Galaxopithecus

RT @Go_Kick_Rocks88: Something certainly going to happen in 2025 Something is certainly going to happen in 2026 Something is certainly go…

@SunOfAbramelin @WitchyUFOGirl You understand what I'm about to say far better than I ever could, but from the outside peering through opacity it seems like the constitutional crisis you mention is so broadly systemic it's difficult to imagine this issue advancing in any way that prioritizes average people.

I very much agree that urgency matters, and I am not arguing for indefinite delay. My point is that any amnesty must be conditional, time-bound, and carefully sequenced. I also know we possess more leverage than you might think; what we lack is leadership willing to use it. Amnesty should be one instrument in a broader disclosure strategy, not a concession made out of frustration and weakness.

AMNESTY FOR WHAT? When it comes to Disclosure, the American people are being asked to forgive everything — in exchange for what was theirs all along — for reasons they are not permitted to know. A new essay on UAP disclosure, justice, and reconciliation: sunofabramelin.substack.com/p/on-amnesty

@PelleyDm @FEversor49113 @fratercrc @UAPLuigi @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp I've got all these guys blocked because they're so delightful 😂

@FEversor49113 @fratercrc @UAPLuigi @galaxopithecus @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp lol

Nazca “Alien” Mummies Exposed as Fakes on The Weaponized Podcast! 🚨 Jeremy Corbell (@JeremyCorbell) and George Knapp (@g_knapp) deliver a full-scale debunking of the Nazca mummies in the latest Weaponized episode. Three experts label them as hoaxes constructed from manipulated human remains. Here’s what they said: • “They’re definitely human beings… that have been manipulated.” ~ Michelle Adams (@TkMe2UrLeader11) • “I think they’re fake.” ~ Will Brown (@incredhistory) • “For me, absolutely they’re fake. The case is closed.” ~ Dr. Dan Proctor (@galaxopithecus) Is the Nazca mummies saga finally over? 💀​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

@PelleyDm @fratercrc @UAPLuigi @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp 💯

@fratercrc @UAPLuigi @galaxopithecus @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp No, I am a retired biologist. I examined the images of the skeletons when they "debuted," and they are a hodgepodge of mismatched and misplaced bones, not to mention the fact that most of the joints simply would not work as presented. Form and function.

Yeah based on the crap images we've been getting in the "tranches" I'm not holding my breath for moon images.

@PelleyDm @UAPLuigi @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp Not sure on the current status of the market but some were selling for up to $1 million. The smaller doll-like animal bones ones sell for a range in the five figures.

@UAPLuigi @galaxopithecus @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp Definitely fake, and even worse they are the remains of Indigenous people that are being exploited for money. It is hideous, actually.

Lots of interest for this. Drop me your email if you wanna partake! Going to do multiple sessions so as many as possible can get a taste!

@Occultjourneys Bon appetit!

@galaxopithecus Alrighty, I'll try hunting that one down.

Am I the only strange Dad out there that likes to taste test the baby foods, also the medicines so far? My wife asked what his medicine taste like tonight (teething, minor antibiotic liquid dose) and I was like "banana, you wanna try it? It's pretty good"...she laughed at me.

@Occultjourneys I think so, but maybe another, it's been a few years 😂

@galaxopithecus That one sounds delish. Is it Gerber brand?

@TheZignal Sounds amazing! I'm not very experienced. I haven't learned any techniques, just intuitive approach I guess.

@galaxopithecus How interesting! Bet her class was great. Always find it informative to compare practices and find common threads. I have indeed! Taught quite a few people who all started as skeptics.

So…who wants to try remote viewing? Thinking of running a small group (4 or 5 people max) in the next few weeks. If you reply here, I’ll prioritise you. Totally free, sceptics welcome! Come give it go.

@TBrighamPhd @JosephAPWilson1 @JosCRios Amen

@JosephAPWilson1 @JosCRios Stop the desecration of human remains in ufology.

