Damian Wootten

@sinnersoviet3 Fascism is honest Communism. Instead of lying about totalitarianism going to “wither away”, the Fascist tells you that is their end goal. They both deserve to be burned down to the foundations. They’re inferior ideologies built on human suffering. They deserve no sympathy.

@AValcreuse @AmadeusBolshev Ok, so you want to make a critique of Slavery, you don’t make a system that mirrors it. If I say I have a problem with Slavery and force you to work for free at gunpoint, what do you call that? If I say I hate chess and make a game identical to it under a different name?

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev Your point is : "He wrote slavery is good". What Marx wrote : "With Proudhon's analysis, we could conclude slavery was good". Do you realize where the problem is ?

"they call themselves John Brown gun clubs because they want to do to you what John Brown tried doing to the South" Holy aura

@redoctober111 Weak minds think alike.

This alone was enough to attract me to Communism. Once you realize this reality nothing else hits the same & you will begin to question the years you’ve spent slaving away to gain little to nothing out of it…🙁

@DvidTwit It’s not like they viewed the Communist as the International Jews? You’re forgetting they were Anti-Semites. They were caught up in all the popular beliefs at the time. They believed they were behind Marxism and Capitalism. They adopted Mysticism and called it a science.

Those are the exact words spoken by the man in this photo during the Reichstag session of March 1933.

@leftypol_org Maybe shouldn’t have allied with them then when they declared war on Poland? The Nazis were already going to lose. It didn’t matter if they did take the Caucuses, they were doomed before the war began. Ironically you’re cheering on the deaths of 158,000 people from executions.

@AValcreuse @AmadeusBolshev What we call that is a false dichotomy. You can’t accept that an individual can be flawed, especially from what 179 years ago? You can’t retroactively place values on him he simply didn’t have at the time.This is the problem with Marxist, they imagine what he is like vs who he is

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev This led us to 2 solutions. Either Samuels didn't checks quotes who were given to him by either dishonnest or ignorant peoples (that's a crime in the historian academic) ... Or he knew full well, and purposefully lied. Wich one ?

@AValcreuse @AmadeusBolshev Must’ve missed the part where I already provided the source and mentioned he was responding to Proudhon’s Philosophy of Poverty. Even provided the link from Marxist.org, but I’m already done dealing with y’all’s dishonesty.

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev That's a level of dishonesty rarely achieve by accident. The quotes are real, yes. They are attribution. It's the Proudhon analysis, applied to the slavery, to debunk said tools. Those quotes are litteraly Marx saying "look how dumb you sound" to a developping anarchist.

@AmadeusBolshev After being abandoned in Bolivia by the Communist. Don’t forget that little interesting tidbit.

@Machzero0 @AmadeusBolshev So you failed to follow the conversation? This is why I hate talking to Communist, it’s all optics with you guys. What can you expect from people who ignore all the evidence to defend an idea of what they think Communism is vs what it actually is.

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev "this guy supported slavery, look at this quote." "doesn't seem like an endorsement" "try looking it up!" "yeah this passage is him stepping into someone else's shoes to suggest that their 'good/bad' system is absurd, he doesn't believe this" "so you used the passage i gave you?"

@kumatetk13q @AmadeusBolshev Kind of like what is called for in the Communist Manifesto, strange? When they call for Dictatorship of the Proletariat, you think they meant your Dictatorship?

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev Hey, I'll give you a shocking news, the soviets is the Urss which took the power from the people to give it all to a state leaded by politicians, not at all communist nor what Marx intended as State, check what happened with the "fichas y pulperías"

@The_Holy_Sea @LuffysAfrooo @AmadeusBolshev You sit all day theorizing what Communism is and when someone who actually experienced Communism, you say nuh uh, that’s not what I have in my head what it is. I mean when you work your first 72 to 84 hours a week with threat of imprisonment you might understand, they lied to you

@LowLifeInk1 @LuffysAfrooo @AmadeusBolshev You very clearly are not better read. The fact that you can read at all honestly surprises me at this point with how little you understand.

