🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮

152.3K posts

🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮 banner
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮

🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮

@gkxtitx

This account is no longer active. Follow me at @aubreanreveries to keep up with my stuff.

In my own world, daydreaming Katılım Ağustos 2018
2.6K Takip Edilen2.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮@gkxtitx·
Hi guys Some of you have messaged me, wondering where I've gone Long story short, I'm no longer using this account I'm exclusive on my new account now, @AubreanReveries . If you wanna see my posts and keep being oomfies, follow me there 💕✨ See you on the other side ✨
English
1
0
7
1.4K
KikReask
KikReask@ChrisJAIK22·
@AubreanReverie That's fair man. Hope to see you about and I'll have a look at the discord later. 😁
English
1
0
2
144
Heritage Matters🔱
Heritage Matters🔱@HeritageMatterz·
Eltz Castle, Germany 🇩🇪 It has been continuously owned by the Eltz family for over 850 years.
Heritage Matters🔱 tweet media
English
18
127
835
11.8K
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮@gkxtitx·
Fuck yeah the Animal Crossing tote and Heart Container keychain I ordered for my sister like three months ago finally came in. I had actually given up hope for these ever showing up at all and was going to request a refund. Things worked out better this way heh.
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮 tweet media🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮 tweet media
English
1
2
9
554
Rick Worley
Rick Worley@bloodoftheland·
He could take five minutes to read and learn why Rothko is highly regarded, or he could just go with his "first instinct" which is that the only purpose of art is to be purty pitchers and he don't think this is purty, so therefore it's bad
Rick Worley tweet media
Bugman Hegel@FedPoasting

Your first instinct is correct btw. This isn’t beautiful, this isn’t a masterpiece. In order for you to think it’s anything of the sort you have to override your innate understanding of beauty and the sublime and try and cognitively brute force yourself into viewing it as something that it is not. Often times this is done through an egotistical identification with “high society.” If this is valued in the millions by “experts” and it is considered “high status” to enjoy it, if I don’t also try and convince myself I enjoy it, I am a mere pleb. Beauty is in fact, objective, and we have an innate understanding and perceptual relationship with beauty. Rothko paintings are nothing of the sort.

English
3
4
23
3.2K
Rick Worley
Rick Worley@bloodoftheland·
@AubreanReverie The reaction to my SW videos has shown me that many people don't have any concept that art means anything at all other than looking pretty. The idea that images symbolize things or convey thoughts and emotions other than what they literally portray is completely beyond them
English
1
1
5
242
Rick Worley
Rick Worley@bloodoftheland·
If this yokel knows a lot of kindergarteners that can make 10 foot wide layered geometrical compositions, he should look into scholarships for them immediately
Rick Worley tweet media
Drifter@FUNobodyCares

@FedPoasting It's something a kindergartener could do and will be sold for more than the average salary in the US.

English
4
2
14
1.6K
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮@gkxtitx·
There's this notion in right wing and conservative circles that art has to necessarily be classically beautiful and rationally comprehensible to be considered art and a valid form of expression. They have a very narrow and surfacey conception of what constitutes beauty and meaning. It's quite sad.
Bugman Hegel@FedPoasting

@TheAgreementist When you look at a sunset you instinctively revere its beauty. Beauty is an embodied, instinctive response. It “insists upon itself.” It does not need to be rationalized.

English
1
1
6
498
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮@gkxtitx·
I don't think most people understand the concept of nonrepresentational and non-narrative art. They can't wrap their minds around the idea that the function of some art pieces is not to convey messages or themes. To make rational sense. Some art pieces exist only to elicit emotions and sensations the viewer. They were made simply to get a reaction our of them. In some cases, the artist doesn't even know what particular kind of reaction he's after. He just wants to move and touch people by creating aesthetic experiences. It's as valid a form of expression as any other. Just because you can't cogitate it rationally, doesn't mean it's pointless or has no meaning. It could well be that the meaning is beyond spoken language to describe. Images are a language in their own right after all.
English
1
1
3
172
HuangHello
HuangHello@huanghelou12·
@FedPoasting People who talk shit about AbEx art, particularly Rothko, reveal themselves as having never seen one in person. Seeing it in a picture on a screen does not do it justice. Seeing it in person, standing in front of a Rothko actually on a wall, is an almost transcendental experience
English
26
1
78
9.2K
Bugman Hegel
Bugman Hegel@FedPoasting·
Your first instinct is correct btw. This isn’t beautiful, this isn’t a masterpiece. In order for you to think it’s anything of the sort you have to override your innate understanding of beauty and the sublime and try and cognitively brute force yourself into viewing it as something that it is not. Often times this is done through an egotistical identification with “high society.” If this is valued in the millions by “experts” and it is considered “high status” to enjoy it, if I don’t also try and convince myself I enjoy it, I am a mere pleb. Beauty is in fact, objective, and we have an innate understanding and perceptual relationship with beauty. Rothko paintings are nothing of the sort.
Katherine Everitt 💥@katherineveritt

‘Four Darks in Red’ by Rothko (1958). At the Whitney Museum. The heaviness of the black panel sinks into the painting. The weight. The burden. All else loses focus.

English
523
466
6.2K
422.6K
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮
🇫🇮☠ 𝑶𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔 ☠🇫🇮@gkxtitx·
I don't think most people understand the concept of nonrepresentational and non-narrative art. They can't wrap their minds around the idea that function of some art pieces is not to convey messages or themes. To make rational sense. Some art pieces exist to elicit emotions and sensations the viewer. They were made simply to get a reaction our of them. In some cases, the artist doesn't even know what particular kind of reaction he's after. He just wants to move and touch people by creating aesthetic experiences. It's as valid a form of expression as any other. Just because you can't cogitate it rationally, doesn't mean it's pointless or has no meaning. It could well be that the meaning is beyond spoken language to describe. Images are a language in their own right after all.
English
0
0
7
91

Keşfet

@ChrisJAIK22 @NemisisThe913 @fooled_trooper @HeritageMatterz @bloodoftheland @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13