) so no data leaves your machine! I've added the link for the open-source repo below 🧵↓

🚨 We aren’t just orbiting a star. We are a high-speed convoy screaming through the dark at 500,000 miles per hour. > Every breath you take is in a location you have never been before, and to which you will never return.