giveno

variational @variational_io points tip firstly, avoid the majors except you are scalping for profits but if you want points then you must focus; - hunt alt pairs with low oi (not dead, just ignored) - open and hold at least 4 - 5 positions - set a wide sl/tp and allow it to hit - leave position open at least 40hrs - i think your position size on the total open interest of a pair actually counts so hunt low oi alt pairs - start with 3 trades, after 24hrs+ close one oldest trade and open a new one - don't spam volumes even with a small port, you can still manage a few points per week if you exhibit organic trading behaviours variational has RFQ execution, zero fees, loss refunds, internal liquidity and it has that early lighter energy and vibes if you haven’t started on var yet, use my boosted ref; 👉 omni.variational.io/?ref=OMNIGIVENO

Hoping $BP opens at $10-20B fdv Rooting for the Team 🎒

@Rizzy_az @01Exchange gud tek

@givenoxbt @01Exchange gud tek

higher @01Exchange $1.2k collected from funding fees... 01 gud tek 👍 join here; 01.xyz/ref/giveno

@VictorTopDefiG @01Exchange still learning

@givenoxbt @01Exchange No one does it better than you king

@cryppimagic @01Exchange i use @LorisTools and ai

@givenoxbt @01Exchange gud tek bro; where do you find funding arbitrage opportunities?

@0x70626a @perpltrade early here

Perpl is 1 of 1 innovation 12k lines of custom solidity code to deliver a true clob perp dex that doesn't compromise This type of infrastructure takes a long time to build and starts slow by design. It requires solid foundations and doesn't allow for shortcuts. But there is a benefit to going through all that trouble. It scales infinitely This is what institutions and tradfi need to finally size into crypto Every day, the Perpl backend hardens. The limits will soon come off, the gates will open, incentives will start rolling, and we will begin our growth stage. Soon. Thank you to the early cohort for understanding the vision

@0xRiim @01Exchange cos i’ve not closed the positions

@givenoxbt @01Exchange why does it read ‘unpaid’?

@AmanXBT @01Exchange 01 gud tek

@givenoxbt @01Exchange Ait’s too fast funding fees jumped from $100 to $1.2k. ngl, gud tech though...

@cedehub @01Exchange the numbers is insane ngl

@givenoxbt @01Exchange great one damn

@0xfarmed @01Exchange yeah i use ai to check which pairs has the highest funding rates

@givenoxbt @01Exchange Wild how much funding fee's you are getting. Is there a strategy on what markets your pick

@ohasteve @01Exchange drop wallet for the $1.2k...courtesy of 01

@givenoxbt @01Exchange legend cooking How many likes for $0.91

@ohasteve @edgeX_exchange bro is cooking 🤝

Ready for $EDGE , $10B fdv is FUD After @edgeX_exchange what next? Plenty walked away from perp farming after the $DIME flop, but they’re forgetting something important. $HYPE, $LIT, $AVNT, and $PARTI all came after Orderly and LogX flops. The biggest wins didn’t come before the failures… they came right after. That’s the real edge in perp farming: showing up early, when attention is low, metrics are quiet, and conviction is rare, and having the courage to double down before the crowd catches on. DOUBLE DOWN ON : @variational_io Still in S1, tge in Q3 link: omni.variational.io/?ref=OMNIZZTP1… @extendedapp Still in Season 1, tge in H2 massive partnership soon app.extended.exchange/join/MANTRA @hibachi_xyz 2x Points opportunity rn, best time to amass points t.co/qZ2zR6I0cL @pacifica_fi best perp to farm on Solana app.pacifica.fi/?referral=mant… @etherealdex app.ethereal.trade/?ref=TWR8G6OI9… 1 ref left YOU ARE EARLY ON: @perpltrade monad's flagship perpdex, amazing product. i did the testnet, now im showing up on mainnet. @01Exchange fast rising, numbers dont lie 01.xyz/ref/mantra

