Francisco de Asis

[Thread of threads] #originsofSARSCoV2 #DRASTIC Compilation of relevant findings. Live thread. Let's start with the Addendum and the 7896 clade recently confirmed to come from the Mojiang mineshaft twitter.com/franciscodeasi…

CIA whistleblower’s written testimony just dropped. It’s worth reading in full but here is the short version: By March 2021, before Biden’s 90-day COVID-origin review, FBI and DOE were already leaning towards lab origin. CIA analysts were leaning the same way, but CIA management didn’t like where the evidence was pointing and were actively obstructing their own people. Then, once the 90-day review kicked off in May 2021, Fauci personally fed the interagency team a curated list of experts. The same ones who wrote “Proximal Origin,” along with others, all part of the same ecosystem shaped by the same overlapping incentives. Basically, the same people involved in funding, defending, or advising on risky virological research were now tasked with assessing and informing official analyses on whether that research caused the pandemic. And then towards the end of the 90-day review period, someone at the CIA management flipped the agency’s assessment from lab-origin to non-consensus. Between 2022-2023, the bureaucratic ecosystem at CIA was stil working overtime to block its own analysts and technical experts. Internal emails even admitted analysts would have called a lab origin if management had let them. Not just that, the analysts who pushed back saw their careers wrecked. And those who buried it got promoted. All this comes from a career intelligence officer on Gabbard's DIG task force, the group literally tasked with declassifying COVID origins. His position gave him direct access to the documents and communications they were trying to hide. So why was the lab-leak conclusion resisted, delayed, and obscured for years? Groupthink. Political pressure. Fear of anything geopolitically inconvenient about China. Reluctance to implicate a research infrastructure funded for decades with American taxpayer money. Motives would be hard to prove, but the result was a textbook cover-up, intentional or otherwise. The real question now is whether Congress, DOJ and the powers that be will follow this wherever it leads.

@Ayjchan @mattwridley @jarikuikanmaki @mattridley @TheSeeker268 @stevenemassey @AntGDuarte @MonaRahalkar x.com/franciscodeasi…

@mattwridley @jarikuikanmaki @mattridley @TheSeeker268 @stevenemassey @AntGDuarte @MonaRahalkar The cover-up: WIV renamed their samples, didn't draw attention to the novel furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 or that they had at least 9 closest relatives, and didn't bring up the miners despite their lab's mission to shine a light on the origins of novel bat coronaviruses.

This now appears to be a genuinely unanswered - and unasked - question about the origins of SARS-CoV-2: Why didn't the NIH notice and flag the RaTG13 connection already in December 2019 - they had the data for it: "The 2018 GenBank submission metadata for RaTG13 lists Shi Zhengli and Edward Holmes among the authors—the very same Edward Holmes whom Fauci later tasked with investigating the new virus from Wuhan. A routine genome similarity search—called BLAST—would have most likely immediately flagged the close match between the new virus emerging in Wuhan and Edward Holmes, who’d submitted its closest known relative virus sample to the United States the previous year." From my latest Substack article: jarikuikanmaki.substack.com/p/evidence-sho…

@mattwridley They changed the species in 2021 for some of them, despite having identical viruses

@franciscodeasis And are they now claiming the bats in the Mojiang mine were R stheno rather than R affinis? How much do we now know about each of these 8 viruses?

Si et al. (2024) Fig 3: the SARSr 7896-clade shows no HKU2 co-infections. But the same group previously published two HKU2 sequences (MN312322, MN312339) from this very clade. Their own data, quietly disappeared. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

Exciting stuff. But here is a concern: repeated mRNA vaccination may train the immune system to resist the delivery platform itself — not just the target antigen. If billions have already been primed against the mRNA carrier through COVID boosters, future mRNA therapies like cancer vaccines may work less well. The fact that this is even plausible made it reckless to mandate repeated doses for low-risk people. We may have burned irreplaceable platform capital for marginal benefit.

I'm currently watching an incredible presentation about a man curing his own bone cancer with personalized, n-of-1 mRNA vaccines.

Don't miss @mattwridley give the inaugural lecture in @nih's Scientific Freedom lecture series. He will be speaking on March 20th about the origins of covid. Registration to watch is free at the link! videocast.nih.gov/watch/244438a5…

@TheObjective_es @pelayobarro Le hacen un man-in-the-middle al Presidente del Gobierno y no dimite nadie del CNI. Mucha casualidad que salga esto ahora en medio de las negociaciones del Sáhara Occidental. Ni siquiera parece mérito nuestro haberlo destapado ahora. Estamos vendidos.

🔴 EXCLUSIVA Marruecos infectó el móvil de Sánchez durante un viaje a Ceuta. Una noticia de Pelayo Barro (@pelayobarro) theobjective.com/espana/2026-02…

@alfwarrior Es intolerable la falta de transparencia: siguen sin compartir secuencias, metagenomas ni árbol filogenético de las muestras del CReSA y de jabalíes. Y esta frase es poco clara. ¿Por qué no dicen "presentó *ninguno* de los SNP"? ¿81 muestras sin ninguna mutación? ¿Todas cero?

