CouchKiller

9.7K posts

CouchKiller banner
CouchKiller

CouchKiller

@freedom4isntfre

Libertarian leaning conservative

Katılım Nisan 2022
2.3K Takip Edilen2.5K Takipçiler
CouchKiller retweetledi
Matthew H
Matthew H@MattH_4America·
If Massie loses tomorrow, it will be because old boomers who watch Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, read Trump's "Truth" Social lies and worship the orange clown as if he was Jesus, got in line and voted against the best person we have in DC. Why? Because Trump told them to. That's it.
English
31
26
158
1.8K
CouchKiller retweetledi
Matthew H
Matthew H@MattH_4America·
If Thomas Massie loses tomorrow, then I want democrats to impeach Trump in 2027 if they win this fall, and most likely they will. Fuck this traitor in the White House. We voted for America First and got Israel First and America Last. MAGA needs to end - I've had enough.
English
268
515
4.5K
40.5K
Laura Ingraham
Laura Ingraham@IngrahamAngle·
If Massie is a “true conservative,” then why does everyone on the Left want him to win?
English
14.2K
8.2K
45K
3M
CouchKiller retweetledi
Lowkey Rey 2.0
Lowkey Rey 2.0@AtlRey·
Here's the honest truth: If Thomas Massie loses tomorrow, millions of conservatives will end up resenting Trump and the pro-Israel lobby even more than Democrats do. They won't forget. They won't forgive. Trump's grudge against Massie could blow up in spectacular fashion.
English
1.5K
765
6K
81.2K
MJTruthUltra
MJTruthUltra@MJTruthUltra·
Dan Bongino says he saw a very different side of Thomas Massie when he was in the FBI— “I could not believe what a fraud this guy was” “He is an epic-level fraud, whatever you think about this guy, I’m telling you, he is an absolute fraud— I tried multiple times to get this guy to come over for a briefing on a case he kept bloviating about on Twitter— and he didn’t do it.” 🎥 @mitchellvii Clip rumble.com/v7a1r4q-bongin… Full Show rumble.com/v7a0t4e-trump-…
English
4.9K
7.9K
26.8K
1.1M
CouchKiller retweetledi
Jeff Berube
Jeff Berube@ABJeffBerube·
That’s not even close to the whole story. For most of us, one, two, three, or even ten pipelines changes nothing. When oil crashed in 2014, the industry had tens of thousands of layoffs. The province was hurting but there were signs of hope: Northern Gateway, Energy East, and TMX. Northern Gateway had its approval cancelled by Trudeau. Energy East was cancelled because Ottawa wanted to count upstream and downstream emissions, which put the project on shaky ground. But the coup de grace came when Québec’s prime minister at the time, François Legault said that there was “no social acceptability for a pipeline.” TC cancelled it shortly after. Finally, we fought over TMX because Ottawa wouldn’t assert its jurisdiction. Trudeau let Horgan and BC make it so risky to try to build TMX that Kinder Morgan had to pull out. Nobody wanted the federal government to buy the pipeline, they should have simply enforced the conditions to ensure it was safe for Kinder Morgan to proceed. Albertans had stayed quiet for a long time over equalization because Ottawa was staying out of our faces, so it was just the price to pay to operate in this country. But when came time to help Alberta after the oil crash, the whole nation turned its back on us and proceeded to crush the three beacons of hope we were counting on to turn the corner. That’s when a lot of us started