Giuseppe Bertone

@Paul_Reviews Anonymous age verification works with ZKP, although ZKP implementation is still in discussion for the EUDI.

Bypassing the latest #EU #ageVerification app (2026.07-1) with a Chrome extension... again. Despite 3 months of security hardening and genuine improvements across the board, the fundamental issue cannot be solved. Anonymous age verification doesn't work.

@Polymarket Ah ah ah

NEW: Pavel Durov vows Telegram won’t scan private messages “no matter what” amid the EU’s latest Chat Control push.

Private communication is a precondition for a free society. Any measure that scans everyone's messages by default is mass surveillance, regardless of what it is built to find.

@ilpost Ma non vi sentite ridicoli a scrivere ste cazzate? Avete presente quanto è grande un finestrino di un aereo?

Su un volo Ryanair in Grecia un finestrino si è rotto e un passeggero ha rischiato di essere risucchiato fuori ilpost.link/FM0IlIQn01

@SethSummersTV So, let's abolish windows with curtains? :D

Why did Texas think it would be a good idea to put a secret viewing place right next to a kids founting play place?

@ArturoB23022138 dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/eng…

Restrittivo in inglese si dice restrictive

@coinbureau "skipped MiCA to protect the 400 million plus users" ah ah ah

🎥WATCH: TETHER CEO EXPLAINS WHY $184B USDT DID NOT APPLY FOR MICA Paolo Ardoino said Tether did not apply for MiCA license because “it is very dangerous when it comes to stablecoins.” He said the rules could force issuers to park 60% of reserves in “uninsured cash deposits” at small European banks unable to handle redemptions. "I think it's a very not well thought legislation," Ardoino said, adding he "skipped MiCA to protect the 400 million plus users” of Tether.

@paolomossetti C'è scritto contenuto sponsorizzato, c'è scritto ADV all'inizio. Veramente, far polemica sul nulla. Non leggere i contenuti sponsorizzati se non ti piacciono.

Brutto scivolone di Geopop, che pubblica un contenuto sponsorizzato sulla gentrificazione che, dopo aver spiegato come questo processo espella di fatto le fasce popolari dai quartieri, si conclude con: «I quartieri che mostrano i primi segnali di trasformazione - nuovi spazi culturali, arrivo di professionisti, riqualificazione degli edifici - tendono a vedere una crescita dei valori immobiliari nei 5 o 10 anni successivi. Saper leggere queste trasformazioni prima che diventino evidenti nei prezzi è, in fondo, uno degli esercizi più utili che chiunque voglia orientarsi nel mercato immobiliare possa fare. È anche il tipo di analisi che caratterizza chi, come Banca Investis, lavora ogni giorno per aiutare famiglie e investitori a prendere decisioni patrimoniali consapevoli». L'articolo è realizzato in collaborazione con una banca, citata solo alla fine. Il post era chiaramente segnalato come pubblicità, ma non indicava subito il nome dello sponsor. Al di là degli aspetti formali, non è granché quando il ruolo editoriale si riduce a megafono di un istituto finanziario, trasformando la gentrificazione da problema sociale a opportunità patrimoniale e usando immagini manipolatorie come quella della copertina.

@WatcherGuru AGI is here! As a minor release.

JUST IN: OpenAI officially releases GPT-5.6 limited preview, claiming to be more powerful than Claude Mythos.

@forensico Hai firmato un NDA? :D Altrimenti si sono fumati l'impossibile, tu puoi divulgare quello che ti pare.

Mi è appena arrivata una segnalazione di #databreach piuttosto grave che credo pian piano arriverà a svariati milioni di destinatari... la cosa su cui vorrei riflettere però è il disclaimer in calce alla notifica. 🙄 La società infatti avvisa - in modo alquanto maccheronico, con ripetizioni ed errori ortografici - che le informazioni contenute nel messaggio sono di natura riservata e per uso esclusivo del solo destinatario, precisa che qualunque utilizzo, divulgazione o copia esterna non autorizzata o non altrimenti consentita è rigorosamente vietato e aggiunge infine che oltre a violare le norme in materia di protezione dei dati personali ai sensi del Regolamento (UE) 2016/679 e D.Lgs. n. 196/2003 e s.m.i., può costituire violazione di altre norme di legge, nonché integrare condotta perseguibile penalmente. 🫣 Nel dubbio ho offuscato il messaggio... ma secondo voi è corretto ravvedere - e paventare agli interessati - conseguenze penali, privacy e violazioni varie per la diffusione della notizia di un data breach che li coinvolge personalmente, oltre probabilmente a qualche altro milione di utenti? 🤨

@pcaversaccio Time to resurrect Mist? github.com/ethereum/mist

you can fully destroy perfect onchain privacy by leaking metadata (IP, user-agent, timezone, language settings, etc.). using Tor for any onchain interaction is one way but it's very easy to also fingerprint you as Tor user. what Ethereum needs is its own browser that _natively_ embeds Kohaku (as wallet) with the following system invariant: everyone using the same privacy profile (let's call them "Fingerprint Profile") looks exactly the same to websites, because the browser forces all observable behaviour into a small number of _standardised_ (but not Tor-identifieable) patterns. we can only win this if we control the kernel space (i.e. browser) and not only the user space (i.e. extension). also, my current thinking is that a browser is the interface to the internet and if we want to "scale" privacy in some form, a browser is the perfect distribution channel (private OSes will be much harder for example).

