Genius No. 1

@ThinkWithMe @WooWooSpaceJew @AtheistBigfoot @Maracus57 @Askwhyisit Whose Biblical interpretation are you "sure" is the correct one? Look at all the "experts" on God's nature around us: Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Roman Catholics, Materialist atheists, Calvinists, Muslims... I could go on! On what basis do you go with the group you choose?

@politicalmath It's not news that Leftists are 𝙞𝙣𝙫𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙮 intellectually dishonest and hypocritical, so what do you get out of being emotional about their deceit?

The big defense of Platner is this "Sure, ok, he got a Nazi tattoo. But do you *really* think he's a Nazi? For real, you don't *really* think that." This is sickening to me b/c they expect their right-wing opponents to be honest on a thing where they have an entire industry supporting this accusations of racism and Nazism in order to destroy the lives of their ideological opponents. Walz never thought Elon Musk gave a Nazi salute. No one on the left *really* thought that. No one on the left *really* thinks that Musk is a Nazi except for the mid-wittiest of midwits who are so susceptible to suggestion, they are prime candidates for cult membership. The SPLC has pulled in over a billion in donations calling mainstream conservatives anti-Semites and racists when they know that's not true. Just this week, left-wing cartoonists portrayed a black SCOTUS justice as a KKK member. Does they really believe that? Of course not! But they will say that they do. If you ask left-wingers "come on, you never really believed that these people were Nazis and racists", they will just lie to you and tell you "yes, I genuinely believe that throwing up the OK symbol was racist and, if you push me on it, I will double and triple down on it. I will insist that I am an idiot even though these people are obviously not Nazis. I'm locked in on this stupid position and I will use any accusation of this kind to ruin your life even though I know it's not true." They expect you to be honest when they absolutely would not and then they will leverage your honesty to advance their own purposes without EVER granting you the same benefit of the doubt or honest assessment.

@BuzzCheech @JeremyDBoreing It's related to why insanely angry, fake-Christian bigots use 'the Jews killed Jesus!' to justify their scapegoating. One might say they're cowardly, self-loathing malcontents, who project onto Erika because they won't own their own sins... 😄

@JeremyDBoreing What has she actually done to elicit such vitriolic hatred?

So many women on this platform be like:

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles For you to be consistent, you have to say that Tucker hasn't ever had any sincere beliefs. I find that ludicrous, just as I do your idea that all manipulators have the exact same motivations (e.g., Tucker's and Candace's psychological profiles clearly aren't identical).

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles As far as I can tell we have this disagreement. You think that he was sincere when he was at fox. I think he has never been sincere during his entire career. I believe I have enough evidence to prove my side of the argument. You seem to not want to have that argument.

People hate Ben Shapiro because he doesn't sell them a victim narrative. Tucker Carlson is the opposite. He tells the majority of the population that they cannot succeed and that life is unfair. And they eat it up.

@rachy_0101 @Jordan_S90 Denying that Candace has a personality cult isn't inspired by God, is it? 😆 She's an unChristian liar, and so are her defenders.

@Jordan_S90 It's cute and pathetic that you think labeling us "cultists" is going to somehow "shame" us into not watching Candace's shows. What, is this tactic #1574463536? 😄

No such thing as a Candace Owens follower anymore. That ship sailed a looong time ago. They are all Candace Owens cultists at this point. Make sure to label them appropriately as such.

@RavenGrace0613 When considering the spiritual force👿 behind their behavior, it clearly is their goal. They can't succeed, but they are too consumed with rage to care about that.

I have a question. All these anti Israel and Antisemites. What is there end goal? Are we just suppose to wipe out Israel and have another holocaust? I’m being serious.

@physicsgeek @bonchieredstate "Welcome to Humanity!" 😅

@bonchieredstate Every exposure to Candace Owens excretions has been against my will. The fact that anyone, anyone at all listens to her for more than laughs is troubling

You guys see the op, right? It’s right there.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles It's obvious to me a manipulator like Tucker has more facets to his personality than you think he does, and by the extent of our interaction I think you're too presumptuous, pompous, and close-minded for me, so what's there for us to discuss further?

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles I prefer reasons instead of assertions. I could say that you are obviously a fragile ego that developed from having an overbearing mother who never allowed you to express yourself thus you take all disagreement as a personal attack. Assertions are easy.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles Tell me why you think I should be more interested to show you you're an egomaniac than I am to give examples of Candace's lies to members of her cult! 😆 I believe I've made it clear I find you an unreasonable person, who's not looking for the truth about yourself, or Tucker! 😂

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles Ok enlighten me. What behavior have I shown that indicates egomania. Please give me an example of binary thinking in this conversation. Also if we compare the language directed towards each other do you really think I would win on the obnoxious scale?

