Gareth Healey

3.9K posts

Gareth Healey banner
Gareth Healey

Gareth Healey

@garethmhealey

Advisor to STANDOUT agencies. Award-winning author of https://t.co/YGyh6xGmyr

Yorkshire, England, UK Katılım Şubat 2010
1.7K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Logan Gott
Logan Gott@LoganTGott·
SaaS founders don’t use LinkedIn Not because it doesn't work. Because running it properly is a full-time job. Posting takes an hour a day. Sending 40 qualified connection requests takes another hour. Following up on DMs, writing lead magnets, tracking responses, closing pipeline… it adds up fast. Claude Code makes things interesting though Set up correctly, it becomes the execution layer underneath your whole LinkedIn motion. Posts in your voice. Leads qualified against your ICP. DMs personalized to what a prospect is actually working on. Replies triaged. Lead magnets generated and delivered. You stay in the approval seat. The problem is nobody has written down how to set this up specifically for LinkedIn. Every Claude Code tutorial is built for engineers. The GTM content floating around is generic and won't help you post tomorrow. So I put together The Claude Code LinkedIn Playbook. 8 sections built specifically for SaaS and AI founders who want LinkedIn producing real pipeline. Here's what's inside: → Claude Md file setup that makes every post and DM sound like you wrote it → The 5 LinkedIn skills every founder should build first → MCP stack that connects your content engine to your CRM, Notion, and Gmail → Sub-agent workflows for batching lead qualification and hook testing → Context management so Claude stops forgetting your voice mid-session → Modal deployment that turns your skills into a hands-free machine → Plan mode for high-stakes posts and outbound sequences → Day one install decisions that compound over 12 months One skill per week for 5 weeks. That's all it takes to run the full system. Want The Claude Code LinkedIn Playbook? 1. Follow me 2. Comment "PLAYBOOK" I'll send it straight to your DMs.
Logan Gott tweet media
English
368
18
244
20.2K
Ellaa
Ellaa@learnwithella·
I just built a Claude Code SEO agent that replaces your $200/mo. Ahrefs subscription 🤯 One prompt → keyword gaps found, competitors analyzed, content written in your brand voice, rankings tracked weekly. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who know SEO matters but never have the bandwidth to actually do it consistently. This agent runs the entire loop for you: → Connects to Google Search Console and pulls your real ranking data → Finds your "gap zone" — keywords sitting at positions 5–20 → Scrapes who's outranking you and breaks down exactly why they're winning → Interviews you once about your brand, customers, and positioning → Writes content in your voice — not generic AI slop that tanks after 90 days → Tracks rankings weekly and feeds results back into the next cycle No expensive tools you barely open. No freelancers writing content that sounds like everyone else. No manually checking rankings and forgetting to act on it. What you get: - Keyword cards with a specific action for each gap zone opportunity - A competitive breakdown showing who's beating you and the exact fix - A weekly content plan generated from your real GSC data - A brand voice profile Claude uses for every article it writes Built 100% in Claude Code with Google Search Console. I put together a full playbook with the skill files, brand interview, and the exact weekly workflow. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "SEO" And I'll send it over (must be @learnwithella following so I can DM)
English
232
24
307
25.8K
Corey Ganim
Corey Ganim@coreyganim·
me hyping you up to go sell your first AI audit for $999 because the model is stupid simple: 1. charge $999 for a 45-min interview where you ask "where does your time go?" 2. feed the transcript to Claude. it spits out 5-7 AI tool recommendations with hours saved per week 3. build a polished report in Gamma (30 min from a template, looks like a $10K consulting deliverable) 4. walk them through it on a review call 5. upsell additional services for $3-10k+ you don't need to be technical. you don't need to code. you don't even need to know the tools. you simply need to ask good questions (and Claude can create the question bank for you). the window is wide open. most business owners know they should be using AI but have no idea where to start. be the person who tells them. full guide below 👇
Corey Ganim@coreyganim