@VictorTopDefiG @variational_io my g 🤝

@givenoxbt @variational_io Giveno is a whale

points update on @variational_io +57 points (17 from referrals) $100k volume $170k open interest keeping it steady here cos var is a long grind so less overtrading, more focus on holding efficient positions and letting OI do the heavy lifting...better option than burning capital, remember its bear market out here so, what works: - open interest > volume - hold > flip - alts > crowded majors (sometimes) - time in market = more points variational points still looks mispriced to me lighter had 12M total points, and its point priced at $40–$60 on tge variational has only 9M total points so i don't think $21 per point is too bullish as this implies around $600m to $650m fdv at $1B fdv, the point is already worth around $38 per point but even if points only end up at $13 - $15, it is still a profitable farm as its zero fees and we can still profit from funding fees delta neutral + funding arbitrage continues to be one of the most capital-efficient ways to farm points without relying on market direction and variational + 01 @01Exchange is the perfect combo for stacking free valuable points how many points did you guys get? omni.variational.io 12% points boost ref: OMNIGIVENO

@0xRiim @pacifica_fi that’s me

@givenoxbt @pacifica_fi fulltime perp farmer😎

pacifica week 28 update @pacifica_fi 5,138 points $380K volume $180k open interest low volume week again... open interest did most of the heavy lifting. just held positions, rotated trades, tapped into equity perps + farmed funding. also noticed that newly listed pairs could give some points boost. this week s' points basically came at zero cost — funding fully covered the grind. airdrop angle: - pacifica feels underfarmed relative to its design - no VC funding → less supply overhang, more room for community capture - if emissions stay tight, points could reprice aggressively on TGE most people are still farming it like every other perp dex… but this one clearly rewards how you trade, not just how much clean plays. clean farming. keep swimming join; app.pacifica.fi/?referral=give…

@matyv_7 @variational_io not much, just honest work ✌️

@givenoxbt @variational_io you are coooking bro

@ElNachoCrypto @variational_io final boss 💯💯

@givenoxbt @variational_io gg time to go check mine...