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles You have 𝙣𝙤 Logical formulation to back up that I see you as an egomaniac only because of simple disagreement. I see Tucker as having more dimensions than you do, and that you're not a good introspector, related to your binary thinking & why I find you to be so obnoxious. 😄

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles If the only thing that is necessary for you to see someone as an egomaniac is they disagree with you, that shows a problem with you.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles Since you are apparently too stupid to figure this out by yourself, I see you as an egomaniac, just as I do Tucker, Candace, and Carrie Preteen, and nothing you've said to me in this conversation has served to Logically dissuade me from my conclusion. 🤣

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles This is why I don't think you have much experience with manipulators. A manipulator will always appear to express sincere beliefs to anyone they view as a target. The reason they express the belief isn't because they believe it, it's because you believe it.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles 🤣🤣🤣 Saying that Tucker has always been the same manipulator, even when he appeared to express sincere beliefs, is just as useless as saying bipolars are still bipolar even when not having manic episodes. 😂 Your reasoning may impress you, but it can't hold my attention! 😅

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles I'm being much nicer than the recorded example of Christ. But if you would like me to imitate His argument style I'm willing to do so.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles You've "won", I "bow down" before your "brilliance", but you don't seem satisfied with your "victory" in a Christlike manner, do you?! Now, why might this be... (😅🤣)

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles 1st if you respond then obviously not. 2nd I've given you honest responses while you have pigeonholed and strawmanned repeatedly. 3rd I haven't insulted you once while you have insulted me so needing "intellectual superiority" might be a you problem.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles It hasn't sunk in to you yet that I've moved on from you and your "intellectual superiority" about Tucker, has it?! 😅

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles Yes he was being manipulative. Manipulative doesn't mean false. It means he looked at his audience and realized they wanted him to say Iran was evil. So he said Iran was evil.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles FTR, Tucker was not being manipulative when he called Iran, "evil", and I do see by your denial/deflection/naked asserting that you aren't intellectually honest enough to have the type of conversation about Tucker I'm seeking. 😂

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles I didn't make an inference about your motivation. I made an inference about your lack of knowledge. His method hasn't changed at all if you know what to look for. Which is why I don't think you have experience dealing with a manipulator.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles Fact: those who want to focus on how Tucker has been criticized 'incorrectly' don't so because they're highly interested in categorizing him properly. 😉

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles It's a matter of psychological patterns. The problem in simple form is anti Tucker people opposed him using the same methods leftists use. That created resistance in people who experienced leftist attack.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles Your inference about my motivation for asking my questions is incorrect. 😆 I did not view Tucker as a manipulator/liar when he was bold about calling out Iran years ago, but I do now, because his demeanor and views have vastly changed. His shift is not so simply explained.

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles Because you are asking questions that you wouldn't ask if you did. You are probably thinking a manipulative person is the same thing as a manipulator.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles Oh yes, I have NEVER had any experience with manipulators in my life!!! 🙄🤣🤣🤣 How can you possibly believe that?! 😂

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles You said you have experience with manipulators. I don't think you really do. I'm not talking about someone who is manipulative. Some people replace normal human function with getting other people to act for them. He doesn't need normal reasons. He doesn't have normal function

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles What good justification could there be for having resistance to engaging in an honest evaluation of Tucker? Invoking that some people are 'too mean' to him is not a *good* reason, it's an emotional/defensive one.

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles There is a difference between manipulative & manipulator. It's entirely relevant to why some people are resistant to having a conversation about him. I'm not sure why that's unclear. You could always clarify the question if you want me to answer a different aspect.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles The reason(s) he's changed so drastically matter to me, and it *should* to everyone else who cares about his words, I say. He's clearly not trustworthy, which extends to his claims of being a Christian, naturally.

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles He called the government evil because it suited his goals at the time. It doesn't now. I don't think it's more complicated than that.

@adam_newsw28111 @nosoup4knowles People who admit they're manipulative are not identical to those like Tucker who deny they are, are they? And your mentioning "catastrophic mistakes" anti-Tucker people have made towards him doesn't seem at all germane to me. 🤷‍♂️ Tucker is objectively a liar.

@geniusnumberone @nosoup4knowles It depends on the level of function in question. All manipulators share reasons on a macro level. I don't see how I'm expanding the conversation I answered your question as best I could in space limited form.