fuzzyy

@sama I would actually be surprised if they didn't understand this

still sorta breaks my brain to see our models be good at design finally

@chahrlz_ @toyinomotoso It’s just that at certain moments while using ChatGPT, you get the feeling that that’s exactly how it is😁

@fuzzyxbt @toyinomotoso How did you come up with this 😆 🤣

Can someone explain how you upload a 845-page document to Chatgpt and it goes through the entire doc in under 5 seconds?

@claudeai teacher: i know you used ChatGPT for this essay student: how? teacher: Claude told me

We're introducing Claude for Teachers: free access to premium Claude capabilities for verified K-12 educators in the US, with a library of teaching skills and a direct connection to evidence-based curricula, mapped to academic standards in all 50 states. claude.com/solutions/teac…

A 20-year-old in a gold watch says he makes $30,000 a month working 2 to 3 hours a day — and by the end of the video, he’s the proof it works on you, not for you. He opens by needling you. The doubters “know nothing about life.” It’s not the usual hype, he says. Not a $1,000 course. Then the secret: build a digital asset. A personal brand that sells a digital product. He even credits where he learned it — Iman Gadzhi. Here’s the loop, in his own words. Every creator posting content has something to sell. They post to attract people, then sell those people a product. So he did the same. He couldn’t build the product himself, so he “leveraged AI.” Two free tools — one writes his content, one builds the product he sells to the people that content pulled in. Read that again. AI makes the posts that hook you. AI makes the thing you’re sold. He’s the face in the middle, collecting. The content that hooked you was AI. The asset he’s selling is a manual for making it. You’re not the customer. You’re the digital asset.

@michellezfr Bro treating Claude like a therapist he doesn't want his wife to know about😅

Wearing noice cancelling masks to talk to Claude is crazy

A guy claims he makes $30,000 a month producing nursery rhymes — without drawing a single frame or writing a single lyric. His entire audience is under 4 years old. Here's how the economics work. There's a channel called NuNu TV. Nursery rhymes. Bright colors. Singing animals. The kind of content a toddler watches on repeat while a parent cooks dinner. One video — 40 million views. Another — 31 million. A third — 3.3 million. These aren't outliers. This is what the kids' niche looks like on YouTube when it works. Now run the numbers. 55 million views on YouTube Shorts pays out roughly $11,000. One video. One upload. No face on camera. No editing skills. No voice talent. The question was always the same — who has time to produce hundreds of animated videos? Nobody. That's why he doesn't. He opens ChatGPT and types one line: "Give me a scene by scene breakdown for a one minute kids nursery rhyme video." What comes back is a full production script. Opening scene. Characters. Camera angles. Background. Narration. Music cues. Every second mapped out. Then he drops that script into an AI video generator. The platform reads the breakdown and builds the animation automatically. 3D characters. Color grading. Scene transitions. A finished nursery rhyme that looks like a studio produced it. Total production time — minutes. Not days. Not weeks. Minutes. The strange part isn't the technology. Animating with AI has been around for a while. The strange part is the audience. A 35-year-old watches an AI-generated video and immediately notices something is off. The motion feels wrong. The voice sounds synthetic. The pacing is unnatural. A 2-year-old watches the same video and hits replay 47 times before lunch. The quality bar in kids' content isn't photorealism or narrative depth. It's bright colors, simple melodies, and repetition. AI was built for exactly this. One person. No team. No studio. No animator on payroll. Just a prompt, a generator, and an audience that never gets tired of the same song. The ceiling isn't talent. It's upload speed

@jahirsheikh8 openai: 200 million users. also openai: 11 million people with 18 accounts each

“ChatGPT and Claude watching multiple Gmail accounts use free tokens everyday from the same IP address”

"Are you motivated?" Hell nah. Motivation is a mood. It shows up on Monday and vanishes by Wednesday. But here's what nobody says ↓ You don't need it every day. You need discipline. — Zero applause — Zero energy — Zero desire — 5 AM alarm when every cell says stay in bed That's discipline. Discipline builds what motivation promised. But there's a level above it ↓ When the work stops feeling like work. When you think about it on vacation. When you'd rather solve the problem than sleep. That's obsession. Motivation → the trailer Discipline → the movie Obsession → living inside the movie and refusing to leave You don't need to feel ready. You need to start before you're ready — and never look back

@toyinomotoso Same way i read terms and conditions. scroll to the bottom and click agree

@solquicks I can just picture his swaggering walk

what normal human being sits like this?

