Free Humanity

Watch live: Exposing the risks Digital ID at the EU Parliament ⬇️

@wideawake_media @danastingregory

@wideawake_media Live in the EU Parliament now - reflect Digital IDs europarl.europa.eu/streaming/?eve…

Bill Gates commends India's "digital public infrastructure"—which merges digital ID with bank accounts and digital payment systems—as "foundational" for monitoring citizens' health records, micromanaging farmers, and solving climate change.

"The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill lays the groundwork for mandatory Digital ID from birth in the U.K." @MontgomeryToms, a young British campaigner for freedom, speaking about the impact of Digital IDs on the next generation at EU Parliament.

"He who controls the data, controls society." Tom Lausen on the risks of the centralised data infrastructure systems underpinning Digital IDs.

"The Digital Services Act threatens the very fundamental basis of a free society: The control of discourse" Prof Dr. Martin Haditsch

@NoToDigitalID 👉 LIVE now at EU Parliament: europarl.europa.eu/streaming/?eve…

No to Digital ID.

"Programmable money, with the ability for the state to determine how, when and where your money can be used, is the ultimate form of totalitarian control." - @reggielittlejhn

"The centralisation of finance is the concentration of power." - Professor Richard A. Werner on CBDCs

👉 europarl.europa.eu/streaming/?eve…

Watch live: Exposing the risks Digital ID at the EU Parliament ⬇️

Live in London: The People vs Digital ID x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

PRESS CONFERENCE: Make Europe Healthy Again Launch x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

LIVE: Make Europe Healthy Again Launch x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

LIVE: Make Europe Healthy Again Launch x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

LIVE: Make Europe Healthy Again Launch x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

🚨 FINAL CALL: IHR Amendments take effect tomorrow. Today we submit our open letter to national representatives demanding the IHR Amendments be rejected. ✍️ Sign & share NOW: freehumanity.org/say-no-to-the-… #RejectTheIHR #SayNoToTheWHO #FreeHumanity

AI for Activists session at @OsloFF 2025 #OsloFreedomForum

Pavel Durov, @durov founder of @telegram was banned from traveling to Oslo by French authorities. A sobering reminder: even “free” nations are not immune to creeping control. #DigitalFreedom #FreeSpeech #OsloFreedomForum

72% of the world lives under tyranny. It doesn’t always begin with violence. It begins with silence. And silence breaks the moment we speak up—together. #OsloFreedomForum #FreeHumanity

Front Page of The @Telegraph thanks to @UsforThemUK "Britain has weeks to escape new powers allowing the World Health Organisation to recommend imposing lockdowns in future pandemics, a group of MPs and peers has warned. The UK must opt out of the WHO’s new international health regulations (IHRs) by July 19 to avoid the body co-ordinating the response to any future Covid-style pandemic. In a letter to the Foreign Office, 14 leading parliamentarians urge the Government to exercise Britain’s right to ignore amendments to the regulations before the looming deadline. Former home secretary, Suella Braverman, is joined in the letter by the Conservative MPs Danny Kruger, Sir Iain Duncan Smith, Esther McVey and Jack Rankin. Labour’s Graham Stringer, the DUP’s Sammy Wilson, and the former Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe have also signed it alongside Lord Frost, the Tory peer and former chief Brexit negotiator. The parliamentarians’ letter was organised by UsForThem, a campaign group that protested against school closures and WHO overreach during the pandemic. Molly Kingsley, the group’s founder, said: 'Without the US, the WHO can no longer claim to be a globally representative health organisation. For the UK to further tie itself to the organisation at just the moment the US chooses to depart is unnecessary, misguided and short-sighted.' Extracts from the letter: The WHO has not merely lost its way. It has been captured – politically, ideologically, and financially. It dances to the tune of those who pay its piper – notably the Chinese Communist Party and, increasingly, a pharmaceutical-industrial complex with little interest in transparency and even less in accountability. The WHO’s proposed amendments to its international health regulations and its forthcoming pandemic treaty present the most serious threat to national sovereignty in a generation. Buried within these legal frameworks are proposals that would allow unelected WHO officials to declare public health emergencies and issue recommendations – including on lockdowns, border closures and vaccine requirements. Imagine that for a moment: decisions made in Geneva influence whether your child can go to school in Glasgow, or whether an elderly parent in Leeds can leave their care home. In practice......a health body founded to serve the world’s poorest is now increasingly serving its richest and most powerful – those with the deepest pockets and the greatest interest in shaping global norms. Big pharma profits soared during the pandemic. Pfizer’s revenue jumped from $41 billion in 2020 to over $100 billion in 2022, largely off the back of taxpayer-funded vaccine development and government mandates, and all under the approving gaze of the WHO. What the British public sees – what they intuit – is not just bureaucratic overreach but a creeping usurpation of their democratic rights. Reform is essential, but it must be more than cosmetic. The WHO must be stripped of its ideological pretensions and restored to its founding mission – to be a servant of global health, not an arbiter of political orthodoxy. Commercial influence must be exorcised. Authoritarian regimes must be held at arm’s length. And local decision-makers, those closest to the people, must be empowered, not overridden. If such reform proves impossible, then withdrawal must be considered not as retreat, but as leadership. Britain has often led when others dithered. We could do so again – working with democratic allies like the US, Canada, and Australia to forge a leaner, more transparent health coalition. One that shares data freely, responds rapidly to crises, and respects national sovereignty. In the end, the question is simple. Who governs Britain? If the answer is not 'the British people, through their elected representatives' then we have lost more than a debate over global health. We have lost our freedom" The Telegraph telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/…