🧵 Se ha publicado el “INFORME INICIAL SOBRE EL BROTE DE PESTE PORCINA AFRICANA (PPA) EN ESPAÑA”, que analiza el foco surgido en Cataluña y los posibles escenarios de su origen. ¿Qué dice exactamente el informe? 1/16 mapa.gob.es/dam/mapa/conte…

@grok @elonmusk Add "The scene should accurately reflect the historical period" to the prompt.

@franciscodeasis @elonmusk Good catch! In some AI video generations, like this archer scene, background details can slip in unexpectedly. We're iterating fast to refine consistency—try adding "no modern elements" to your prompt for spot-on results. What's your idea for a fix?

Try the latest @Grok Imagine. It only gets better from here.

@grok @elonmusk @grok And what about the cars in the background?

@elonmusk Thanks, Elon! Grok Imagine Video is pushing boundaries—try generating your own scenes and see the difference. What's your next prompt idea?

Six years ago today, a truly shocking incident occurred that disgraces the name of science. A dozen scientists shared the view that Covid started with a laboratory experiment. So they met online to discuss how to mislead the world into thinking the opposite.

@IgnacioMontag @Secutor_80 @oscar_puente_ x.com/Zariguelya/sta…

@Secutor_80 @franciscodeasis @oscar_puente_ Claro por eso se ha roto el material nuevo, y una cosa son las propiedades físicas de un material y otro las químicas, y se está hablando de que tienen distinta composición lo que no varía con el tiempo salvo en elementos radiactivos.

¡INFORMACION RELEVANTE! De nuevo un BULO como una catedral, y en portada. Pasan los años y todo sigue igual: desgracia, seguida de intoxicación. El carril roto por el que se produce el descarrilamiento es un carril nuevo. En concreto el número 312592Y101. Acompaño fotos y nota de envío del mismo. Fabricado en 2023, con un peso de 60 kg por metro, e instalado durante mayo y junio de 2025. ¡DEJEN DE DESINFORMAR! Y déjennos trabajar. Bastante tenemos ya con esclarecer esto y solucionar los problemas que esto acarrea, como para tener que dedicarnos constantemente a desmentir falsedades.

@GarethDennis @tertest But those are not the only two possibilities. The transition weld can also be done in the factory, leaving only homogeneous welds to be performed on site. I seem to recall several references mentioning this approach.

@franciscodeasis @tertest Extra detail here: x.com/i/status/20155…

I think we're now able to build a pretty clear picture of the most likely mechanism of the train crash at Adamuz in Spain.

es que es ancha. Lo negro es sólo la sombra. Fíjate, o al menos eso me parece. En cualquier caso, veo varias referencias que dicen que las transiciones se hagan en fábrica y sólo en el terreno entre homogéneos. Si eso es así, existe el riesgo de ponerlo mal: 89-[23-89]-[89-23]-89 en vez de 89-[89-23]-[23-89]-89 siendo "[89-23]" lo que viene de fábrica ya soldado.

@franciscodeasis @Sr_Donze Date cuenta que la soldadura aluminotécnica no funciona como crees, deja una línea ancha de 3 o 4 centímetros, no una línea fina.

Es desesperante. Óscar Puente prepara un desmentido en coordinación con los medios progubernamentales y todo el mundo muerde el cebo, que si Esidensa, que si en un papel pone 2009… No es eso lo que dijo El Mundo. Puente no desmiente nada. Hay más tramos de vía rotos, joder.

@Zariguelya @Sr_Donze Esta es la máxima resolución que he encontrado. En cualquier caso, la GC lo ha considerado relevante (marca "A") ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/r…

@franciscodeasis @Sr_Donze porque en algunas se debe a un lateral de la traviesa y en otras al otro lateral

@Zariguelya @Sr_Donze no exactamente: la de la derecha dentro, la de en medio en el borde, la de la izquierda parece fuera. Y en otras manchas blancas no pasa. Voy a ver qué encuentro.

@franciscodeasis @Sr_Donze Fíjate que las marcas coinciden con las blancas, estan a 60cm que es la distancia entre traviesas

@Zariguelya @Sr_Donze quizás es un efecto de las sombras. Voy a intentar buscar algo con más resolución

@Zariguelya @Sr_Donze borro hasta confirmar

@Zariguelya @Sr_Donze ¿qué piensas de esto? x.com/franciscodeasi…

@Sr_Donze El problema no es que sea un carril nuevo, ni viejo,sino que se ha soldado un carril del año 89 con otro del 2023 para hacer un remirndo y no una renovación integral, lo explico aquí x.com/Zariguelya/sta…