@kumatetk13q @AmadeusBolshev Never heard of the Camargue killing fields? People forced out of their homes to work the fields often to death. Yeah, a job you can quit at anytime is quite similar to being forced at gunpoint to work. I mean I remember my 72 to 84 hours a week with threat of imprisonment.

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev Saying making them slaves to work 8 hours daily five times per week, healthcare,security and education for everyone without a top class, educate everyone so wouldn't happen what happened with Stalin,but I guess you don't know the differences between private and personal property

@Halfasstroknot @AmadeusBolshev John Brown was an Evangelist, not a Socialist so failed at that. It seems like you’re out of your depth, stick to shallow waters next time.

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev The point of communism is the abolishment of the state; you don’t even know what you’re talking about. Read some books between your diaper changes.

@kumatetk13q @AmadeusBolshev Writing steps for totalitarianism doesn’t mean it’s totalitarianism. You see when the Bourgeoisie ask you if you want a job or not and quitting whenever you want is Slavery. Me putting a gun to your head and deciding every moment of your life is not Slavery.

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev You mean the soviets? Because they were a authoritive government which used the communism as base, the point of the planks isn't directly doing that and about the problems of the times, many of his ideas couldn't be done for many reasons

@Machzero0 @AmadeusBolshev And I already stated that he was responding to Bruno Bauer, another Anti-Semite.Of course you didn’t wait for me to respond that he was culturally Anti-Semitic,not Racially. At least they were still friends.They still rode together on a donkey making fun of Jesus ride to Damascus

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev This is basically the same problem you’re having with “On the Jewish Question” of course, you’re assuming that everything Marx says is some sort of standalone scripture instead of existing in the context of an argument

@Machzero0 @AmadeusBolshev Ok so you used the passage I gave you? That’s not the own you think it is. I already told you he was talking to Proudhon. I even told you that it was in response to Philosophy of Poverty. Rephrasing what I said back to me isn’t an own.

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev okay, i looked it up. he’s mocking Proudhon’s formulation of dialectics by saying “he would argue that slavery has benefits so we should work to preserve the good and get rid of the bad, which is absurd” well that was easy

@Machzero0 @The_Holy_Sea @AmadeusBolshev So he is responding to Bruno Bauer writing about what to do about the Jews? He thinks they’re a Social Problem for Germany. Marx is critiquing the length of Bruno Bauer is wanting and is talking about how Jewish Culture is the Problem. He was Culturally Anti-Semitic, not Racially

@LowLifeInk1 @The_Holy_Sea @AmadeusBolshev Okay, could you explain what the thrust of Marx’s argument is? I’m sure you’ve actually read the full essay, but some people might think that the fact that you’re posting a bunch of identical quote images means you just googled “controversial Marx quotes”

@The_Holy_Sea @LuffysAfrooo @AmadeusBolshev I have no idea what I’m talking about despite being better read than you are on your own ideology? I mean not only did I read more than you but also experienced it. I didn’t “theorize” all day what Communism is. You should look into 996 program Comrade, it’ll do you some wonders.

@LowLifeInk1 @LuffysAfrooo @AmadeusBolshev We've already established that you have no idea what you're talking about, you don't need to provide additional evidence to that point.

@kumatetk13q @AmadeusBolshev Slavery existed since there were Hunters and Gatherers. It predates literally all economic systems. The word Slave derives from Slav, Slovakian. So we established Slavery wasn’t just Racial but an Ancient Evil.Making a new system of everyone being Slaves isn’t abolishing Slavery

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev Also, again the once time he spoke about racism and more was because it served the bourgeoisie to make the collective of workers separated rather than join together, dude read Karl Marx directly instead of reading it through anti Marxist

@kumatetk13q @AmadeusBolshev It sounds nice in theory but it doesn’t work. Me threatening to take away all your stuff for “equality” to put you in a bunk house so you can go toil the fields while I get to go hunt in the mornings, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, and be a critic by night?

@LowLifeInk1 @AmadeusBolshev You mean the whole point that was make sure that people wouldn't have problems with resources, house, food and a decent home? The one that promoted the education and free healthcare leaded by everyone? That one where the bourgeoisie would work rather than be just doing inversions