Frank Steiner

How the fuck can @michaelgove have the audacity to spout this bullshit (unchallenged?) on @SkyNews?! Would you call this success you Tory 🔔🔚? Go have a swim and tell us how lovely it is... #ToryCriminals #BrexitReality #BrexitWasAScam twitter.com/HugoSAS/status…

Are you all ready for @realDonaldTrump biggest scam yet, with @howardlutnick and his family at the centre of it... Also, question for all #MAGAMorons if foreign countries allegedly paid tariffs why are US companies in line for refunds? 🤔🤯 finance.yahoo.com/markets/commod…

@gavinantonyrice @afneil the senile has been, bless the old fart

Andrew asserts a fact and Jessica Simor's reaction is to call him sexist. How revoltingly patronising. Can women not deal with facts - & debate based on them - just as well as men? Perhaps Simor doesn't believe so.

@KellMorrHK @GiveUsAQuid

@fstoner @GiveUsAQuid Fascism is a socialist movement. You can never outrun your nazi past comrade. Now put on that swastika, you earned it

He was also a National 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭 (he believed in an all-powerful State), but please don't remind Leftists about this as for some reason they find this very upsetting.

@nickreeves9876 But Iran is the one with the crazy religious fanatical leadership, right? 🤦‍♂️

This is Trump's spiritual advisor in the White House, Paula White-Cain. It is not difficult to see how people taken in by such an obvious charlatan are taken in by Trump.

@GenXQuestions @StephenKing Fuck off with your whataboutism 🤦‍♂️🤯 Kamala was labelled word salad cause she didn't have the vocabulary of a toddler, like Trump and his #MAGAMorons Dementia Biden still made more sense then Trump on any day

@fstoner @StephenKing What about drunk Kamala And her Retarded word salads? What about dementia Biden And his Retarded word salads? Were liberals Concerned about that at all?

Trump is so idiotic it is beyond description even for the guy who wrote PET SEMATARY and MISERY. I can’t even.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Genuinely impressed you typed this much and said this little. That's a skill. Not a useful one, but still. 👏

@fstoner @GiveUsAQuid Hitler killed National Socialist, that must mean he mustn’t be a National Socialist. Hitler killed a fellow WW1 veteran, he mustn’t be a WW1 veteran, Hitler killed a man, mustn’t be a man. I haven’t touched it because it is a stupid line of argument.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid You literally just did 🤦‍♂️🤯 I'll mute you now, this level of stupidity is doing my head in and reminds me of the saying from the great George Bernard Shaw: Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid And yes, I'm using AI to fact-check this. Beats spending 3 hours doing it manually so I can debunk your retarded word salad faster. The facts don't change either way 🤷‍♂️😂

@fstoner @GiveUsAQuid Also the main industrial supporters were few and far between. The industrialist that did support him got their industries Nationalized. It was mostly a grass roots movement making most of its income ticket sales which operated in deficit. More importantly, I know you’re using AI.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid The NSDAP was financially struggling in late 1932 — Goebbels himself wrote they were bankrupt. Big industrial money didn't just help, it saved them at the critical moment. Timing matters.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Thyssen donated 100,000 gold marks to Hitler as early as 1923. Krupp pledged 1 million marks at that 1933 meeting alone. Friedrich Flick used 48,000 slave labourers — 80% of whom died. "Few and far between" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid "Few and far between"? In February 1933, Hitler met secretly with 25 of Germany's top industrialists — Krupp, IG Farben, Flick, Allianz, Quandt. They raised 3 million Reichsmarks on the spot to lock in Nazi power. That's not grassroots, that's a boardroom.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Hermann Schmitz *ran* IG Farben. His board approved Monowitz — built next to Auschwitz specifically for slave labour access. So saying they didn't use imprisoned Jews is plain wrong. Efficiency complaints don't buy you out of that. He was convicted at Nuremberg. Try again.

@fstoner @GiveUsAQuid And you haven’t read a single report from Hermann Schmitz. He was warning the oil crisis going on at IG Farben and was saying that the use of Jews for slave labor was ineffective and produced half to a third of the need oil for military campaign. Problem was ideology came first.

@GenXQuestions @StephenKing Dude, all you need is eyes and ears... Literally anything Trump spouts at any time he's on telly is absolute bullshit

@StephenKing Stephen, can you give us A few examples For why Trump is idiotic? We know you know a lot about fiction. But how much do you know about reality?

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Your Mises citation literally says Nazi economics was neither nationalisation nor war socialism. You've now cited three sources that contradict you. That's impressive in its own way.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Historians across the entire political spectrum — left, right, centre — classify Nazism as far-right. This isn't contested in any serious academic literature. Confidently misreading a primary source doesn't make you educated. It makes you the guy who skimmed the index.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Hitler calling it "national socialism" in a speech is not evidence of socialism. North Korea calls itself a democratic republic. Words in authoritarian propaganda aren't definitions. Trump calls himself smart, go figure 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤣

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid The Shirer quote confirms the SA was unruly — which supports my point that the purge was about internal power, not ideology. Thanks for that.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid **Tweet 3** Günter Reimann was a Marxist critic arguing Nazism *parasitised* capitalism - not that it replaced it. You're using a source that directly contradicts you. Read the subtitle before citing it.

@fstoner @GiveUsAQuid They did, they nationalized all industries into 13 Corporations, same as the USSR. They Nationalized everything, even had Kommissars to set price controls, wage controls, rent, subsidies, quotas, labor, etc. Even have Communist historians back this up with primary sources.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Price and wage controls during wartime mobilisation aren't socialism — they're logistics. The US, UK, and Canada all did it in WW2. By your reasoning Roosevelt and Churchill were Marxists. The word you're looking for is dirigisme, not nationalisation.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Nazi Germany actually privatised major industries after 1933 - steel, banking, shipbuilding handed back to private owners. Adam Tooze's The Wages of Destruction documents this exhaustively. "They nationalised everything" isn't a simplification, it's the opposite of what happened.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Also - this doesn't touch my actual point. You just proved it. Hitler murdered the faction pushing economic radicalism. The socialist programme died with them. Thanks for the confirmation.

@LowLifeInk1 @GiveUsAQuid Points 11-17 (nationalisation, profit-sharing, land reform) were largely NEVER implemented. The Strasser faction that pushed these seriously was murdered in the Night of the Long Knives, 1934. Hitler purged the actual "socialist" wing of his own party.