Gareth Andrew
1.5K posts

Gareth Andrew
@gingerhendrixai
Software/AI Engineer. Hacker and experimenter. Vibe Coder.


Dynamic Workers are now in Open Beta, all paid Workers users have access. Secure sandboxes that start ~100x faster than a container and use 1/10 the memory, so you can start one up on-demand to handle one AI chat message and then throw it away. Agents should interact with the world by writing code, not tool calls. This makes that possible at "consumer scale", where millions of end users each have their own agent writing code. blog.cloudflare.com/dynamic-worker…

We’re introducing Dynamic Workers, which allow you to execute AI-generated code in secure, lightweight isolates. This approach is 100 times faster than traditional containers. cfl.re/4c2NvPl

Dynamic Workers are now in Open Beta, all paid Workers users have access. Secure sandboxes that start ~100x faster than a container and use 1/10 the memory, so you can start one up on-demand to handle one AI chat message and then throw it away. Agents should interact with the world by writing code, not tool calls. This makes that possible at "consumer scale", where millions of end users each have their own agent writing code. blog.cloudflare.com/dynamic-worker…


We’re introducing Dynamic Workers, which allow you to execute AI-generated code in secure, lightweight isolates. This approach is 100 times faster than traditional containers. cfl.re/4c2NvPl



I think it's time to admit conversational threads are an anti-pattern. Every message should be able to exploit the full context, especially the smart fraction. There is never a situation where appending a message to a trajectory is the best we can do.


you can try this out in cursor today! cursor.com/marketplace/cu… this will look at your conversation history every N prompt, spawn a subagent to extract memories, and then store them where the agent can access them easily. if you're curious, there's a full article in thread!

Is software turning into a liquid? Is this what most software is going to be? Nameless, shapeless? Created (poured?) just in time, evaporating just after? My current fascination in this week's Joy & Curiosity intro. registerspill.thorstenball.com/p/joy-and-curi…





I’m surely being stupid. But if AI is rather unconstrained by expertise or capacity or to some extent speed Why do we need to divide tasks or departments to 9 agents ( the marketing agent, the optimization agent etc ) to each do one thing. And then another agent to manage the swarm. Cant one agent just be doing it all you know. It seems very skeuomorphic. Will we have HR agents to make sure the agent agents are being looked after ? A office canteen manager agent to feed the agents ? Seems daft

Astral was my first (& so far only) angel investment. A small check in their Series A.