Today we reduced the size of the Matter Labs team. This was my decision, and I want to explain it. In 2024 we began building for regulated financial institutions. That work became Prividium, and the entire company is now committed to one goal: building the infrastructure that brings enterprises and regulated financial institutions onchain, with privacy at its core. As that work has progressed, we have learned a great deal about where our customers need it to go. Meeting that direction calls for a different mix of skills and roles than the phase before it, and some of what made sense earlier is not what we need now. That is the reason for today's changes. It hurts, because this is not about the effort or talent of the people leaving, who I deeply respect. They are some of the strongest engineers, designers, and operators I have worked with. Everyone leaving has been offered financial support, and we are helping with the transition wherever we can. If you are hiring, you can request access to our opt-in talent list here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI… To everyone leaving: thank you for what you built here, and for the standard you set. Alex

@delvyslanfranco Ci ha provato dai, quando ti ricapita :D

Hoy, República Dominicana es el hazmerreír luego de que el embajador Tony Raful intentara saludar con un beso a la reina Letizia, y su esposa desfilara con bolsas de supermercado.

Stop Google from limiting APK file usage change.org/p/stop-google-…

Honestly @Rabby_io, this is disgusting Before I even set up my wallet, you are sending my data to - your matomo instance - and just in case track me on Google Analytics - and to be really sure dump my data into Sentry I hereby kindly inform you that this is a breach of your Privacy Policy (yes, the one that you last looked at 5 years ago) and a gross violation of GDPR Articles 13 and 46. Please stop tracking me at your earliest convenience. Thank you.

Today, @hedera joined a coalition of over 200 organizations urging Senate leadership to bring the Clarity Act to the floor without delay. The bill passed the Banking Committee with bipartisan backing and would establish clear rules for digital asset markets, strengthen consumer protections, and ensure American competitiveness. It’s time for Clarity.

Hold. Trade. And now Stake. Everything you need for @hbar is in one place: ✅ Regulated custody with a federally chartered digital asset bank ✅ Staking to earn competitive rewards ✅Trading on BitGo's platform with lower costs Learn more: bitgo.com/products/staki…

The /r/hardware mods locked the thread for our 3.5-hour-long documentary on the collapse of the industry, which is our most important video of the year so far. They are stifling discussion on a topic critical to their own community and one we feel strongly about. I am disappointed because I wanted to read their community's discussion on something so critical, whether they were in favor of our report or against our report, and now they've silenced it altogether. I don't know if this is a shoves-fingers-in-ears moment of denial or what, but it is suspiciously inconsistent behavior. Because it's locked, I can't post there -- so I'll post here and hope it finds its way back to the subreddit. They claim it's because people were commenting on the video length that we can't have an open discussion about how the industry is getting gutted inside-out. The inconsistency of the mods' actions is an unfortunate symptom of a larger disease of denial. There are threads every day that are critical of reviewers -- in particular, our own content, which we called out in the very video they locked the thread for -- so why lock this one? And I want to be clear: As the one on the receiving end of that criticism, I fully embrace and support unlocked, open discussion. As long as discussion is happening. It certainly doesn't hurt us to get more perspectives. But I can't shake the question: Why is this the one that trips the threshold, but not every other thread for our investigations where their community voices its discontent about our content? I guess an existential threat to the /r/hardware subreddit should be locked under guise of 'off-topic' discussion rather than allow open discussion. As the one being criticized for the length of the video on that very thread, I certainly don't mind it. That's fair commentary and their community should be allowed to post their criticisms of us. I support it, even if I sometimes don't agree with it, because we sometimes learn things we can improve from those posts. Unfortunately, shutting down the thread under this false pretense also shuts down ALL discussion of the topic, ruining a good thing for everyone while claiming it's because people were only commenting about video length. That, I think, was the objective. Stop all discussion and use a scapegoat to do it, because if this were a legitimate reason, they'd lock threads constantly. To the /r/hardware mods, I guess my question would be: Why lock this one but not every single other thread with our videos that your community is critical of? It's the same behavior. The decision to lock our most important video of the year so far, and one which is about the collapse of the very industry you occupy while plugging your ears and screaming "lalala," is an interesting deviation from the typical policy of allowing users post whatever they want. And some behind-the-scenes for everyone, but this subreddit is less than 0.5% of our traffic. It doesn't even register on the report. For me, it's not about the views but instead a callout on the mods' inconsistent behavior and silencing of its own community. This hurts our ability to even try to serve their community, because now I can't read the discussion to see if it might have good suggestions to make adjustments for future videos. Hopefully this makes it back to them. I guess I'll go read the discussion on PCMR and some other websites. For our big pieces like this, it helps to read comments outside of our own YT community so that we can take in other requests/ideas/content suggestions from people who may not already be part of our community. It's one of the most fun parts of the job to try and sort the good critiques or suggestions and implement improvements. Go figure they silence discussion of our best video this year and kill its traction in their community.

@tugce190333 Con le donne con le mestruazioni, in menopausa o in gravidanza?

Kadınlar regl, hamilelik, menopozla uğraşıyor, erkekler neyle uğraşıyor