Yo me preguntó si este sujeto @JosephAPWilson1 tendría un mínimo de conocimiento de anatomía, jajajaja, debió haber pagado su título universitario en una escuela patito

@ShaneFrakes Disclosure is weirder every day but not in any way I might have expected

Well, disclosure is definitely happening now. Dr. Phil’s involved. With him on board, maybe he can send the government to Turn-About Ranch and beat the disclosure out of them.

@PelleyDm 🤣

I just spent 10 minutes of my life (which I will never get back) googling "hog rider balloon." That's enough internet for today. 😂 #ufo #uap #tranche

@BinxieB @The_Astral_ I think some of the cognitive dissonance is that these media personalities are usually used to promote other kinds of ideas. This feels like it jumps the shark because it's outside that influencer's normal sphere.

@The_Astral_ Who's next? Oprah?

Why is Dr. Phil getting early access to the UFO files? And why is he suddenly being heavily promoted as a public voice on UFOs?

From @UAPReportingCnt reports “the truth is coming.” I’m reframing that statement though: “a new narrative is being shaped” and don’t expect it to be one you’re going to recognize if you’ve given any time to this subject. I LOVE the idea of this influencer strategy as @RepLuna has been promoting however, to borrow @DrPhil’s down-home style - he knows as much about UAPs as I know about farming Turnips - and his entire pitch stinks of Narrative Control. I AGREE wholeheartedly with most of the framing, but the most TELLING parts of the direction this narrative is going for the broader public is his focus on credibility - and it’s a hit on his own credibility . His most irresponsible move - Amplifying the “drunken fisherman” stereotypes used to intimidate and suppress witnesses for 77+ years. In this he (or his handlers) continue to propagate a control mechanism that signals to the public that “only I / we / the government witnesses and whistleblowers are the source of truth and credibility.” So if it doesn’t come through them - it’s not legit. But he’s not the only one. @ProfAviLoeb is using similar language about social media, generally setting the narrative that what’s said online should be discounted entirely for his “science.” While one can’t argue the amount of noise is difficult to filter, he casts aside other, very valid, work being done. But Prof Loeb’s particular interest is to guide the broader public away from the criticisms about himself, and the fact that he and this Scientific Council are the “pressure relief valve” spy-agencies built. With no access to classified data or previous analysis the council has no choice but to look at info and say “we need new data and that’s going to take time.” Win-win for the government. They’ve bought themselves time and can say “we released files but they’re inconclusive.” The fact that they HAVE the data but just won’t make that available is the part they want the general public to gloss over. This is shaping up to be the largest and most public whitewash of an issue in history - anywhere. The Government is hedging the strategy of “if it’s said enough times by enough people it becomes true” and recruiting trusted credible figures, who are themselves not fully educated on the history and issues, to say the right things. Dr Phil’s “anger” is the most laughable while his drunk fisherman analogy is the most disappointing. Avi Loeb, Hal Puthoff’s and even @jordanflowers redirects to be “looking forward” are both self-serving and provide breathing room for the absence of accountability to normalize. The common strategy here is flood the airwaves with credible figures delivering a tight forward-looking narrative that balances performative transparency while deflecting accountability; amplify through sympathetic media; discredit the “everyday” experiencer and elevate ‘credentialed” experiencer/witness. Suppress/dampen evidence that doesn’t come through the same pipeline. While some celebrate that any movement is good movement, I’ll ask you to ponder the wisdom in a single line of my (and one of @TheDylanBorland’s) favorite Pink Floyd songs - “would you exchange a walk-on part in the war for a lead-role in a cage?”

@PelleyDm And I think the person presenting them was supposed to be a "whistleblower" for Congress 😬

@galaxopithecus Thank god. I remember when they first came out I had flashbacks to a physiology class I took where we had to reassemble various skeletons for the final exam. I took one look at those "mummy" x-rays and cringed. What a hodgepodge of nonsense. 🙄

These just sort of disappeared like a fart in the wind 😂 #UAP