paying closer attention to politics to figure out how to get our voices heard. It didn’t take very long before we started looking at seats in the House of Commons and the Senate and realizing how unequal and unfair our representation is in Ottawa. Bottom line is that we’re effectively screwed and that the people we subsidize through equalization continuously vote for governments that attack our industry. Fixing the constitutional mess is impossible because it would require either Ontario or Québec and all the maritime provinces to vote in favour of curtailing their own political power. It will never happen. In 2019, we figured that Canada was going to be smart enough to realize that Trudeau was a disaster and we’d get back some common sense. Wrong. Trudeau was voted in for a second time. If you were in the oil and gas industry at the time, you probably had your first taste of western alienation with the Wexit movement instantly polling above 30% in support of independence. Next up is covid and that’s when all hell broke loose with the spending, the OIC to prohibit common guns, etc. Albertans’ living standards were the most impacted by Trudeau and now Carney’s insane deficit spending. We watched as Trudeau pranced around on the world stage, virtue-signalling with our money while the cost of living was sky rocketing. In FY 2024-2025, we watched the Liberals send $13B abroad between gender equality and climate change foreign aid, while running a $36.3B deficit. We had one last hope with Pierre looking like he was going to get elected and stop the bleeding. But they parachuted Carney in and the rest is history. The country’s finances are in shambles and it would take 3 generations to fix this mess if we started today by doing the obvious, which Ottawa is still refusing to do. Ottawa is fiscally irresponsible and now headed down a very dangerous path of authoritarianism with all the bills that were passed in this parliamentary session. Alberta independence supporters see the writing on the wall and don’t care about any number of pipelines. Once you’ve looked close enough at the system, you realize it can’t be fixed and there’s no coming back from realizing the true extent of the mess Canada is in. The Canada we grew up in doesn’t exist anymore. It is a sinking ship and independence is the only way to save Alberta.
English
135
736
1.9K
43.6K
CouchKiller
CouchKiller@freedom4isntfre·
@dubsndoo Not one of those things is or will happen -its been 50 years at least mow
English
0
0
0
13
terry l.
terry l.@dubsndoo·
I have a feeling that a couple of new pipelines, a new equilization formula, a recalibration of Alberta’s seats in the House and the Senate, would go a long way to tamp down separatism sentiment in the province. Stick with Danielle Smith, she’s making it happen.
English
107
13
147
4.4K
CouchKiller retweetledi
Michelle LA🇨🇦
Michelle LA🇨🇦@MichelleLA1981·
This just tells me 80% of Canadians are brainwashed and retarded.
Michelle LA🇨🇦 tweet media
English
241
131
956
11.3K
CouchKiller retweetledi
Clint Russell
Clint Russell@LibertyLockPod·
Kentucky, I implore you. Do not let the Epstein class replace this man. I am already radicalized but if we lose Massie I will be left without hope at the federal level. Please get out and vote for him like the nation's survival depends upon it. Because it does.
Thomas Massie for Congress@MassieforKY