x.com/i/article/2030…

English
26
43
630
151.7K
sandra djajic
sandra djajic@TakoTreba·
I'm coming back from maternity leave soon. First thing I did? Built myself a content dashboard for LinkedIn. Using Claude. Every post I've written. Pulled apart. — Impressions — Hook patterns — Keywords that drove reach — What to double down on Most people guess what works. I wanted to know. If you want to build one for yourself, comment "dashboard" and I'll DM you how.
GIF
English
258
11
164
25.2K
Fakhr
Fakhr@iamfakhrealam·
10 TRICKS TO STOP HITTING CLAUDE’s USAGE LIMITS
English
63
176
1.8K
339.1K
Julian Goldie SEO
Julian Goldie SEO@JulianGoldieSEO·
Claude Dispatch just changed how computers work. You can now send tasks from your phone and Claude finishes them on your desktop while you're away. Not next year. Right now. 🤯 This turns AI from a chatbot into a coworker that works while you commute, eat, or sleep. Asynchronous AI work just started.
English
2
0
4
655
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
143 million people thought they were catching Pokémon, they were mapping the real world for AI
English
154
1K
3K
202K
Nijol
Nijol@Nijol71·
During a job interview, when they ask: “Do you have any questions for us?” Don’t say “No, I’m good.” Use the Golden Response instead:
English
226
993
9.3K
7M
Alton Syn
Alton Syn@WorkflowWhisper·
mark cuban just laid out the exact playbook for making money with AI agents. pick one vertical. learn the flows. become the AI team they never hired. he's right. but he left out the how. i've been doing this for 3 months. here's what it actually looks like: week 1: i called 12 local businesses and asked one question. "what's the most annoying part of your day?" the pool company: "we lose 11 jobs a week because nobody follows up cancellations." the PT clinic: "insurance verification takes 3 hours every morning." the cleaning company: "we quote in 2 days. our competitor quotes in 2 hours." week 2: i built every single one of those workflows. → pool company cancellation recovery - 6 min → PT clinic insurance verification - 11 min → cleaning company instant quote generator - 7 min → dog groomer appointment + waitlist manager - 9 min → pest control follow-up sequence - 4 min average build time: 7.4 minutes. average close rate when you build it live in front of them: 70%. week 3: $10,750 upfront + $1,200/mo recurring. zero proposals. zero decks. zero "let me get back to you." they watched it work. they paid on the spot. cuban said "you don't need a CS degree or VC money." he's right. you need one question, one tool, and the willingness to build it in front of them. i documented the entire framework in a free PDF: → the 1-question discovery script (word for word) → 6 copy-paste workflow prompts by industry → pricing guide (what to charge per workflow type) → the live demo script that closes 7 out of 10 → full MCP setup walkthrough (5 min install) comment "CUBAN" and i'll send it. consultants charge $15K for a discovery workshop. i just gave you the playbook for free. synta(.)io - describe the workflow in plain english. it builds, deploys, and fixes itself. (must be following for DM)
Alton Syn tweet media
English
1.1K
141
1.4K
123.2K
Jordan Ross
Jordan Ross@jordan_ross_8F·
I charge $25,000+ to build these automations for agencies. Here are the first 10 we install every single time — for free. We've worked with 1,250+ marketing agencies. Our clients have added $500M in annual recurring revenue. Our 20 engineers log over 6,000 hours a month solving exactly one problem: agencies bleeding time on tasks a $20/month tool could handle. Most agency owners want to automate. They just don't know where to start — so they don't start. Meanwhile, their team is burning 20+ hours a week on work that shouldn't require a human. One example: data analysis alone costs the average agency 1 hour per client, per week. Multiply that across 15 clients and you've got two full workdays gone before anyone's opened a brief. I put together a free Doc called The 10 Agency Tasks We Automate First. Each task includes: → What the task is and what it currently replaces → How long the setup actually takes (most are under a session) → The exact tools behind each automation with real pricing ($20–$800/month depending on stack) → Why we use a 30-minute threshold to decide if something's worth automating → A prioritization framework so you know where to start with your specific agency → Entry-level cost breakdown — first five automations can run ~$100/month on tools you likely already have → The 6 tools our engineers rely on across these 10 automations (including the MCP solution we built — the first of its kind for agencies) → A clear view of what 20+ hours of recovered capacity actually looks like across a team You don't need a dev team. You don't need a big budget. You need the right list in the right order. Comment LINK and I'll send it directly. If we're not connected, add me first so it reaches you.