@EHuanglu Meme-worthy villainy😆

sam altman was caught copying apple in 4k

A 19-year-old charges law firms $2,000 a month to do something their paralegals spend 10 hours a week doing manually. He reads zero legal documents himself. Here’s what he figured out. Every mid-size law firm has people whose entire job is reviewing contracts, flagging inconsistencies, pulling out key dates, deadlines, and renewal clauses. It’s slow. It’s expensive. And it’s the kind of work nobody in the office actually wants to do. He built a workflow using Claude and GPT-4 that takes a batch of contracts in PDF, runs them through a custom prompt chain, and returns a structured report — every obligation, every liability, every deadline, every clause that deviates from standard language. Flagged and organized. What a paralegal does in 10 hours, his pipeline does in 11 minutes. He didn’t learn law. He learned what lawyers hate doing. Then he went to LinkedIn. Not with a pitch. With a finished report. He took a publicly available contract from a firm’s website, ran it through his system, and sent the output to the managing partner with one line — “this took my software 4 minutes, how long does it take your team?” Three firms said yes in the first week. He now has 14 clients. Each one pays $2,000 a month for unlimited contract processing. His only costs are API fees — roughly $300 a month total. That’s $27,700 in net monthly profit from a system he built in his dorm room over a single weekend. He has no law degree. No computer science degree. No degree at all — he’s a sophomore. The partners don’t care. The output is faster and more consistent than what their own team produces. One firm told him his reports catch clauses their junior associates routinely miss. The strangest part isn’t the money. It’s that he runs the entire operation from home. Clients email contracts to a dedicated inbox. A Zapier automation feeds them into the pipeline. The report lands back in the client’s inbox without him touching anything. He checks his dashboard once a day. Usually while eating breakfast. Everyone’s arguing about whether AI will replace jobs. This kid isn’t replacing anyone. He’s selling the firms back their own employees’ time — and they’re happy to pay for it

A guy opens Google Maps, picks a random restaurant, and rebuilds their entire website in under 2 minutes. Then emails the owner a link to the finished version they never asked for. That's the whole business. $7,000 a month. Here's how the process works. Step one is Google Maps. You search any category — restaurants, dentists, salons, gyms. Small local businesses. The kind that run on word of mouth and haven't touched their website since 2016. You click through to their site. And most of the time, you already know what you're going to find. Blurry header image. Broken mobile layout. A font that stopped being cool when Obama was in office. A menu page that loads as a scanned PDF. That's your client. Step two is the AI. You copy the URL of their existing site and paste it into an AI website builder. The platform crawls the original — pulls the structure, the content, the sections, the images. Then it regenerates everything from scratch using a modern layout. You don't write a single line of code. You don't drag and drop elements. You don't choose a template. The AI reads the old site and builds the new one on its own. The generation takes about 2 minutes. Step three is the part most people wouldn't think of. You don't call the owner and pitch a service. You don't send a proposal with estimated timelines and deliverables. You send them the finished website. Here's your current site. Here's the new version. Already built. Already live on a preview link. Click and compare. That changes the entire sales conversation. You're not selling an idea. You're showing a result that already exists. The owner isn't imagining what their site could look like — they're looking at it. The psychology is simple. It's much harder to say no to something you can already see than to something someone is describing to you over the phone. Most web designers spend weeks on proposals, revisions, client calls, wireframes. This skips all of it. The product is ready before the client even knows you exist. You charge $500–$1,500 per site depending on the business. Land 5–10 clients a month and you're sitting between $5,000 and $10,000 in revenue from a process that takes minutes per project. The skill isn't coding. The skill isn't design. The skill is knowing that most small business owners already know their website is bad — they just never had someone show up with the fix already in hand

@AIslop_ If AI can do it, then I can too💪

haters will say it’s AI

@cinnamxchi With a girl like that, it’s not scary to walk around at night😂😌

Me getting ready to confront the girl who knows you’re mine

@saidotdev That's cool. It's like pulling out a slug😅

Apple designers absolutely cooked with this new Siri Ul!

@ritu_twts When I learned to code using AI

After Fable 5 and ChatGPT 5.6, is this accurate, or still completely opposite?

@ClaudeDevs Browser access means it's one curiosity loop away from forgetting what it was coding?

Claude Code on desktop now has an in-app browser. Claude can pull up docs, designs, or any other site. It can read, click through, and interact the same way it does with your local dev servers. It's sandboxed and configurable: you choose whether sessions persist.

@aollivier82 The bat would not agree to this

Just asked Sol to download Blender, set up the MCP, and make me a realistic bat, and then make a video showcasing how it made it. We've hit a new era with Sol/Fable.