free food

@FkMySmPnsLife Wokeify = looking manly

@_sn_n This is the scenic shit alt-righters post with a corny caption "Defend your homeland"

Republicans hate this

@AB84 x.com/i/status/20492… @CommunityNotes he stole this tweet

new games suck because theyre made by faggots

@hrguerra He is black btw

Someone using “mongrel” to describe humans in the year of our lord 2026.

@NotAxelCarnage @SeverusChud Tomato TomAto

@furious1238 @SeverusChud Feminist libtards and cuck males, yes

>Nearly all White French studio >Makes Life Is Strange and Vampyr >Gets completely overidden with activists >Millions spent on new game Aphelion >Manages to create the most unattractive protagonist imaginable >Game peaks at 219 players on Steam Surely this is some government DEI money laundering scheme, because how is any of this sustainable?

@ShitpostRock2 Last of us 2

@ShitpostRock2 I am a very lazy homebody, who will try to get out off work every chaonce he gets.

Without using your name, ethnicity, religion, occupation, or gender, who are you?

@HighwaySta86558 @SeverusChud You had me for a second

@furious1238 @SeverusChud Yes, because if they don't, they get labeled as pro-Russian

Remember when KCD2 promoted themselves as an authentic 1403 Bohemia, then subverted the entire story by revealing your "best friend" as a gay romance option, followed by a Mali Muslim that preaches Islamic superiority to you lmao

@HighwaySta86558 @SeverusChud You serious?

@SeverusChud You guys don't know anything, in the Czech Republic it's actually illegal to make a game without a gay romance option, that's why they had to do it, it wasn't a choice

@Recursion_Agent Yes when a sitting president denies the election and tries to coup the government its pretty significant.

Last year alone, more than three dozen people were murdered by leftist violence, and you're talking about Jan 6 again.

@HistoryBoutique Charlie Kirks murder was not done by a leftist. Tyler Robinson has no political affiliation.

I have been screaming this for months. Their “data” doesn’t even list Charlie Kirk’s assassination as left-wing violence. Thank you Batya for the thorough research. What stands out the most?? The OMISSIONS of left-wing violence: Datasets ignore or undercount events like the 2020 George Floyd riots (dozens dead, ~$2B in damage, yet only ~3–5 incidents tallied as left-wing), BOTH prior assassination attempts on Trump, the m*rder of Charlie Kirk, pro-Palestinian shootings (Elias Rodriguez’s 2025 D.C. incident), anti-ICE attacks, and anti-Tesla actions. These are often reclassified as “ethnonationalist” or dismissed as insufficiently “political.” We cannot fix the problem until we identify the problem. If you are still identifying as someone on the left, you might want to stop. This has been the most widespread example of gaslighting in national history.

@directordaddyy Zorro is from Spain. Not Hispanic.

If they don’t get Robert Rodriguez to direct this plus Antonio banderas and Jamie foxx then I DONT WANT THIS CUZ THEY ALREADY PISSIN ME OFF WITH THIS NON HISPANIC OR BLACK WRITER

@bonchieredstate Not threaten to wipe out a civilization. Not make alligator Alcatraz. Not call for the hanging of dem senators for speech. Don't crypto scams that enrich himself and his friends. Don't send ICE gestapo to cities on a whim. Don't consolidate power to the executive branch. ETC.

Such as?

@GenreManiac These were made on a shoe string budget. Im 2026, the budget for these would be around $200 million.

Before the Sopranos, HBO'S TV Movies were their claim to fame. They used to put out 90 min flicks that absolutely ripped!

Austrian economist (in both meanings of the word) and NATO's strongest soldier Günther Fehlinger has reportedly abandoned his wife and newborn baby, and has started dating Olympic gold medalist figure skater Alysa Liu.

@reddit_lies I don't know man. Threatening to wipe out a civilization doesn't sound like sane or rational.

"agree with us and we won't try to kill you" -The anti-bad-guy good-guy club

@bumbadum14 A republican secretary of state debunked this bullshit claim. Ride trumps nuts retard.