@TomCryptoDefi @variational_io

@givenoxbt @variational_io Thats a lot positions haha

@Absoluto92 solid picks

@patron4eg tldr; short $LINEA on variational @variational_io 🤝

Overall, I agree with your takes. Over the long term, I have little doubt that Linea can become a large and important part of the Ethereum ecosystem. But that alone does not guarantee a high price for the $LINEA token. To answer properly, I would split the point into two parts: 1. The current factual situation 2. What exactly $LINEA is missing for sustainable growth 1. The current factual situation At the moment, nothing is happening on the network that creates strong conditions for $LINEA price growth, neither from the retail side nor from the institutional side. • A significant share of the liquidity on the network is, in essence, capital from Consensys and the Etherex team. At the same time, it supports the limited activity of users in Aave, Euler, and MetaMask Card on Linea, while also being used to farm the weekly $REX emissions. I am personally one of those MetaMask Card users on Linea. • The cost of maintaining the Linea network is currently higher than the revenue it generates from fees. As a result, we have not seen $LINEA token burns for a long time. • New $LINEA tokens continue entering the market, which adds further pressure on price. • I would not rule out the possibility that before Native Boost goes live, or around the same time, they may announce another wave of Linea Ignition in order to boost TVL, increase liquidity inflows and $ETH rewards, and restart the ecosystem flywheel. That may be good for the network itself, but for the $LINEA token it would most likely mean yet another source of sell pressure. • In practical terms, the only strong bullish scenario I currently see for $LINEA price is the arrival of a new major buyer. That could be either a company that starts systematically accumulating $LINEA, or a fund that publicly announces a meaningful long-term purchase. In that case, we could see a sharp price move followed by public confirmation through an official announcement. Other than that, I do not currently see any obvious drivers for a major upside move from current levels. 2. What $LINEA is missing for growth • Right now, the token does not have a sufficiently clear value proposition for buying and holding. The market still lacks a strong answer to the question: why buy $LINEA, and why hold it for the long term? • $LINEA needs to be integrated into major lending protocols such as Euler or Aave, so the asset can be used as proper collateral. • There needs to be a clear staking or holding mechanism where long-term holders receive real rewards, ideally in other assets rather than only in $LINEA itself. • Promises of a potential airdrop still look too vague. For the market to start pricing that in seriously, there need to be real and successful examples where holders actually made substantial money. So far, that does not exist. On top of that, even the potential valuation of the $MASK token on Polymarket does not look strong enough to meaningfully change sentiment. • The cost of maintaining the Linea network remains high and still has not been meaningfully reduced, despite earlier promises. • In my view, it makes little sense to keep spending $LINEA tokens on growing the MetaMask ecosystem if MetaMask captures the economic value for itself and barely participates in the token economy of $LINEA. Yes, MetaMask Card runs through Linea, but it already supports other networks as well, including Base, Monad, and Solana. That reduces the uniqueness of Linea in this case. • There are too many stories about what will supposedly be built "in the near future" and too few concrete actions and facts that are already having a positive impact on the token’s value. • The Linea Exponent campaign also looked questionable. In practice, significant resources seem to have been spent on projects with one-page websites and artificially inflated activity driven by bots. As far as I can tell, the Linea team never properly cleaned that up and never carried out a truly fair distribution. Out of that entire group, in my opinion, only Apex had any real value. • There is also a lot of legal and organizational friction that gets in the way of organic community initiatives. For example, I personally tried to launch my own project, ConsensysStrategy. After just three tweets, when the last one started getting traction very quickly, the Consensys team almost immediately issued a strike and left no room for a normal discussion. More than a week ago, I wrote to their legal department offering to remove "Consensys" from the name, replace it with "Consensus," and clearly state that it is an unaffiliated community project. I still have not even received confirmation that my email was received. • There are people willing to highlight and promote their work, myself included, but as I understand it, a large share of their partnerships is covered by NDA. Because of that, it is practically impossible to do proper educational or analytical work around the ecosystem. Even when someone like @LeChiffre tries to explain things, the result feels weak because there is almost no public detail to work with. • Since November 2025, I have not heard a single truly strong bullish thesis for $LINEA. • The potential partnership with SWIFT also does not yet look like a convincing catalyst. SWIFT has been telling stories about on-chain cross-border settlement and tokenized asset infrastructure for years, but the market does not believe it without clear timelines, details, and official commitments. It may happen in 3 to 5 years, or it may never happen at all. • I also doubt that truly large-scale $ETH capital, for example entities on the scale of Bitmine, would move into such structures just for an extra 1 to 2% yield while taking on additional custody risk through stVaults. The market still remembers cases like Fantom, where after bridge-related issues, assets inside the ecosystem lost a meaningful part of their perceived reliability for a very long time. • And perhaps one of the key issues is the conflict of interest between Sharplink shareholders, Consensys interests, and $LINEA token holders. It increasingly feels as if the value of Linea as a network and ecosystem is being used primarily to strengthen MetaMask and improve structures that benefit Sharplink and Consensys, while direct value for $LINEA holders remains secondary. 🧐Conclusion In the foreseeable future, I do not see any strong positive scenarios for the $LINEA token except one: if Consensys either creates a structure that starts buying $LINEA onto its balance sheet, or reaches an agreement with a fund for a long-term investment involving real market purchases of the token for several years. At the same time, I still see interesting opportunities inside the network itself. Linea as an ecosystem may still offer many localized opportunities and ways to make money, even if the $LINEA token itself does not perform strongly. That is exactly why I continue to watch what is happening inside the network very closely and try to capture individual opportunities as they appear. That is also why I have been accumulating $REX this entire time. On top of that, I still have not given up hope of launching my own project within the Linea ecosystem, and I hope I will eventually be able to reach an agreement with the Consensys legal team and get the Twitter account of my project, @ConsensysSTR, unblocked. @LineaBuild @etherexfi @Trantor2140 @GuiDechaux @DeclanFox14 @Consensys @Sharplink @MetaMask @swiftcommunity

@rookie_of_Ph zero it is then 😂

all my nw in zro either i retire or i go to zero no in between