Jordan Ross tweet media
English
328
21
229
25K
Historic Vids
Historic Vids@historyinmemes·
Meet Winston — the fastest dog ever recorded to run.
English
401
1.6K
24.3K
1.9M
Mike Scully
Mike Scully@Mike_Scully_·
I've spent the last 7 days using OpenClaw for almost everything in my business. Not testing it. Not playing with it. Actually using it to get work done. Here's what I found. Day 1 — I needed to build out a full email nurture sequence for a client. 7 emails, segmented by lead source, each one with a different angle. Normally takes me a full day to plan, outline, and write. OpenClaw had the structure, subject lines, and first drafts done in under an hour. I spent another hour editing. Half a day saved. Day 2 — Had to audit 90 days of content across 4 platforms for a client. Pulled everything into a doc, fed it in, and asked for a performance breakdown by content type and funnel stage. Got a full analysis with recommendations I'd normally charge for as a standalone deliverable. Took 20 minutes. Day 3 — Built out an entire ManyChat DM flow. Keyword triggers, qualifying questions, routing logic, follow-up sequences. I described what I wanted in plain English. It mapped the whole thing out and gave me the copy for every step. Would've taken me 3-4 hours. Took 45 minutes. Day 4 — Wrote a sales call framework doc for a new closer joining the team. Discovery questions, objection handling, pitch structure, segment-specific angles. I gave it context on the offer and the ICP. It came back with something I barely had to edit. Day 5 — Used it to restructure a Skool course. Fed in the existing module list and the new roadmap I wanted to hit. It reorganised everything, flagged gaps in the content, and suggested new modules I hadn't thought of. Saved me an entire afternoon of staring at a whiteboard. Day 6 — Cold email campaign. 4-email sequence, personalised first lines, A/B variants for subject lines. I gave it the ICP, the offer, and the tone. First drafts were 80% there. I tweaked the personality and sent. Day 7 — Took everything I'd built that week and asked it to create SOPs for each process so my team could replicate them without me. Got clean, step-by-step documentation I could hand off immediately. Here's the thing nobody talks about with AI: The ROI isn't in the flashy stuff. It's in the boring stuff you do every week that eats 3-4 hours each time. When you cut that in half across 5-6 tasks, you've just bought back an entire working day. Every week. That's not hype. That's maths. I'm not posting this to say OpenClaw is perfect. It's not. You still need to know what good looks like. You still need to edit. You still need to think. But if you're running a business and you're not using these tools daily, you're leaving time and money on the table. And here's what keeps me up at night: This is the worst this technology will ever be. Right now. Today. This is the floor. It's already saving me 10+ hours a week. It's already producing work that would've cost me thousands to outsource. And it's only going to get faster, smarter, and more capable. Every month the gap widens between the people using this stuff and the people watching from the sidelines. If you're not learning how to work with AI right now, you're not standing still. You're falling behind. Because the people around you, your competitors, your peers, the person going for the same client, they are learning it. This isn't coming. It's here. The only question is whether you're building with it or waiting until it's too late.
Mike Scully tweet media
English
51
30
396
41.5K
Hassan W. Bhatti
Hassan W. Bhatti@hwbhatti·
Think it. Say it. Done. The average person spends 3 hours typing + switches 1,000 tabs per day. That ends today. Meet Lemon: The first voice-to-action AI agent that turns your voice commands into finished tasks. RT + Comment "Lemon" to get free access for 30 days. (must be following so I can DM you)
English
1.7K
892
2.9K
3.5M
Zephyr
Zephyr@Zephyr_hg·
Every morning I wake up and there's already 3 pieces of content ready for me. I didn't write any of them. Here's the automation that does it.
Zephyr tweet media
English
4
1
25
3K
Vipin Gautam (Viipin I Gautam)
BYE-BYE SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGERS IN 2026. I use Claude to design, edit, and schedule 30 days of content in 2 hours. Here are 7 prompts that can do the same for you:
English
143
422
4.4K
824.5K