“Left 0 traces”

@SanDiegoKnight Bro is sourcing CIS. A KKK adjacent institute.

This Cato ‘immigrants pay more taxes’ flex + Indian chart is peak cherry-picking. Impressive numbers… until you actually look under the hood. 🧐” 1. It’s median household income, not individual or per-capita — and Indian households are structured differently • The chart (and the “twice as much” claim) uses households, not people. Indian-American households are larger on average (~3.0–3.8 people vs. U.S. average ~2.5) and far more likely to have multiple full-time high earners (dual STEM/medical professionals is common). en.wikipedia. • Indian Americans still have high personal earnings (median ~$85k for ages 16+, ~$106k for full-time workers per 2023 Pew), but the “almost twice” headline evaporates when you adjust for household size and number of workers. This is a classic statistical sleight-of-hand when comparing groups with different living arrangements. 2. Extreme positive selection bias … this is the cream of India’s elite, not “immigrants” in general • Indian Americans aren’t a random sample of India’s 1.4 billion people. The vast majority arrived via H-1B, EB-2/3, or student visas …hyper-selective for advanced degrees and high-skill jobs. You’re comparing the top ~0.1–1% of India’s talent/IQ/education distribution to the broad U.S. average (which includes everyone from McDonald’s workers to retirees). • India’s own per-capita income and education levels are far lower. This doesn’t prove broad immigration is economically magical; it proves cherry-picked high-skill immigration works for the selectees. Second-generation outcomes are strong but show some regression toward the mean, and chain migration/family sponsorship often dilutes the skill level over time. 3. Cato’s overall “immigrants pay more taxes” claim has well-documented methodological holes • Cato (a libertarian think tank that favors more immigration) attributes welfare benefits received by U.S.-born children of immigrants to “natives,” not the immigrant parents. This understates immigrant fiscal costs. The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) and others note this flips the picture: when you count the full household burden (including kids), immigrant-headed households use welfare at higher rates than native-headed ones. • Cato aggregates all immigrants (high-skill Indians + low-skill groups + illegals). The net positive they find is heavily driven by the high earners. Other studies (National Academies of Sciences, Heritage, etc.) have found first-generation immigrants often impose net costs, especially low-skilled/illegal cohorts. • Their data ends before the post-2021 border surge effects fully hit long-term budgets. 4. H-1B-specific issues (the main pipeline for Indian success) • Many Indian immigrants in tech come via H-1B, which has documented problems: outsourcing/body shops (e.g., Infosys, TCS), wage suppression (foreign workers often paid less for similar roles), and ethnic nepotism once Indians reach management (preferring co-ethnics for hiring/promotions). This displaces U.S. workers and depresses wages in STEM. • Fraud allegations are common (fake credentials, benching workers, etc.). Critics argue this isn’t “adding value” so much as arbitraging cheaper labor and networks. 5. Other drains and context • Remittances: Indian Americans send massive sums back to India (India receives over $100B+ in remittances annually, a huge chunk from the U.S.). That’s money leaving the U.S. economy. • Cost of living: Indians are heavily concentrated in high-cost metros (SF Bay, NYC, etc.), where nominal incomes are inflated anyway. Adjust for purchasing power and the gap shrinks. • The post uses Indian success to defend a general “immigrants = net positive” narrative from Cato. But Indians are ~1.4% of the U.S. population and an outlier. Broad policy implications (more low-skill immigration, open borders, etc.) don’t follow from one high-performing subgroup.

@UnrektEngine @CaraAl26949 @ReviewsPossum It maybe common, but not legal. If you breaks into someone's house, you have every right to shoot them.

@furious1238 @CaraAl26949 @ReviewsPossum Who exactly did Ashley threaten with imminent gravely harm? Maybe you are unaware about American protest culture. It's relatively common for protestors to invade spaces and not murder everyone. maybe it's different in Bahrain.

Did the person who built that prop shoot at anyone?