Franco Impellizzeri

3.1K posts

Franco Impellizzeri banner
Franco Impellizzeri

Franco Impellizzeri

@francoimpell

Professor in Sport and Exercise Science and Medicine at UTS - EIC Science and Medicine in Football

Sydney, New South Wales Katılım Mart 2017
744 Takip Edilen8.8K Takipçiler
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
Sci & Med Football
Sci & Med Football@SciMed_Football·
‼️‼️ You may remember our newest submission category, ✨Preliminary Reports✨ How do our wider academic peers feel about this? Well, you can read about 8 external experts' opinions in this #FullAccess article here! 👇 #d1e290" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
English
1
3
5
832
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
Daniël Lakens
Daniël Lakens@lakens·
This is a great qualitative research paper. It sheds light on questionable research practices. But more importantly it demonstrates direct replications in qualitative research work as you would expect: independent teams reach basically the same conclusions royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/1…
English
0
28
103
15.4K
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
Frank Harrell
Frank Harrell@f2harrell·
The constant stream of poor biomarker research in biomedical research journals makes me think my article "How to Do Bad Biomarker Research" must have been hugely influential :-) fharrell.com/post/badb #Statistics #biomarker
English
4
22
86
10.1K
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
John B. Holbein
John B. Holbein@JohnHolbein1·
"Once a paper is published ... it is more harmful to one's career to point out the fraud than to be the one committing it."
John B. Holbein tweet media
English
10
85
394
45.1K
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
E3Rehab
E3Rehab@E3Rehab·
In our latest podcast episode, @ChrisHughen sat down with @francoimpell to discuss risk factors in sports medicine. We dive into causal versus non-causal mechanisms, challenges in defining risk factors, the importance of transparency in research, the illusion of control in clinic practice, and much more. youtu.be/_-0yndWOf-w
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
3
13
2.6K
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
Sci & Med Football
Sci & Med Football@SciMed_Football·
Science and Medicine in Football is committed to promoting robust and reliable research. Our newest submission category for small-sample intervention studies (✨ Preliminary Reports✨) is another step in the process. Rationale and instructions below👇 #d1e302" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
English
0
4
14
2.7K
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
Daniël Lakens
Daniël Lakens@lakens·
New 'Preliminary Report' submission format at Science and Medicine in Football. An idea that should be interesting for other journals! Explicitly make space for honestly reported smaller sample-size studies #d1e305" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Daniël Lakens tweet media
English
0
6
30
8.7K
Franco Impellizzeri
Franco Impellizzeri@francoimpell·
@lakens, @JennyMurphy2, @JoeWarne1, Cristian Mesquida, Anne Hecksteden, Brice Batomen, Chinchin Wang, Tim Meyer. I also greatly appreciate reviewers from outside sport science and medicine, who offered their time, expertise, and feedback to support this (pilot) initiative.
English
0
0
0
365
Franco Impellizzeri
Franco Impellizzeri@francoimpell·
Happy to announce @SciMed_Football’s new 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 category for small-sample studies, a pragmatic step to address the spread and misreporting of underpowered football research. Grateful to all co-authors for months shaping the submission requirements.
Sci & Med Football@SciMed_Football

🚨‼️ New Submission Category‼️🚨 Introducing… ✨Preliminary Reports✨— a new submission category for small-sample experimental studies encouraging focused aims, transparent reporting, and responsible interpretation. Read more here👇 #d1e302" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…

English
1
4
6
2.1K
Franco Impellizzeri
Franco Impellizzeri@francoimpell·
Tess Baker amazes once more with her brilliant fusion of art and science! Thank you, Tess! PS: For those wondering how many more artworks Tess will share… your guess is as good as mine! No idea! She’s an artist and makes them only when inspiration hits :-(
Sci & Med Football@SciMed_Football

✨When science meets art.✨ Another captivating masterpiece from Tess Baker, a very artistic statistician from McGill University! Thanks, Tess! Curious to see the inspiration behind this artwork? 🧐

English
0
0
3
928
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
Andrew Vickers
Andrew Vickers@VickersBiostats·
Very common to ask patients to rate pain from "no pain" (0) to "worst pain imaginable / possible" (10). Here is a randomized trial showing anchor for pain score of 10 should be "extreme pain" (TL;DR: we want to evaluate pain, not imagination) jpro.springeropen.com/articles/10.11…
English
2
6
39
9.5K
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
Sci & Med Football
Sci & Med Football@SciMed_Football·
✨When science meets art. 💫 Tess Baker, a statistician from McGill University, has a special gift: transforming studies into artworks. Thank you, Tess, for sharing this with us!
Sci & Med Football tweet media
English
1
4
5
843
Franco Impellizzeri retweetledi
Ben Van Calster
Ben Van Calster@BenVanCalster·
In our latest work, we demonstrate that risk estimates for patients are HUGELY uncertain due to model uncertainty, data uncertainty, and population uncertainty. Even when based on large sample sizes. @laure_wynants @ESteyerberg arxiv.org/abs/2506.17141
English
3
25
77
13.3K
Franco Impellizzeri
Franco Impellizzeri@francoimpell·
This study is of better methodological quality than previous ones and includes data on 5,200 runners (it is the largest study so far and a casual inference approach was used). It showed that the higher the ACWR, the lower the injury risk. Oops! bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/…
English
2
10
64
4.8K
Franco Impellizzeri
Franco Impellizzeri@francoimpell·
@GMignemi_ @lakens Interesting perspective. Could you provide an example of a definition that allows one to make claims? Or elaborate a bit more.
English
0
0
1
36
Giuseppe Mignemi
Giuseppe Mignemi@GMignemi_·
@lakens Well, I do not totally agree. It depends on what we define with "exploratory" and how we are drawing inference. It's not all about p-values and testing.
Milan, Lombardy 🇮🇹 English
2
0
0
194
Daniël Lakens
Daniël Lakens@lakens·
Researchers should not make claims based on exploratory analyses because the probability that these claims are wrong can be unacceptably high. doi.org/10.1080/026404…
Daniël Lakens tweet media
English
4
9
54
3K