Here’s my POSITIVE ad for the FINAL week. This one’s a minute long because I had too much to say to fit into thirty seconds! Let me know what you think. If you like it and want to help me broadcast it, please chip in here: massiemoneybomb.com

English
926
4.1K
22.2K
1.5M
🇺🇸 Pecan 🇺🇸
🇺🇸 Pecan 🇺🇸@PecanC8·
Lets say a war breaks out and teams are divided by these lines. Alaska joins Team 1 and Hawaii Team 5. Who wins? I'd bet on Team 7, followed closely by Team 8. Don't mess with the South, lol.
🇺🇸 Pecan 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
230
98
187
15.3K
CouchKiller
CouchKiller@freedom4isntfre·
@stevestonnotri1 @BillboardChris You are exactly correct -which one turns their back on their voters first ? And they all will in the BC cons leadership race -Dallas Brodie is the only uncompromising elected official I ve seen in Canada and she gets crucified by the socialist media
English
0
0
0
14
steveston in Canada
steveston in Canada@stevestonnotri1·
@BillboardChris As seen here in the BC Conservative leadership race. I watched the recent debate and found myself thinking which candidate/s will renege on stated beliefs if elected, and swerve back to their true centre-left position, giving the province NDP-lite.
English
3
1
12
442
Billboard Chris 🌎
Billboard Chris 🌎@BillboardChris·
The real problem with Canadian politics is not the liberals. It is that the ‘conservative’ wing is full of liberals. When any real conservative comes along who will fix things, the fake ones in the establishment do anything to prevent them from winning.
English
166
231
2K
23K
CouchKiller
CouchKiller@freedom4isntfre·
@BillboardChris Not really true -the problem in Canada is Over 60% of the population are communists on social policy and that includes 25% approx of the conservatives -Fiscally the country is more like 55% socialist but with a bought and paid for media -every issue in elections is social policy
English
0
0
0
14
CouchKiller
CouchKiller@freedom4isntfre·
@theblockspot Wah wah wah -shut up and play -you have to beat the best to be the best !!!
English
0
0
0
5
Sam Block
Sam Block@theblockspot·
The Minnesota Wild (104 pts) were the 3rd best team in the West this season. They should’ve played the 6-seed Mammoth (92 pts). Instead, they played the 2-seed Stars (112 pts)… and took care of business. Their reward? The 1-seed Avs (121 pts). Just absolutely ridiculous.
English
676
379
10.4K
574.8K
Tyson Hockley
Tyson Hockley@HockleyTyson·
The boomer generation in Canada hates Trump more than they love their own grandchildren. 🇨🇦
English
522
938
8.5K
116.5K
Karen
Karen@KarenLa21271377·
Why does Alberta have only 6 senators with over 5 million people, Nova Scotia have 10 senators with ~1.1 million people, Newfoundland and Labrador have 5 senators with ~550,000 people, New Brunswick have 9 senators with ~870,000 people, Manitoba have 5 senators with 1.5 million people, Ontario have 23 senators with ~16.2 million people, PEI have 4 senators with ~182,000 people, Quebec have 20 senators with ~9.1 million people, Saskatchewan have 6 senators with ~1.27 million people, BC have 6 senators with ~4.82 million people? How is this fair and equitable??? Unreal. This system is outrageous and no I don’t live out west, I live in Ontario and I knew that the seats in the house were not fair and I didn’t look that up but I had the senators list when I called all of them to ask them to vote against bill C-9 and I just can’t believe how unfair this is. We should all have equal seats and senators as per population! Is there something I don’t understand here.
English
240
354
1.4K
53.7K
The Food Professor
The Food Professor@FoodProfessor·
While U.K.'s PM Starmer is facing growing pressure to resign amid a sluggish U.K. economy, PM Carney’s popularity is at a record high — despite Canada arguably being in worse shape on several key metrics, including unemployment, productivity, private-sector growth, and food inflation. Wonder why...
The Food Professor tweet mediaThe Food Professor tweet media
English
1.7K
1.1K
4.7K
200.2K
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈@TheEXECUTlONER_·
This man is in Phoenix, Arizona visiting his daughter. It is 108* there!🥵 He noticed this unit on top of her house and wondered why it isn’t on the ground like most houses. He asked her and she said that was the way it was when they bought the house. Why would this be on top of the roof? I’ve lived in 5 different states and never seen them on the roof. And notice how big it is, it’s huge! Why would they be on the roof? What’s the reasoning? And 108*? Are people really digging a 108* weather? Could you handle that?
English
3.9K
297
3.5K
6M
SmackdownMac
SmackdownMac@GSmackdownmac·
@cgy_guy The separatist obtained my personal information illegally and I received a call from someone representing APP, I never gave them my mobile number, and they asked me if I supported a separating from Canada and when I said No they got very nasty with me
English
6
0
6
324
Calgary Guy
Calgary Guy@cgy_guy·
I understand that some people have deep emotional ties to Canada, but logically Alberta has been taken advantage of for decades. Albertans have various justified concerns about how we are treated. If you are going to work for the NO side on independence, at least present a valid plan for resolving these issues. Mostly the NO side has just stuck to calling us names. If you care about Canada, do better for Canada. I don’t feel Canada can be fixed and will be voting for Alberta Independence. Prove me wrong.
English
101
129
523
18.9K
CouchKiller retweetledi
Kirk Lubimov
Kirk Lubimov@KirkLubimov·
Danielle Smith says if Pierre Poilievre would have won, we wouldn't need to worry about carbon taxes; "Pierre Poilievre did not get elected. If he had gotten elected...we have a Liberal government where their carbon tax objectives are a much higher priority, and so if we're going to try to get to a deal, there's a compromise that we have to make." But we made a compromise not only on carbon tax but on all net zero targets and Pathways Project requirement. Why do we need to agree to higher taxes and uneconomical requirements to develop our prosperity??
English
110
184
989
72.3K